Washington Post TV writer Lisa de Moraes reported Friday that Team Obama is demanding a lot of free TV space in prime time in the next few weeks: a Monday night press conference, a "stimulus" push on the Monday night after that, the 16th, and the State of the Union on Tuesday, February 24. (What about House, and The Bachelor?) Network suits are already whining, but are too afraid of pulling out the Just Say No card:
President Obama's desire to talk -- and talk, and talk -- to the American public could cost broadcast networks millions, and millions, and millions of prime-time TV dollars.
Broadcasters are bracing themselves for the likelihood of three prime-time interruptions in three weeks, totaling at least three hours of prime time -- and ad breaks -- yanked.
"His economic stimulus package apparently does not extend to the TV networks," one network exec noted.
Obama's reps have alerted broadcasters that the president will hold a news conference Monday, according to network execs. It's expected to eat up the first hour of prime time; that alone could cost broadcasters more than $9 million in lost ad revenue....
"Notice they're not going on Friday or Saturday," one network exec complained. "They're . . . preempting our better shows. You're not happy to lose a 'House' if you are Fox, or two of the better comedies at CBS, or 'The Bachelor' at ABC -- we're all going to take a bath."
So skip them? The networks were not afraid to tell President Bush that his political salesmanship wasn't worth pre-empting in prime time. But none want to "incur the wrath" of Obama (and unlike Bush, it's not so easy to stiff the president unanimously in an act of ideological solidarity):
Although the broadcast networks can opt out of carrying these presidential appearances, "you don't want to incur the wrath of the White House" because "if you're on the [poop] list, you are last in line for interviews and things like that," one network exec explained.
But besides the economic hit, broadcasters are worried that this kind of shock-and-awe approach to prime-time preempting might be part of an Obama strategy to charm his way to a new economic-rescue plan. "As we're meeting this guy, from a network perspective, it's like, 'Is this part of the plan for him?' " the network exec said. "Is this what it's going to be: Is he going to take to the airwaves every time he has something to say?"
Such a strategy, of course, could backfire.
"Do people really want to come home after looking for a job, or after being at a job they hate, sit down to veg out in front of their favorite show -- and he's on again?" said one TV suit, who suspects/hopes the Average Joe's reaction to too much Obamavision might be "nothing he's going to say is going to help me get a job, or put food on the table."
Said the TV suit: "He could lose a lot of goodwill doing this."
—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center.
Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Bailout Bribes
February 6, 2009 - 14:59 ET by KC MulvilleLook for Obama to make sure that the TV networks get a share of the bailout ... so that he can apply pressure and get facetime whenever he wants it.
When they're old enough, I'm going to make sure to tell my kids ... only in a family does someone give money without strings attached. Not true for everyone else.
Obama demanding all this
February 6, 2009 - 15:02 ET by Clear thinkerObama demanding all this airtime from TV has the hair on the back of my neck standing up. Curious.... am I the only one that feels antsy about this?
Evil California
Making Fun of AGW http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/
I Agree
February 6, 2009 - 15:24 ET by God Bless the USAI agree with you ... it made the hair on my neck stand up too! What's next?????
Radio stations will drop Rush's morning update...
February 6, 2009 - 15:28 ET by Prester John....and replace it with the Obama morning update if they know what is good for them, if ya know what I mean.
A photo from AP
February 6, 2009 - 22:10 ET by ahusserThis picture says it all. Remember who put this guy in office. And yes it is very very scary.
"Somehow, I told you so, just doesn't quite say it." Will Smith in 'I, Robot.'
Obama demanding time on tv
February 7, 2009 - 16:24 ET by merlin61What's next? Castro- like diatribes, Chavez-like
diatribes? Paving the way for socialism?
It's like Dear Leader
February 6, 2009 - 15:02 ET by MaideneerIt's like Dear Leader taking hours and hours to speak to the masses.
Too bad TV Networks! This is what you get for being so in the tank...you now abide the "rules", or else.
Hopefully,
February 6, 2009 - 17:26 ET by SouthernRootsBeing on the West Coast, they won't tape delay the "talks" and we can watch the shows as regularly scheduled - if we choose.
I won't be wronged. I won't be insulted. I won't be laid a-hand on. I don't do these things to other people, and I require the same from them. - J.B. Books (John Wayne)
Schadenfreude
February 6, 2009 - 15:03 ET by slickwillie2001Those networks made him. Let them eat the cost; after all, Obammy says we all have to sacrifice.
I could not agree more.
February 6, 2009 - 16:05 ET by JimcinscThe networks made him, and there's no doubt about that. Without the networks constant build up on this empty suit, there would be no man in it right now. The guy was a community leader and a state and US senator who apparently did absolutely nothing during those terms, and the only thing that qualified him to be president is the networks saying he was the Messiah, the One who sends shivers up one's leg.
I say let the networks eat the cost of what they have created.
I could care less about the
February 6, 2009 - 15:06 ET by bigtimerI could care less about the networks whining...not one bit, they put this joker in there....
What I care about is I am already sick and tired of seeing him everyday...every single day.
We thought Clinton was bad, needed the constant spot-light and attention, a camera he never missed....
O is three times as bad already...I guess if he doesn't get his way, he is going to be dictating to us all he can now...reminds me of Chavez, he may be nationalizing the networks soon...the Fairness Doctrine in their eyes.
Thank goodness for the clicker, mute...and the internet.
Me, too!
February 6, 2009 - 15:34 ET by StarAZI hate "me, too" posts. Me, too! Hold on--Obama just went to the john, he's coming out, etc. Or split screen--he is not out yet, be patient. And when he does slather himself all over the screen it's with that phony smile or his little scoldy face--we've been a bad, bad America.
Aló Presidente
February 6, 2009 - 17:14 ET by mom_roxThe comparison to Chavez was my first thought as well.
That was my thought too; I
February 6, 2009 - 22:50 ET by motherbeltThat was my thought too; I am already sick of seeing him.
He thinks the whole country should stop what they're doing and sit up and pay attention every time a thought pops into his head.
Real Hubris.
I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows. -Bart Simpson
Fox is nuts if they pre-empt
February 6, 2009 - 15:14 ET by SickofLibsFox is nuts if they pre-empt House for this crap. What do they have to lose, all those good feelings Obongo has for them?
Anybody that wants to watch can go to MSNBC, where every freakin' second of broadcast time is devoted to Obongo anyway.
Pelosi is very upset about this, also, as it pre-empt her new cable sitcom "Is That a Liberal In Your Pants, Or Are You Just Happy To See Me?"
It would be interesting to see what would happen if they didn't
February 6, 2009 - 15:18 ET by Prester JohnRemember all the times the Bush was not given time by the networks because they deemed what he was going to say "political"?
If Fox didn't preempt BHO there would be calls in Congress for investigations and revocation of their FCC license.
Double Standard
February 6, 2009 - 22:03 ET by easygoerBelow is the AP story about Bush's speech at the Army War College in
May 2004. The country was at war and it was an election year, yet the
major broadcast networks did not cover the speech of the president.
Now
we are in an a recession, so Obama's speech will be aired. But so
should have Bush's. Or is hearing from a president during a recession
more important than hearing from the commander in chief during a time
of war? My own view is that anytime any president gives a primetime
address to the nation the broadcast networks should show it whether
the White House requests it or not. Of course, unless it's sports or I'm someone's guest, I never watch these networks
Networks Pull Plug On Bush Speech
NEW YORK (AP) -- ABC, CBS and NBC decided not to offer live coverage of
President Bush's speech about Iraq Monday, although the cable news
networks planned to pre-empt their regular programming for the address.
Bush is to deliver the first in a series of speeches about the future
of Iraq at the Army War College in Carlisle, Pennsylvania. CNN, Fox
News Channel and MSNBC all said they would carry the speech live.
The broadcast networks took an unusual amount of time to tell viewers
their plans for Bush's speech -- ABC did not decide until Monday
afternoon -- because the Bush administration did not formally request
the time.
When the White House requests the networks set aside time for a presidential address, it's unusual for them to refuse.
But it's a difficult decision for the networks, forced to weigh the
newsworthiness of the event, when it is left up to them. In that case,
the three networks often take their cues from one another.
Monday was one of the last nights of the May "sweeps" period, when television ratings are used to set local advertising rates.
NBC had two editions of "Fear Factor" scheduled on Monday. CBS had
season finales of its popular Monday-night comedies and ABC was showing
the theatrical release "A Beautiful Mind.
SoL, Fox News
February 6, 2009 - 15:19 ET by Chris NormanSoL,
Fox News pre-empted the the second half of O'Reilly last night to bring us Obama's entirely political remarks to his fellow Democrats. I bet O'Reilly was steamed. Fox News seems to be bending over backwards to broadcast every word and movement of Obama.
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
SoL, Fox News
February 6, 2009 - 15:19 ET by Chris NormanSoL,
Fox News pre-empted the the second half of O'Reilly last night to bring us Obama's entirely political remarks to his fellow Democrats. I bet O'Reilly was steamed. Fox News seems to be bending over backwards to broadcast every word and movement of Obama.
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
Chris, yeah, I was watching.
February 6, 2009 - 15:39 ET by SickofLibsChris, yeah, I was watching. I could not believe they did that either, considering it was on at least ten other channels.
I think Fox is making some pretty stupid decisions on this stuff lately. It's not like the world is being locked out of Obongo speech coverage (unlike that HBO inauguration-coverage fiasco).
Chris... Oh that is
February 6, 2009 - 15:39 ET by bigtimerChris...
Oh that is funny...I bet he was unhappy alright.
I didn't watch it last night, caught part about three thirty this morning so I didn't know about that...at least you made me laugh.
Btw...what were you doing watching it...I thought you gave up on him. ;-)
Probably like me...I catch certain segments depending on what is going on politically ect. I was watching the Senate last night...such as it was, like I'm doing today.
Is it time?
February 7, 2009 - 00:45 ET by ImAllRightIs it that time to add on FOX NC onto the list of liberal outlets? I've been seeing this move towards the left more and more from them and its just a matter of time before more than just Chris Wallace and Major Garret fawn over him.
Hannity is going to be the only obviously Right Wing voice on there before you know it...and I think Sean is an idiot! - He's nothing more than a parrot squawking back the talking points for the day, I don't get how so many of you can like the guy when he's dumber than about 99% of the people on his shows (radio and tv) but more respectful than only 1%. He's no Limbaugh (I'm starting to listen to him quite a bit more often, first time in about 5-6 years that I tune in multiple times a week).
Anyway, back to the point.
Just my opinion, but FNC is headed down a leftist path and I don't like it at all, wouldn't be surprised one bit to see them cave to whatever Obama wants (he's the President though, and to be honest, I'd rather see him than have him never be seen, I don't hate the guy like most of you seem to, just alot of his policy stances).
"Democracy is worth dying for, because it's the most deeply honorable form of government ever devised by man." - Ronald Reagan
Obama!
February 6, 2009 - 16:05 ET by blazermaniacActually, Obama replacing Olbercrap & Madcow would be a good thing for PMSNBC. They could get an additional ten viewers. Those other two couldn't draw flies!
Obama's brain on drugs
February 6, 2009 - 15:09 ET by DontFeedTheTrollsYour local Community Organizer will be peeking in windows just to make sure our Fearless Leader is being watched and listened to. Don't be the one in your neighborhood who disappears in the night!
D
Thank heavens for Netflix!
Keep the ILLEGALS out, join NumbersUSA to send free faxes to your reps.
Well
February 6, 2009 - 15:18 ET by well99Pravda(msm) is his media so he should be able to use it however he chooses. It is not like the msm has real journalists. If those suckuphiants lose money from non news programs when he enlightens us oh well.They were the ones that groveled at his feet and licked his shoes clean.Now they spend a fortune getting their noses fixed anytime he takes a hard turn.It is on them.
LOL
February 6, 2009 - 15:18 ET by MidAmericaThe networks spent the election carrying obama on their shoulders and now they complain because they have to carry him on their backs?
Karma is a bitch. The
February 6, 2009 - 15:25 ET by eaglewingz08Karma is a bitch. The networks shilled for him, let them eat zero ratings. Fox comes out the winner because Obama never calls on them at press conferences anyway. Good way for them to make inroads in the competition.
Networks Bailout Obama
February 6, 2009 - 15:28 ET by Red JeepDetails at 11
Obamavision, Obamacare. Obamaboredom.
One more
February 6, 2009 - 20:33 ET by jdlybrandnewsisblues
Obamarreah.
Venezuelans get this sort of
February 6, 2009 - 15:31 ET by MANstreammediaVenezuelans get this sort of entertainment from Hugo Chavez all the time (therefore I'm not surprised).
If the networks were smart
February 6, 2009 - 15:32 ET by OxyCon...they’d advertise all of the Obama paraphernalia they’ve been producing before and after Obama’s infomercials, because the only people that will be watching will be the members of the Obama cult, and they’ll purchase anything so long as Obama’s face is on it.
Even 60 Minutes
February 6, 2009 - 16:00 ET by StarAZEven 60 Minutes--still claiming to be a news org--came out with a smarmy video.
Totally uneffected
February 6, 2009 - 15:36 ET by oldArmyTotally uneffected here......I don't watch the networks....LMFAO....so TALK Mr. President TALK....in FACT....TALK ALL NIGHT!!!!....
this is what is called a cruel irony.
February 6, 2009 - 15:42 ET by katainkent(for the MSM anyway) I will just have to make sure my DVR stays up to date.
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -Edmund Burke
the propaganda begins
February 6, 2009 - 15:43 ET by candanceI hope America is ready for weekly doses of "education" from Obama. Soon his voice will be broadcast in public places, his picture hanging in public buildings.
Saul Alinsky would be proud.
But acts of kindness and generosity must be free and voluntary; no man has a right to compel another to follow his conscience. This is a concern which lies between a man a his God.
-Richard Fuhrman, pro slave advocate, 1823
New Press Secretary
February 6, 2009 - 16:21 ET by BlueCat57Maybe he'll replace that bozo Gibbs with Baghdad Bob if he's still alive.
BlueCat, Baghdad Bob would be a major improvement...
February 6, 2009 - 21:55 ET by R D Helm...over Gibbs.
Hell, at least Bob knew what he was doing.
-Dave
Our clueless political leaders are about to drive us all over a cliff. The time to HITM is now-before we go over.
If his television
February 6, 2009 - 15:48 ET by DJEddleIf his television appearances are going to consist of more "New Deal" type announcements and personnel decisions like we have seen in the past few weeks, then I say give him as much air-time as he wants.
Like earlier today...he announced his new economic advisory board - which consisted of at least two very questionable characters, including an illegal alien activist and a board member of a subprime bank failure. I wrote about it here:
Obama Announces New Economic Recovery Advisory Board
This man's administration is quickly becoming a comedy of errors. Unfortunately, we will all be paying for these errors.
*If you like the comments, check out the articles.
No problem for me.
February 6, 2009 - 15:48 ET by Dave in TexasGlad I've got cable. He's not taking over that. Hmm. Maybe I should keep my mouth shut.
And how will we know the difference?
February 6, 2009 - 16:11 ET by BlueCat57How will we tell the difference between the regular programming that pushes abortion, liberalism and the message of change and hope and the Obama speeches?
Most of the stuff in prime time is junk anyway and what I watch I watch for "free" by watching on the networks' Web sites, so I don't care when it is broadcast or if it is interrupted. Yeah I can't get all the great shows (The Big Bang Theory doesn't stream full episodes) but I can find enough of the network junk to put me to sleep.
For those that watch the cable news channels I'm guessing it will be even harder to tell the difference between the "news" shows and an Obama speech.
Sorry I couldn't make this funnier or more sarcastic but I'm feeling a bit under the weather.
Equal Time
February 6, 2009 - 16:34 ET by Pilgrim1949And of course the networks will provide, free of charge, equal time to opposing viewpoints to ensure that the "public airwaves" (the same airwaves that ordinary people use in everyday conversation?) provide a balanced and FAIR representation of the facts.
Won't they?
What's that I hear? It's crickets....... and they're... ...laughing!
FREE???
February 6, 2009 - 16:49 ET by David N MOLet 'em pay! I'm already sick of him and if he takes my "Fringe" or "24" away I'll just ....
David
Save me from the Good People!
BARRKY just wants to be like his COMRADE CHAVEZ who regularly ..
February 6, 2009 - 17:04 ET by Jayke... takes over the airwaves for marathon speeches,
requiring channels to carry portions of them in what is known under
Venezuelan law as a "national network."
This guy is a COMMIE!
If I have to give up House or 24
February 6, 2009 - 17:52 ET by DelsaI'll watch an old movie.
Or take a laxative and be in the bathroom while the marxist president is speaking.
I'll be doing anything BUT watching SOBama
My prayer is
February 6, 2009 - 17:58 ET by Delsathat the networks who stand on their own feet JUST SAY NO!!
