In The Tank, Fashionably: Vogue Hosted Fundraiser Starring Michelle Obama Before She Was Cover Girl

Photo of Tim Graham.
  • Bookmark and Share

In Monday’s Washington Post, media reporter Howard Kurtz raised a question few in the media have asked in all the cooing over Michelle Obama’s cover story in Vogue magazine. Isn’t it relevant to know that the writer, Andre Leon Talley, was also a host of an $1,000-a-head Obama fundraiser starring Mrs. Obama? (NBC’s Today didn’t say a word about that in a gauzy interview with Talley last week celebrating how Michelle was at the "red hot center" of both fashion and politics.) Kurtz reported:

The Vogue cover story on Michelle Obama, by editor at large André Leon Talley, is nothing if not laudatory: "With her long, lean, athletic frame, she moves as if she could have danced with Alvin Ailey in another life. Curled up in the corner of a huge taupe velvet sofa, wearing knee-high boots as she nestles into the cushions, she almost seems like any other mom recently relocated to a city because of her husband's new job."

The Talley article mentions briefly that Obama showed up "at a fundraiser I co-hosted last year." That would be a $1,000-a-head fundraiser -- "An Evening With Michelle Obama" -- also hosted by Vogue editor Anna Wintour and designer Calvin Klein.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Wouldn't the story have had more credibility if written by someone who hadn't helped the Obama campaign raise money? Vogue Managing Editor Laurie Jones says Talley "has enjoyed a personal relationship with Mrs. Obama" since meeting her at an Oprah Winfrey party in 2005 and acknowledged working as a campaign volunteer. "André wrote a uniquely personal piece," she says, that "was possible only because of his access to the family."

Talley appeared in the second hour of NBC’s Today on February 11, and co-host Meredith Vieira disclosed nothing of Talley’s political activism. She asked how they met at this Oprah Winfrey party:

TALLEY: And it was extraordinary because everything that Michelle--everything that she said--or she talked to me like she'd known me, and I was so stunned when she said, `Well, I do know you and I read your column.' And my jaw dropped at the table just like that. And then I saw her at the ball dancing beautifully with President Obama--now President Obama, and she just is an amazing woman. I think it comes from just being solid, having good family values. Growing up in a home where there was love, a father that sacrificed everything for her, you know. He had multiple sclerosis, and he was working in public works, and just, he was wonderful.

VIEIRA: And she's all about the opposite of exclusivity...because that was not her life.

TALLEY: No, inclusiveness. Right after the inaugural, on the second day, she was inviting people to the White House, and some of her friends who had dropped in from Chicago, told me that there were people standing at the White House gates that needed to have these cards to get in, and the SS--the security service says, `Well, you don't have a card, we can't let you in.' But Michelle looked out the window and saw these people and said, `Let them in, it's cold.'

NBC and others could notice that the only First Ladies on the cover of Vogue have been Hillary Clinton and Michelle Obama, but they couldn't raise the idea that perhaps the fashion magazines have a trendy liberal bias? Instead, Today ran long, loving shots of the Michelle cover, with Nat King Cole's "Unforgettable" playing underneath. 

Some were openly dismissive that Vogue magazine counts as journalism. On Kurtz's CNN show Reliable Sources on Sunday, PBS host Gwen Ifill insisted Talley was not a journalist. "This is Vogue we're talking about. So I mean, it's not like he's a journalist, Andre Leon Talley."

—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Caveat emptor

The charm offensive is on. The Obamas are attractive and charming people. So what? Like they say about lawyers, when you have the facts, argue the facts. When you have no facts, pound the table. Here, having no facts, they turn on the charm.

Yeah, I know they've been selling candidates since elections began. I didn't like it before Obama, and I don't like it now. When I sense that they're turning on the charm, it makes me protect my wallet. Unfortunately, this time they picked my pocket first; the charm is only intended to prevent me from being angry about it.

Didn't work for me.

As always, KC

You've summed it up neatly.

Don't even get me started about the oh-so-fashionable Michelle (NOT!).

 

KC

As i heard it, it went:

When you have the law --- pound the law

When you have the facts --- pound the facts

When you have neither --- pound the table

The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.” -- Chief Justice John Roberts

Hey, b.....I just quoted

Hey, b.....I just quoted that in another thread!

GMTA!

I call it the old rule of lawyering LOL

Don't you just love this:

The Talley article mentions briefly that Obama showed up "at a fundraiser I co-hosted last year."

The event was called "An Evening With Michelle Obama" and  she "showed up." 

What are the odds??????????? ROFL!!

