In an interview with Marisa Guthrie of Broadcasting & Cable magazine, NBC Meet the Press host David Gregory insisted that the on-air Chris Matthews tingles over Obama and Keith Olbermann send-Bush-to-jail Special Comments at MSNBC are not to be confused with NBC: "NBC News as an organization is not influenced by those passionate, opinionated people that we have on the air." Gregory was objecting to the notion that MSNBC's "in the tank" political coverage harms NBC's reputation for fairness:
Q. Do you think the "in the tank" criticism that was leveled at MSNBC was fair? And do you think the image of the network has been resuscitated post-election?
A. We have opinionated people on MSNBC in that role in primetime. I don't think that is a systemic point of view. NBC News as an organization is not influenced by those passionate, opinionated people that we have on the air. Generally speaking people try to ascribe motives to particularly the political press. They reach these judgments through their own ideological prism. We're doing what we need to do.
It's always annoying when liberal media elites try to insist that their critics have an "ideological prism" that they completely lack. Gregory also insisted that Tim Russert's Democratic political background was an "extra qualification" and suggested the press will be tough on Team Obama, eventually:
Q. Do you ever feel that no matter how smart the question is or how well you follow it up, that Tim Russert had built-in advantages because Russert worked in the political sphere?
A. I don't agree with your premise that his credibility in the chair was about the fact that he worked in politics. His credibility was [due] to his work as a journalist and somebody who held people accountable. The fact that he worked in politics was an extra qualification. There are a lot of reasons to feel daunted succeeding Tim Russert. I don't feel daunted because I never worked in politics.
Q. How has the Obama administration handled the Washington press corps so far?
A. I think there's actually a lot they've tried to learn from the Bush team with regard to managing the press and being very disciplined. The Bush approach was to see the press as a special interest, in some ways to be dismissed. The Obama team would like to have a measure of control over the press and a little bit of distance.
Q. Critics say coverage of Obama has been rather adoring. How long do honeymoon periods last?
A. I went through that with the Bush administration where there was a period where people thought the press went too light with him. There is a period where the press is going to give [Obama] some room to get to do what he says he's going to do. And then there's time to match that up with the reality of the record. This is a period of chronicling. And look, the press is also fairly capturing a lot of the excitement about this president, about the mood of the country toward him.
Q. The administration was accused of selling the exclusive rights to Barack and Michelle's Inaugural dance to ABC News. To many, I think it flew in the face of the administration's pledge of transparency and openness. Do you think they could have possibly painted themselves into a corner?
A. They may be more transparent about how government money gets spent. There may be more of an effort to grant FOI [Freedom of Information] requests. But in terms of how they operate internally, their strategic thinking, I don't think they're going to be much different than any other administration. There are things they're going to try to keep under wraps; there are things we're going to try to shove out into the open. That's the tension between the press and the White House. We'll find out what their transparency really means.
Gregory also promised tougher times for Obama earlier on The Colbert Report. "I think the press will do a good job, I think the press will ask the right questions," he said. "I think you will see this press corps — I certainly will ask the same kinds of questions to this administration that I asked to the last. I think I asked tough questions of the last administration and I will do the same."
—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
There are things they're
January 27, 2009 - 08:36 ET by SeashellThere are things they're going to try to keep under wraps; there are things we're going to try to shove out into the open.
I have a feeling that what Obama wants under wraps will stay under wraps with this complicit press.
I have news for David Gregory...
January 27, 2009 - 08:41 ET by PrairieSkyMother Ship NBC (the National Barack Channel), sets the news reporting policy and tone for MSNBC...and as the old saying goes, s#*t rolls down hill...
