MediaWeek magazine writer Mike Shields is attacking Bill O’Reilly as "un-American" and "downright offensive" for suggesting liberal newspapers are "out of touch" and reporters will soon be "out of work." (One example is a January 28 column.) Shields accused O’Reilly of "cheerleading the downfall" of the newspaper industry:
There’s another interesting aspect to O’Reilly’s anti-newspaper diatribe. During this horrid economic cycle, when millions of Americans are out of jobs and terrified about their future employment prospects, rooting for American businesses to go under seems way out of touch to me, especially for a commentator who’s constantly talking about sticking up for regular "folks." It kind of sounds, well, un-American.
But in O’Reilly’s view, this is the liberal elite getting what it deserves. The thing is, it’s pretty hard to be elite when you’re on unemployment or raising a family on a salary that’s been cut by 10 percent.
Bill, I’m suggesting you rethink your position here. You may not love the management at the SPI or the Times. You may even have a point regarding treatment of President Bush vs. President Obama. But was the guy who covered the Mariners for the SPI really a lefty communist who deserved to get canned? Were the junior reporters, and photo editors who worked at the Baltimore Sun, which just lost a third of its newsroom, too liberal in your estimation to participate in freedom of the press?
You are painting the media with a pretty broad brush here, and as someone who knows several out-of-work reporters, I find your attacks downright offensive. Plus, you still haven’t explained to me clearly why it’s not OK for a publication to lean left, if that’s what its readers want. Should grungy, crunchy Seattle have only a hard-right newspaper?
Fox News clearly leans toward the conservative point of view, and there’s absolutely nothing wrong with that. In fact, the network’s tremendous success proves that news organizations have missed a huge opportunity to serve this audience for years. So what if The New York Times’ political coverage leans left? Point it out. Disagree with it. But root for its destruction?
What other American industries do you want to die because their politics are not to your liking, or that of your boss, Roger Ailes? Who else do you want to see tossed out on the street?
Typically, the man from MediaWeek wants to deny that a strident liberal bias might be a factor in declining newspaper circulation:
O’Reilly’s theory for why these publications are in such deep trouble is because they have suddenly shifted radically left in their coverage, and readers are rejecting it. That’s why he’s happy.
That theory doesn’t sync with the thinking of most sensible people in the media who understand the industry is going through massive macro changes, and that many Americans—particularly the young—are permanently changing their reading habits away from newspapers and magazines. Not because of political leanings, mind you, but because the generally free technology of the Web trumps the tradition of carbon-based, physically distributed media every time.
Shields noted that all the major newspapers are seeing their online audience grow, which would counteract the notion of an unpopular media bias. He doesn’t seem to consider that conservatives would feel freer to go to the web sites of the Washington Post or New York Times for free – and do so knowing it’s not in any way subsidizing the liberal newspapers by subscribing.
Shields doesn’t seem to realize that if a paper like The New York Times publishes our terror-fighting secrets, that might look "un-American" to many – and it’s certainly not so "un-American" to root for the "un-American" media outlet to struggle.
Media outlets certainly don’t root for the average workers in the industries they don’t consider in the "public interest" – everything from tobacco to oil to coal to the makers of SUVs. In their own mythology, they're supposed to report "without fear or favor." So why can't media critics tell newspapers what might be ailing them?
—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
The reason the circulation
May 18, 2009 - 11:00 ET by capeindieThe reason the circulation and interest in these liberal rags is declining is because of the management and its decicsions to promote lies and deceit. The truth does not exist in journalism anymore...the american people are not stupid and can smell the poop through the expensive air fresheners
Correct and usually it is
May 18, 2009 - 14:40 ET by kgCorrect and usually it is the liberal tilt that is touted as truth. That is exactly why I quit reading news papers and magazines.
"DumbAssity of Dope"
My local paper
May 18, 2009 - 17:47 ET by Kat Outta the BagMy local paper is more and more liberal as time goes on...or maybe I'm just more aware of it. I'd love to cancel my subscription but it's such a habit to read it while I have my breakfast. Besides, what else would the cat lie on while I'm trying to read? ;-)
KOTB...