 

I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows. -Bart Simpson

MB

 I was thinking the same thing. How nice of her to just show up randomly, on the same night that he was having an event called "an evening with Michelle O?" Why, she is prescient! To just guess that it would be a good time. Wow. What they all say about her must be true! She is brilliant. I'm sorry, I hate to be cruel, but I have never seen any dancer with the AA dance group with thighs and hips that big. Some of them have junk in the trunk, but she is by no means lithe and svelte like a dancer.

 

All a Democrat needs is the upper-story window of public attention and the chamber pot of rhetoric. How else to explain the rise of Joe Biden?  P.J. O' Rourke

;^ )

amazing ain't it?

The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.” -- Chief Justice John Roberts

buttoned up

Mrs. Obama has been buttoned up. The political party that claims to "support women" has turned her into a clothes horse. She can't be trusted to talk to reporters, because it's too hard to spin her comments into what she should have said. So she will spend the next four years being an unpaid fashion model (well not quite unpaid since her photo sessions will cost the taxpayers a bundle.

Yup. The liberal media has

Yup. The liberal media has effectively turned Mrs. Obama into the next Jackie Kennedy. Just part of the attempt to recreate Camelot. I'll bet things aren't going too well between Mrs. O and Rahm Emmanuel these days.

Michelle Obama, unforgettable????

Gee whiz I'm impressed. Does anyone think a magazine piece like this isn't expected? I'm surprised the media doesn't carry the Obama's around in "sudan chairs" whenever they're in public. Talley compares Michelle with an Alvin Ailey dancer, yeah if the dancer is doing a longshoreman dance. I'm convinced Obama's presidency will be a total failure and just like a brand new penny, Obama looks good but he's not worth much, he should take too weeks off and then quit....

You go, Roscoe

I laughed out loud when I read the comparison to an Alvin Ailey dancer.  Michelle Obama is a tall, large, clod who walks like she's wading upstream.  When she opens her mouth she removes all doubt as to her nasty, pushy personality.  Maybe the White House is sending her to some charm school, but she won't need it with the liberal media love affair.  Let's face it, they took a miserable marriage of convenience between a drug-using, philandering politician and his golddigger wife and turned it into "Camelot," why wouldn't they try to turn an empty suit socialist and his witchy, klutsy wife into a similar fairy tale?  Because we all know that the vast majority of Americans only know and believe the pictures and sound bites they see on TV or read in the headlines of the glossy magazines at the grocery store.

Baby Got Back!!!!!

Oh my, another closely held opinion of mine is that Michelle is equipped with the back side of a "charging rhinoceros" swaggering along during mating season.

Good evening Roscoe

There was a british comedy called "The fall And Rise Of Reginald Perrin". If you ever get the chance watch it. Michele plays his mother-in-law. There are some clips on Youtube.

Jesus Loves You

Klingon?

Somewhere on the blogs I saw her referred to as M'chell, a reference to her Klingon-like forehead.

Michelle is ugly

You guys must be wearing invisible clothes while drinking your Kool Aid.  Aesthetic standards for our ongoing 2,500+ year-old white (Western) civilization do not include black beauty standards.  Once you start mongrelizing beauty, then anything is possible, like Chief Justice Robert's suicidal quote attempting to browbeat whites into pacifism for defending themselves.  When you are sufficiently conditioned, then you will happily watch miscegenation TV ads and programs, while speeding to the extinction of white (Western) civilization as set forth in Pat Buchanan's Death of the West.

Want to know who you should really be fighting?  Ask yourselves what group has for millennia relentlessly undermined white (Western) civilization through economic monopolies and manipulation, abortion promotion, toxic "entertainment" propaganda, family-destroying feminism, corrupting public education, leavening Christianity, etc.  Here's a hint:  It's not the blacks, they're just puppets.

The enemy knows our primary survival archetypes are our race and our religion.  That's why they so virulently attack those who defend those archetypes.  There are several of those attacking serpents posting on this website.  Neutralize them then start talking about survival tactics.  Remember:  If all objections must be satisfied before action is taken, then action will never be taken. 

:-0 “There are no easy

:-0

“There are no easy answers' but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)

Here's a suggestion, Minutemen...

Here's a suggestion, Minutemen...

Why not demonstrate a little courage and actually identify the "group" which has "undermined (Western) civilization through economic monopolies and manipulation..." instead of just simply hinting around about it.  And while you're at it, go ahead and name the "attacking serpents"  posting at NB so the members will know exactly whom to "neutralize".

Jer

I'm rarely speechless

but.....Oh Wow.

He had my vote

Shawn

  If you turn over you will be saying MOM

Don't look Ethyl!

