WaPo 'Humorist' Asks If Cheney Will Be Paid for Book With 'Gunnysack Filled With Human Heads'

Photo of Tim Graham.
  • Bookmark and Share

Gene Weingarten has established himself as a Dick Cheney-hater, since he has compared him to Cambodian communist mass murderer Pol Pot. The "investigative humorist" and former editor of the Post’s Style section is at it again Sunday, with a splenetic and allegedly humorous venting against Cheney an an unholy, murderous savage.

The setup is Cheney’s forthcoming memoirs. He called up the publisher, Simon and Schuster’s Threshhold Editions, and they asked if he was "pro-book," meaning pro-Cheney. When he wouldn’t answer, the publisher would only answer to questions submitted in writing. This gave him an excuse to joke that he wouldn’t be biased or unprofessional, and then laid out all his Cheney hatred. Here’s a piece of it:

3. May I presume that Mr. Cheney will be remunerated in his customary way: a gunnysack filled with unblemished human heads?

4. I notice that this memoir is scheduled for release just a few months after George W. Bush's memoir comes out. Is there any concern among the publishers that the Cheney book will seem redundant -- or will it be, as I suspect, the equivalent of getting a memoir from, say, Eisenhower, after his butler wrote one?

5. A few of the more controversial elements of Mr. Cheney's vice presidency have been his remorseless assault on the environment, his unapologetic advocacy of the dubious doctrine of preemptive warfare, his arrogation and usurpation of executive powers, his almost jubilant embrace of methods of torture, his contribution through malevolence and malfeasance to the virtual death of the Republican Party, and his destructive impact on America's moral standing in the world. My question is, can you estimate how many pages this book will be?

6. Calling on old debts from the lords of the netherworld, will Mr. Cheney attempt to get favorable blurbs from Rasputin, Machiavelli, Torquemada and Salome?

7. I see that Mr. Cheney is writing the book in collaboration with his daughter, Liz. I just wanted to say that is very sweet. (Pause for surprised, grateful response.) Couldn't get anyone outside the immediate family to sling the bull with a straight face, eh?

8. What precautions can buyers take to keep this book from bursting into flame should it come into direct contact with holy water, sunlight or the pure joyous laughter of a child?

Perhaps the oddest theme in these "joke" questions is Weingarten the admitted atheist suggesting Cheney is the very opposite of holy water, or comparing Cheney to Salome, the woman who asked for John the Baptist's head on a platter (well, that's also a severed human-head theme). Cheney is perhaps Satan himself:

2. There has been a great deal of speculation in the national media over the years, mostly by me, over whether the former vice president is Mephistopheles or some other incarnation of the devil, such as Baal, the toadlike ruler of Hades, or Abaddon, demonic malevolence of the bottomless pit, the sultan of torment and despoiler of virgins, who in his pure form resembled a horse with a man's head, a woman's hair, a lion's teeth, a locust's wings and the tail of a scorpion. Will the author be addressing this sort of allegation at all?

The Washington Post clearly doesn't imagine (or particularly care) that any of its readers might be supporters of Dick Cheney, or that this kind of "humor" tends to reveal just what an insular and partisan group of Cheney-haters they can be.

—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

  Another glittering

Another glittering example of  liberal "humor."

Gee, I had to keep going back and finding my place again, because at the end of every paragraph I was laughing so hard!

I know I'm going to hate myself for giving this toad even a morsel of respectability by treating his accusations with any seriousness at all, but I can't help myself, because I am sick to death of those who are allowed to make outrageous statements about those they hate with absolutely no requirement of honesty.

A few of the more controversial elements of Mr. Cheney's vice
presidency have been his remorseless assault on the environment, his
unapologetic advocacy of the dubious doctrine of preemptive warfare,
his arrogation and usurpation of executive powers, his almost jubilant
embrace of methods of torture, his contribution through malevolence and
malfeasance to the virtual death of the Republican Party, and his
destructive impact on America's moral standing in the world

Really?  Mr. Cheney "assauted the environment"?  How?