"...peace is the highest aspiration of the American People. We will negotiate for it, sacrifice for it, we will never surrender for it, now or ever." President Ronald Reagan~ January 20, 1981
PS
January 27, 2009 - 09:36 ET by thebutlerdiditI agree totally with that statement! Who is Gregory trying to fool with this sanctimonious bull? I find it hard to believe he is this naive, so I will have to assume he is complicit. And he is a crappy anchorman, too. What a priggy,prissy man! Is it part of the job requirement that all the men at the NBC stations have a lobotomy and a castration? If not, it must be all the shock treatments. Yes, David Gregory, the media is just following the will of the people,(The nutz on the far-left), not reporting news in a journalistic un-biased manner. Could be why no one with any sense watches this mess.
Bringing the government in to run Wall Street is like saying, "Dad burned the dinner, let's get the dog to cook." PJ O'Rourke
tbdi...Right! And Gregory's reaction makes one wonder...
January 27, 2009 - 16:25 ET by PrairieSkyWhy he is so intent on trying to distance NBC from MSNBC?...There must be something (or someone...maybe Olbertwit, Chrissy and Maddow???) about MSNBC that he doesn't want to contaminate NBC by too close an association. Well, whatever Gregory's motive(s) is/are about why he objects to lumping NBC and MSNBC into the same basket, me thinks he objects too much...And his objections are in vain...As far as I'm concerned, they are one and the same.
"...peace is the highest aspiration of the American People. We will negotiate for it, sacrifice for it, we will never surrender for it, now or ever." President Ronald Reagan~ January 20, 1981
Phone call for Mr. Gregory....
January 27, 2009 - 09:05 ET by superconReality is calling.They said "Get a clue David".
David Gregory would pick up Barack Obama's dry cleaning if he asked him too.
Because with a name like Obama... you know it has to be good.
MESSNBC's DNA is all over Brian's Blue Suit
January 27, 2009 - 09:11 ET by CapeCodScottWhen Chrissey's Leg Gets that Thrill it affects the entire organization, Pathetic.
www.ScottOnCapeCod.com
"Most men lead lives of quiet desperation"... until they get fed-up enough to finally say something about it!
Remember to vote against
January 27, 2009 - 09:21 ET by ConservativeRexRemember to vote against these Republican Sen. when they are up for re-election. They all voted to comfirm the tax cheat Tim Geithner as Treasury Sec. These represent the very RINOS we must vote out. In every case. After this last election, we're onto them. Hell, even McCain didn't vote of this fella, that does surprise me.
Robert Corker (TN)
John Cornyn (TX)
Mike Crapo (ID)
John Ensign (NV)
Lindsey Graham (SC)--no surprise here!
Judd Gregg (NH)
Orin Hatch (UT)
Richard Shelby (AL)
Olympia Snowe (ME)
George Voinovich (OH)
Fitting
January 27, 2009 - 09:33 ET by nadadhimmiA tax cheat as Treasury Sec? What's so unusual about that? We have a communist as President. And if you don't like that comrade, we have a special place for you, for your own good of course.
ConRex
January 27, 2009 - 09:41 ET by thebutlerdiditActually, I have a different take on this. I would say most of those people shouldn't be in office, at least with a R behind their name, however, several of them have said they voted for Geithner, because they saw who the other possible candidates for Sec. of Treasury were, and he was the best of the bunch. This should tell you all about the Democrat nominees, if Geithner was lesser of the other evils. That's scary.
Bringing the government in to run Wall Street is like saying, "Dad burned the dinner, let's get the dog to cook." PJ O'Rourke
That's IF they were being honest
January 27, 2009 - 10:07 ET by choselife3xThough. It's almost TOO good an excuse. When I talked to the staffers yesterday, I asked what the Senators' reasoning was for voting for the guy. No one had an answer for that, so I told them they better come up with a reason for voting a tax cheat into office.
In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.
Cl3x
January 27, 2009 - 10:25 ET by thebutlerdiditI don't know, but when I spoke to Richard Shelby's asst, that is what she said, then he was on local radio, and he said the same. This morning Laura Ingraham said words to the same effect on F&F. Can't say about them all, though, but I guess it makes some sense. I still don't like it too much, though.