Don't look Ethyl! Jesus Loves You

M. Obama

I have my own whacko premonition about Mrs. Obama. I think she has already become weary of White House life. A four-day "holiday" trip to Chicago and then on to Denver? It would look very bad, but I wonder if any sitting President's spouse has ever chosen to live somewhere other than the White House. I mean, for as long as the White House has been the President's primary residence. Of course, the media would find some way to spin it so that it's just another example of "Change".

P.S. As a conservative woman, I find it just as offensive to criticize Mrs. Obama based on any personal opinion re: her appearance as it would be for libs to take personal potshots at Laura Bush. I think it cheapens the discussion. JMO Now Nancy Pelosi? That's a whole 'nother subject. Pelosi would likely be more attractive if she weren't trying so hard to push back the hands of Father Time.

QM

Public figures are just that. Open to all scrutiny. Just as they made fun of Barbara Bush, Nancy Reagan and Laura Bush, those of us on the right will point out their hypocrisy to them. It is one thing to call her an attractive woman, but to continue to attribute to her Jackie O qualities, professional dance gracefulness, brillance, etc. And you really think it is wrong for people to point this out?  Feel free to express yourself in whatever way you choose, just don't expect others to toe your line.

 

All a Democrat needs is the upper-story window of public attention and the chamber pot of rhetoric. How else to explain the rise of Joe Biden?  P.J. O' Rourke

Hey tbdi...good

Hey tbdi...

good afternoon.

I'm just curious as to why you seem to want to let QM she can feel free to post her own opinions here, but she shoudln't expect others to toe her line.

I don't think she even implied such a thing here.

I'm getting tired of seeing intentional picking on QM here...like I have said before, none of us agree all the time, she has been here a long time too....and she has always treated everyone with respect if she is treated the same.

I hate seeing this constant gang up on her here. 

BT- Everyone here can have their own

opinion. If I misrepresented that, then I am sorry. As for toeing the line, that is my interpretation. And for your final point, I was expressing an opinion. Not picking on anyone. Perhaps you should read some of the posts I have seen lately. If attacking people and making character assasignations on them is respect, then you and I have a different definition. Petty little comments about a person's private life, is not respect.  Also, I don't belong to any gangs, to the best of my knowledge. I haven't been here but 3 mos., but I was under the impression we were all equal here. Was I wrong in that assumption?

 

All a Democrat needs is the upper-story window of public attention and the chamber pot of rhetoric. How else to explain the rise of Joe Biden?  P.J. O' Rourke

tbdi... I know very well

tbdi...

I know very well what all has been going on here...I'm not blind.

Of course we are all equal here...that was my point.

I think if some gave her the same respect they want to have here, she deserves the same...things can get started off on the wrong foot...and I have seen exactly what has happened, don't need any links etc., I don't agree with the way she has been attacked either.

I'm just stating my thoughts...I just think some may want to enjoy each other and the different view-points without going ballistic for days and days...that's all.

Some of us will never get-along, but we can ignore the other person without constant bickering...hope you know what I mean...I saw what all went on yesterday for just one example on the OT...that was uncalled for in my opinion, that should have been taken back to the original thread, or the forum thread Mum started, instead of trying to inflame others to attack her...I found it pathetic.

I've had my share of differences, but I don't carry it on as a vendetta constantly in the threads...know what I mean?

Just my two cents. 

 

~One question, BT

What behavior was she being 'attacked' for?

In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.

BT

 I've had my share of differences, but I don't carry it on as a vendetta constantly in the threads...know what I mean?

Sure.

 

All a Democrat needs is the upper-story window of public attention and the chamber pot of rhetoric. How else to explain the rise of Joe Biden?  P.J. O' Rourke

butler: Re: " Feel free to

butler: Re: "
Feel free to express yourself in whatever way you choose, just don't expect others to toe your line."

I have no such expectations. I simply think it diminishes the message when we sink to same smear tactics as the left. That's my opinion and I have expressed it in the clearest terms I know how. That's all. I have no power or intention to stifle anyone's speech. You obviously don't like what I had to say and that's fine. I'd say that makes us even. No harm, no foul.

~Queen Mum

"Sink to the same smear tactics as the left" Try practicing what you preach and you might have some credibility.
Ha! yourself
http://newsbusters.o...
In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.

BabyMama: Your personal

BabyMama: Your personal judgment re: my credibility is null and void.

~Null and Void

Definition: the space between Queen Mum's ears.

(Speaking of smear tactics, have I ever made fun of/altered your screen name in any way?)

In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.

cl... You just can't help

cl...

You just can't help yourself can you...you have to interject yourself no matter what, if no one is paying attention, you put a post like you did yesterday on OT just to keep up the attention you must need...you are doing so again here. It is obvious.

