N.Y. Times Sells MSNBC As 'Progressive But Not Partisan'

Photo of Tim Graham.
  • Bookmark and Share

New York Times media reporter Brian Stelter looked on Tuesday at MSNBC hosts pushing Team Obama from the left. Stelter stuck to supportive sources who believe they apparently have ideological integrity and independence where Fox News has none. They claim to have little contact with the Obama White House, but the staff there love how they’re supposedly "progressive but not partisan." Stelter explained:

It is certainly reaching the White House. Anita Dunn, the departing White House communications director, calls Mr. Olbermann and Ms. Maddow "progressive but not partisan," and in doing so, distinguishes them from Fox News, which she considers a political opponent.

The MSNBC hosts, she said in an e-mail message last month, "often take issues with the administration’s positions or tactics and are never shy about letting their viewers know when they disagree."

Maddow is much rougher on what she calls the "Conservadems" than she is on the Obama team. She wants a much narrower, more leftist Democratic Party. She favors a small tent. Stelter doesn’t wonder whether MSNBC’s advocacy is actually going to help the Democrats politically, or drag it too far away from the independents in the middle.

Ms. Maddow said that apart from an off-the-record meeting between Mr. Obama and commentators that she attended last month, she has heard little from the White House.

Mr. Griffin said, "We heard a whole lot more from the Bush White House."

Stelter doesn’t define how much that would be. Did the Bush White House call daily? Weekly? This part of the story is unintentionally funny:

MSNBC’s liberal points of view have made the channel an occasional thorn in the side of G.E., but the channel has also fostered a diversity of opinions that people like Adam Green, the co-founder of the Progressive Campaign Change Committee, say were lacking in the past.

"There’s been a huge market void for a long time," Mr. Green said. Speaking of the MSNBC hosts, he said, "They are creating an environment where progressive thinkers and activists can thrive."

MSNBC is certainly making a space for radical leftists at The Nation and Mother Jones and hardcore blogs like Firedoglake. But "diversity"? Since when has Keith Olbermann’s show ever shown "diversity" in its selection of guests? Has he interviewed a conservative since 2003?

But here’s where it’s really amusing. Mr. Green’s group, the PCCC, is surely a beneficiary of this new space for leftists. Their campaign page shows three YouTube videos touting the impact of their leftist ads through repeated free advertisements and mentions on MSNBC programs. Green is interviewed by Ed Schultz as they promote an ad pressuring Sen. Max Baucus to support a "robust" government option in health care.

In the New York Times funhouse, MSNBC portrays themselves not only as "diverse" and nonpartisan, they’re even somehow in the political center:

Ms. Maddow, not surprisingly, agrees [MSNBC has created space for progressives]. "What looks like the middle of the country ought to look like the middle on TV," she said in an interview this month.

She paused and added, "Maybe that would have helped us make better policy decisions in the country in the past."

Does Maddow really think she’s in the middle? Should she call her show Maddow In The Middle?

—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Creepy

N.Y.Times Sells MSNBC As "Progressive But Not Paritsan."

Perhaps we should ask the Times to define "incestuous".

→ Creepy for sure

That's certainly going to draw in all those progressive conservatives, isn't it?

MSNBC is right about one thing.  There are loads of RINOs.  But what scares the NYT et ilk the most is that the battle line might naturally redraw itself as between Liberal and Conservative.

LYDSEXICS UNTIE!

OK, than this GOON should say

that FOX NEWS is "conservative, not conspiratorial."

Better yet, FOX NEWS is "bad ass, not biased." 

By the way, speaking of MSNBC, aka the kings of dropping the "teabagger" bomb, The Daily Zing boys just came up with a way funny zing!

If tea-party-goers are "teabaggers," who than is getting "teabagged?"

Click here & find out:  http://thedailyzing.com/458/teabagging-101-steeping/

Post-structuralism

or deconstructionism is rampant in the media and politics. A tax is really not a tax. A war on terror is really not a war on terror. Muslim extremists are really not Muslim. Liberal educators are really not liberal. Bill Ayres is just a guy who lives in the neighborhood. Lies are the truth, Up is really down. Competition is really not competition. Etc.