He was "jubilant" about torture?  Proof please!  Let's have a picture, or at least a witness who saw Cheney giggling over waterboarding or whatever else you consider "torture."

Exactly which "executive powers" did he arrogate and usurp from President Bush??

his destructive impact on America's moral standing in the world 

Really?  The world despised us because of Dick Cheney???

Yet this is the kind of garbage that liberals spew regularly without an iota of evidence.

Oh, I forgot...he can do that, because he's a "humorist."

ROFL!!!!

And liberals can't seem to

And liberals can't seem to put their finger on why people are abandoning newspapers and the SRM in droves.

Just another sick liberal

Just another sick liberal bastards that works for a bunch of sick liberal bastards. (Excuse my southern.)  

Semper suprene nitens

North Carolina now has the worst government money can buy. 

I'd accept...

 I'd accept it if one of those heads was Weingarten's...

Most striking

is that none of this is , how shall I put it,... funny. 

 

"I think you'd better call John, 'cause it don't look they're here to deliver...the mail". -NY 

Wapo and Cheney

I gave Wapo time by reading dilegently for a year. I came to the conclusion that the paper goes with the flow, when it is expedient. Most rags go with the regime in power as a matter of survival. Unfortunately  the Wapo bunch drew my disgust one time too many.

Until a news group re-establishes itself in my world as factual and honest, I mentally ban any thing that is said or reported. Trusting readership is getting harder to find in today's atmosphere. Destroy reader's trust and lose their dollars! Most people equate money with success. But broke folks vote too. If you're ACORN, dead, fictional, and multiple personalities vote.

GLH

contact

I hope readers are going to that Post story and contacting the writer by clicking on their name and telling them what you think of this debris.

 

Saddam Hussein and terrorism.  Trying to tell the rest of the story at http://www.regimeofterror.com

 

Gene Weingarten, a glorified jackass

Tim, I reviewed your post of January 23, 2008 where Gene Weingarten compares Cheney to Cambodian communist mass murderer Pol Pot and noticed that the concluding comment purports to come form Gene Weingarten.  Do you happen to know whether or not it is actually from Mr. Weingarten?  I ask because the real meaning of his apology is beyond description in the annals of journalistic inanity.  He implies that he is far more stupid than a very small box of rocks, does not know his @ss from the Grand Canyon, and is insufficiently qualified to work in any journalistic capacity besides gossip columnist of a DC High School newspaper.

Of course, maybe his problem stems from his working at the Washington Post, which for years and years ignored/covered up massive atrocities which went on for years and years in Cambodia, where more people were tortured – BTW, we are talking REAL torture here, not momentarily psychologically discomforting waterboarding – maimed, and murdered everyday at the hands of Pot Pol and his little ACORN followers than ever occurred in Iraq.  Of course, it is understandable that the Washington Post, as a major important Liberal newspaper with many Pulitzer Prize citations, would not want to cast aspersions on, or blemish in anyway, the various undertaking or policies of Pot Pol, or for that matter any vicious Communist organization or government. So that may be why Gene Weingarten is as ignorant as a Democrat whore about who and what Pot Pol was and did.

Of course technically that leaves open the question of whether Gene Weingarten can tell the difference that what the Bush administration – not just Cheney – did to combat Terrorism – BYW, in Gene Weingarten’s addled brain this is probably somewhat akin to “blaming” Alexander Hamilton  for America’s independence from Great Britain – and the depraved depredations of Stalin and his purges.  In fact Gene Weingarten seems to be so confused in his values and judgment that one is hard pressed to know what, if anything, Gene Weingarten genuinely values in his soul, if he has a soul.  Well, anyway, it is not so surprising under these circumstances that Gene Weingarten has a moderately important role at the Washington Post.  I guess that is all we really need to know about him

- Relying upon the MSM for your information is like relying upon an embezzler to manage your portfolio.