A Non-Melting Arctic Ice Update

Photo of Tim Graham.

A sharp friend sent along these contrasting links: The Washington Post published an op-ed Tuesday from Vikki Spruill of the Ocean Conservancy about environmental issues for the new president:

Focus on the Arctic. The Arctic, Earth's air conditioner, is already experiencing some of the most severe effects of climate change. Not only is sea ice melting, but coastal communities have been dislocated.

The Post accompanied this with a photo of melting Arctic ice over the piece captioned “Disintegration in the Arctic Ocean’s Ward Hunt Ice Shelf.” But the Daily Tech cites new research from the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign:

Rapid growth spurt leaves amount of ice at levels seen 29 years ago.

Thanks to a rapid rebound in recent months, global sea ice levels now equal those seen 29 years ago, when the year 1979 also drew to a close. ...Earlier this year, predictions were rife that the North Pole could melt entirely in 2008. Instead, the Arctic ice saw a substantial recovery. Bill Chapman, a researcher with the UIUC's Arctic Center, tells DailyTech this was due in part to colder temperatures in the region. Chapman says wind patterns have also been weaker this year. Strong winds can slow ice formation as well as forcing ice into warmer waters where it will melt.

Why were predictions so wrong? Researchers had expected the newer sea ice, which is thinner, to be less resilient and melt easier. Instead, the thinner ice had less snow cover to insulate it from the bitterly cold air, and therefore grew much faster than expected, according to the National Snow and Ice Data Center.

It’s always wise to check out the actual science developments on global warming issues when liberal reporters insist, with a rather unscientific attitude, that there is no opposing side to report on.

"There are ways of confusing the public in putting ping-pong matches onto television which we did not particularly think was useful...I'm not sure it's useful to include every single point of view simply in order to cover every base because you can come up with a program that's virtually impossible for the audience to sort out." --- PBS Nova producer Linda Harrar in an interview with me in 1990.

—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

wake up

Its not about the environment. Its about money and power. Those pushing the Global Warming fraud on us are making a killing and, like sheep, the MSM follows right along. They've already annointed Algore as their second savior, despite the hypocrisy of his lifestyle. Just like in any marxist society, the ones at the top live like kings while asking the rest of us to live like paupers for the good of the planet. Well, I hope the stupid masses give up their lifestyle... makes mine more affordable.

"...I'm not sure it's

"...I'm not sure it's useful to include every single point of view simply
in order to cover every base because you can come up with a program
that's virtually impossible for the audience to sort out."

Translation:  "I mean, y'know, they're a pack of dunderheads and we have to TELL them what to think because we're soooooo much smarter! "

The colossal arrogance of these twits is surpassed only by their complete lack of understanding of scientific method and respect for the search for facts and truth.

But hey!  As long as it "feels good", right?

 

and, of course, the debate is OVER!

A PROUD member of the Oogedy Boogedy branch of the GOP!

Sun Spots

I think we'll soon see scientists recieving grant money to study "global cooling".  I'm sure they will come up with some man made pollution which caused this unprecidented solar minimum (lack of sun spots) which is causing our earth to cool. 

 Recent computer models have shown that there is a .00198% chance that GPS satellites are having an effect on the solar cycle.  Everyone should get rid of everything they own that uses GPS.  We need to find an alternate form of navigation and timing signal.  This is the only way we can get back to the important work of stopping global warming. 

I'm sure they will come up

I'm sure they will come up with some man made pollution which caused this unprecidented solar minimum (lack of sun spots) which is causing our earth to cool. 

Exactly..  no matter what happens the climate change/AGW gurus will find a way to benefit from it.  I'm certain that if the present trends continue, global cooling that is (since the peak in 1998), there will be some who will say, See? Our efforts to stem AGW have worked! The Globe is cooling!  We saved the Earth! And this will only serve to give them more credibility with the masses and therefore more power. I hate to sound so cynical and pessimistic, but I really believe that this climate change/AGW con is going to stick for a long time.  

 

no matter what happens the

no matter what happens the climate change/AGW gurus will find a way to benefit from it.

You make a great point.  These guys (along w/the MSM) have made themselves invincible.  The MSM will never report anything to refute AGW because it would ruin their credibility (just like they have to protect Obama because they got him elected).

