Stephen Colbert, Secret 'Potent Evangelist' for Catholics?
Liberal comedian Stephen Colbert's joke-testimony to Congress may have been a low moment for the House of Representatives, but apparently, to reporters, it makes him a symbol of holiness. Kimberly Winston of the Religion News Service hailed Colbert in an article that appeared in Saturday's Washington Post.
"And, you know, whatsoever you do for the least of my brothers, and these seem like the least of our brothers right now," Colbert said, quoting Jesus. "Migrant workers suffer and have no rights."
It was a different kind of religious message than Colbert typically delivers on Comedy Central's "The Colbert Report," where he often pokes fun at religion - even his own Catholic Church - in pursuit of a laugh. Yet it was the kind of serious faith that some of his fellow Catholics say makes him a serious, covert and potent evangelist for their faith.
"Anytime you talk about Jesus or Christianity respectfully the way he does, it is evangelization," said the Rev. Jim Martin, associate editor of the Jesuit magazine America, who has appeared on Colbert's show four times. "He is preaching the gospel, but I think he is doing it in a very postmodern way."
Martin's magazine is a liberal magazine, but none of the holy-Colbert experts or their projects are defined as liberal. Mocking the Catholic Church as a den of child abuse is apparently one way Colbert shows how devoutly Catholic he is:
"He is moving in an extremely secular world - it is hard to get a lot more secular than Comedy Central," Houdek said. "Yet I feel he is able to witness to his faith in a very subtle way, a very quiet way to an audience that has maybe never encountered this before." It's particularly powerful to Catholics, ["Catholic Colbert" blogger Diane] Houdek said, when the lines blur between Colbert's personal faith and that of his on-air alter ego. She pointed to a 2007 segment in which his character reveled in Pope Benedict XVI's statement that non-Catholic faiths were "defective."
"Catholicism is clearly superior," Colbert crowed beside a picture of the pope. "Don't believe me? Name one Protestant denomination that can afford a $660 million sexual abuse settlement." It wasn't just funny, Houdek said, but "powerful."
The reporter should not be surprised if Catholics might find that joke sounds very much like what an "extremely secular world" would be seeking in its comedy. Winston concluded (with an Episcopalian expert) that Colbert's Hill speech was an ecumenical wonder:
The Rev. Kurt C. Wiesner, rector of All Saints Episcopal Church in Littleton, N.H., writes a blog about religion and popular culture. Watching Colbert's congressional testimony, he saw something that reaches beyond Catholicism.
"He offered a human witness, without a doubt," Wiesner said. "He gave witness to what Christians are often called to do, but the message isn't be a Christian like him. It is that one's faith calls us to be engaged with our fellow human beings."
Winston even put Catholic activist Bill Donohue on the "far right," but militant homosexual Andrew Sullivan only on the "left" of religion matters:
Colbert's personal opinions about Catholicism are not usually so clearly displayed, and his range of guests offers little clues. His Catholic guests have ranged from the theological left (openly gay Catholic writer Andrew Sullivan) to the far right (Catholic League president William Donohue).
- Tim Graham's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Please spare us any more of these "devout" Catholics.
Submitted by motherbelt on Sat, 10/16/2010 - 2:45pm.
I do not think it means what you think it means. -Inigo Montoya
Speaking as a Catholic
Submitted by KC Mulville on Sat, 10/16/2010 - 2:58pm.
We already have highly-trained preachers of the gospel: we call them bishops.
I think it's obvious why they applaud Colbert but ignore bishops. This is a case of the media picking who they want to hear from, instead of the Church picking who we want to speak for us.
They'd rather hear from Colbert because Colbert doesn't also say all of those other things that they don't want to hear. Colbert gives them the spoonful of sugar without the nasty-tasting medicine. Colbert doesn't insist on sexual discipline, marital fidelity, obedience to Christ, and all the rest.
