Only one thing to say to this:

CAPTAIN PLANET!

http://www.livevideo...

Teddy, we didn't grow up thinking that the people who were under the thumb of communism were bad, we grew up thinking the commie bastards who forced that failed system upon them were bad.

I guess he can safely rename it Communist News Network.

I guess we can expect the MSM to start asking, "Are you now or have you ever been a conservative?"

Moreover, the thought will never occur to Captain Amerika that instead of telling the world of his taking advantage of a woman when he was thirteen thinking that abortion would correct any mistake of his, he might instead show the world how to treat her with dignity, not molest her, and thus show the world how a gentlemen treats a lady and keeps the population down.

Those without stones sir, those without stones! 

Just another funny liberal. Ted has smoked way too much of his money!

Liberal Hypocrite - Funny Guy

 Making Fun of AGW http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/  

Back in April of this year on Charlie Rose Ted went all Hannibal Lectern (LINK)

www.ScottOnCapeCod.com

"Most men lead lives of quiet desperation"... until they get fed-up enough to finally say something about it!

...who just happened to be in the right place at the right time.

As a life-long Atlantan, I am ashamed that he is from my home town.

-Dave

Did this country just elect Obama/Biden, or was it Soros/Ayers?

just look at his choice in women! And btw he is a total racist secessionist. Have you ever seen the movie God's and Generals?  Old Ted does a bit where they are singing the "Bonnie Blue Flag" and he has to take the side of the confederacy. Real class act, he is!

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

SMILEY: To your point now about overpopulation or the world's population, what do we do about that, if anything?

TURNER: Let 'em eat cake!!!!

It is hard to gain say Justice White's dissent in Roe V. Wade

At the heart of the
controversy in these cases are those recurring pregnancies that pose no
danger whatsoever to the life or health of the mother but are,
nevertheless, unwanted for any one or more of a variety of reasons --
convenience, family planning, economics, dislike of children, the
embarrassment of illegitimacy, etc. The common claim before us is that,
for any one of such reasons, or for no reason at all, and without
asserting or claiming any threat to life or health, any woman is
entitled to an abortion at her request if she is able to find a medical
advisor willing to undertake the procedure.

The
Court, for the most part, sustains this position: during the period
prior to the time the fetus becomes viable, the Constitution of the
United States values the convenience, whim, or caprice of the putative
mother more than the life or potential life of the fetus; the
Constitution, therefore, guarantees the right to an abortion as against
any state law or policy seeking to protect the fetus from an abortion
not prompted by more compelling reasons of the mother.

With
all due respect, I dissent. I find nothing in the language or history
of the Constitution to support the Court's judgment. The Court simply
fashions and announces a new constitutional right for pregnant mothers
[410 U.S. 222] and, with scarcely any reason or authority for its
action, invests that right with sufficient substance to override most
existing state abortion statutes. The upshot is that the people and the
legislatures of the 50 States are constitutionally dissentitled to
weigh the relative importance of the continued existence and
development of the fetus, on the one hand, against a spectrum of
possible impacts on the mother, on the other hand. As an exercise of
raw judicial power, the Court perhaps has authority to do what it does
today; but, in my view, its judgment is an improvident and extravagant
exercise of the power of judicial review that the Constitution extends
to this Court.

The
Court apparently values the convenience of the pregnant mother more
than the continued existence and development of the life or potential
life that she carries. Whether or not I might agree with that
marshaling of values, I can in no event join the Court's judgment
because I find no constitutional warrant for imposing such an order of
priorities on the people and legislatures of the States. In a sensitive
area such as this, involving as it does issues over which reasonable
men may easily and heatedly differ, I cannot accept the Court's
exercise of its clear power of choice by interposing a constitutional
barrier to state efforts to protect human life and by investing mothers
and doctors with the constitutionally protected right to exterminate
it. This issue, for the most part, should be left with the people and
to the political processes the people have devised to govern their
affairs.

It
is my view, therefore, that the Texas statute is not constitutionally
infirm because it denies abortions to those who seek to serve only
their convenience, rather than to protect their life or health. Nor is
this plaintiff, who claims no threat to her mental or physical health,
entitled to assert the possible rights of those women [410 U.S. 223]
whose pregnancy assertedly implicates their health. This, together with
United States v. Vuitch, 402 U.S. 62 (1971), dictates reversal of the judgment of the District Court.

Likewise,
because Georgia may constitutionally forbid abortions to putative
mothers who, like the plaintiff in this case, do not fall within the
reach of § 26-1202(a) of its criminal code, I have no occasion, and the
District Court had none, to consider the constitutionality of the
procedural requirements of the Georgia statute as applied to those
pregnancies posing substantial hazards to either life or health. I
would reverse the judgment of the District Court in the Georgia case.

It doesn't get any better then this...

Ted Turner: "Global Warming Will Create Cannibals" (Video) (1min)

Censored Global Warming Videos

Yes, Mr. Turner, women are dying of unsafe abortions. Laura Hope Smith in Massachusetts. Edrica Goode, Diana Lopez, Holly Patterson, Chanelle Bryant, Orianne Shevin, and Vivian Tran recently in California. Brenda Vise in Tennessee.

 Oops! Wrong women. It's okay if we kill women in unsafe abortions here at home, because it's legal. It's only unacceptable if the guy who kills her can go to jail. My bad!