Pro-marijuana, Anti-tobacco: Marijuana has 4 times the carcinogenic tar
as cigarettes but ‘Lib’s’ have outlawed flavored cigarettes and want to
outlaw smoking everywhere, even in your own home.  Oh, now I follow the
logic, don’t you!?!? To read more click here http://thedailyzing.com/334/7-habits-of-highly-defective-liberals/

honestly, being against decriminalization of pot is a loser issue.  it's hypocritical to allow--encourage, actually--drinking but keep pot illegal. this is a libertarian issue IMHO and goes along with keeping the government out of our personal lives.

I have no problem with this.

Pot might explain this administration's state of mind.

Now, obama doesn't have that blank resume anymore. When someone asks the question: "What has he done?", the answer will be: "legalized drug use".

Way to go obama. Just another stepping stone to the complete dismantling of moral values across the land.

__________
"mmm, mmm, mm. Barrack-Hussain-Øbama↓." - The liberals coolaid drinking song

Well, finally a small business success story for this administration.  You knew this was coming.  What could be better than a stoned and unarmed populace?

I love the warning sign.

...are a huge reason why Barack Obama won the election. They have the misconception that because Democrats are softer on issues like pot, that they are the party of freedom. Folks don't realize that democrats are the party that tell you what you can eat, what you are allowed to say, and decides who is a news organization and who is not.

I have been saying this for years, If the GOP nominates a person that is strong fiscal conservative whose conveys the message that, I am for real freedom, I will not tell you what kind of car you can drive, how much nicotine you can use, but at the same time, what you do behind closed doors as long as it does not affect anyone else, will be the next POTUS in 2012. 

There are more independent marijuana voters out there than independent value voters, they all vote for the GOP regardless.

At least with prohibition, Congress followed the Constitution and amended it to make alcohol illegal. They never amended our Constitution to make Drugs illegal and have been violating Americans rights ever since.

The DEA and ATF are both unconstitutional agencies that have been ripping off the taxpayers ever since they were founded without any mandate in our Constitution.

It is none of the Federal Governments business what people smoke or take in their own bodies.If they get jacked up,drive or fly a plane that is another issue altogether. 

Drugs were legal in this country until the 1930's and we were fine without any laws against drugs what so ever. 

This Administration getting behind a drug that emotionally stunts the user and washes them of all desire to actually get off their rears and DO something useful or DO for themselves explains everything. Liberals all remind me of people who think and act like 14 years old and wish and hope for a government that provides all they need so all they have to do is lay around and get high. Makes perfect sense now. What 14 year old isn't lazy, by nature, unmotivated to pick up for themselves, by nature, and oppositionally defiant, by nature?  Liberals will soon want their drug of choice to be free to them, of course.

Conservatives believe in smaller government and less regulations yet are against any Marijuana legalization movements. I understand its the Christian morals that come into play but you can't be for less government intervention, then turn around and restrict other peoples freedom from doing something you don't aprove of that doesn't affect you.

The health hazard argument is nonsense since most recent studies have failed to show any link between pot smoking and cancer, despite all the mumbo jumbo about "carcinogens and tar" if thats the case why arent marijuana brownies legal?

Now don't get me wrong i haven't been a pot head for over a decade. It still bothers me though that law enforcement spends  time and money enforcing pot laws when those resorces could be much beter spent elsewhere.

And no i don't believe an employer should have the right to drug test. I believe its a health issue and no ones business other then you and your doctor. If it takes a drug test to tell you some one is getting high then it probably means its NOT affecting their work so why should you care? If it is affecting their work then fire them for that.