Bringing the government in to run Wall Street is like saying, "Dad burned the dinner, let's get the dog to cook." PJ O'Rourke
George Voinovich (R-OH) has
January 27, 2009 - 13:14 ET by stratmanGeorge Voinovich (R-OH) has declared his intention to retire in 2010. George looks a little sickly to me and may want to be with family more. (he is a good family man)
My fear is that a Democrat will replace him, and an activist Lib/Leftist at that. Ohio is going mad over the promise utopia types. That will be much worse than Voinivich.
CR...Thanks for posting this list...
January 27, 2009 - 16:35 ET by PrairieSkyI haven't had the chance yet to dig up who voted to confirm the tax cheat Geithner, our new Treasury Secretary...Unbelievable...Like you, I am surprised that McCain didn't vote for him...A moment of conservative clarity on his part! LOL!
As for the rest on this list, the only other one that surprised me a bit was John Ensign. I had thought that he would vote no, but I suppose nothing should surprise me anymore. I am so fed up with the Repubs on the Hill...It seems that none of them have a spine anymore (if they ever had one...)
"...peace is the highest aspiration of the American People. We will negotiate for it, sacrifice for it, we will never surrender for it, now or ever." President Ronald Reagan~ January 20, 1981
I went through that with
January 27, 2009 - 09:28 ET by motherbeltI went through that with the Bush administration where there was a period where people thought the press went too light with him
Uh, what galaxy was that in, David?
Who thought you went too light..MoveOn.org? Democratic Underground? Daily Kos?
You've (the media) already caved.
I'm waiting with bated breath for the day you actually hold him accountable.
I'm waiting with bated
January 27, 2009 - 09:31 ET by SeashellI'm waiting with bated breath for the day you actually hold him accountable.
Just don't "hold your breath" because it ain't going to happen.
Right...I should have said
January 27, 2009 - 09:39 ET by motherbeltRight...I should have said "not" waiting with bated breath!
Stupid keyboard! LOL
To David Gregory:
January 27, 2009 - 09:26 ET by okiehawk44Oh. OK. I was mistaken again -- hate when that happens.
Oh really....?
January 27, 2009 - 09:30 ET by supercon" We have opinionated people on MSNBC in that role in primetime. I
don't think that is a systemic point of view. NBC News as an
organization is not influenced by those passionate, opinionated people
that we have on the air."
Then how does he explain that stain on Chris Matthews's blue dress?
Because with a name like Obama... you know it has to be good.
Paradox
January 27, 2009 - 09:31 ET by KC MulvilleThe paradox here, of course, is that bias is something you can almost never see by yourself. That's like the Obama Administration "evaluating" itself and determining that they've done nothing wrong. Take their word for it.
How would David Gregory come to the conclusion that NBC News isn't biased? Naturally, he wouldn't think that he was biased himself. It would be his evaluation of others within his organization. When he looks at Andrea Mitchell's reporting, for instance, he'd judge her performance based on ... what? Ultimately, he'd judge her performance using the same standards he uses for himself. But all that tells Gregory is whether Mitchell's reports are similar to his own. Gregory still hasn't measured whether both of them are biased in the same direction.
Funny, though - he readily acknowledges that the MSNBC crew is compromised. "We're nothing like them!"
And isn't it amazing that
January 27, 2009 - 09:38 ET by motherbeltAnd isn't it amazing that NBC is not influenced by those left-wing commentators, but Fox News IS Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reilly!
Exactly, MB. What kills me,
January 27, 2009 - 09:50 ET by thebutlerdiditExactly, MB. What kills me, is that the lefties all want to rag on Fox, calling it Faux News, or Fix News, and saying it is far-right wing news. If that's the case, how is it that most people have no idea what party the people at Fox affiliate themselves with? You can't tell, for the most part, they just tell the news. As for everyone there being Republicans, then how do you explain Chris Wallace-D, Shepherd Smith-D, Geraldo Rivera-D, Alan Colmes-D, Greta Van Sustern-D, Bill O' Reilly-Ind, Glenn Beck-Libertarian? I'm sure there are more, but that's just off the top of my head. Yet, they don't embarass themselves with frothing and foaming and tingling.