This is how they foist their true agenda out there in plain sight - by calling it the exact opposite. Most Americans are too stupid to figure this out, and the Marxists know it..

Ha Ha Ha

It is certainly reaching the White House. Anita Dunn, the departing
White House communications director, calls Mr. Olbermann and Ms. Maddow
"progressive but not partisan."

Thank you for the laugh, Anita.

 

I DON'T CARE WHO YOU ARE, THAT'S FUNNY...

 This might be the biggest joke I've seen this year in the MSM. No way in hell that most libs could claim that MSNBC is not partisan. Since that's the reason most of them watch(for the few who do watch)MSNBC in the first place.

As for the NYSlimes, well, what can we say about them that we have not said already here at NB? I will say that what they report is not grounded in reality, & that seems to be reflected in their reporting & editorial content. Not to mention their circulation numbers, thank God the people are rejecting this fishwrap.

 

"...How blind can you be, don't you see...

...that the gambler lost all he does not have..."  

Nightwish

ROFLMAO

Mika Brzenski regularly gets text or email messages from the White House DURING "Morning Joe" to correct or amend whatever she has been saying.  She always complies like a good little girl (Nellie Olesen)!  I hope they pat her on the head.

What does I'm "not authorized to access this page" mean?

I wanted to comment on the "TWILF" thing ...I know I'm old(48)but I really don't know what that means. But now I'm more confused about the not authorized thing?!?

Paul

Usually means a heartfelt goodbye to another troll. I don't know what page you were trying to open, but it is usually good news. :)

BTW, here's some definitions of TWILF for you . 

"If the man, with the power, can't keep it under control...some heads are gonna roll." -Judas Priest

HAHAHA RESTLESS

I'm hardly a troll...but I was looking at the gore/Palin TWILF blog, I get to every other page but that.   maybe its a NBs thing

Paul...

Actually it's more often just a temporary glitch.  Refresh the page, or go back to your account page and try again.

Jer

.... are you kidding me??!

.... are you kidding me??! olberman, maddow, the "middle".

has anyone seen picss of anita dunn .? looks like a demmo/lezbo freak, and i think she's married to a man????...    guhhhhh...

Next they will be telling us they are normal.

Next they will be telling us they are normal.

"DumbAssity of Dope"

Perhaps I missed something

Ms. Maddow, not surprisingly, agrees [MSNBC has created space for
progressives]. "What looks like the middle of the country ought to look
like the middle on TV," she said in an interview this month
.

 Wow!  Judging from MSNBC's ratings, middle America must be freakin' small.

 

The truth is that MSNBC has

The truth is that MSNBC has been a successful, failure, in presenting a non bias reporting of the news.

Facts are like kryptonite to the liberal.

Reading the title to this

Reading the title to this blog and the opening paragraph, I am left with the distinct impression that the NYT or Skelter on behalf of the Times has proclaimed MSNBC "progressive but not partisan"; or that the staff of one or more of MSNBC's nightly political talk shows has explicitly stated such, or at least expressly embraced the slogan,

Not so.  Skelter has simply repeated part of an email from Anita Dunn.  Silly words from a silly woman.  Quoted, but not "sold" by the Times.

Jer

They're right....from their

They're right....from their warped point of view.

They don't care what Party someone is from, as long as they're left-wing.

Progressive, but not

Progressive, but not Partisan?

Isn't that like saying, "Bat-shit Crazy, but not Loony?"

A nation cannot be free without a free, unbiased media. We are not free.

Using Muslim Tactics

Ms. Maddow said that apart from an off-the-record
meeting between Mr. Obama and commentators that she attended last
month, she has heard little from the White House.

Mr. Griffin said, "We heard a whole lot more from the Bush White House."

What Griffin meant is that other than their daily WH Conference Call and morning delivery of the Talking Points E-Mail. Yeah, other than that they hardly hear from Hussein. Except when a Leftist shows up on Fox or a radio talk show like Rush, Mark, Michelle, Laura, Sean - - - The Axis Of Conservative Evil.

''Lie to your enemies and continue to lie even when the truth is known.'' Sounds Muslim enough to me.

 

Sarah Palin: The Most Dangerous Conservative In America

Billie Jean King?

