PBS Planning to Kick Out Stations That Broadcast 'Sectarian' Religious Programs

Photo of Tim Graham.

Here’s one sign that the zeitgeist in Barack Obama’s Washington is going to please the secular left. On Saturday, Washington Post reporter Paul Farhi highlighted a policy shift brewing inside PBS: the PBS Board is going to vote in June on a committee’s recommendation that PBS strip the affiliation of any station that carries "sectarian" content. Broadcast religious programming – like a Catholic Mass – and you’ll lose every PBS program from Sesame Street to the NewsHour.

Apparently, PBS passed a fairness-and-balance policy in 1985 that insisted on "Three Nons" – noncommercial, nonpartisan, and nonsectarian.

Are they serious? PBS routinely fails at nonpartisanship, and its programs have long been a commercial bonanza for savvy "nonprofiteers." The "sectarian" use of PBS, by comparison, is quite rare and localized.

Farhi reports that WHUT, based at Howard University in Washington, has already informed the Archdiocese of Washington it will cancel its "Mass for Shut-Ins" if the PBS Board approves the policy. But here’s where it gets weird: WHUT’s general manager, Jennifer Lawson, a former top PBS manager, chairs the committee that’s recommending the anti-sectarian policy.

But the current proposal would deem "religious services of faith-based groups" as inappropriate, she said. "The intent is for [PBS stations] to show editorial independence," Lawson said.

That’s an odd quote, considering that the current practice of a few stations having a more sectarian character shows "editorial independence." Stripping these stations to conform to a more national model means less editorial independence. Here’s more from the Farhi report:

A strict ban would leave stations such as WLAE in New Orleans with a dilemma: Stop airing its daily telecast of Catholic Mass or end its affiliation with PBS. The station, which is partly owned by a Catholic lay group, has been presenting the morning Mass since it went on the air in 1984.

"We don't want to lose our association with PBS, because they provide a lot of fine programs," said Ron Yager, the station's vice president and general manager. "But at the same time, we need to serve our community. We've built an identity around this. People know us for this."

Yager said his station has never received a complaint about the Mass telecast in the 25 years it has aired. "I'm really not totally sure of their reasoning for doing this," he said.

Lawson said her station has never had a complaint about its Mass broadcasts, either. But the program has sparked interest from other religious groups that would like the station to broadcast their church or mosque services, she said. "We just have to tell them that ['Mass for Shut-Ins'] is a legacy program, and that we don't have the wherewithal or inclination to do any more," she said.

Is this why Lawson’s committee is pushing for an end to "sectarian" content? Muslims are demanding air time from the mosques? Here’s more:

Like WLAE, some public TV stations are licensed to religious organizations that tailor locally produced shows to their beliefs.

KBYU in Provo, Utah, for example, is operated by Brigham Young University, which in turn is affiliated with the Mormon Church. The station airs much of the usual PBS fare -- "Arthur," "Barney," "The NewsHour With Jim Lehrer" -- but also broadcasts two hours a day of "BYU Devotional," which includes lectures from leaders of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. KMBH, based in the Rio Grande Valley of Texas and licensed to an affiliate of the Diocese of Brownsville, carries Sunday Mass broadcasts, Bible study in Spanish, and a family issues program hosted by a priest. In 2007, the station drew national attention when it declined to air "Hand of God," a critically praised "Frontline" documentary about clergy sexual abuse.

Jan McNamara, a PBS spokeswoman, declined specific comment, saying only, "We're still gathering feedback from our members to see where they stand."

Current.org, which reports on the public broadcasting community, had more detail in an earlier report, but it’s quite clear that Jennifer Lawson’s committee is eager to protect the "erosion" of the PBS brand that religious programming represents:

Station Services Committee Chair Jennifer Lawson told Current that the board is striving to achieve "some degree of clarity of what sectarian programming is, and it would be assumed that a religious service like a Mass would be sectarian."

In contrast, she said, shows like the journalistic Religion & Ethics Newsweekly or the geo-history documentary Walking the Bible are acceptably nonsectarian.

The rule could affect Lawson’s own station; she is g.m. of Howard University’s WHUT in Washington, which carries Mass for Shut-ins on Sundays. Denver’s KBDI also airs a local Mass. If the membership pact changes, stations that run worship services would be advised to "migrate that off of public television," she predicted.

Lawson said the board will vote on the Three Nons issue before its next meeting, June 14-16 [2009].

The committee explained its backing for the Three Nons rules in a draft of its report. The committee "believes that if PBS or its Member Stations were perceived by the public to be ‘commercial,’ ‘political’ or ‘sectarian,’ PBS could be hampered in its ability to carry out its mission."

PBS, it continues, "places a high value on presenting diverse perspectives, as opposed to rigidly adhering to any single political or religious point of view."

Allowing such programming "would cause the public’s trust in PBS to erode, along with the value of the brand."

Erosion of a brand? That doesn’t sound non-commercial. It sounds very corporate. Look down at the bottom of the Current.org article, and you’ll see PBS recommending changes to make a better impression with....Nielsen ratings counters. That doesn’t sound non-commercial, either.

The craziest part of all of this is the PBS managers who can suggest PBS places a "high value" on "diverse perspectives" on politics.

—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center.

