ABC's "Prescription for America" special plugging the Obama health-nationalization plan is not the first time a network has taken on such a task. NBC did the same thing for Hillary-care in the summer of 1994, but with a twist: its two-hour special was commercial-free, paid for by the liberal Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. From the July 1994 edition of our newsletter MediaWatch:
NBC raised a lot of eyebrows by accepting $3.5 million from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation for its two-hour, commercial-free June 21 health care special, To Your Health. Five foundation fellows served on Hillary Clinton's secret task force, and when that secrecy became an issue, the foundation spent $500,000 for four town meetings featuring the First Lady.
In 1991, foundation president Dr. Steven Schroeder told The Chronicle of Philanthropy: "We are very conscious that fundamental change [in health] is not going to happen without government...Many of our recent grants have been predicated on the idea that we would get government involved."
On CNBC's Tim Russert May 9, Tom Brokaw said: "I can assure you that I wouldn't be involved with that program in any fashion if it were being directed or if it were being engineered by a special interest group."
Several conservatives (including MediaWatch publisher L. Brent Bozell) wrote to NBC President Robert Wright charging the grant "constitutes an appearance of partisanship." In a phone conversation, David Bohrman, the show's Executive Producer, gave Bozell his word the show would be balanced and pursue all aspects of the debate. But NBC earned the Janet Cooke Award.
The special, a series of pre-taped segments followed by discussions with on-stage panels and an audience at Washington's Warner Theater, tilted in favor of pro-government spokesmen and failed to explore conservative policy options. Hillary Clinton was the sole guest for the first half-hour, referring to NBC's anecdotes as proof of the need for the Clinton plan. On-stage panelists leaned two-to-one in favor of the Clinton plan or single-payer. Speakers from the audience also leaned to the liberal side by two to one.
Bohrman told MediaWatch: "We went back an
d timed out everything in the broadcast. No matter how you add it up or take a look at it, it was very well-balanced." But when MediaWatch suggested the ratio was more like 2 to 1, Bohrman changed his spin: "Whenever any two people try to add it up, you get a different number...What adds to the perception may have been that there was such a large dose of Tom and Mrs. Clinton at the beginning."
The program's pre-packaged news features were mostly horror stories: uninsured parents of kids with dramatic medical problems, or a woman who couldn't fund home care for her mother. Those sufferers were brought into the theater to demand more government. Reporter Maria Shriver added to one victim's demand: "And you want it now!"
This year, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation can he heard in the underwriting announcements on National Public Radio -- still plugging the need for health "reform."
—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center.





On CNBC's Tim Russert May 9, Tom Brokaw said: "I can assure you that I wouldn't be involved with that program in any fashion if it were being directed or if it were being engineered by a special interest group."
d timed out everything in the broadcast. No matter how you add it up or take a look at it, it was very well-balanced." But when MediaWatch suggested the ratio was more like 2 to 1, Bohrman changed his spin: "Whenever any two people try to add it up, you get a different number...What adds to the perception may have been that there was such a large dose of Tom and Mrs. Clinton at the beginning."














Editor at Large
Comments Policy
and so it goes...
June 17, 2009 - 06:59 ET by AJBThe state-run media is now setting up shop in the White House. How appropriate. Now there can be no denial who they work for. There will be 'hand-picked' questioners and absolutely no dissent or thought that is not praising The One.
I imagine there will be choirs of school children singing praises to Comrade Glorious Supreme Leader for Life Obama, and camera shots of the old and tired with tears in their eyes while the camera flashes to Comrade Glorious and his big ears and smile. Ah, it truly does bring tears to my eyes (and poop to my pants)
Same song, differerent verse
June 17, 2009 - 07:28 ET by jondelwicheAny HONEST discussion of controlling costs must address tort reform as a way to limit defensive medicine (ie likely the driver of 20-25% of costs, a cool 500 billion each year) which results in hundreds of thousands of needless Csections, mri's, CT's,Rx's etc etc
Any "discussion" missing tort reform as item #1, is simply some political agenda. It wasnt there with lawyer Hilary, and it likely wont be there with lawyer Obama. When the AMA booes its guest, one should know something is terribly amiss.......
Jondelwiche.. very good
June 17, 2009 - 07:59 ET by rimskyJondelwiche.. very good point - Tort Reform. This is a very large component of overall medical costs, a fact about which there isn't near enough discussion. The problem here is that we have wolves guarding the hen house.
Thanks, the trial bar uses misinformation
June 17, 2009 - 22:14 ET by jondelwicheciting the relatively miniscule costs of malpractice insurance and settlements.
That pales! in comparison to drs simply CYA'ing with tons of essentially needless tests and procedures.
ObamABC is unprecedented.
June 17, 2009 - 08:10 ET by HockeyKidObamABC is unprecedented. The NBC airtime was paid for by a third party, whereas ABC is giving the airtime to the Smoker in Chief.
Speaking of smoking, I say no president should be allowed to write healthcare-related executive orders, or suggest healthcare-related legislation, until he's been tobacco-free for at least 2 years.
"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me
By definition
June 17, 2009 - 09:26 ET by KC MulvilleBy definition, if you control the response or rebuttal, it isn't a fair presentation. I always argue that this is the problem with documentaries: the filmmaker always controls the rebuttal. He can place it where it does the least damage, and follow it with counter-arguments if he wishes.
But, you might argue, doesn't each side have the right to present their case as they want it presented? Sure. And if opponents of the president's plan want to offer their own rebuttal, they can find some network to host the informercial. So what's the problem?
There are two problems:
No president has ever gotten this much help ... maybe FDR, but none since then.
And yet...
June 17, 2009 - 10:15 ET by slickwillie2001And yet the Bamster has the gall to whine about Fox News like a three year old that thinks someone else got a bigger ice-cream cone. This idiot doesn't know how good he has it.
jessieH ABC must have
June 17, 2009 - 10:53 ET by jessieHjessieH ABC must have given more money to ACORN this year. CBS spent their money on lawyers for Letterman.
That died a pretty quiet
June 17, 2009 - 11:10 ET by RR GOPThat died a pretty quiet and fast death from what I remember. Billary resigned themselves to consolidating their own power, getting richer, killing off enemies, etc. after that. It's as if their collective heart just broke into pieces.
;-(
One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 61% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory (yep...approval for Congress now at 39%...do you believe that!?).
WOW
June 17, 2009 - 14:31 ET by tonyrich300You need to watch this
http://www.youtube.c...