What's that photo of Billie Jean King doing up there?

re: Billie Jean King?

dunno, but off camera to her left, was Elton John.........

LOL

I thought it was Roy Orbison. The shirt threw me off.

"What a revoltin' development this is!"

Chester Riley

re: LOL

she must have borrowed the shirt from gal pal KD Lang.......

"What's that photo of Billie Jean King doing up there?"

I don't know.  But I can now see why she was not Jacko's lover. 

 

Sarah Palin: The Most Dangerous Conservative In America

"They claim to have little

"They claim to have little contact with the Obama White House,..."

So I guess Ed Schultz's front row seat at press conferences is a fluke?

all it takes

Geez.  All it takes is about 15 seconds of any one of their rant shows-- Chris, Keith, et.al-- to know that they are rabidly partisan-- with no hope for cure--  the frequency of their collective use of the slur word "teabagger" is at least twice that of say, the number of mentions of the name "Obama" on Rush's show-- look, being partisan isn't in and of itself bad, it depends on what you're partisan for or against-- and in the Chris/Keith/Maddow camp, they are partisan AGAINST anything or anyone who is for true progress-- the progress of promoting individual liberty and entrepeneurship, which we could use the most recent historical example here as Reagan conservatism, which is the best most recent example of the original, constitutional meaning of "...providing for common defense....promoting the general welfare...."

If Maddow is in the middle...

Holeinthehull

If Maddow is in the middle then I must be standing on Mars. The only thing Maddow is in the middle of is herself. What a joke!

Does any care?

A flawed review from a failed newspaper media 'critic', about a failed 'news' network. If it weren't for Newsbusters, would either of these entities have any audience at all? 

 

President Obama is nothing more than a lying empty suit; a Hollywood style special effects smoke and mirrors show that has shown itself to be a total fraud.  

WAKE UP AMERICA! SAVE OUR CONSTITUTION! 

Liberals bemoan the press, cannot defend Obama or the Dems.

This trend is amazing.  It is as if the FOX news channel was running America.

Liberals seem intent on attacking anything Conservative in the media, rather than trying to defend Obama's insane policies.

Well, I guess when they come on TV and say that this President is trying to make sure he makes the right decision 80 days into the Afghan issue that is somehow defending his policy.

Ooops...

That's right, he has no policy as of today.

Ah well what the heck.

He's still the smartest man in the room.

I remember when I was running large teams of Engineers for a tech ignorant boss who got put in charge because of who he knew rather than what he knew.

I'd always say to his face when he would complain about all the 'problems' we normally enountered.

"Everything is hard when you haven't done it before."

ACA 

 

...

Quoted from: 'Acaiguana notes from the Underground' (Soon to be at theaters near you)

Fish wrap, fish wrap, rolly poly fish wrap

The New York Tripes has to be kidding here, right?

The only thing Maddow is in the middle of is, nevermind.......

To think Obambi is over in Asia speaking on free speech, while back home anyone that dares dispute his words and actions are hammered amd maligned by the all too wanton press.

Google - Obama 2006 was for tribunals for KSM

It is the latest in a LOOOOOOONG line of uh, uh, uh, uh lies and "videotapes". 

 

A great man once said, YOU only get out of life what YOU put into it, he obviously wasn't a liberal.

Isn't Progressive and Partisan the Same?

Progressive is just another word for "Left Leaning Liberal" and that is partisan no matter how you slice it.  You could coat it in roses an they would still smell the same.  Like BS. 

Liberalism: The haunting feeling that someone, somewhere, can help themselves.

AF50

I despise those who use the word "progressive" to describe themselves.  Toward what are they progressing?  A Maoist state?  A Marxian utopia?

Having said that if they are stating that they are progressively (fill in the blank) obnoxious, irritating, stupid, trivial, pestilent, flat-lining, mendacious, entropic, boring, self-righteous, rude, contemptible, repulsive, ugly, foul-mouthed, or just plain moronic, they I would agree that they are truly progressives. 

For the MSM: In your pomp and all your glory, you're a poorer man than me.  As you lick the boots of death born out of fear.

Ian Anderson "Wind up"