On Thursday night's O'Reilly Factor, Bill O'Reilly lit into NARAL publicist Mary Alice Carr for her Washington Post op-ed blaming him for the murder of abortionist George Tiller -- and following up on the NewsBusters report on her article's reckless factual errors, whacked her for lying:
Writing in The Washington Post today, pro-abortion zealot Mary Alice Carr says, quote, "O'Reilly is being incredibly disingenuous when he claims that he bears no responsibility for others' actions in the killing of Dr. George Tiller on Sunday. When you tell an audience of millions over and over again that someone is an executioner, you cannot feign surprise when someone executes that person. O'Reilly knew that people wanted Tiller dead. He knows that his words incite violence."
Well, that is a complete bull. We analyzed Tiller honestly, and I'm entitled to my opinion on his methods.
Here's a personal note to Ms. Carr. Your pro-abortion zealotry, madam, has led to the destruction of thousands of potential human beings. So don't take that righteous tone with me. Also, you flat-out lied in your Post op-ed, and you should be ashamed.
Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Oh, c'mon
June 7, 2009 - 02:19 ET by danebramageNot potential human beings, Bill, actual human beings. Before the sperm and the egg unite, they are only potential human beings (which makes the actual destroyer of potential human beings contraception). After the union, actual human beings exist.
This is why O'Reilly is more of a menace than a help. The distinction here is not some small matter. To say that the baby in the womb is only a potential human being is to say exactly what the pro-abortion crowd is claiming. Tsk tsk.
Great catch Danebramage
June 7, 2009 - 12:32 ET by acumenMy tired ol' eyes breezed right past that terminology by O'Reilly.
Thanks for pointing out db. Important distinction indeed.
Funny...
June 8, 2009 - 08:29 ET by EdCoyneI'm not at all a "pro-life zealot", but those words jumped right off the page for me, too.
Ed Coyne
www.PoliCalc.com
Back and forth
June 7, 2009 - 02:47 ET by KC MulvilleI've never been a big fan of O'Reilly, but I have to hand it to him here. O'Reilly gave the only appropriate response to these shrill denunciations about being complicit in Tiller's murder because he voiced his opposition to what Tiller was doing. O'Reilly called it for what it is: namely, crap. It's the lie behind zealotry.
If anyone thinks pro-lifers will be intimidated from opposing abortion just because some media types call us names, forget it. We ain't going anywhere.
Where were you Carr?
June 7, 2009 - 03:49 ET by Lord ErondWhen Klinton was using a 23 year old intern as an ash tray?
When the media was raking Palin over the coals for choosing to have Trig?
You feminists are a bunch of hypocritical sluts
"Let him who would move the world, first move himself." -Socrates
"We sit together, the mountain and I, until only the mountain remains." -Li Po
You ever notice that with
June 7, 2009 - 03:54 ET by mostlymoderateYou ever notice that with leftists, it is never the "CRIMINAL" that commits the crime? It is either the gun, where we should ban guns, or a third-party that cause the killing which in this case happens to be Bill O'Reilly.
P.S. How many liberal's
June 7, 2009 - 03:58 ET by mostlymoderateP.S. How many liberal's have called G. Bush or Dick Cheney "MURDERERS"? Every damn one of them that I know have used that word.
Good point, mm!
June 7, 2009 - 05:55 ET by motherbeltGood point, mm!
But of course, had an attempt been made on either of their lives, liberals would brook no finger-pointing at themselves. They would blame Bush's actions for someone's (justified?) hatred of them.
Murders. War criminals. And let's not forget the old Hitler references. Does she think there was no one in this country who would love to be a "hero" by ridding us of the next Hitler?
We don't know how many wackos were derailed by the SS before they got very far.
I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows. -Bart Simpson
Baby killers
June 7, 2009 - 07:43 ET by ThisnThatAnd let's not forget the famous damnation of our soldiers: BABY-KILLERS.
Uttered by the true, proven, and proud-of-it baby killers themselves.
A woman definitely has a right to choose -- whether or not to become pregnant. But I guess that's just taking on too much individual responsiblity in this society, isn't it?
___________________________________
Liberals constantly demand that we accept a glaring falsehood as truth; Obama's elimination of the word "terror" will make terrorist acts less terrifying
Baby killers?
June 7, 2009 - 08:10 ET by cocodrieDo you people wish to deny modern liberals their right to kill unborn babies, coddle criminals and terrorists? Do you wish to deny criminals their right to life, liberty and the pursuit if our lives and money?
Why should the American soldier be allowed to protect America from adult terrorists carrying rockets, guns and bombs? All the terrorists want is our lives and our country after they destroy Israel.
Where is your tolerance and love of freedom?
Jesus Loves You so much He died for you
Educare/Ayers/Klonsky/CAC/POTUS
June 7, 2009 - 09:24 ET by NortoWant to see bad behavior being rewarded, search this and see welfare mom's "field of dreams." coming to Waterville, Maine, even as we speak and in spite of the money being used does not meet the "stimulus" criteria. Our Governor weasled that one through otherwise the money needed would not have been raised.
