Newsweek's Line: 'Christ's Voice' Found in Rejecting 'Religion-based Bigotry'

Photo of Tim Graham.
  • Bookmark and Share

Newsweek has clearly sided against the social conservatives on the gay agenda. When he published a cover on "The Religious Case for Gay Marriage" last December, editor Jon Meacham dared conservatives to protest, since it was useless: "History and demographics are on the side of those who favor inclusion over exclusion."

Nevertheless, Newsweek is still pushing the gay agenda on its website, touting a link to how an "Evangelical Explains Why He’s for Gay Rights."

Brent Childers, executive director of a group called Faith in America founded by gay furniture magnate Mitchell Gold, was the author. Strangely for a group with this name, their mission statement proclaims: "Our organization is not a religious organization. It does not take a theologian or religious background to understand that religion-based bigotry and prejudice brings condemnation, discrimination and violence to bear on its victims."

Childers wrote for Newsweek that he was marching in Washington this weekend at the "National Equality March" to proclaim his version of Christianity, where "Christ’s voice" is found urging acceptance of the gay lifestyle:

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) Americans are a diverse, extraordinary, resilient, and passionate group of forgiving men and women. I wouldn't be standing beside them demanding full and equal treatment under the law and speaking out against the harm caused by religion-based bigotry at the National Equality March in Washington, D.C., on Oct. 11 if I thought they were not created in God's image the same as myself, same as my family, as we all are-we are all God's children.

And I know better than anyone, since six years ago I was one of those bigots. At that time it would have seemed abominable to even consider attending a "gay-rights" event. To me, these would have been the people tearing apart the very seams of our culture and our country.

Today, it is a natural expression of who I am. Some might call that a miracle.

So what it is that would bring someone from a place where he once declared himself a "Jesse Helms Republican," a man who condemned homosexuality as a threat to children and society, told his own son that being gay is a ticket to hell, to travel from Hickory, N.C., to the West Lawn of the Capitol building on Oct. 11, 2009? How can one travel from the seemingly impossible road of bigotry to one of acceptance and love for our LGBT brothers and sisters? The answer is one that I hope religious leaders such as Pat Robertson and James Dobson (and most importantly, their followers) will hear.

It's because something deep inside told me that I needed to step out in faith onto a bridge of knowledge and understanding. I didn't know where this bridge would take me but something was telling me it was a path I needed to walk. My own mother challenged me in 2003 to look at my beliefs and the true intent behind the teachings I held in blind faith. "Do you think your views are Christ-like?" she asked me. Her question was dead on: once I walked away from the Church's teachings of rejection and condemnation, my relationship with God transcended to a higher spiritual plateau. I realized an unparalleled sense of spiritual clarity when I opened my heart and mind to a genuine expression of love, compassion, and acceptance of all sexual orientations and gender identities.

This new voice -- Christ's voice -- became the core principles of my faith: love, compassion, and respect. That voice I now realize was desperately wanting to be heard, a voice no longer comfortable with the place in which I had chose to confine it for so long -- a place of bigotry, prejudice, fear, and misunderstanding.

The walk across that bridge wasn't very strenuous but it was at times painful. The pain came as I began to realize for the first time that I had been using my faith to bring harm to others. That's not a pleasant realization for anyone who marches under a Christian banner of love, respect, and compassion.

But it wasn’t enough for Childers to claim that he was one hearing the voice of Christ, and all the social conservatives relying on God’s word were wrong. They were also causing violence and death to gay Americans:

During the past four years I have looked into the faces of those I once caused harm to with religion-based bigotry and prejudice. And while I may have never inflicted a physical blow, I know today that my words indeed caused deep wounds-perhaps at some point deeper than I care to dwell upon.

They are the faces of individuals like young Sean Kennedy, who died in Greenville, S.C., in 2007 after being struck by a person who considered Sean a "faggot"; Pat and Lynn Mulder of Auburndale, Fla., whose gay son also died as a result of a hate crime; Jared Horsford of Texas who carved derogatory words into his flesh because he thought it would help control the demon he was told lived there; Nicholas White who was relentlessly berated by fellow 4-H peers at camp this summer as other 4-H campers stood behind the tormentors in silence; or the mother I met recently in North Carolina who grieved over her dead son-a child that had been rejected because he was gay and thought peace could only come through suicide.

There are many, many others I have met in my work with Faith in America, as we try to bring awareness and understanding to the pain and trauma caused to LGBT people, especially youth, when church teaching is misused to justify and promote a societal climate of rejection, condemnation, and discrimination. This environment fosters suicide, hate crimes, an epidemic of antigay bullying in our schools against all kinds of children gay and straight...

Childers has been helped by liberal media outlets before on these issues. His biography reports "Childers worked with one of the organization's supporters in proposing a question about religion-based bigotry that was selected to be asked in the first CNN/YouTube debate in July 2007 in Charleston, S.C."

—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Typical trickery...

This is a typical trick of the non-believer.  To issue a challenge essentially to God - 'If God doesn't come down in 5 minutes, then it means he doesn't exist'.

Only now they're using it over points of doctrine.  'If God is truly against gay relations, then he'd better show up and stop us.  If he doesn't, it means he wants us to be gay.'