Bringing the government in to run Wall Street is like saying, "Dad burned the dinner, let's get the dog to cook." PJ O'Rourke
Other excuses
January 27, 2009 - 09:35 ET by krendlerAnd when studies showed during the campaign that the "hard news" programs were hideously lopsided in their coverage of Obama (in time and in tone), we got "Well, Obama is simply a much more compelling story than John McCain."
And the creeps on MS-NBC (and NBC, like Andrea Mitchell) aren't merely "opinionated", they're overt partisans.
we at the...
January 27, 2009 - 09:41 ET by AJBWe at the government are NOT going to let the policies of the SS influence how we run our government. Our Nazi party will continue to be the party of the people and continue to work for the people. Yeah, the SS had NO effect on those old Nazis, now did they?
Oh yeah, NBC and MSNBC are
January 27, 2009 - 09:49 ET by SickofLibsOh yeah, NBC and MSNBC are COMPLETELY separate, and not to be confused with each other. No overlap whatsoever.
Then tell me this, Gregory, how come we keep seeing the same old MSNBC 'Allstar Media Whores' on MTP now?
Like Mitchell, Harwood, Todd, Freidman, Norris, Brooks, etc. Sunday morning on NBC is no different than any weekday on MSNBC. We're not that stupid.
Zzz....what? Sorry
January 27, 2009 - 09:59 ET by StarAZI tend to nod off when Greogory speaks...sorry, how rude. Let's see--is the question whether he, Gregory, is as slanted as the others? Answer...I have seen it. And, yes, the usual blah-blah types come on MTP. On a related subject--Chuck Todd is now chief WH correspondent? Is he a trained journalist? I thought he was a number cruncher or something.
Gregory
January 27, 2009 - 10:05 ET by east tennessee johnOf course, NBC News personnel aren't going to be influenced by a MSNBC "journalist "anymore than 1 pea in a pod is "influenced" by anyother pea in that pod. What self serving B.S. I'm waiting for these "hero worshippers" to blame Bush after the next attack, God forbid, and totally blow off what little creditability they have left and I want to hear the spin on that one.
Reputation for Fairness?
January 27, 2009 - 10:11 ET by NoJelly"Gregory was objecting to the notion that MSNBC's "in the tank" political coverage harms NBC's reputation for fairness..."
I wasn't aware that NBC had anything resembling any such thing...
You can yammer
January 27, 2009 - 10:13 ET by Karinon all you want, Dave. I'm not watching your network under any circumstances.
What a lying piece of garbage
January 27, 2009 - 10:51 ET by Lord ErondNow that we have them running for cover, it is amazing that they feel they have to get out there and defend themselves against the "in the tank" for Obama accusations. That's truly the first sign that you're guilty
Someone should fire this disingenous piece of trash.
"What you can not enforce, do not command" -Sophocles-
I will trust anything David
January 27, 2009 - 11:10 ET by TN MomI will trust anything David Gregory reports if he can first pass the KoolAid breathilizer test!
Oh, and Gregory, pass the KoolAid breathlizer to Brokaw when you're done!
This is just a response to
January 27, 2009 - 11:13 ET by marpelThis is just a response to the new Bernie Goldberg book, "A Slobbering Love Affair". Chris Matthews is so in the tank for BO that he professed his man-crush during the inaugeration, stating emphatically that MSNBC is also the network of "CHANGE"...and he was slobbering while he was saying it. As Goldberg has stated, "Chris Matthews is a hooker putting out for Obama"...LOL
gregory
January 28, 2009 - 01:00 ET by gordonAHAHHAHAHAAAHAHAHAAA!!!!
oh sure, they're not affected, nooooooo
man, I needed a good laugh.
can anyone at NBC spell delusional?