Baby Killers?
June 7, 2009 - 14:51 ET by Sergeant ROCKYou'd think the liberals would adore the military, if that were the case. However, it's just another case of liberal projection.
"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason
How many of these creeps
June 7, 2009 - 06:16 ET by danboHow many of these creeps have written or said they wanted to see Pres. Bush, VP Cheney, and people like Newt, or Rush dead?
But they have the right to express their opinion. People on the right incite violence.
Limited Disclosure: I used to belong to the Sierra Club untill they went crazier. Worse of all, I was bribed by Exxon with free New Orleans Saints glasses with fill ups in the 70's.
It's not just criminals
June 7, 2009 - 05:41 ET by pagg30It's not just criminals with the left. It's any demographic with a problem or challenge.
Blame guns, drugs, gangs, alcohol, schools, tests, society, fast food, walmart, homedepot, the car, the tools, etc...
In their eyes nobody is responsible for themselves. You can allways blame and then usually sue somebody else.
I hate these people.
Liberal logic 101
June 7, 2009 - 05:49 ET by motherbeltBOR knows that people wanted Tiller dead.
So talking about him incited someone to kill him.
I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows. -Bart Simpson
One Man's Trash Is Another Man's Treasure
June 7, 2009 - 07:14 ET by flyingmonkeyCan't we just say that both Tiller and Roeder provided a valuable service to their respective constituencies?
BTW, Roeder has been elevated to domestic terrorist status by Bloggers For Change.
BTW, Roeder has been
June 7, 2009 - 07:34 ET by motherbeltBTW, Roeder has been elevated to domestic terrorist status by Bloggers For Change.
And Abdul Hakim Mujahid Muhammad??
Not so much.
I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows. -Bart Simpson
Yeah, MB -- but the problem
June 7, 2009 - 07:50 ET by ThisnThatYeah, MB -- but the problem here is that the Army recruiters were the terrorists being investigated by Homeland Security -- not Muhammad. We need to keep our priorities straight.
And I saw one reference to where that story was placed in the newspaper. Right behind the following stories:
___________________________________
Liberals constantly demand that we accept a glaring falsehood as truth; Obama's elimination of the word "terror" will make terrorist acts less terrifying
In the ensuing debate over
June 7, 2009 - 07:38 ET by moderncommentaries83In the ensuing debate over Tiller's death, a lot of pro-aborts have said that if pro-lifers hadn't used "inflammatory rhetoric" in this debate, Tiller would still be alive.
The problem is their definition of "inflammatory rhetoric" means telling the truth about abortion.
Which, I assert, is their fault. As O'Reilly correctly points out, pro-aborts are the ones who encourage, endorse, and applaud the barbaric practices of abortion, from even the first trimester - through the third, Tiller's "speciality" - pro-lifers point out these facts. It is barbaric. It is upsetting. And it should bother people who, you know, actually have a conscience and a heart.
Third trimester abortions are awful (I've read the procedures and will spare you the graphic details), painful, and wholly unnecessary. Tiller did these abortions for reasons as silly as the mother worrying about not being able to play sports or have a social life (which she didn't think about before she had sex, created a baby, and waited nearly 9 months to kill that child).
We tell the truth.
If pro-aborts don't like the TRUTH about abortion out there, that's not our fault. This isn't a haircut or manicure we're talking about here. It's the willful, bloody murder of another - wholly innocent - human being. A human being sacrificed for the bad choices his parents made.
It's the fault of pro-aborts that we are forced to reveal the evil of abortion to the world. Not ours.
Aut viam inveniam aut faciam
Well said mc83!!!
June 7, 2009 - 08:11 ET by flyingmonkeyWell said mc83!!!
Ditto
June 7, 2009 - 12:29 ET by SickofLibsDitto
What? No board liberals to
June 7, 2009 - 19:56 ET by gmaniac1What? No board liberals to come and debate the issue of killing babies? I thought this was their bread and butter along with gay marriage.
When the people fear the government it's called tyranny, when the government fears the people it's called liberty!
gm1... ...shhh...it's been
June 7, 2009 - 20:00 ET by bigtimergm1...
...shhh...it's been nice for without them.
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
No Libs Need Apply
June 7, 2009 - 22:56 ET by flyingmonkeyI agree. Shhhhhhh!!! Their selective outrage was making me want to puke.
What About The Soldier?
June 8, 2009 - 09:25 ET by GeneralAlBlaming O'reilly for the killing of Doctor Infanticide is akin to blaming Obama for the killing of the young Army Recruiter by a MUSLIM EXTREMIST!!!! However, there is more probability to the latter than the former! O'reilly doesn't spew hate and venom as does the Tele-Bungler Messiah! He says it in code but he can't hide his hate from those of us who have been hated by the left for the better part of our lives!