Please just let it be...try to get along or move on and ignore each other.

Do not make the mistake of ever thinking everyone here agrees with you and these tactics all the time....they don't...they just don't want to get involved, anymore than I do, but enough is enough already...others just move on to other places with the constant BS. 

bigtimer

  Yesterday, the thing that was posted on the open thread, that was an extremely uncalled for attack by QueenMum on choselife for personal things that had no basis in fact and had nothing to do with the thread's original purpose or the discussion therein.  So you, instead of seeing that QM was way out of line posting the way she did, decide that CL moving it to a more visible thread is the problem?  Do you not see a problem with this?  I am also aware of what is going on here, and I also know that the other day in a private message CL told me she was happy to let all that be in the past as long as no more attacks were forthcoming.  Then the very next morning there is QM with her little slingshot.  You say you are aware of what is going on, and I believe you are, but I think you are seeing it from an unfair perspective.

Also, it would be great if they did this in QueenMum's tea room, but so far Queenmum hasn't done any of her attacking in there, it has all been out here in the open for all to see.

Hi sheryl... That was my

Hi sheryl...

That was my exact point...if cl wanted to carry this on yesterday morning with QM, she should have put it on QM's Tea Room forum thread, instead of trying to have more attack her on OT and give cl more attention.

I am tired of seeing the attacks...that is all.

In my opinion, the two of them should just hash it out there, that was the purpose of it...and yes, I have followed all of this, what I feel doesn't matter, they need to hash it out between them, instead of a little group ganging-up constantly...do you see where I am coming from? 

I know how close you and cl are, but it is like both of you attack her at the same time...I just hate to see the constant pile-on...I like all people involved with their opinions and individual posts...food for thought for all..but this has been endless...I hope you all take it to the Tea Room...where it belongs.

I am done with this...I don't want to fight with anyone...got my own problems in life.... like we all do.

I come here to learn about politics and others opinions on the subject...a place for all of us to vent. 

~You didn't answer my question

Who's following who around?
http://newsbusters.o...

So BT, if you want it to stop, answer that one question.
What is Queen being 'attacked' for?

(I saw Cobra called you a racist the other day. How pleased would you be if he followed you around for over a week saying it over and over again?)
In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.

cl... Oh I know you saw

cl...

Oh I know you saw that...you made sure to thank him for his link right off the bat.

The difference is cl...when I say numerous times like I did to cobra...that I am moving on, when it was obvious he wanted to fight, I did just that.

Sometimes...it is just better to move on.

~Still didn't answer the question

Queen has been following me around to make nasty remarks.
If Cobra FOLLOWED YOU for over a week making repeated posts on multiple threads about how YOU are a RACIST he feels pity for, would you be annoyed?

Be honest here, BT.

(Incidentally, I followed Cobra's post with the link in it from the Recent Comments. My BlackBerry has a 2 inch screen that shows one post at a time, IF it is short. I saw his comment only (which was not directed to you) and clicked on the link and read the article. I came back to that same comment, replied, then scrolled up to see who he was talking to. The troll's comment had been deleted. The disagreement between the two of you had only just begun.)

In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.

Oh please cl...I'm a gal

Oh please cl...I'm a gal too...I know exactly what you are and have been doing to keep this up.

You have been just as rude in various posts, all the while knowing nobody is going to say anything against you and your posts....

Enough already.

Get a grip and move on...this isn't The View...this site is about bias in the msm, not lets see how much attention I can get for a day and make sure I have my handful of loyal followers.

I am moving on....I've said my piece here...there is a lot more to life than needing to be the center of attention at all times. 

~Bigtimer just admitted Queen Mum is rude

Priceless.
Since you've seen everything, who began those exchanges? Did I follow Queen around and make any digs about her personal life? I DARE YOU TO ANSWER THAT HONESTLY.

As for the rest of your comment, I have no 'followers'. That's ridiculous. Have you never had any friends?
Also, I have never watched 'The View', I've just seen references to it on this site. I don't watch any daytime TV.
I notice you have.not answered even one question. You instead throw out irrelevant, meaningless accusations. How very *liberal* of you.

In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.

cl... Grow

cl...

Grow up.

 

 

 

~DIDN'T ANSWER A SINGLE QUESTION

If you could have refuted any of my statements you would have. In a SECOND. You're defending Queen's disgusting behavior and you don't have a leg to stand on. You won't even ATTEMPT to be honest.
You are as low as she is. RACIST. RACIST.

(how about I make up six more crappy, dirty smears and follow you around repeating them. Annoyed yet?)
Immature and vile behavior, isn't it? Glad you defended it?