Read commentsFree email alertsTake action

Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Just Drop the Show Jennifer ...

there really is no need to go through all these gyrations.   With the advent of cable, few but true believers watch PBS offerings.

PBS for years stated that

PBS for years stated that Public TV and Radio were needed because of a dearth of programming.  Today with the advent of cable, satellite, Iinternet, DVD etc we have TOO MUCH programming options.

PBS used to hae breaks in their historical programming when they would run a branding commercial that would say "If not PBS, Who?" and I would scream at my TV "The History Channels, History International, Discovery, A&E, HBO, and the rest."

Public broadcastings day is over.  THose public stations should surrender their valuable bandwidth to more useful (And non-partisan) activities.

In these troubled times ..

shouldn't the valuable broadcast licenses be auctioned off?

Agree, much revenue could be

Agree, much revenue could be made if done properly and few taxes would be required.

if PBS or its Member

if PBS or its Member Stations were perceived by the public to be ‘commercial,’ 

Are they joking?

Maybe they don't interrupt programs with commericials, but on what planet is (paraphrasing) Sesame Street [or whatever program] is made possible by a grant from.... not an advertisement?

They might say "Wow, that sucks!"  But at least they'll say "Wow!"  -Duff Goldman, the Ace of Cakes

I guess its time to take

I guess its time to take the public out of Public Television and change it to the Progressive Television Network.

http://teleprompteri...

I don't watch PBS

all that much but I haven't heard ANYONE complaining about them broadcasting catholic or religious programing.  This is just another attempt to silence religious people in general and catholics in particular.

Gotta remain "politically correct" don't you know.  We can't offend anyone.  EXCEPT for the people that are religious because they believe in "antiquated" ideas and ideals and they're not as VOCAL as other minority groups, (NAACP, Homosexuals, feminists, etc...)

However, if no one from the private sector is complaining about the programing, WHY change it?  This is nothing but a politcally motivated dog and pony show.  Gotta have the federal dollars keep rolling in.  Freakin' hypocrites.  Lord, I HATE politicians and their PC BULLSH!T. 

 

It's GOD'S job to judge the terrorists.  It's OUR mission to arrange the meeting. - US Marine Corps.

Gary Huggins There's one

Gary Huggins

There's one way to end this dilemma. Forge legislation to eliminate all PBS stations. These broadcasts are rife with anti religious actors and only furnish an activist sector of the country that I know. Times are very fiscally difficult. Now would be a perfect time to abolish such wastes of time and monies. I will personally give of my resources to ANY congress person to acheive this end.

NPR too

National Public Radio, too

 http://www.onenewsnow.com/Culture/Default.aspx?id=510936

NPR:
""places a high value on presenting diverse perspectives, as opposed to
rigidly adhering to any single political or religious point of view."

Two Arizona stations have to get rid of religious programs which were actually raising some revenue for
the stations...

 

Show a catholic program? 

Show a catholic program?  No, they won't want to do that as it might "Support" something.

But they sure as hell would show a four part ballet of the founding of the aids quilt by the Gay Pride Reperatory Dance Company.

They were for localization

They were for localization before they went against localization, and after they get by with cancelling shows by not being the bad-guys (It's policy, ya know!), they'll be for localization again. 

As for diversity in political views, it's a no-brainer that most of their stuff is left-leaning.

WE THE PEOPLE of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare,

What public TV should be

"We don't want to lose our association with PBS, because they provide a lot of fine programs," said Ron Yager, the station's [WLAE in New Orleans] vice president and general manager. "But at the same time, we need to serve our community. We've built an identity around this. People know us for this."

If you can forget for a moment what NPR has become, what Yager says seems closer to the spirit of what a public TV station should be.

It also seems contrary to the spirit of the Constitution for the government to control a huge radio and TV operation, especially one which offers "news".  I bet if the Founders could have foreseen public broadcasting, they'd have banned it.  

When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.

Your grandmother is a thief

Everytime someone mentions PBS, I think of Michael Nesmith. The former lead guitarist and songwriter for the Monkee's, among other things, invented MTV and founded Pacific Art Video, one of the first companies to market video programs for the home entertainment market. To make a long story short, PBS stiffed Nesmith and Pacific Arts over home video licensing rights and payments for several series, including Ken Burns' The Civil War. After winning $47 million in compensatory and punitive damages in court, Nesmith uttered his now famous comment, "It's like finding your grandmother stealing your stereo. You're happy to get your stereo back, but it's sad to find out your grandmother is a thief."

PBS is so far gone it's off

PBS is so far gone, it's off my radar - I rarely think of it. Even up to a few years ago, I'd occasionally watch "Mystery!" - especially the Sherlock Holmes and Hercule Poirot episodes. Now, I have the DVDs, I don't even think of PBS when I'm trying to see if there's anything on.

Having said that, the alternative cable channels have lost their original concepts that gave us so much variety. Remember when A&E actually had arts and cultural programming? When the Travel Channel was involved totally with travel and not poker games? And, finally, the History Channel concentrated on history only and not Global Warming? I think NBC buying up so many cable channels to dump it's old Law&Order episodes had something to do with this.

The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.

CUT all federal and state

CUT all federal and state funding for PBS.

A nation cannot be free without a free, unbiased media. We are not free.