The fact is that climate is ALWAYS changing

The false strawman here is that there is, or should be, some form of stasis to the climate. It's just that the climate takes much longer than a normal lifetime to go through it's cycles. Therefore it's easy for narcisists and dunderheads to think that the climate is always the same as it is now. Like tectonic drift, it's easy to assume that the continents have always been in the same relative position as they are today. We of course know differently.

Next I am waiting to hear someone take up the cry to stop continental drift.

What about the receeding Moon!!!!  The Moon is receeding in it's orbit of the Earth by about 2-3 inches a year. In a few thousand years it will have a longer phase cycle and the tides will be less frequent. What should we do??!!!

Hey, I got the wrong "CHANGE"!

Alan Keyes / Sarah Palin - 2012

Wait! What??

The Continents are DRIFTING?!??

This is obviously from all of the heavy SUV's rumbling back and forth across the very FACE of MOTHER GAIA! 

This can be the ONLY EXPLANATION! 

I call 'dibs' on consensus, and... Hey!  Where's my grant money?

 

Ah, but the continents are

Ah, but the continents are drifting back together to recreate the original Pangaea.

How so, we ask? Through the miracle of Obamism, a growing cult which prays to Mother Earth every day for environmental neutrality.

Thanks to them, we will soon be able to stand on the shores of Miami and shake hands with Al Quaida in Tunisia. Just amazing.

 

Who cares about the

Who cares about the tides?!  THE MOON'S GOING TO CRASH INTO EARTH!!!! 

"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me

News Flash for Knuckle Heads ...

Here is the upshot for leftists and intellectually challenged university professors. . It is cold (below freezing) in the winter and warmer in the summer.   There is nearly constant darkness in winter and near constant sunlight in summer.   Ice can melt in summer and refreeze in winter.

Go figure.

The site Tim mentions has a

The site Tim mentions has a link where you can go and compare the differences in polar ice from year to year for yourself.  It's interesting and shows a built-in bias that the pictures next to the link within the Cryosphere Today site shows the polar ice in summer, when it is at its minimum.  If you look at the pictures in the link I've provided, you'll see areas with less ice, but it looks to me as if the ice in the Western Hemisphere balances out the loss of ice in the Eastern.  They even have a link to a movie where you can "View the updated high resolution animation of this year's sea ice retreat (01/01/2008 - 08/30/2008). ".  It's shocking.  From January through the end of August, the ice receded.  I've noticed the same thing outside my back door here in Illinois.  I always thought it was that winter-spring-summer thing.  Who knew it was Man-made Global Warming.  Use the first link and the date December 28, 2005 and you'll see that we now have more polar ice and not less, in just three years.  The warming cycle the earth was in is over.  I didn't cherry pick a date.  There was no data in January of 2005 that I could find.

The AGW'ers better hurry.  They only have a small window to claim "Our efforts have succeeded" before the cooling takes over and people start to notice we don't need to use tax dollars to buy carbon credits from Al Gore.

"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last."  - Sir Winston Churchill

The HIGH temperature in

The HIGH temperature in Fairbanks, Alaska yesterday was -41 and at it's lowest point (-47) was 8 degrees from a record low.

Global warming indeed. 

www.theholyrosary.org

"There is no problem, I tell you, no matter how difficult it is, that we can not resolve by the prayer of the Holy Rosary." -Sister Lucia

We've succeeded!  Earth is

We've succeeded!  Earth is saved!  Al Gore is my hero!!  Everyone understands that we need to stay the course now, right?  Otherwise all the ice will start melting again, like, you know, in June or July. 

"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me

Over the weekend in Fargo, ND...

...my brother said it was -22 F with a windchill of -80 F.

Ouch.

It is warming,

It was 70 F when I woke up this morning and now it 74 F. The only thing that has changed is that the sun has come up and Hansan says the sun has little to do with AGW.

A person may be won over with logic and reason but the masses must be bought with spectacle and platitudes. - 2008 Elections

Agnostic, Tape your doors

Agnostic, Tape your doors shut and climb into the freezer.  At that rate of increase, it will be over 120 degrees before it starts to cool down.  Of course I'm using AGW mathematics.