In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.

Look at your

Look at your own reflection gal.

Pathetic.

I don't know who in the hell you think you are, but that post was beyond contempt.

Because everyone doesn't agree with you and your tactics and smears you give out...you can't take the criticism right back at you...you resort to calling me a racist.

Sickening...says a lot about you. 

~I QUEEN MUM'd YOU!!

How you like her now?

I could take my imitation of her even further and follow you around for a week. She's a real peach, huh?

In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.

cl... No you are the real

cl...

No you are the real peach...and a rotten one at that.

~STILL can't back anything up

Or answer any questions.
Name a SINGLE TIME I have EVER made a nasty dig about another poster's personal life.
Or shut up and crawl away.

In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.

BT-I realize you are trying to make peace,

but by continuing to say stuff to CL, aren't you making the problem worse? And by jumping on what I said originally to QM, you were the one who brought up the smears she had made, not me. I was strictly referring to how she always chides everyone's "tone" and how it makes us like the liberals who do the same. I don't think that is fair, and said so. Now it has turned into this. By you rushing to defend her, how is that any different than Sheryl or even me defending CL? Even if I didn't like CL, I would defend her, strictly because there's no sense in attacking someone's family life, and then trying to tell everyone how we should be above pettiness. Surely you see how that is hypocritical? She even called CL a "Baby Mama" today. That's not rising above pettiness. I never wanted an arguement to begin with, I was just stating an opinion, if you read back upthread, you will see. Now, saying Grow Up, to CL, haven't you done the thing you said you didn't like, or want?

 

All a Democrat needs is the upper-story window of public attention and the chamber pot of rhetoric. How else to explain the rise of Joe Biden?  P.J. O' Rourke

tbdi... ...and aren't you

tbdi...

...and aren't you doing the same with your continued criticism with your gal pals...I have kept quiet about all of this for a long time as this has continued...with the exception of saying right off the bat the Mum was a respected member here that has been here a long time also, after cl went after her... if you all have the great need to continue to carry on as snobby high school girls..do that.

Cliques get you everywhere....lol. 

Enough already...I just don't like seeing one person constantly be attacked by someone else we really don't know either, who is also relatively new here, keep up the constant attack daily, someone who has been here along time, whether you agree or not...we all have our own stories...now don't we? 

Btw...what the heck do you expect...QM to stay silent and be meek and mild, just go away and disappear because you don't like her?

I don't think so. 

 

~Wow, blind as a bat

And twice as ugly.
Give us a link, or quit lying.

Did you expect me to take Queen's insults about my family meekly?!
What kind of a *insert string of Queenish insults* are you?

In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.

cl... Do not tell me what

cl...

Do not tell me what to do.

Let it go...most of us have all heard enough about your poor trials and tribulations regarding QM...endlessly. 

~Bigtimer's definition

Of endlessly: Friday-Monday.
Good Obama woman! Time must hang heavy on your hands.

STILL can't back ANYTHING up.
So full of it her EYE'S are brown. Oops, I'm sorry. I stooped to QUEEN MUM's level there for a second.

I went and made a personal judgement about the eye color of someone I don't know. Shall I start on your children, now?

What? What's that? Shut the f*** up about my children, you b****!! Yeah, that was how I felt, too.....funny....

In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.

Oh get over yourself cl.

Oh get over yourself cl.

~Oh the IRONY

BT hasn't a shred of evidence for anything she's claimed. I can BACK UP EVERYTHING I've said about Queen Mum. QM and BT have nary a leg to stand on between them. Reminds me of a word....huh...OH YEAH...PATHETIC.
You and Queen are 'past pathetic'.

In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.

cl... Why, whatever

cl...

Why, whatever happened to your Harlequin type of posts?

LMAO!

I'm done...I will always stand up for a friend...always.

For me, you won't let go and move on, you have to have your buddies join you to act as if you are so important...we all are just dust in the wind cl...you may want to remember that.

~You notice she isn't here standing up for you

This started because I stood up for sheryl. You know that. You backed me up that day, albeit reluctantly.
I always stand up for a friend...ALWAYS. I stand up for my family, too.

In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.

  What constant attack are

  What constant attack are you referring to?  Do you mean when Choselife called Queenmum a single mom?  Or when she told her she was neglecting her family to be here so much? Or are you talking about when Choselife inserted herself into a conversation between Queenmum and Hydronym and said she probably didn't even have kids and of course she drank while pregna.... wait... those attacks were from QUEENMUM, not from choselife.  Now if you want this to end, then end it.  The best way would be to urge Queenmum to apologize to Choselife and then to cease and desist on these character assaults.

