How much do reporters hate George Bush? Newsweek correspondent Michael Hirsh appeared on the left-wing Young Turks radio show and cheered on the Iraqi journalist who chucked his shoes at Bush. "They have reason to be upset with the author of this, and a shoe aimed at Bush’s head is not such a terrible expression of some of that frustration." He suggested the Bush era was a time of "mass hallucination" and Obama’s rise put an end to the madness. Hirsh wished Bush good riddance: "This guy’s about gone, and we can stop pretending that there was any kind of, you know, rational strategic motivation behind this act of war that he committed." Hirsh said Bush and his team have "blood on their hands," but will never admit they were wrong. "Bush is not going to end up in The Hague obviously, there’s not going to be any charges against him, and so, you know, a shoe shied at him by an Iraqi journalist might be the one small measure of justice that was achieved."
Hirsh’s interview with Young Turks host Cenk Uygur was posted on YouTube on Monday:
CENK UYGUR: It’s obviously not a constructive way to go.
HIRSH: I think it was somehow appropriate.
UYGUR: You do?
HIRSH: I think the guy, the journalist who did it is now a hero in a good part of the Arab world.
UYGUR: There’s no question about that. He’s already gotten a courage award in Libya, and there’s thousands of people protesting for his release already. But do you think this is an appropriate wakeup call for Bush and if so, did he receive it?
HIRSH: Oh, I think Bush is going to need a lot more than that for a wakeup call. But I think – there are a lot of Iraqis, obviously, Arabs, but particularly Iraqis, who are quite angry with the devastation of their country. I mean, look at this report from Stuart Bowen’s office, the Iraq special inspector late last week, which concluded that despite all the money we put in there, all we acheived in doing was basically bringing the co untry to back to appromixately where it was when Saddam was in rule, and at the cost, obviously, of thousands and thousands of Iraqi lives and limbs. You know [adopting a laughing tone], they have reason to be upset with the author of this, and a shoe aimed at Bush’s head is not such a terrible expression of some of that frustration.
UYGUR: That’s really interesting. So. I thought what was much more problematic in that visit was Bush’s interview with ABC, where he says, you know, it turns out al-Qaeda wanted this to be the central front in the war on terror, and Martha Raddatz says wait wait wait, not before you invaded, after you invaded.
HIRSH: Yeah.
UYGUR: And he says, "So what?"
HIRSH: Look, you know. Very soon now, and I think about, in a little more than 30 days, we’re going to stop this, you know, nation mass hallucination [sic] we’ve all allowed ourselves to be subjected to, whereby, you know, we thought the Iraq war was viewed as a rational act. It was not a rational act. Obama rose to attention in part because in 2002 he said, ‘look, this is a dumb war.’ And we can now get on with our lives. You know, this guy’s about gone, and we can stop pretending that there was any kind of, you know, rational strategic motivation behind this act of war that he committed. Uh, and that’s that. Let’s just move beyond it already, and try to fix the damage as best we can.
Uygur then complained that Bush is "callously indifferent" to his disastrous actions, and Hirsh suggested that for all the blood on his hands, Bush isn’t going to be charged with war crimes, so the shoe-throwing is a small fraction of justice:
I think once, like Bush and all his senior officials, have made a decision like the invasion of Iraq, the alternative to defending it is too terrible. To contemplate the idea that you went to war completely unnecessarily, and that all that blood is on your hands, is just too much to contemplate. So I think you’re going to see Bush and Condi Rice and Rumsfeld and the rest of them, they’re going to spend the rest of their lives justifying that, trying to defend it. You will not hear anyone say "We screwed up the whole thing. It wasn’t the right thing to do." You simply won’t hear it, and that’s just the way it is. And Bush is not going to end up in The Hague obviously, there’s not going to be any charges against him, and so, you know, [laughing tone again], a shoe shied at him by an Iraqi journalist might be the one small measure of justice that was achieved.
Cenk Uygur (pronounced Jenk Ooey-gur) has let his radical atheist flag fly on the Huffington Post in a piece titled "If You're a Christian, Muslim, or Jew, You're Wrong":
We live in a twisted world, where right is wrong and wrong reigns supreme. It is a chilling fact that most of the world's leaders believe in nonsensical fairytales about the nature of reality. They believe in Gods that do not exist, and religions that could not possibly be true. We are driven to war after war, violence on top of violence to appease madmen who believe in gory mythologies. These men are called Christians, Muslims and Jews...
George W. Bush is the most powerful man alive. He is a class A imbecile. He is far less intelligent than the average Christian. But like most of the others, he believes Jesus died for his sins. That idea is so perverse and devoid of logic it should shock the conscience. Instead, it gets him elected, and earns him the reverence of a great percentage of America. America! The most advanced country in the world -- run by a bunch of villagers who still believe Santa Claus is going to save them.
There is no damn Easter Bunny. There is no Jesus waiting to return. Moses never even existed. These were all convenient lies from the men of those times to gain power. Their actions were rational -- they wanted to deceive their brethren so that they could amass power. I get their motivations. But I cannot, for the life of me, understand our motivations, thousands of years later, still following the conmen of yesteryear into our gory, bloody, violent end.
Jesus is said to have said on the cross, "My God, My God, why have you forsaken me?" Because Jesus was insane and the God he thought would rescue him did not exist. And he died on that cross like a fool. He fancied himself the son of God and he could barely convince twelve men to follow him at a time when the world was full of superstition.
Remember this when spin control artists like Time's Amy Sullivan tell you the Obama supporters and the religious people can easily make a coalition.
—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center.





















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Please pray for Cenk
December 18, 2008 - 10:38 ET by HockeyKidPlease pray for Cenk Uygar. His "oops" moment will come--hopefully not before he realizes its approach.