May 18, 2009 - 17:56 ET by JAB...and what about the bird cage? Although, we call our local liberal rag around here the "Mullet Wrapper" and have for many years.
"Too bad Ignorance isn't painful..."
Mullet Wrapper
May 18, 2009 - 18:11 ET by Kat Outta the BagOur paper used to have a columnist many years ago who called his column The Mullet Wrapper. : )
KOTB
May 18, 2009 - 18:14 ET by JABAt least he was honest (if he was a liberal), I probably would have read his columns just for fun.
"Too bad Ignorance isn't painful..."
and here's an example of the lies and deceipt...
May 18, 2009 - 17:53 ET by timotheThose of you who watch BOR semi-regularly know that he has recently applauded the Atlanta-Journal Constitution's decision to offer more fair and balanced reporting of the news. Yet somehow, the author seemed to miss that little factoid entirely.
I rail against some of the biased coverage by the print media, especially the way the AP framed the war in Iraq and wars in general. But the most eggregious acts of misreporting by the mainstream is NOT what they report, but what they omit.
The reporting of the tea parties or lack thereof was blatantly obviously liberal to the point of being sickening. How could these so called "journalists" who supposedly yearn for the truth, first fail to report the many and varied tea parties before April 15th, then unanimously use the template that talk radio and Fox News caused the large gatherings on April 15th?
I think the new media is finally beginning to break the chains of dominance the old media has had in framing the news. Thank goodness!
Contempt prior to investigation is ignorance.
Ah
May 18, 2009 - 11:03 ET by RowaneAh, they hoist the Stars and Stripes when its THIER jobs, but its just fine to trash the other guy's.
For crying out loud, can they not understand that O'Reilly is a notorious fence straddler?
How DARE he question their
May 18, 2009 - 11:04 ET by motherbeltHow DARE he question their patriotism!!!
I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows. -Bart Simpson
The question is
May 18, 2009 - 11:16 ET by slickwillie2001Simple question: which is better for a healthy democracy, a biased old media that provides one party around a ten-point advantage, or no old media at all?
well
May 18, 2009 - 11:41 ET by RowaneI'd say, none at all
Willie
May 18, 2009 - 14:38 ET by DoktorFrankenNone, of course.
It really doesn't matter that the press ignores the thousands of complaints and subscription cancellations. They are failing - And that's a good thing.
The Progressive Foundation Is Crumbling
May 18, 2009 - 11:16 ET by rammingspeedThey're going down swinging, that's for sure. The progressives will never understand how they've undermined themselves with their bias driven reporting and editorializing. It's mesmerizing to watch. It is not "un-American" or otherwise bad to hope that someone gets their due. That's what O'Reilly does. It's not schadenfreude, it's acknowledging bad behavior and feeling satisfied when someone has, how shall we say, a learning experience.
Not to worry, NB gang we will see tax write-offs, bail-outs etc.
May 18, 2009 - 11:31 ET by upcountrywaterNo way will the MSM die. The democrats needs the MSM it's a symbiotic relationship, they both die, if one does.
Reagan VS 0bama
During this horrid economic
May 18, 2009 - 11:25 ET by NewsbusterbrownDuring this horrid economic cycle, when millions of Americans are out
of jobs and terrified about their future employment prospects, rooting
for American businesses to go under seems way out of touch to me,
especially for a commentator who’s constantly talking about sticking up
for regular "folks." It kind of sounds, well, un-American.
Shields supports all businesses? Yeah, right.
“There are no easy answers' but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)
"O’Reilly’s theory for
May 18, 2009 - 11:29 ET by capeindie"O’Reilly’s theory for why these publications are in such deep trouble is because they have suddenly shifted radically left in their coverage, and readers are rejecting it."
Stop the presses!!!! Newsflash...reporter finally gets a clue!!!!! DUHHHHHHHH
"Sudden Shift Left"?
May 18, 2009 - 13:21 ET by Dan DiegoHardly, it's the sudden spotlight that is now cast upon them by "alternate" media (NB & others) in addition to cable TV and talk radio hosts bold enough to speak the truth and expose their bias and lies.