I don't recall a single unprovoked attack on Queenmum from ANYONE.  Do you???

Apologies go both ways. I

Apologies go both ways.

I don't appreciate being called a racist by your BFF.

I am only going to say this one more time...like I did in other posts up above somewhere...cl didn't need to put her quibbling with QM on open thread yesterday out of the blue, unless she wanted to keep up this up with her herself... and of course bring attention to cl...hoping others would attack her again...it was obvious, I don't need you to explain to me how this went, I was and have been here watching all of this...QM made a forum thread for just what cl did yesterday on OT...did she take it there...NO....did she answer her on hydro's thread...no.

She was hoping this would carry on with her and wanting others to join in...just like what is happening now.

Sad. 

BT-I never said I didn't like her, you're right, I

 don't know her. I said I didn't care for her opinion, and that should have been the end of it. All I wanted to do was show you, that you were the one who brought it up today. I am a little old for a clique, as most of us all here are, but why be disingenuous? I never got a straight answer, and neither did Sheryl. Do you condone attacking someone's personal life? Do you condone someone accusing someone else of lying? To me, that goes to character. It was an ugly thing to do, and yes, I agree with Sheryl, she should apologise. That would end it, correctly. How about we leave it between the two of them, shall we?

 

All a Democrat needs is the upper-story window of public attention and the chamber pot of rhetoric. How else to explain the rise of Joe Biden?  P.J. O' Rourke

Hello...

ladies, the last thing I'd like to see are bt, cl3, ssims, tbdi having some sort of a tussle.  please, I happen to like all of you and it'd be a shame if we go down the way of the libs.  Luv you all.

sf... Words of

sf...

Words of wisdom.

Thanks.

you betcha, bt.  on the

you betcha, bt.  on the other hand, a little tussle might be what conservatives need!

:-)

QM

 Not my problem. I was only expressing the fact you tend to try to shape the way many threads go. I was merely disagreeing that it was a way I wanted to go. As for your statement of your opinions, I would think more of them if they didn't come from someone who has inpugned someone's character, gratuititously. Why in the world would you ever question someone's personal life, and imply they were not telling the truth? For what gain? I cannot fathom what reason you would have to say that CL3X was possibly lying about being a mother, being married, nursing her children, and then making snarky comments as to why she wasn't with her hubby and kids on a made-up holiday? What reason could there be? What does that do to advance your ideas? Sorry, I just can't get that. Of course you are going to experience fall out from it. It was a nasty cheap shot. Unprovoked. So, while many people here disagree, hopefully accusing people of lying about their home life won't be a continuing theme.

 

All a Democrat needs is the upper-story window of public attention and the chamber pot of rhetoric. How else to explain the rise of Joe Biden?  P.J. O' Rourke

~Press Release

I'm on a BlackBerry. I spent that evening curled up in the loveseat with my husband, watching a movie and talking with him about hydro's thought provoking Abortion thread, while making a few posts on it.

Thank you all for your deep and absorbing interest in my personal life. (yes BT, of course I'm kidding about that part! :-o)

In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.

Cl3x

  What we all really want to know is...

... What were you WEARING?

Sheryl-or not wearing???

I wonder if she got one of those Pajama grams? Or Vermont Teddy Bears? LOL. I swore to injure my hubby if he did either. Mainly I am just glad those commericals are off for now. At least until another made-up holiday, that I can't stand. Most good men know gifts are way better on an off day, than any gift given on a seemingly required holiday. And $80 plus teddy bears?  I'll pass.

 

All a Democrat needs is the upper-story window of public attention and the chamber pot of rhetoric. How else to explain the rise of Joe Biden?  P.J. O' Rourke

Land Shark

  Er... Candy Gram...  (Remember those?)

My husband went out in the rain and got me frozen yogurt and we sat on the couch and watched TV all evening.  We are really too old to make much of a deal over Valentines Day.  And he is pretty nice all year long, so I certainly don't expect him to try and outdo himself just because the Florists and candy companies say to.

Oh yeah, sheryl. I remember.

To me nothing is better than a kind hubby on a regular old Thursday, who does something nice for you when you don't feel well. Mine is fantastic. I call him my reward. Not that I deserve him. LOL. Frozen yogurt is equal to chocolates, anyday. It sounds like you got one of the good ones.

 

All a Democrat needs is the upper-story window of public attention and the chamber pot of rhetoric. How else to explain the rise of Joe Biden?  P.J. O' Rourke

Thank you ladies

You brought back some fine memories from my happier years. Happy belated Valentines Day.

God bless you all.

