Rachel Maddow Shreds Creigh Deeds as Inept, But Suggested Bob McDonnell Was Sinking in September

Photo of Tim Graham.
  • Bookmark and Share

On Sunday’s Meet the Press, MSNBC hostess Rachel Maddow broke out the ten-foot-pole of disgust for losing Virginia gubernatorial candidate Creigh Deeds. But back in September, she suggested Bob McDonnell’s thesis from "Pat Robertson’s Liberty University" would sink him: "Here’s where Republican electoral chances stop being separate from the wild-excesses of the conservative movement."

Oops. Actually, double oops, Miss Maddow: Robertson’s college is Regent University. Isn’t it amazing that her liberal fans always tout how she "does her homework"?

Here’s Maddow on Sunday:

I think that if, if Republicans could choose to have anything to extrapolate from the, from the Bob McDonnell race, it would be to have as an opponent Creigh Deeds. If they could pick anything that they wanted. I mean, Creigh Deeds was a, was a marketably ineffective Democratic candidate, essentially running away from the president, running from everything popular in the Democratic agenda and doing it in a stylistically poor way. So I'm sure he's a very nice guy; he was a very bad candidate.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Here’s Maddow on her MSNBC program on September 22:

And here's where the conservative movement and the Republican establishment smash into each other like bumper cars without bumpers. Here’s where Republican electoral chances stop being separate from the wild-eyed excesses of the conservative movement. At the Values Voter Summit this weekend, Republican presidential ever hopeful Mitt Romney told the conservative crowd there that he thought signs were good that the Republican in the Virginia governor`s race, Bob McDonnell, would win. Romney this week also raised over $100,000 for Mr. McDonnell.

But Mr. McDonnell has seen his poll numbers shrink recently, ever since he brought up his master's thesis in an interview with The Washington Post. Mr. McDonnell did his graduate degree at televangelist Pat Robertson’s Liberty University.

And after he brought up his thesis with reporters, those reporters went and read it and then they promptly reprinted the parts where he said things like government policy needs to stop favoring with the cohabitators, homosexuals or fornicators. Fornicators? He also says that women shouldn't work outside the home, for what it's worth.

After electing two Democratic governors in a row, is Virginia really going to turn around and elect a Republican this year who went to Pat Robertson's university and who crusaded against fornicators? Well, now, it's getting worse for Bob McDonnell and his poll numbers show it.

That prediction (or bout of wishful thinking) didn't exactly work out.

—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Looks like Madcow needs to find an education.

Next year more dems will stumble.

What a moron!

How can you confuse Jerry Falwell with Pat Robertson.  Does she really "do her homework" like she says she does?

"But a constitution of Government once changed from Freedom, can never be restored.  Liberty, once lost, is lost forever." - John Adams

Rachel Madcow is a product

Rachel Madcow is a product of affirmative action. What do you expect?

She's weak

Despite the hype about her educational background, Maddow merely regurgitates WH talking points, and in a rather snarky voice.   She exhudes overconfidence on her scripted show, but her weak grasp of facts wilts under conservative scrutiny on shows like Meet the Press.

But watch for her to be groomed as a news anchor for NBC Nightly News.  They're sure giving her a lot of air time on NBC.

What we can learn from sports and political commentators

In sports, politics, acting—in practically every avenue of productive life, people are measured by their past performances: what their batting average or quarterback rating has been over the previous years, how they voted in 1991 and 2002 and last May, what movies they starred in and which awards they won, etc. 

Commentators are not held to that same standard or yardstick. Their prognostications are forgotten in a day or two, and no one ever says "let's go to the videotape" and reviews a pundit's pund-endings.

Tim Russert famously would show the interviewee on the set some clip of what he or she said or was said about them. But you never see a review of the commentator's past statements and predictions.  

As they say, qui custodiet ipso custodes, or to make it more relevant, qui punditiet ipso punditoadies? 

Yes, Rachel, he was a bad

Yes, Rachel, he was a bad candidate - running away from Obama's commie agenda.  He should have directly opposed it - like the winner did.

Does a person have to be an idiot to get a job at MSNBC?

Chalk up another stellar

Chalk up another stellar moment for The Boy Who Would Be Queen (as our local conservative talker, Chris Plante, likes to say, "Rachel Maddow, or, as I refer to her, 'Paul'...") 

"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me

I'm sure Creigh Deeds

...really enjoys all of the Liberals and their media mouth pieces dumping all over him simply because his loss made Obama look bad.

How dare he lose in the age of Obama! Mmm mmm mmm!

Maddow's frequent gaffes

Maddow's frequent gaffes only strengthen the obvious - she's an idiot with crappy ratings. She should be on FoxNews where people would actually watch her (then turn her right off).

NBC: A "REAL" News Organization?

Real quick observation:

With all the crap from the WH about FOX not being a "real news organization" because of its commentary hosts (Beck, O'Reilly, et al.) how can NBC be considered real news when they have one of their most partisan hacks (Madcow) on the crown jewel of their "hard news" division (Meet the Press)?  Once again, the hypocricy astounds.  

 

"If you find yourself going through hell, keep going."

Sir Winston Churchill

dye job

dono

did she just get a bad dye job or is it the lighting?

What value does Maddow

What value does Maddow bring to the table, other than the fact that she's a liberal lesbian? Her commentary is just a repitition of conventional liberal "wisdom" (foolishness) and talking points, delivered in a somnambulant drone. She tries for snarkiness, but ends up making a fool out of herself. The best that can be said about her is she is no worse than the various knaves and fools who populate MSNBC, if that is a positive...

The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.

Maddow

She's a very angry man.

 

Gun Control - The theory that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her own pantyhose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal bullet wound.