Well,
May 18, 2009 - 11:35 ET by Delsathe great news outlets aren't going under due to a Conservative "tilt"!
When Bill is right / correct, he is correct! Right?
Exactly
May 18, 2009 - 11:59 ET by KC MulvilleThe news networks are dropping like rocks, but FoxNews is going strong. The NYTimes is collapsing, but the Wall Street Journal is holding steady.
So much for that theory.
→ Exactly KC
May 18, 2009 - 12:06 ET by Cool ArrowMAD Magazine is funny, but I don't go to them for the truth.
"I was fighting a war in Iraq!" - Nancy Lugosi
Who reads, anyway?
May 18, 2009 - 11:43 ET by Franksam...many Americans—particularly the young—are permanently changing their reading habits away from newspapers and magazines. Not because of political leanings, mind you, but because the generally free technology of the Web trumps the tradition of carbon-based, physically distributed media every time.
Many young Americans grew up in a culture that prefers video to print. I turned Sesame Street off for my kids twenty years ago when I realized that it was all about five second bursts and short attention span programming. They are among the few of their friends who read anything, including novels, newspapers, etc.
Their contemporaries are hardly motivated by the 'green' aspects of web content. They like U-Tube, and eschew content which they might have to think about. Just to ramble, the public schools hardly promote the written word as they used to.
Readership is not only down among young people, of course. my wife and I have many friends who obviously do not read a newspaper, because they are incapable of discussing curent events until Jay Leno or David Letterman have told them what to think.
I watch BOR once in awhile. I don't think that he wants the print media to die. He wants them to be independant and analytical. Right now, they are anything but.
Nwewspapers have Websites
May 18, 2009 - 13:11 ET by CobraManMost, if not all, of the newspapers also have websites. This allows those newspapers to have access to those "techno brats," as my mom used to call them. Those websites also has ad revenue available to them in the form of those dreaded banner and flash ads, so those newspapers still have a revenue source available to them AND can enjoy the reduced cost of "printing" online. Yet despite the cost effectiveness of internet sites, those newspapers are STILL having problems, are STILL loosing their audiences! So it can't be the media that the problem, it must be the message.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus.
The US Supreme Court
One of the most depraved,
May 18, 2009 - 11:45 ET by merkavaOne of the most depraved, virulently anti-America/anti-Israel newspapers is circling the drain:
---------
http://www.telegraph...
The future of the owner of The Independent newspaper has been in serious doubt after the group failed to reach an agreement with bondholders over a €200m (£178m) bond.
---------
Couldn't happen to a more deserving gutter-rag, this is the paper that employs the likes of Robert Fisk. If we can get rid of the New York Times and The Guardian as well then the Credit Crunch has almost been worthwhile.
Shields completely loses
May 18, 2009 - 11:57 ET by Gat New YorkShields completely loses his argument by making personal attacks on O'Reilly and misrepresenting what he is doing.
Shields is an ad agency media planner turned trade journalist in the same field. His analysis is highly flawed and shows a lack of comprehension in communications dynamics.
The Left loves to put the
May 18, 2009 - 11:57 ET by KevroyThe Left loves to put the worst spin on everything. Now, Americans are 'terrified' about losing their jobs. Terrified? Worried maybe, but not terrified. The Left continues to work towards their goal of the pussification of America.
Oreilly
May 18, 2009 - 12:24 ET by Six String SpiffFunny how 'open minded' libs despise any opinion they don't agree with. I can guarantee Conservatives read/watch more liberal media than libs do for Conservative media. I have somebody in my family who refuses to listen to anything but NPR... Granted, this person is not a foaming at the mouth liberal, but my point stands. I read Time, Newsweek (more like playing wheres waldo with that pub!) listen to NPR, read Huffington post (God help me), Drudge, Foxnews, Rush Limbaugh (when I can) and Jay Severine.
Those pretty much balance themselves out and I can get a really good idea of where the truth is. Liberals want to shut down other POV that aren't theirs.. I have never undertsood that.
Islamic Religious Services Will Be Held at the Firing Range At 0800 Daily.