Jesus Loves You

Coco

 Thank you, kindly, sir. In the interest of full disclosure, I get a delivery of flowers weekly from my hubby. It is a waste of money, but he likes doing it, and I love to look at them. The roses from the flower place Rush and Sean hawk, are great. Can't think of the name of the place. The last ones I got from there,  were still pretty 3 weeks later. Their tulips are gorgeous, too. If any of the guys are thinking about sending flowers get them there. Oh yeah, the name is ProFlowers. Coco, I bet you got your lady love some romantic gifts in the past, didn't you? I know you seem like the type. Happy President's day, to you.

 

All a Democrat needs is the upper-story window of public attention and the chamber pot of rhetoric. How else to explain the rise of Joe Biden?  P.J. O' Rourke

~TBDI!

I heard that bear commercial on the radio and I thought it was a joke!
I'm a history buff, you say Valentine's, I think MASSACRE.
Hubby got me a little chocolate. And if you want to know what I was wearing...you'll have to PM me.
You know the guys are watching this thread like HAWKS.
Yeah, frontways shawn, Jer, Dave...I SEE YOU. We are not, I repeat NOT going to start kissing each other!!!
Well, sheryl and butler and I might do a three-way later, but it'll be in the PM's. So STOP drooling on this thread, I'm getting soaked here.

In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.

CL-LOL- you're so crazy!

 That bear commercial is bizarre. Not only do the chicks look like they were just doing a porno an hour before, the double entendres in that nasaly voice of the one who gets the bear makes me ill. And of course, the guys are all turned on by it, and that prompts them to be tools who click on and part with 80 plus dollars for, as the commercial tells us, VALENTINE'S NIGHT. Like no one would ever guess that one. *Oooh, it's so much BIGGER than I thought!* ,  *I could just kiss it and kiss it!* I have the urge to shoot the tv with my Valentine's gift.

 

All a Democrat needs is the upper-story window of public attention and the chamber pot of rhetoric. How else to explain the rise of Joe Biden?  P.J. O' Rourke

V-Bears

  You know those are the bears you see in every yard sale EVER!  80 bucks you say?  I guess it would have been a good deal for me at 25cents.  DARN I missed another great investment!

Sheryl-I call 'em dust collectors

 I know I would have thought the bear was a cute gift when I was 16-25, but after that, no. And yeah, the commercial shows an order form and it says one is 80 bucks, minus S&H. There may be cheaper ones. I watch Fox news online, from a channel out of the Florida Keys, (don't ask me why it streams from there), and they played it at least 3 times a show. I was getting batty. Have you ever noticed that most stuffed animals do end up in thrift store and yard sales? I don't give them as gifts, myself. My grandkids don't care anything about them.

 

All a Democrat needs is the upper-story window of public attention and the chamber pot of rhetoric. How else to explain the rise of Joe Biden?  P.J. O' Rourke

Bears

 They used to be popular.  I used to have quite a few before the fire.  After the fire people started giving me stuff like that and I had to tell them NO!  One of the best things about the fire was that I didn't have all that STUFF to take care of. I don't miss them.

Vermont teddy bears

I made my wife promise that if I ever bought her one of those ridiculous bears she would divorce me and then shoot me.

Jer

choselife, tbdi, & sherl...

Not that I don't possess a very vivid imagination, but you gals can split my entire stimulus tax rebate for the video.

Jer

Video?

  She didn't say NOTHIN about no video! Dang! I better get to the gym!

~SEE

I TOLD y'all they were watchin'.

In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.

watchin' sure....but by no

watchin' sure....but by no means interrupting!

Jer

I will do a video as long as I can be fully clothed, and

wearing my Spanx to hide the extra 20 lbs I am carrying. LOL> I told the Doctor I wanted to lose weight the other day, and he said oh, all you "girls" start getting in your 40's and think you need to be skinny. Uh, I just want to not be built like Dolly Parton's short sister, anymore. He said I looked fine. This coming from a man who is maybe 5'8 and weighs about 210. With a beard coming out of his nose and ears. Yeah. 

 

All a Democrat needs is the upper-story window of public attention and the chamber pot of rhetoric. How else to explain the rise of Joe Biden?  P.J. O' Rourke

tbdi...

Time for a new doc--for aesthetic reasons alone.  This is one of those times I wish my imagination weren't so vivid.  Hope his "beard" was at least neatly groomed.

Jer

Jer, lol, he is gross. He wears ties and they are usually crusty

  He is a Romanian bear of a man, and his regular beard is not much better, either, I am afraid. I don't mean to be cruel, but I think his bathing practices are iffy, at best. He is my specialist at Emory, or I would ditch him.  The very worst part? He insists that I hug him when I get there, and when I leave. Ugh.

