Elizabeth Edwards Stammered As 'View' Ladies Hammered

Photo of Tim Graham.
  • Bookmark and Share

Elizabeth Edwards probably didn’t figure one of the toughest interviews on her publicity tour for her book Resilience was going to be an appearance on ABC’s The View on Tuesday.

First, Barbara Walters grilled her on why she wasn’t staying home with her children in the "golden days" she has left and asked if she was simply out for revenge. Several others pressed her on how she could continue to press ahead with her adulterous husband. Ironically, the only softball-thrower on the panel was Elisabeth Hasselbeck.

Edwards stammered through several challenges to her marital decisions. Sherri Shepherd asked how she could renew her vows after the adultery.

SHEPHERD: In talking about going through that healing and grieving,um your husband had asked if you guys could renew your wedding vows for your 30th anniversary, which was July 30, 2007 [ahem, hyped by ABC News.] Now that was seven months after you found out about the infidelity. How were you able to even do this when he asked you to do that?

EDWARDS: I, I, well the truth is, that was in a sense the perfect time to do it to make a, make a statement -- and the vows we said to one another acknowledged the pain that he had caused and said you know, we're going to try to start -- this is the first day of our second marriage in this sense. You know, just try to start-

JOY BEHAR: Do you trust him now? Do you trust him now?

EDWARDS: Not entirely, no. I, it- I, uh, I've been called naive, and perhaps I am. But I'm not that naive. That you know we, we, he, you know, he has a lot of work to do to rebuild that trust.

WHOOPI GOLDBERG: I assume, now trust is very important, as you know. So my question to you is, during the campaign, after you knew that he had done what he had done, you still stood by his side and were out there, knowing that, if they won, if someone were to find this out, we'd be perhaps in four more or eight more years of hell with that. And that was okay with you?

EDWARDS: Well, I, understand that what I believed had happened, was that uh, I was talking about one night. You know, and did I think that one night, uh, you know, one moment of weakness was going to sink him? If I thought that about political figures, it'd be really hard to --

WALTERS: What if you had known then that he had been more --

BEHAR: He told you two days after.

WALTERS: Yeah, what if you had known then, would you still think this is, this is a man who would be a great president? Would you still have campaigned?

EDWARDS: N-no. Understand that I, I still think that it's possible for person, people to have personal human failings and still, and still have policies. Now but what, understand--

BEHAR: But, Elizabeth, we had gone through the Clinton years.

Goldberg and Behar weren’t so much upset that John Edwards was immoral as much as they were upset at the idea that the Democrats would be stuck with another public-relations embarrassment that Republicans could exploit.

The View ladies also pounded away on Mrs. Edwards over whether Rielle Hunter’s love child has a father named John Edwards:

SHERRI SHEPHERD: Now some reports say that she may get a paternity test. You said you're not interested in, in finding out about whose child this is. Is this, do do you think this is something that you need to prepare your children for? If it turns out to be this is a --

EDWARDS: Well, if I, I said -- it was not that I was not interested. But if the whole issue would go away, I’d be, that’d be perfectly happy. Somebody is obviously the father of this child. If that person has other children, then the other children need to be prepared. If that’s my husband, then it is. If it's somebody else, than they need to make certain that their children are prepared for this, this change in their lives.

When I've talked about it, though, you know, it doesn’t, um, the fact doesn't change my relationship with my husband.

WALTERS: I'm not sure I understand. If you found -- I do want to say something about why we're talking to you here, because you've gone through so much and our hearts do go out to you. What we are trying to do is to give some of the questions that you know have been written about that you haven't had a chance to answer. If it does turn out that this is your husband's child, would you leave him?

EDWARDS: No. No, I--

WALTERS: Would you then tell the children and try to have them accept this child?

EDWARDS: Of course, whatever the arrangements turn out to be then would require different conversations. But, but absolutely you'd tell them, have conversations with the children. And it's not like they don't –you know, my children have computers. They, they go on the internet.