"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last."  - Sir Winston Churchill

day off

I have a plan. I'm going to drink a few frozen drinks and hopefully I'll be able to stay cool until the sun goes down. If I wake up with a hangover then I might welcome AGW. Otherwise I will just have to wait until summer.

A person may be won over with logic and reason but the masses must be bought with spectacle and platitudes. - 2008 Elections

Here's a personal story

Here's a personal story about Arctic ice and icebergs.

This took place back in the previous environmental crisis, the very popular "we are all going to die because of man-made cooling" episode (late '60's early '70's). I happened to be on assignment in a spot 750 miles north of the Arctic Circle. I asked my guide to take me to a place where I could see icebergs. And so he did.

He took me to a place where we could watch an ice shelf that stretched as far as the eye could see. Quite interesting. And lo and behold, every few minutes, a massive sheer of ice--miles long sometimes-- would simply split off from the ice shelf and crash into the sea. I remember hearing a somewhat delayed but enormous sound--much like thunder--when the ice hit the water. Huge waves were formed. Voila, an iceberg.

I asked my guide if this was an unusual sight (remember this was during the man-made global cooling "crisis".)

He looked at me as though I were a little nuts. "Of course not", he said, "this happens all the time at this time of year, and has been for millions of years."

Learned a lot during that trip.

 

Do you suppose we could convince Algore to check it out?

I'm sure he will find that your guide was misinformed ;-) 

What a gigantic ripoff this whole GW business has been - Al Gore has done to the world what Madoff has done to his clients!  We have all received one royal xxxxxxing!

A PROUD member of the Oogedy Boogedy branch of the GOP!

Arctic Ice Propaganda

1. First of all we have only measured the Arctic ice
via satellite since the '70s. This was a very cold period, so cold the
media was proclaiming another ice age was on the way.

Another Ice Age? (Time Magazine, June 24, 1974)
The Cooling World (Newsweek, April 28, 1975)
The Big Freeze (Time Magazine, January 31, 1977)

The Coming Ice Age (1/3) (Video) (9min) (In Search Of, 1978)
The Coming Ice Age (2/3) (Video) (5min) (In Search Of, 1978)
The Coming Ice Age (3/3) (Video) (8min) (In Search Of, 1978)

2. It is impossible using the scientific method to prove that man-made C02 is the cause of any melting ice ANYWHERE.

The Skeptics Handbook (PDF) (Joanne Nova, Ph.D. Meteorology)

3. The Arctic ice grows completely back every winter which the media intentionally ignores. They like to use the single day when the ice has retreated the most during the summer as propaganda that it is like that year round.

Arctic Winter Ice 1979-2006 (Animation) (NASA)

4. There are plenty of scientific explanations for any increased loss of Arctic ice.

Winds, Ice Motion Root Cause Of Decline In Sea Ice, Not Warmer Temperatures (University Of Washington)

5. There are also active volcanoes under the Arctic.

Arctic Volcanoes Found Active at Unprecedented Depths (National Geographic)
Hydrothermal Vents Found in Arctic Ocean (National Geographic)
Hotbed of Volcanic Activity Found Beneath Arctic Ocean (National Geographic)
Scientists Find Northernmost Arctic Hydrothermal Field Venting Water at 570 Degrees F (Science Daily)
Under Icy Arctic Waters, A Fiery, Unexpected Find (The New York Times)

6. Historically there is extensive scientific evidence of the Arctic ice melting in the past, obviously not caused by SUVs.

1922, The Arctic seems to be warming up (Monthly Weather Review)
Arctic Historical Data Cast Doubt on Climate Change Theory (CTV News)
Bones Of Crocodile-Like Beasts Tell Tale Of Arctic Warming Millions of Years Ago (Science Daily)
Less Ice In Arctic Ocean 6000-7000 Years Ago (Science Daily)

Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is Not Pollution

  OPERATION: HAL is in

 

OPERATION: HAL is in effect!!!!

Wait a minute...

"Earlier this year, predictions were rife that the North Pole could melt entirely in 2008"

Those predictions tried to account for the drastic reduction of Arctic ice that was being observed...

BUT IF THE ICE HAD ALREADY MOSTLY MELTED, WHY DIDN'T THE WATER LEVELS AROUND THE WORLD RISE 200 FEET AND FLOOD OUT LIFE EVERYWHERE???????

Did I miss the flood? Where was I?