Besides, Colbert didn't go there to evangelize Christianity. He went before Congress in character as a jackass. That's not evangelizing.
Why are you so focused on
Submitted by mandrake on Sat, 10/16/2010 - 3:15pm.
Why are you so focused on Stephan Colbert? He's just a second rate comic on a small time network. Are you sensitive or something?
Bias comes in small drips
Submitted by KC Mulville on Sat, 10/16/2010 - 3:50pm.
The media doesn't ever stop programming for the night, and have their news anchors tell you openly that they intend to distort their reporting to force you to vote Democrat. Quite the contrary. Bias works in small drips, drip by drip by drip. Chances are, most of the prejudice is compiled slowly, and likely without any deliberate realization that it's haappening. But it happens nonetheless.
A good lawyer defending his client never allows the prosecution to lead the witness, inject hearsay, or slip in anything that might prejudice the jury.
The way to combat liberal bias, therefore, is not to wait for the huge, obvious event. The only way to do it is to expose the small events as they happen.
What's scary is the sheer volume of small events.
Colbert is as Roman Catholic
Submitted by Thoreau on Sat, 10/16/2010 - 4:12pm.
Colbert is as Roman Catholic and Conservative as Nancy Pelosi. His whole life is a based on a joke. He's an acting stooge crapped out by John Stewart to confuse stupid Conservative's.
There's nothing to see here but socialists licking each other's balls. Colbert is Pelosi without the plastic. Move along. Nothing to see here but doubling down on stupid, and pissing themselves about the November elections.
The Gospel of Jesus Christ
Submitted by ricklail on Sat, 10/16/2010 - 4:15pm.
The Gospel of Jesus Christ has nothing to do with what Colbert did or said. It is the death, burial and resurection of Christ. Christians are called to spread that mesage. Along the way take care of the sick and hungry not the lazy that won't work.
Typical Liberal Nonsense
Submitted by Tenebrous on Sat, 10/16/2010 - 7:00pm.
This fits liberal "thinking" to a T. The truth is not obvious; no, the truth is some SECRET thing that only the uber-intelligent can see, and the more hidden, the more unlikely, and the less the evidence there is, the more liberals will proclaim it is as true. So of course, the foul-mouthed, anti-conservative, church-heckling Colbert is REALLY interested in evangelization! *facepalm*
Now of course this is insane, but why do liberals insist on such things? Intellectual arrogance, an inability to accept the obvious as the obvious, and a desire to be praised by their peers. Every liberal position involves mental gymnastics designed to confuse people so that no-one can oppose them.
Visions and Principles blog
But why...
Submitted by yutsnark on Sat, 10/16/2010 - 10:37pm.
... aren't there more satirists on the right?
Colbert's party is in total
Submitted by rfpzzzzz on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 2:20am.
Colbert's party is in total control of the government. If there is no border security or a sensible immigration policy that benefits our country and treats our citizens as well as law abiding immigrants with respect it is the fault of the Democrats. Democrats do not want to have a sensible policy they really want to use the issue for votes.
Both parties act like borders and immigration needs and problems have not existed for about as long as people have gathered together. It is another reason why responsibilities need to be taken from the government. Walmart or some other company could probably solve the border problem in no time. We should privatize this service as well.
The Revolutionary Politics Of Jesus; Love
Submitted by Blue Collar Todd on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 6:09pm.
I get tired of Liberals asserting this verse in Matthew 25 to justify their Statist agenda. Even more absurd is that they cannot even consistently apply their wrong interpretation to the one class of humanity that ought to fit "the least of these", the unborn. This passage is about how we treat our fellow Christians and Liberalism is setting up the pretext to treat Christians in a discriminatory manner. Jesus is talking about those who follow Him, and this means we need to reject the Liberalism that is being advanced by the Democrats.
Exactly!
Submitted by Grumpy in Arizona on Sun, 10/17/2010 - 6:13pm.
Great comment and so true.