WALTERS: Right now you don't think this is his child?

HASSELBECK: Has he had contact with this other woman in terms of if that test is positive?

EDWARDS: Well, well I'm the wrong person to ask about that. I don't think so. But I think that--

WALTERS: You don't think this is his child?

EDWARDS: I-I don't know whose child this is. And, uh, you know, I think that's probably the reason there is no father written on the birth certificate, I understand. But whoever the father is, they're, they’re going uh, uh, to have to deal with the fact that they have this child.

From my perspective, my, and this was the question I was answering for Oprah, my relationship with my husband is not changed by this. What, however it turns out, he did what he did and that's the problem with our marriage. The consequences of it would only matter if he had been trying to start a family with this woman. No one--

SHEPHERD: But you still have to live with the consequences of what you did.

BEHAR: And so do your children.

EDWARDS: But-

SHEPHERD: Every day looking at this child is a, you know, reminder of what was done.

GOLDBERG: But I don't think Elizabeth has to look at the child. That's the whole point.

EDWARDS: That's right. I don't have to.

Finally, here’s the initial exchange where Barbara Walters suggests she’s not spending enough time with her young children:

WALTERS: You have terminal cancer. There are some people who have said you have three children, two of whom are very young, an 11-year-old, Emma Claire, and nine-year-old Jack. Would you not be spending whatever days you have with your children rather than writing a book, going on television shows, touring with it, taking all that time, that precious time away from your children?

EDWARDS: I thought a lot about that and it's not just the book. I'm a senior fellow with the Center for American Progress. I speak about health care. I give speeches to breast cancer groups, do fundraisers for people. I do a lot of traveling away from my children.

And I've often said I wish I knew the answer to this question. If I'm living one year, I live it much differently than if I'm living 10.

WALTERS: Do you have any idea?

EDWARDS: I don't have any idea.

WALTERS: You don't think you should spend these golden days, let's say, with your children

EDWARDS: I think that, I want my children to know a lot of things about me after I'm gone. But one of them is that I cared about things outside of my own life and I tried to make a difference in those areas because that's an important lesson for them to learn. If I don't show it in this instance, how is it that, you know, they're really going to internalize it in the way they might?

WALTERS: Can I ask you another part of that? Because you didn't have to do this book. Were you at all concerned, especially for your little children, that writing so intimately about your intimate affairs with your husband might embarrass them, might make it perhaps a little more difficult at school?

EDWARDS: Well, understand that I wrote this book -- first of all, I agreed to write the book before I knew of any of these things and I decided to keep my agreement to write it, although I has so-- I admit I had some hesitation about it. But I wrote it from my perspective, the things that I went through. I went through these things in my house, with my children.

They actually, it's not like there is some part of this they didn't experience. We try, you try to shield them as much as possible. But if you're screaming at your husband you know, they’re going to know it.

It's kind of odd for Barbara Walters to press someone else about embarrassing family members by telling private tales about extramarital affairs. Barbara did just that in her own recent memoir, Audition.

The transcript was done by MRC's Colleen Raezler.

—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

My opinion(big deal)

My opinion(big deal) is leave this women alone... 

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

Boo Hoo

It's hard to leave her alone when she puts her self out there for media attention at the expense of her children.

“It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds”

Samuel Adams

Exactly!

The media wasn't hounding Elizabeth Edwards over this.  She's proBut if the whole issue would go away, I’d be, that’d be perfectly happy. moting her book, and making the rounds for weeks, spilling her soul out before TV cameras and millions of people.  If the gets tough questions, it's because she has exposed heraelf to this kind scrutiny.

EDWARDS:  "But if the whole issue (paternity of the Hunter baby) would go away, I'd be, that'd be perfectly happy."

Howzit gonna go away if she keeps talking about it? 

I have no empathy for the lady.  Her husband is a bonafide schmuck, but I felt that way about him long before the Rielle Hunter story broke.  She knew he was a schumck, but she stuck by him and played the PR game as long as his candidacy was viable.  They acted out a lie in front of us, and now she wants to come clean.  Sorry, I don't empathize.

 

Only The View can get away with this?

Think about it.  If some conservative asked these questions on national TV they wold have been condemned for not feeling sorry for E. Edwards.  But The View harpies can do it and so it's OK.  BTW, Edwards was FINALLY asked the right questions.  

“It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds”

Samuel Adams

Who knew what and when?

We know Elizabeth Edwards knew before John announced he was running, when did the rest of the press "know"? Anyone want to bet that there was more than one story the NY Times spiked during the election season? I can't believe the National Enquirer was all over this thing and no other press organization had a clue about it. It just shows how little respect liberals have for the office of the presidency. Edwards should be thankful he's a Democrat, if he were a Republican he wouldn't have had a chance to announce before the NY Times had it on the Front Page.

Election 2008-God's way of showing us that elections count.  

Oh Cry Me a

Oh Cry Me a River...

Elizabeth calculated wrong... again.

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

Funny how these Liberal

Funny how these Liberal bra-burning bitches always castigate women they oppose as threats to their ideology by saying they should be at home with the kids.

One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 61% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory (yep...approval for Congress now at 39%...do you believe that!?).

The money quote of the piece

Goldberg and Behar weren’t so much upset that John Edwards was immoral
as much as they were upset at the idea that the Democrats would be
stuck with another public-relations embarrassment that Republicans
could exploit. 
-Tim Graham

Damn Skippy!

 

I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows.  -Bart Simpson

 

double post

I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows.  -Bart Simpson

 

Stop that

 
Stop that doublin' lady! LOL!

Gary

Gettin' along is so much easier than buttin' heads. - My Dad

And funner too! - Me

Stop that

Crap!

 

Gary

Gettin' along is so much easier than buttin' heads. - My Dad

And funner too! - Me

 

 

 

 How perfectly normal for these two, the whole world is about them.

They move into that old guys neighborhood then go to the press and tell every one they are afraid of him.

They talk about the death of their son, to wear like a badge of honor.

They live in a house that is so obscene (28,000 sq foot) but goes out and created a tax-exempt nonprofit organization to fight poverty..(and to get a tax right off.)

http://harpers.org/archive/2008/08/hbc-90003382

 

As soon as the run for the President is over they take away the scholarship they funded..

http://www.newsobserver.com/news/higher_education/story/1160097.html

 

 

They use her cancer to help their own march towards the White House.

She can’t trust him with another woman, yet we were to trust him with our country..

 

He made is slimy living from people that were accidentally hurt by doctors.

 

Think to yourself if you knew were dieing, what would you do?

I would try to golf with my son (when I could not play, I would ride the cart and watch, he is a 1 or 2 handicap), go fishing with my son and daughter, go sailing, I would never miss my grown daughter’s softball games, I would take non-stop pictures of the good times, I would take video so they could show their kids, I would never stop hugging them, and telling them I love them. (With the money that the Edwards have, I would take them around the world).

The Edwards; sell books, run for President, have affairs; show the whole world, (including their own children) their dirty laundry.

What is that line people say in the end, nobody ever said: I wish I spent more time at work.

With the Edwards, I’m not so sure, they can’t see out of their self-important bubble, it seems like even their own children look like props and tools to use to get ahead.

 

These two are as deep as gold plating.

 

Both of these two deserve each other, the dieing and the already dead..

 

Ronald Reagan, 1962: I did not leave the Democratic party, the party left me.

Insert: your name, 2008, and the Republican party.