"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me
"And he died on that cross
December 18, 2008 - 10:51 ET by mattm"And he died on that cross like a fool. He fancied himself the son of God and he could barely convince twelve men to follow him at a time when the world was full of superstition."
And his disciples fled, cowered in fear and went back to their old lives as fishermen and tax collectors; being disillusioned and demoralized.......Until.... he rose again - appeared before them for 40 days and then ascended into heaven; having defeated Sin and the Grave...
There is no way Christianity would have survived two weeks let alone 2000 years had Christ not arisen. We'd never have even known of his existence. He would have been forgotten. But it's not the case. Even our calendar reflects the truth of Christ.
"REAL PROOF: THE DISCIPLES' LIVES
But the most telling testimony of all must be the lives of those early Christians. We must ask ourselves: What caused them to go everywhere telling the message of the risen Christ?
Had there been any visible benefits accrued to them from their efforts--prestige, wealth, increased social status or material benefits--we might logically attempt to account for their actions, for their whole-hearted and total allegiance to this "risen Christ ."
As a reward for their efforts, however, those early Christians were beaten, stoned to death, thrown to the lions, tortured and crucified. Every conceivable method was used to stop them from talking.
Yet, they laid down their lives as the ultimate proof of their complete confidence in the truth of their message." - Josh McDowell
Amen, this "he could barely
December 18, 2008 - 10:56 ET by Dan The Man 2Amen, this "he could barely convince twelve men to follow him at a time when the world was full of superstition." was what jumped out at me also. You handled teh response beautifuly.
Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.
National media is a farce...
December 18, 2008 - 11:09 ET by spiderdanOnly a blithering idiot reads Newsweek. If this were anything but a propaganda rag, editors of this bird cage liner would fire this "reporter" for straying from his mandate of objectivity.
It's clear -- to legitimate Americans -- most of these "reporters" are clamoring for status as "thoughful and insightful" editorial craftsmen, offering keen observations and real life experience to the readers while provoking dialogue heretofore avoided or overlooked. In this case, as most others, a left wing imbecile forfeits journalistic credibility for a chance to espouse a personal point of view -- using the aforementioned credential to gain access to a larger public audience. The worst sort of simpleton finds the words of this moron enlightening.
Young Turds
December 18, 2008 - 11:07 ET by winston smithYoung Turds
Hey, Jenkem, you coward, you left someone out...
December 18, 2008 - 11:13 ET by SickofLibsI noticed that although Jenkem mentioned Muslims in the title of his Huffpo post, ("If You're a Christian, Muslim, or Jew, You're Wrong"), he deftly avoided any insults to (or even mention of) Allah or Mohammed in his post, choosing instead to bash only Moses and Jesus.
He apparently at least has a self-preservation instinct.
Hmmm when I read it, he did
December 18, 2008 - 11:27 ET by taterHmmm when I read it, he did bash Mohammed a little and Osama bin Laden. More so than most people who bash religion but conviently leave out Islam.
Either way nothing we can do other than pray for him and hope he understands what Jesus did for him and what a loving God can do for his life.
www.theholyrosary.org
"There is no problem, I tell you, no matter how difficult it is, that we can not resolve by the prayer of the Holy Rosary." -Sister Lucia
Why no interpretation of the actions of the other 50 reporters?
December 18, 2008 - 11:24 ET by krendlerThese pundits have been extrapolating this creep's behavior (i.e., injecting their own BDS-based opinion) to say it represents the sentiments of the Iraq people and the entire Arab world. Gee, what about the dozens of reporters in the room who didn't throw their shoes, and more than a handful who actually turned on the shoe-throwing wimp and tackled him?
Don't I get to say, "Well, it's clear from this event that the vast majority of Iraqis and most of the Arab world are solidly behind the president and his liberation of Iraq from the hands of a mass-murderer and dictator"?
Them
December 18, 2008 - 11:48 ET by KC MulvilleThere comes a point in conversation when you just reach a dead end. Sometimes the other person's assumptions and biases are so different that you just can't carry a conversation with them. There's no common frame of reference.
These two represent a subculture within our country that simply occupies the same space, but whose political worldview is openly hostile to others. We see them as smug and self-important, utterly contemptuous of us. They haven't mastered the foundaton of society - if you want respect, you have to show it to others. So, until we see some respect from them, ignore them. Instead of being angry with them and trying to persuade them, it's better just to leave them alone. They're not worth the effort to engage them in constructive conversation. We can live within the same borders without needing to reach a common perspective.
The dull and the ignorant ... they too have their story ...
It's funny how smug media
December 18, 2008 - 12:44 ET by fitzfongIt's funny how smug media members can make fun of professional athletes who overuse "you know". Take a look at the transcript of this Newsweek moron's interview.
"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan
fitzfong.blogspot.com
The ghost of Khrushchev?
December 18, 2008 - 17:27 ET by j17ghsKhrushchev once promised to bury us while pounding his shoe on the podium at the United Nations. Is it just a coincidence that this Iraqi threw a shoe at Bush? (Or that we now have one of Khrushchev's comrades as president-elect?)
Dear Michael Hirsch: I
December 18, 2008 - 21:12 ET by seanrobinsDear Michael Hirsch:
I have a challenge for you:
Pick any Third-World tin-pot dictatorship in the world, where we all agree egrigious human rights abuses take place (your choice), and attend any public address by any official (again, your choice) in the government that is abusing its own citizens, and throw your shoes at him in protest of the human rights abuses.
Don't worry... I'll come to your funeral - rather, the funeral of what little that's left of you.
sean robins
blog.seanrobins.com
I hope he and other
December 18, 2008 - 21:20 ET by bigtimerI hope he and other ungrateful, despicable enemies within that have been expressing same sentiments burn in hell.
I cannot help but to express my total disgust here.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh