A Commemorative Inaugural Edition of Newsweek arrived at the office in the mail this week, and it included a column by Eleanor Clift titled "Suffrage, Hillary Style" which touted Hillary Clinton’s "18 million cracks in the glass ceiling" and sang the same old song about how sexism is still more acceptable than racism:
Hillary’s campaign illustrates how far we’ve come and how far we haven’t come. The tone and tenor of the debate around Hillary, and around Sarah Palin, was far more personal and mocking than toward their male counterparts. Maybe the material was richer, but there was no attempt to dance around gender issues the way there is with race. As a society, we still condone sexism; we view it as a part of nature, a given that isn’t worth bothering our pretty heads about.
Bringing Palin in for sympathatic treatment on sexism is a little strange for Eleanor, since this is how she greeted the choice on The McLaughlin Group last year:
This is not a serious choice. It makes it look like a made for TV movie. If the media reaction is anything, it's been literally laughter in many places across news....In very, very many newsrooms.
Clift complained that the media clearly favored Obama over Hillary when she was "equally serious," but she didn’t ponder whether Hillary was equally smooth or equally appealing:
Older women whose lives and careers were constrained by sexism felt disrespected by a media captivated by a serious black candidate in a way they weren’t by the prospect of an equally serious woman contending for the job. Younger women who haven’t experienced as much sexism wondered why their mothers thought it was such a big deal;’ if not Hillary, there’ll be someone else.
Earlier, she illustrated the generation gap among women Clift knows: "A Hillary campaign worker who objected to a Hillary nutcracker with its stainless-steel thighs was chided by her own grown daughters for not having a sense of humor. "
Clift began by recounting the American history that recalls Obama reaching the White House before a woman:
The fact that she lost out to a black man recalls the hurt felt by the early suffragists when the 15th Amendment passed after the Civil War extended the vote to freed black males. Women were told it was "the Negro’s hour," and they should step aside. Allowing former slaves to vote while denying educated women the same right enraged suffrage leaders and divided the movement between those who accepted the disparity and those who raged against their second-class status. The rift last for 20 years, with bitterness far more deep-seated than the hard feelings exhibited by Hillary’s hardiest campaign supporters.
—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Lighten up
January 31, 2009 - 22:40 ET by choselife3xI think a Hillary nutcracker is hilarious on several levels.
In order for something to be truly funny, there has to be an element of truth in it. The truth hurts sometimes. :)
In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.
I've come to a
February 1, 2009 - 10:19 ET by 5kidsnadogdifferent way of thinking on this. I've never been a Hillary fan, but I found all of it offensive. Not because of who she is, but because she is a woman, just like myself, and I think the denigration of a woman is the denigration of a woman, whether I like her politics or not. When a woman is strong, they use words like b*tch, when a man is strong, he's a leader. The "Bro's before Ho's" was as offensive to me as the "Sarah Palin is a c*nt", and the "Retarded Babies for Palin". The nutcracker was implying that Hillary's strength was somehow an attempt to emasculate instead of just her attempt to further an agenda she believes in (and believe me, I'd like to see her agenda go no further, but not by sacrificing the dignity of women).
To me, it's like the way Martha Stewart was treated with her whole conviction. They demonized her in the press by saying that she was a b*tch to her employees, etc. That just wouldn't have happened if a man was in a similar situation. And believe me, many men have done the same thing and not had a whisper of trouble come their way.
Nice of her to mention
January 31, 2009 - 22:43 ET by gopsteveNice of her to mention Palin...but if there was no Obama, and Hillary would have gotten the slobbering treatment by the msm, do you think we would be hearing about Palin from Clift?
Is anone else's head spinning??
January 31, 2009 - 23:38 ET by RESTLESS 1I mean, really, can anyone follow the train of thought of this clift idiot?
They wanted "that one" elected. Done. Stop the snivelling already!!!
"This
liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about
basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008
Lose-Lose-Lose Situation
February 1, 2009 - 00:31 ET by nawendtLet's just be honest here; Imagine the following scenarios:
1) Clinton gets the nomination. Outcome: America is still racist.
2) Clinton gets nomination, but loses presidency. Outcome: America is still racist and put its sexism on hiatus for a few months.
3) No matter the democrat chosen, McCain wins. Outcome: Use 1 and 2 to figure out the preliminary reaction. America is even more racist and sexist than ever. Hell freezes over.
---"Be careful how open-minded you are, your brain may just fall out." ---
BS! No way did Hillary
February 1, 2009 - 03:45 ET by mostlymoderateBS! No way did Hillary endure the sexism that Palin endured. The attacks on Palin and her family shock the conscience and I am not even counting the numerous attacks on "hillbilly hicks" from anywhere other than New York City or Los Angeles.
Playing the victim card
February 1, 2009 - 05:14 ET by EdhenryPlaying the victim card while asking to be leader of free world. Nice combo. Hillary was wrong woman, too much baggage. O was more liberal which suited the bias media.
Palin was right woman and endured more from the fossil media than Hillary. But that was becasue Sarah embarrased the media. Sarah had values, a career far beyond Diane, Viera, Katy, a family (and she had the audacity to look better than all of them combined)
Clift? idoit, stuck on cannards. Not worth listening to.
Eleanor, shut up! You stood
February 1, 2009 - 06:13 ET by SlicksterEleanor, shut up! You stood by and did nothing when they attacked Gov. Palin. You are a mindless media drone.
Not to mention...
February 1, 2009 - 07:52 ET by BobAnthonyA CERTAIN C-WORD!
Want the PLAIN truth and no spin? Listen to The Plains Radio Network online. It's like nothing you've ever heard.
www.plainsradio.com
→ It's OK Bob
February 1, 2009 - 09:58 ET by Cool ArrowWe can say "crustacean"
Ask not what your country can do for you. Ask what you can do for your country - Khalil Gibran
AA?
February 1, 2009 - 12:45 ET by slickwillie2001Has it occurred to Clift that if not for Affirmative Action of the gender variety, she would not have a job or be invited to share her opinions on TV?
So on balance, do we think that AA makes up for sexism, or does it over or under compensate?
I don't think there was any
February 1, 2009 - 15:39 ET by RR GOPI don't think there was any 'sexism' against Hillary...only the charges of such by her supporters.
Now, there was against Palin...her hair, her dresses, her children especially Trig.
Agism against McCain.
Racism by Obama.
And ongoing showings of racism with the Michael Steele RNC election.
Hypocrites.
One of the 24% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 89% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory.
THERE WAS SEXISM IN THE DEMOCRATIC PRIMARIES
February 2, 2009 - 08:49 ET by RoyalAdmittedly, the sexism during the general elections was worse. But those on this board saying that there was not any sexism in the primaries did not follow the primaries very closely. I did. The sexism was evident and overwhelming.
It was kind of worse for Hillary in a sense because there was no network that is sticking up for her during the primaries. The only network that has been balanced during the primaries was Fox and unfortunately for Hillary, most Democrats don't watch Fox News.
Eleanor's a Woman???
February 2, 2009 - 11:27 ET by BW222I've never been able to figure out what sex Eleanor was. That's not a problem with Gov. Palin - she's all-woman.
BW222