 

All a Democrat needs is the upper-story window of public attention and the chamber pot of rhetoric. How else to explain the rise of Joe Biden?  P.J. O' Rourke

tbdi...

Hmm...Let's see.  He's about 5'8" and you're about 5'3" which by my calculation means during each hugging session you could very well be required to briefly experience an "up close and personal'" interior nostril view of the good doctor.  That alone should constitute an effective appetite suppressant.

Jer

Jer

 Close, I am 5'2, barely. But yeah, I never want to eat after leaving. If I could afford to go see him more often, I might really drop the pounds! And trust me,  he is an up close and personal type. I usually want another bath afterwards. Lol. I have been seeing him for 6 years, 1x a month.  I wish I could find someone else that is a specialist who treats conditions like mine who was also a little closer to where I live.

 

All a Democrat needs is the upper-story window of public attention and the chamber pot of rhetoric. How else to explain the rise of Joe Biden?  P.J. O' Rourke

Hey Queen...besides Pelosi

Hey Queen...besides Pelosi being another matter with her pushing back the hands of time...

I agree...

Plus if she would just keep her mouth shut once in awhile, every-time she opens it, she inserts one of her feet.

If anyone ever listened to her at all very much, they would be terrified that she is Speaker of the House, let alone third in line for Perez in case something terrible happened. 

As an aside...I can't believe O had to have this bail-out BS signed Friday, he doesn't stay in and sign it immediately, instead makes a Hollywood production of this all Tues, most likely prime-time network wise, with Collins, Snowier and Specter smiling sweetly behind him...when NOBODY had time to read the conference changes in the 1000 plus page stimulus bill.

Outrageous...all of it.

Btw...the O team is going to be going, going, going all the time...it is an ACORN outreach program, and we just financed it for his next election...in the Stimulus Bill.

It's About Liberal Bias

QM:

I don't disagree with you that the First Lady should not be a target of snarky potshots - unless, that is, she starts putting herself out in the media as some sort of fashion icon.  And we would be ill-advised to criticize her brains, her attitudes, even her marriage, unless she puts it out there - or her husband's publicity handlers put her out there.  Laura Bush was content to stand by her husband's side and be his wife - and the media LOVED to be snarky about her.  If Michelle chose to be the wife and helpmate of the President, I'd say "hands off."  But I think it's very representative of the liberal media bias that the only two first ladies who have graced the cover of Vogue are Hillary and Michelle.  Neither of whom is exactly model-attractive or any kind of a fashion icon.  In fact, today they love to make fun of Saint Hillary and her pantsuits.

So if Michelle doesn't want to expose herself to criticism, she should not put herself out there.

And as far as Michelle and Barack already being sick of the White House, after less than a MONTH in residence, it reminds me of another arrogant liberal, Bill Clinton, whose wife considered the White house to be just a ritzy federal prison.  People who don't respect the office of President shouldn't run for President. 

SecretC: I see your point.

SecretC: I see your point. But does M. Obama really have a choice at this point? Do we know if Laura Bush or the twins were ever asked to be on the cover of Vogue? Why should Mrs. Obama turn down the offer? To be honest, I'm not that concerned about it. The snowball that is Obamamania will keep rolling until some terrible reality stops it or the public gets tired of it.

I do agree that Mrs. Bush is a very attractive woman. Maybe being on the cover of Vogue would cheapen her image.

I just had a thought...

  The media is fully aware that a lot of Sarah Palin's appeal to the masses was that she was attractive.  Now they are trying to make MichelleO their version of Sarah' by highlighting how "pretty and graceful and charming" she is...  They NEED her to be pretty, and it looks like she has had quite a makeover (and probably some airbrushing) to achieve that.  They really really want her to resound with the American people.  Beauty is necessary because we all know this is the American Idol generation and they are the American Idol first couple.

This is not an Open Thread

Most of this thread is an embarrassment to NewsBusters and disrespectful to Tim Graham. Those who've decided to hold a gabfest on this topic need to move to the Forum.

Queen...So right you

Queen...

So right you are.

My apologies to you Tim. 

"The First Lady the world's

"The First Lady the world's been waiting for"

??????  WTF???

I doubt most of the world even knows what a First Lady is!

At any rate, I guess the millions of those who voted for McCain and others besides Barack of Nazareth aren't part of the world anymore.

One of the 24% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 89% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory.

RR GOP

yeah, who's world? and what color is the sky there?

The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.” -- Chief Justice John Roberts

First Lady?

I thought that was the ashamed American.

Jesus Loves You

coco.... Well, for the

coco....

Well, for the first time in her life she is REALLY proud to be an American.