Bill Moyers Misleads the Press

Photo of Tim Graham.

PBS omnipresence Bill Moyers isn’t proud of his power-lusting service as a White House hatchet man for Lyndon Johnson. But he isn’t doing himself or PBS any favors by misleading reporters who are nosing around into how he helped invade the sexual privacy of the White House staff in the LBJ era. Over at Slate, Jack Shafer first wrote a great piece on how Moyers wanted the press man-handled for Lyndon. (Read the whole thing.)

Then he added a piece that did some sleuthing to demonstrate that Moyers, that scold of Republican truth-mangling, tried to mislead The Washington Post. Shafer, a left-leaning libertarian sort, insisted "my beef with Moyers isn't what he did in the mid-1960s but his refusal to acknowledge in a straightforward manner what he did." Here's how it unfolded:

The Washington Post asked him last week to comment on its discovery that he had directed the FBI to investigate Johnson administration figures who were "suspected as having homosexual tendencies." He confessed to the Post via e-mail of having scant memories of the incidents of four decades ago but volunteered that the inquiries could have been in response to allegations brought to Johnson by FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover.

Paging through Michael Beschloss’s book from Johnson’s secretly recorded White House tapes of 1964-65, Reaching for Glory, Shafer spied Moyers smack dab in the middle of guessing who was gay on the White House staff, perhaps Jack Valenti, the future lobbyist for Hollywood:

Cartha "Deke" DeLoach, assistant director of the FBI and Hoover's liaison to Johnson, handled the administration's mop-up of the Jenkins affair and took instructions directly from the president on how to proceed. On Oct. 27, they had this conversation:

DeLoach: Mr. President. … I know how busy you are, but this is so humorous, I felt like I just had to tell you. We got a rumor that—in fact, Bill Moyers knew about it and asked me to check it out—that [a member of the Johnson staff] was involved in a homosexual incident down in Houston, Texas.

LBJ: I believe anything now, so check them all out...

Shafer added:

Beschloss adds in a note that "Jack's FBI" is a reference to the "FBI investigation LBJ ordered on all top staff and Cabinet members after the Jenkins episode." Indeed, in response to Johnson's criticisms that a just-discovered prior arrest of Jenkins proved that the White House staff hadn't been adequately checked by the FBI as he had demanded, Deke DeLoach told the president on Oct. 14, "I'll check to make certain that everybody on your staff has had that check." So, contrary to Moyers bit of dissembling to the Post, the administration's investigations were not initiated by Johnson after hearing from Hoover.

Moyers has a reason to hope that everyone under 60 forgets, after all his PBS moralizing on shows with titles like The Secret Government, and after suggesting Reagan should be impeached for Iran-Contra dishonesty in a documentary suggestively titled High Crimes and Misdemeanors.

The more that uncooperative writers peek under the rocks of Bill Moyers in government service, the phonier he looks. He looks, unsurprisingly, like a Democratic hack who became a Democratic hack media star on PBS, a network launched by LBJ's Democratic hacks.

—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Moyers

Moyers, that's a vaguely familiar name. Is he a memebr of Acting President Obama's staff?

Yeah, I think so.

But his actual place of work is at PBS.  In any case, his salary is paid for with tax dollars.

Impunitas semper ad deteriora invitat.

We know how this is going to go

Moyers has two ways to go here:

  1. Deny the accusation. Which means we rely on the evidence presented by the journalists. He could be innocent, of course, but with all the shenanigans already reported about LBJ's (pardon the pun) liberal use of the police power for political purposes, it wouldn't surprise me.
  2. Moyers could argue that as a tainted veteran of these abuses, he's in a unique position to discover and morally explain them. Of course, who has more credibility, the criminal who ignored morality the first time, or the innocent citizen who never stooped to crime?

(Similarly, why is Bristol Palin an expert on abstinence when she failed it, but another teenager who successfully remained abstinent is never considered? But I digress ...)

Frankly, I was against Moyers' moralizing already. The idea that he was also a hypocrite at the same time, well, that doesn't much surprise me.

"my beef with Moyers isn't

"my beef with Moyers isn't what he did in the mid-1960s but his refusal
to acknowledge in a straightforward manner what he did."

In typical lefist mode, (I don't care if he is a libertarian, it's a leftist  tenet....which probably explains the "left-leaning" part) it doesn't matter how horrendous the acts, it's the fact that Moyers doesn't admit to them, that's the problem.  

If he would just admit it and show some remorse......

I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows. -Bart Simpson

I am not so sure.

When John Edwards was finally forced to admit his sin, it seems that liberals were petulant that he had to bother to admit it. 

Perhaps, however, as his sin was adultery – and not creeping Nazism – leftists would argue that that was no sin at all.

Impunitas semper ad deteriora invitat.

Bill Moyers

The only many Senator Goldwater despised, no hated was Bill Moyers...enough said....

No surprise

So here's the Politburo version:

  It doesn't matter you're a lying hypocrite. Because you are firmly on th plantation it doesn't matter. What does matter is you don't own up to it. Cry out your guilt to your comrades, Mr. Moyers, you're among friends!

 

Moyers continues to tie

Moyers continues to tie himself into a pretzel with each successive explanation of past behavior.  The man of virtue and moral clarity is really nothing but a hypocrite.

If the MSM-types are becoming uncomfortable with Moyers, his days 'on the air' or 'in print' or 'online' are truly numbered.

Moyers

It's remarkable that Rev. Moyers has failed to discuss his assocation with the 'Daisy Ad" of 1964.  He either has to admit this kind of 'Politics of Fear' was and is appropriate or he needs to ?repent? (he claims to be a minister) for his many deceitful and outragous activities he sanctioned.