The mantra of the left has become if you don't support Marxism,
May 18, 2009 - 12:28 ET by R D Helm...same-sex marriage, the murder of unborn children, and whatever other perversion they can possibly come up with in the future, just like these "newspapers do," then you are somehow un-American, and even immoral.
Screw them.
-Dave
Screw them a little at a time-
May 18, 2009 - 12:52 ET by JIMMY1660once i was able to confirm 100% that our home town paper had thrown me under the bus. I wrote and I called-addressing my concerns.chin music. so, once i wrote for the last time to cancel my home delivery and i would not support any advertisers in their paper. low and behold-that paper is struggling. there must be more of Me's????You are not alone your vote and voice do count.speak up and vote.
BHO- the one term DIMOCRAT
"un-American" and "downright offensive"
May 18, 2009 - 12:30 ET by urbuggenmeIsn't it kind of hard to justify paying out a salerary to "the liberal elite reporters" when their readership only equals that of a small local news-shopper paper that is left in your drive that you don't even pay for in the first place?
per the MSM;
I am a respectable, right winged extremist, tea bagging, trailer park living, bigoted, racist, gay bashing homophobe, democrat slamming, liberal trashing, ACLU cussing, gun toting, Muslim hating, SUV driving - gas guzzling, hippies use the side door to enter, cigarette smoking by the No Smoking sign, beer drinking, meat eating, resource wasting, free internet porno watching, God fearing Christian, employed full time, tax paying, white trash redneck and single
To all the Main Stream
May 18, 2009 - 12:54 ET by Ruths husband BenTo all the Main Stream Media underlings who do not support the leftist liberal leanings of their owners and management: You lie down with dogs, you wake up with fleas.
Sorry, but if it takes you losing your job to dynamite your leadership out of their unelected office as Obama lapdogs, I'll be glad to see you at the soup kitchen.
"Who are you going to believe, me or all that lying data?!"
-Al Gore
Its Right for Me but Not for Thee!
May 18, 2009 - 13:03 ET by GeneralAlAs usual, the Communist loving press has its rose colored glasses on! Its OK for Smith and Wesson to go out of business and eliminate jobs because we all know that guns kill people! Its OK if auto workers are out of work because SUVs waste gas! Tobacco, popcorn oil, etc.. As long as it is a liberal industry, it must be preserved. For that reason, we must preserve the newspapers and other non productive jobs for the furtherence of the liberal establishment!
Two words...
May 18, 2009 - 13:17 ET by CobraManThis reminds me of the Direct TV ad that shows the Cable Company, Inc. being beaten by Direc TV. In that ad is the line "Two words: Federal bailout!" One of the executives answers: "I've seen our profit/loss statement and we do qualify!" Just like that commercial, this is has a request for federal bailout written all over it!
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus.
The US Supreme Court
Dissecting the reasoning of a libtard:
May 18, 2009 - 13:31 ET by mattm"rooting for American businesses to go under" - is that what he's doing? Nope. BTW - ever hear of left-wing whipping boy Walmart?
"...it’s pretty hard to be elite when you’re on unemployment." Idiotic argument. The unemployment was the result of the elitist attitude of the MSM, not a symptom of it.
"...was the guy who covered the Mariners ...a lefty communist who deserved to get canned?" Not the point, Shields.
I could go on, but the coup de grâce is this: "the network’s (FOX) tremendous success proves that news organizations have missed a huge opportunity to serve this audience for years." Exactly O'Reilly's point!
This is typical liberal arguing technique: Misrepresent your opponents view, set up straw men arguments to refute, and then, usually, say something that actually proves your opponent's point!
Oh yeah, don't forget the veiled insults "the thinking of most sensible people." i.e. implying that O'Relilly is not sensible. This is another mark of liberal rhetoric - the pot calling the kettle black.
What a dufus!
Well I'll be durned, a
May 18, 2009 - 13:45 ET by ConservativeRexWell I'll be durned, a liberal who doesn't get it.
Every single one of those newspapers that went out of busniess and every single one that is struggling at this moment had a chance to turn things around and increase their readership. By doing one single thing. Change their ideology. Even by half. They did not do it. They would not do it. So, there is always a penalty to pay.