Hi Delsa... I don't care
February 6, 2009 - 18:09 ET by bigtimerHi Delsa...
I don't care what the networks do...my prayer is that the rip-off to the american tax-payers, the porkulus.... does not pass.
I also pray he is mad as heck Monday night because it didn't pass...the arrogant socialist, to put it politely.
I am sick and tired of hearing all of this being crammed down our throats.
A trillion plus dollars in one week being passed...is OUTRAGEOUS!
Bigtimer
February 6, 2009 - 18:42 ET by DelsaI think we are living in a parallel universe.
This stimulas is so wrong. I can't belive this could be voted for.
I never thought I'd live to see the day killers of our service men and women would get off because this pr**k of a president would set the terrorists free and I never thought we'd be marching our kids and theirs into a Socialist/Marxist State.
I just don't know what to do. And I pray whatever is done can be undone.
I HATE THIS
Delsa,
February 6, 2009 - 21:45 ET by R D HelmI keep hoping I am going to wake up and discover that this has all been one long, hideous nightmare.
And just how did this clueless empty-suit of a surrender monkey get elected POTUS in the first place?
I hope those family members of terrorist attack victims who met with him today verbally tore him a couple of new ones.
I am pretty damn sure I would have, and it would have not been polite nor respectful.
With me, respect is earned, not commanded, and this empty suited fraud of a marionette isn't scoring any points with me.
Not one.
-Dave
Our clueless political leaders are about to drive us all over a cliff. The time to HITM is now-before we go over.
RD
February 6, 2009 - 23:15 ET by DelsaI was yelling at the screen and tears were coming down my cheeks listening to what the empty suite known as POTUS did regarding the dismissal of all charges for this, stuck to my shoe, piece of crap terrorist.
Obama is a disgrace. His cavalier attitude toward our military in general and the victims of the Cole attack, made me sick.
The entire Clinton administration has shown up like a bad penny in this new? administration. This is a rerun and I am not excited about it.
I listened to the mother of a young sailor killed in the Cole attack say she voted for Obama and now she is sorry. She also said her daughter suggested he be impeached.
I agree. Who knows, with all the Clinton retreads around him, he just may be impeached?
My son's best friend returns from Iraq Feb.28th. As a young Marine he will be sent by this empty suite to Afghanistan and he had better not be sent without bullets.
I pray for your military.
Oh God. I've gone off. I just dislike this jerk beyond words.
exactly
February 7, 2009 - 01:56 ET by i was just thinking"This is a rerun and I am not excited about it."
Yes, and like most sequels and re-makes, it's worse than the original!
Pray for the military
February 7, 2009 - 03:34 ET by jackssnAs one who spent 21 years in I agree. The wife had to change the channel before I when nuts. Tell your best friend I wish him well and God speed.
ETCS(SS) retired
Calm down, Delsa...The
February 7, 2009 - 03:48 ET by JerCalm down, Delsa...The charges haven't been dropped and the accused isn't being set free. The criminal complaint was dismissed without prejudice and will be refiled at a later date.
Jer
Jer
February 7, 2009 - 16:48 ET by well99The case never should of been dismissed.It was done for poilitical points.It just shows Obama's apathy towards the military.Those sailors served their country so they could be sold out to appease the left.
Shadenfreude - definition of
February 6, 2009 - 18:02 ET by Canadian MikeCould any desserts be more just than this? Sorry MSM, you gave up any moral right to complain about this long ago. Maybe if you had maintained a shred of objectivity I could have worked up some sympathy but the only thing that comes to mind right now is "haha".
Any Senator voting for this so called "stimulus"
February 6, 2009 - 18:59 ET by Delsabill are traitors and are scrapping the American way of life.
I hope they are defeated the next time they are up for election.
Maybe they will all be arrested for DRUNK DRIVING, spend the rest of their lives behind bars, instead of in them, and out of the Senate!
Sure to backfire
February 6, 2009 - 21:27 ET by CobraManThis is sure to backfire. Americans were upset when the Apollo 12 moon landings interrupted I Love Lucy reruns. How do you think most of Americans will feel about this?
Obama: My job is above my pay grade
If PBUH interrupts 24, I am starting an impeachment petition
February 6, 2009 - 21:32 ET by R D HelmHis over-exposure is going to contribute to his eventual undoing.
-Dave
Our clueless political leaders are about to drive us all over a cliff. The time to HITM is now-before we go over.
No need to watch, he's just
February 6, 2009 - 22:18 ET by TN MomNo need to watch, he's just gonna throw a hissy fit and demand that everyone support Pelosi's porkulus bill or the country will explode. He's gonna say he cares about Americans having trouble making ends meet, but that will contradict with his actions of cheating Americans of $$ by appointing Tax Cheats to his cabinet. He's gonna blame the GOP for partisan politics, and blame Bush, Wall Street, and Fox.
btw, will Hollywood still love him when he cuts into their prime time?
PS Set your tivo/DVR to UNrecord mode....
I will be sure not to
February 6, 2009 - 22:30 ET by Scuba DudeI will be sure not to watch this. I am lucky enough to have cable and plenty of channels that won't have his arrogant mug on. And if that fails there are movies on dvd or chatting with you fine folk.
As far as the alphabet networks losing money? GOOD, you deserve to have Barky take the money out of your pockets. It was YOUR news divisions that decided to throw any ethics out the window and push to have this empty suit elected.
RD
February 6, 2009 - 23:04 ET by DelsaYou've hit the nail on the head from impeachment over missing 24 to his empty suitedness.
I am with ya Dave all the way.
boo hoo hoo
February 7, 2009 - 01:53 ET by i was just thinkingThey created the monster, let them deal with it. We're all supposed to feel sorry for them now. Tough noogies!
Here's a simple solution: Obama can nationalize the major networks. Then they won't have to worry about losing profits, because there will be no profits to make. Why not... the giver-ment is taking over everything else.
Is C-Span off the air or
February 7, 2009 - 06:45 ET by RR GOPIs C-Span off the air or something?
Pretty sad that this guy's already trying to save his presidency and his Socialist agenda. How many weeks has it been now?
One of the 24% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 89% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory.
O will announce
February 7, 2009 - 10:36 ET by GoodieThat Dr Greg House will be the next Sec of HHS. The first appt I agree with, more clowns in the circus.
O,s last day 1-20-2013
Prime Time
February 7, 2009 - 11:05 ET by 1611LilacLadyI'm so glad I have cable and won't see the illegal alien President's face nor hear his voice. **groan**
As for the loss of income for the msm networks . . ask me if I care.
Isaiah 5:20a Woe unto them who call evil good, and good evil. . . KJV
Already Sick of his BS Press Conferences
February 7, 2009 - 18:03 ET by ScottyDogI may be wrong but ever since the inauguration I have woke
up to him on TV just about everyday to announce some cabinet appointment or
other crook he has decided to let run a federal agency.
CNN broke in to a news broadcast the other day to let Barry Soetoro
ramble on about how he felt about flying around in Air Force One.
I swear, the sound of his voice has me reaching for the
clicker for something else to watch and I have no desire to miss the next episode
of House to listen to Barry try and BS us about the phony stimulus package.
It is nothing but Grand Theft of taxpayers funds.
Hey ScottyDog! Where have
February 7, 2009 - 18:13 ET by bigtimerHey ScottyDog!
Where have you been hiding?!
I've missed you here...don't stay away so often.
Hope all is well with you and yours.
Now, on to O, I'm with you all they way, have posted as such myself.
I am sick and tired of seeing him, they are very much over-doing putting the empty-suit dictator out there all the time, every single day...people are going to ignore him if this keeps up, the simpletons.
You just know Monday the Senate is hoping to cram this bill down our throats before he gives his Hollywood Production speech tomorrow night...so he has something to crow about, if he doesn't get it, he will be using the fear tactics, AGAIN on the country, for those that will listen that is.
RE:Where have I been
February 9, 2009 - 16:30 ET by ScottyDogMom came down with cancer and I have been spending most of my time
taking care of her and shuttling her to chemo and numerous Doctors.
Still come by from time to time to read the posts but have not had much
time to post.
The Senate is committing Grand Theft with this unconstitutional Stimulus Fraud. Barry is just a puppet for the Rockefeller CFR New World
Order. Every one of his cabinet picks so far is a member of the CFR or Trilateral
commission.
These groups advocate the destruction of our Constitutional Republic and it should be treason to be a member of a group with this kind of mission statement and hold high office requiring taking an oath to preserve and protect our Constitution.