It's the same wresting of doctrine that leads them to take the christian belief that 'men should love one another', and twist it to mean 'erotically'.  There are stern warnings to those who wrest the scriptures in that way.

I don't know this guy's full story, but I know enough from what I read there to know he's full of it.  If he follows that logic, than ANY transgression is meant to be embraced.  'Intolerance' of sin is preached by such men as the only real sin.  Therefore by that logic, every sin is meant, not to be repented of, but to be 'tolerated' by everyone else - absolving the sinner of any guilt and shifting the guilt onto the shoulders of everyone else for not 'tolerating' his transgressions.

Not to mention - when a preacher preaches for money, it's called priestcraft.  Where someone pretends to be a holy man teaching God's will, but doing so for money, power, or fame.  Is this guy preaching God's will - or his own?  The fact that he's using the typical liberal trick of saying 'everyone who doesn't agree with me is going to hell' says it's priestcraft.

They cite Acts 8

These people also claim that Acts of the Apostle 8:26-40 makes their case for gay acceptance. (Philip and the Eunuch.)

Good evening Tim

That's an idea!

If all the  homosexuals became eunuchs the whole problem would be solved. The best place to start would be NAMBLA.

Jesus Loves You so much He died for you

Tim, I don't understand how

Tim, I don't understand how they can twist that story into that. The man is a eunuch!!

But they also talk about Jesus and the acceptance of "sinners" (tax collectors etc) and forgiveness (the woman caught in adultery) and conveniently leave off the ending of the stories where He says "Go and SIN no more."

One other thing...

All of the gospel writers were observant Jews - they never, ever would have accepted the gay lifestyle or the  homosexual acts.

The writer of Acts was a Gentile doctor, Luke.  I doube he would have been so tolerant with homosexuality either.

"I dont need to read a newspaper to know the world's been shaved by a drunken barber."

Walter Brennan, The Colonel, Meet John Doe, 1941

He Has Something.............

This guy is hiding something! He is either a closet gay, cheating on his wife, or imbezzling funds!

The Word Of Love

I've seen some gays say that Jesus and John were gay and "loved" each other.  The "disciple" that Jesus "loved" is mentioned in scripture four times.  Three of those four times, the Greek word for "loved" is "agapao" which means an uncondtional sacrificial love.  Once the Greek "philao" is used which means a brotherly love.  "Eros", meaning a sensual or sexual love is never used.

People who are ignorant, like Childers, wouldnt be expected to know this.

They tried to say the same thing about King David and Jonathan too.

Homosexuality is rebellion to God just as every other sin is.  In order to justify this rebellion, then God's word has to be twisted and perverted. And it's not just the gays that do it either.

"I dont need to read a newspaper to know the world's been shaved by a drunken barber."

Walter Brennan, The Colonel, Meet John Doe, 1941

Christ's Voice

I don't suppose he said anything about how Islam treats gays.  Like hanging, pushing off of tall buildings, etc.  How about the Islamic soccer team that wouldn't play against the French gay team?  No, he probably didn't have the guts to say anything because he knows the uproar it would cause in the Islamic world.  It was just an article to take swipes at Christians.

Before we have a government that can supply us with everything we will have a government that can provide us with nothing.

Non-believers

I don't go to libiots for spiritual advice. Few of them would know Christ's voice if it was forgiving them.

Newsweek has decided that

Newsweek has decided that God is pretty ticked off at those who believe what the Bible says. Must be true because they found someone who said so.

No citizen's right to life, liberty, pursuit of happiness, or property is safe as long as Obama is President of the United States.

More Illogic and hatred

No one reads Newsweek anyway.

The radical left loves to teach that Christian intolerance is the root of all evil. It is so deeply ironic and is rooted in a profound failure to understand true Christianity.

Thinking themselves wise, they became fools.

"Christ’s voice" is very clear about this.

Maybe if we want to know what Christ really thinks about this, we should go to the source since he inspired all scripture.  I mean, if you're going to pretend to quote someone, then quote them.

Romans 1:22-32

22. Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools
23. and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like mortal man and birds and animals and reptiles.
24. Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another.
25. They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator--who is forever praised. Amen.
26. Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones.
27. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion.
28. Furthermore, since they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge of God, he gave them over to a depraved mind, to do what ought not to be done.
29. They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and depravity. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice. They are gossips,
30. slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant and boastful; they invent ways of doing evil; they disobey their parents;
31. they are senseless, faithless, heartless, ruthless.
32. Although they know God's righteous decree that those who do such things deserve death, they not only continue to do these very things but also approve of those who practice them.

The Bible certainly does not condone hate or violence toward the gay community - in fact it calls us to love them, but not condone the sin.  I can love someone and still acknowledge they are sinning and that their behavior is wrong.  But please, Newsweek, don't put words in God's mouth.  And to Chiders, I would like to point out that just because you believe something, that doesn't make it true.  

 

 

Amen ...

What the fail to see is that while Christians condemn the behavior, we do not condemn the person--that is a right only God has, and actually, we end up doing it ourselves in front of God.

However, according to the libs, if I condemn a behavior, I am condemning a person--what an absurd leap of logic. Aren't we better than our actions? The very Scripture to they use tells us that we are better than our actions, or can aspire to be.

The problem here is personal accounatbility. Libs and others who would decry those of us who see the wrongness in the actions of gay behavior, abortion, contraception, etc., don't want to be held accounatble before God. They see anyone who works against such sins as doing so out of hare, when in fact it is our of love. Christ told us to warn our brothers (and sisters) against things that would keep them from the Kingdom out of a duty of love.

 

Pax Christi 

Well said

You covered it concisely in your final paragraph.  Loving someone does not mean they do no wrong or you approve of their actions.

Sigh!!!!!

"We are all born in God's image". 

Yes, we were all born in God's image, in the form of Adam and Eve. Ever since they bit into that apple, however, we have not been of God's image. Believers try to live their lives in God's image, and by His word, but alas, since the Original Sin, we cannot. 

To claim that our sins are of God's image is idiotic. Has this guy really read the Bible? 

"If the man, with the power, can't keep it under control...some heads are gonna roll." -Judas Priest

God's Image

Well, we are still God's image even though we have a fallen Adamic nature.  God is a triune God - God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit, one in unity.

Mankind is a tripart being (notice the difference) being made up of body, soul, and spirit.  This is the image of God.  We are given some communicable attributes of God, such as love, but not incommunicable attributes, such as omniscience.

Just remember that every time there is an abortion a human being made in the image of God is destroyed.

And btw, scripture doesnt say what the fruit was.  Artists over the years depicted it as an apple.  The OT Jews believed it was a pomegranate because it is a bitter fruit.  In the middle east they believe it was a banana.  It doesnt really matter what the fruit was, it is the fact that Adam chose to eat it and thus caused all of us to be separated from God.  But God made a way to come back and His name is Jesus.

"I dont need to read a newspaper to know the world's been shaved by a drunken barber."

Walter Brennan, The Colonel, Meet John Doe, 1941

Well said,

Well said, misterbee.

Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys.
- P.J. O'Rourke

misterbee

Thanks. I'm aware of all of that. For the sake of brevity, I used the metphorical apple as OS. 

Also, I was referring to God's image being used to justify sinning, as the subject of this article seemed to do. Just because we are made in God's image, doesn't mean He sins too. Nor does it mean He condones our sin. Childers seems to think otherwise. 

"If the man, with the power, can't keep it under control...some heads are gonna roll." -Judas Priest

Every religion has a hell

and I'm not about to get on a religious soapbox like some and profess the attributes of my or any one's religion. It it reasonable to believe that a Superior Being has let every religion foster in some respect...

but, every reasonable and learned person with even the slightest amount of Faith including the folks that write this crap should realize that no matter What or Whom their God is there is one constant in life...

and that is that hell does exist and that is a place that is WITHOUT God.

This is specifically about

This is specifically about Christianity and its adherents. And furthermore the Bible tells us what is and what isnt right and what God is and what He hates.  Thiese idiots are specifically trying to tear down what Christianity is by spreading falsehoods.

Know how to keep a Troll in suspense?  Ill tell ya in the morning.

Every religion has a hell

and I'm not about to get on a religious soapbox like some and profess the attributes of my or any one's religion. It it reasonable to believe that a Superior Being has let every religion foster in some respect...

but, every reasonable and learned person with even the slightest amount of Faith including the folks that write this crap should realize that no matter What or Whom their God is there is one constant in life...

and that is that hell does exist and that is a place that is WITHOUT God.

*facepalm* The Rocky

*facepalm*

The Rocky Mountain Collegian: Illustrating Idiocy

I dont want to see anyone,

I dont want to see anyone, gay or straight hurt or  killed by street thugs for any reason.  Dead is still dead.  As far as young gays committing suicide,  I'm sorry to hear that too, because it could have been avoided.  Jesus is the liberator folks.  And no, I in no way accept the heresy that Jesus accepts the gay lifestyle.  Sin is sin and Jesus is pretty plain about that.  And no, Jesus doesnt hate gays and neither do I.

Just my 2 cents.

"I dont need to read a newspaper to know the world's been shaved by a drunken barber."

Walter Brennan, The Colonel, Meet John Doe, 1941

So what it is that would

So what it is that would bring someone from a place where he once declared himself a "Jesse Helms Republican," a man who condemned homosexuality as a threat to children and society, told his own son that being gay is a ticket to hell, to travel from Hickory, N.C., to the West Lawn of the Capitol building on Oct. 11, 2009?

Payola? Kickbacks? Money changing hands? 

So here's my question

If these people say that Christianity justifies gay relationships, then what is going to stop them from forcing churches to perform gay "marriages"?  

Nothing.

After all, our theology is wrong, therefore we have no right to defend it.

Of course, these are the same people who gleefully believe the fact that Albus Dumbledore from the Harry Potter series is gay (something the texts don't back up at all) is all they need to prove this is inevitable and we should just deal with it.

Aut viam inveniam aut faciam

           GOD

           GOD says "Love Thy Nieghbor), not to go stick your **** up your nieghbor's ***.