An old man I knew used to say "I may look like a horses ass, but I'll be durned if I'm gonna let them treat me like one". So we continue to say, tough, go out of business, you newspapers don't respect us, find someone else to buy your propaganda.
BOR is to the Newspaper Industry as....
May 18, 2009 - 14:45 ET by Kingfish17Does everyone here remember their SAT and ACT tests?
Bill O'Reily is to the Newspaper Industry as the MSM was to the War in Iraq.
If BOR wants the liberal newspaper industry to fail, and he is taking "enjoyment" from people losing their jobs in that industry, then what can be said for the MSM from late 2003 through 2008?
They wanted the war in Iraq to fail, and they took great joy in publishing and keeping a running total of all the war dead.
Now I ask, what position is more "Un-American"?
"I've sentenced boys younger then you to the gas chamber. Didn't want to do it, but I felt I owed it to them." Judge Smails
Budadum dum dum
May 18, 2009 - 14:52 ET by general companyAnother one bites the dust
How do you think I'm going to get along
Without you when you're gone
You took me for everything that I had
And kicked me out on my own
My Gov. thinks I am dangerous, so be careful
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
Sam Walton Could Have Taught These People Something
May 18, 2009 - 15:09 ET by Tyler DurbinAny company that consistently treats its clients with disrespect (or in some cases, contempt) deserves to fail. In taking such blatantly partisan positions, some of these news organizations have effectively raised their middle finger to half the population. What did they expect?
There is no question that the Leftist slant has damaged...
May 18, 2009 - 15:25 ET by ThalpyThere is no question that the leftist slant has damaged many newspapers in the United States and we can only hope that the trend continues until a suitable, objective form takes their place. The press doesn't have to hold back on its criticism of people and issues, but they should throw in the truth from time to time. This applies to all of the MSM where the slant is obvious.
The very idea of having that little Leftist twit, Stephanopoulos telling us what just happened in the world is preposterous! He should still be out looking for ways to keep all of the Clinton women from spilling the beans. You know, the job he did for Hillary when she still believed she could be POTUS. Talk about the epitome of the fox in the hen house!
I'll take both sides here/
May 19, 2009 - 04:34 ET by DeskpilotHardwood new is TERMINAL, let the greenies rejoice! look at all the trees to be saved from harvest in the circulation decline.
Subscription rates of hardwood media is tanking for at least two key reasons that are both realted and independent.
1) A subscription to that which is alternativesly free is an expenditure of discretionary income. FACT. If I have to choose between $4 for a gallon of gas or $4 for a hardwood news, I'll take the recycled dinosaur over the recycled paper everytime.
2) If discretionary expenses was NOT an issue, I would be mindful of where I spnd my money anywasy. I choose not to support businesses that conflict with my lifestyle, and support those that do.
I will go to the sandwich shop owned by a single mother(recent grad to grandmother) who has a great passion for her choice of business, over the national chain that make a competing prodct, though not nerely as tasty. Capelli's of BEAR DE beats SUBWAY everyday.
A key parallel indicator that Mr. Shields misses is in the TV News ratings. Hardwood press that looks and sounds like most of the cable news is failing fast. News sources, like ANY selection on FOX offer far more fact as an issue of a report than conflicting opions on an issue. When discussion on an issue is had, FOX works exceptionally hard to present both sides.
FOX personalities makes no bones about their position on an issue, but that don't steer the discussion or condemn the opponets viewpoint unless, as they often are, tehy are flat out wrong or misrepresenting thier side of the issue. Then they get called on it and next thing you know, ya gotta call engineering to clean up the slobbering mess all over the floor.
Personally, I grab a host of RSS feeds with my morning coffee, and browse web news that isn't available by RSS. Out the door and on my way, i brak out the laptop on the 1:10 bus ride to work and read the RSS I grabbed earlier. (A cell broadband connection would come under the heading of discretionary). I repeat the process in the afternoon for the return trip.
Up to date, not waste on the bus, and no profit for abd service providing harwood news.
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read it in English, You're welcome - Deskpilot, AM(H)1 (AW), USN (Ret)