 

Double Standard

It's always interesting how willing they are to ask the tough questions of some people, but then play brown nose to others. Hillary is probably the most famous of the cheated on wives in politics, yet they never go after her and ask her tough questions about Bill.  Hilary is off limits, yet Ewards is fair game. While I agree that Edwards is a skum bag, him and her, they are pretty low on the totem pole and not really all that news worthy.  Nobody is buying the book, or her excuses for staying married to him. She's in it for the money and the hope that they can somehow rebuild the dream of more political power.  

Took the words right out of my mouth, Eddie.

Where were the witches of Endor when the Arkansas Hillbillies were having their adultery hoedown?  Worthless hypocrites. 

 

 

The great Socio/Economic Experiments of the 20th cent. (communism, socialism, fascism) only killed a few hundred million.  Let's give 'em another try! - me

I agree that if I was dying

I agree that if I was dying and had 2 young children, I'd want to spend as much time as possible with them especially if I had no idea how much time I had left.

Edwards: I think that, I want my children to know a lot of things about me after I'm gone. But one of them is that I cared about things outside of my own life and I tried to make a difference in those areas because that's an important lesson for them to learn. If I don't show it in this instance, how is it that, you know, they're really going to internalize it in the way they might?

So it's all about her ego and how her children perceive HER after she's dead and gone. It's not about what her children want. She'd rather be at a board meeting for the Center for American Progress so her children will think after she's gone, "Wow, I admire mommy for chosing charity work and book tours over us during her final years".

I don't have much sympathy for a person like this.

 

News flash, democrats

News flash, democrats turning on each other.  More to come....

Government's first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives.

Ronald Reagan

What IS it with feminists?

First, Barbara Walters grilled her on why she wasn’t staying home with
her children in the "golden days" she has left and asked if she was
simply out for revenge.

Okay, let's look at this:

  • If a woman chooses to be a stay-at-home mother, a homeschooler, instead of having a career - she's a horrible person and a detriment to women's progress.

But if a woman - like Sarah Palin - is a career woman and a mother, suddenly she's in the wrong and should stay at home.

Now, I'm not a fan of the Edwardses.  I would never vote for John and I find most of Elizabeth's views wrong.  That being said, I think it's terrible she has cancer and that her scumbag of a husband cheated on her.  She doesn't deserve that; nobody does.

So she's doing what feminists say she should do - have a career - and now they chide her for not staying home?  As if she doesn't know she's dying?

The more I see of liberal women, and liberal men, the more I'm convinced it's an extremely abusive, never-ending relationship.  The worst mysoginists and women-haters in the world were/are liberal men and liberal women.  It's a sick, co-dependent relationship doomed to failure.  Which is why liberals hate stay-at-home mothers, conservatives, and anyone else who doesn't buy into the misery they bring about for themselves.

Aut viam inveniam aut faciam

Well?

What did you expect? The left are all 'do as I say, not as I do' hypocrites.

 Walters is not exactly a role model for women or children herself. 

Go Now

These two need to go back to North Carolina and stay there, out of the public eye for ten years or so. He's not that old and he might resuscitate his career then. Until then, seeing either of these two on the tube is like reading someone's divorce proceedings, it makes you feel dirty. Go, now.

But what about Bill's b!tch

So if your husband is the POTUS and he cheats on you it's OK to stand by the SOB, but if he's just running for POTUS and cheats the wife needs to dump him. What the firetruck(minus iretr) kind of logic is that?

It's his kid... and we have the right to know.

Well we all knew Edwards was having an affair, it took this for the MSM to report it.

I would not be surprised if this were his child -- otherwise why would he go to the hospital to visit her and hold it when it was born?

Face it, it looks JUST LIKE HIM.

Should be easy to find out after a DNA test.

What does she have to lose? She is doing  a service to expose one more scummy Democrat... LOL

 

I've said it before and I'll say it again

 this was all to set up for a run for some sort of office. And it's not looking like it'll be a sucessful run. 

WWW.GS2AC.COM. 2nd Amendment Grass Roots Action in the Bay Area, CA. We're not all "Breakfast Cereal" folks here! :)