As Charles Gibson interviewed young vice-presidential nominee Sarah Palin, some might wonder: did Gibson (then a co-host of Good Morning America) throw tough foreign-policy questions at John Edwards in 2004, since he had only four and a half years experience in public office? No.
Gibson’s first John Edwards interview after he was nominated for vice president came on the September 2, 2004 Good Morning America, on the Thursday morning of the Republican convention in New York. Gibson didn’t ask any quiz questions about his readiness or about foreign policy. Instead, he asked six questions about how the Democrats would respond to the GOP going after the Democrats "hammer and tong last night." Gibson merely asked Edwards how he felt about it, and then demanded to know: "You speak with such equanimity this morning. Didn't they make you mad last night?" Edwards replied in part: "Oh, I thought they were over the top, completely over the top." Gibson repeated: " Did you get mad, though?"
Edwards appeared that morning on ABC, CBS, CNN, and NBC. At the time, we reported in the MRC Cyber Alert: "After being the most critical of last night's Republican speeches...ABC's Charles Gibson was the gentlest with Edwards, sticking largely to questions about the candidate's feelings. He asked if the Democrats went too easy 'not to engage as directly' in Boston....On CBS, Edwards stammered as Hannah Storm demonstrated a surprisingly hard-news approach, asking for Kerry-Edwards specifics" on counter-terrorism policy.
The Gibson interview -- or lecture about how the Democrats failed to whip Republicans hard enough -- began with this introduction:
CHARLES GIBSON: In the first half-hour, we talked about how direct were the attacks from the Republicans on the podium last night, directed at the Democratic ticket of John Kerry and John Edwards. A response this morning from John Edwards, the vice-presidential nominee of the Democratic Party. I talked with him a few moments ago.
GIBSON: Senator Edwards, they went at you hammer and tong last night from the podium here at this Republican Convention, saying the fundamental security of this country was at stake in this election, questioning John Kerry's ability to be commander in chief. I wonder how you felt as you listened.
JOHN EDWARDS: I thought there was an enormous amount of anger coming out of the Republican Convention. The contrast couldn't have been more dramatic with our convention and what John Kerry and I talked about. We talked very specifically about our plan to keep the American people safe, to deal with the fact that five million people have lost their health insurance while John, while George Bush has been in office. That four million people have fallen into poverty and almost two million people have lost their private sector jobs, and what we're gonna do about the war in Iraq. Instead, what we heard last night was a lot of angry rhetoric.
GIBSON: Did it make you in any way second-guess the decision at the Democratic Convention not to mention George Bush from the podium so often, not to engage as directly?
EDWARDS: No. In no way. The truth is that what John and I did at the, at the Democratic Convention, which is to portray a vision and a plan of hope and optimism, it's who we are. It's what I believe the American people are, Charlie. I mean, if the American, the American people are not represented by what we heard in that room last night. I mean, that sort of anger and personal diatribe. I mean, they want something better. They believe in something better. They believe, in fact, what John and I believe, that if we're sensible and smart, that tomorrow can be better than today. And that's the kind of America that John and I want to create.
CHARLES GIBSON: You have used this line about two Americas and they have turned that from the podium night after night after night, saying, A, that there aren't two Americas, and, B, that what's really there are two of, two John Kerrys. And they get into this theme about John Kerry's conflicting votes on various issues. How are you going to answer that?
JOHN EDWARDS: Oh, very simply. They're in New York poking fun at, at the fact that there are two Americas and out here in the real world, I mean, I've been out on, meeting with people, meeting with folks who have lost their jobs. These people -across the country, they're living it. I mean, these people who have lost their, millions of folks who have lost their health insurance and whose incomes have gone down, they can't pay their bills anymore, they're struggling everyday just to get by. The millions of people who have fallen into poverty. A lot of folks who've worked hard all their lives and now have nowhere to turn. I mean, the truth is, we can do better than that, and they can make all the fun about it they want in New York, but out here in the real world, people are living it and we have a plan to make their lives better and we're going to fight for these folks.
GIBSON: This crowd was chanting "flip-flop" last night. It is this elemental issue that they're trying to make that there are two John Kerrys, citing his conflicting votes on a number of issues.
EDWARDS: Yeah, but the truth is, Charlie, I know this guy. I know him very, very well. He's somebody who's an American hero, which is actually what Zell Miller said just a couple of years ago. He's somebody that all of us look up to and respect. He's got inner strength and courage and these, these are the kinds of personal negative attacks that you see when you've got the kind of record that this administration has. I mean, the facts are overwhelming about what's happened in this country in the last four years, and what's happening on the ground in Iraq right now, and the American people are looking for an alternative and we want them to know what it is specifically we would do differently.
GIBSON: You speak with such equanimity this morning. Didn't they make you mad last night?
EDWARDS: Oh, I thought they were over the top, completely over the top. And, and actually what bothered me more than anything was in the midst of -I mean, there was, if you, if you got up and went to your refrigerator to get a Diet Coke, you would -you would miss everything Dick Cheney had to say about health care and everything he had to say about jobs. I mean, this is the first, we've had 11 straight presidents in this country, Charlie, who have created jobs. This is, until George Bush. You know, we've got all these folks who are having trouble with their health care premiums going up, 26, 27 hundred dollars, and what do they have to say about it? Nothing. I mean, don't people deserve to know from their president and vice president what it is they've done and what it is they're going to do? And instead, all we hear is a lot of rhetoric about, about their opponent. I mean, I just think leaders in this country, the American people deserve leaders who are better than that and do better than that.
GIBSON: Did you get mad, though?
EDWARDS: Oh, yeah. I was, I was, especially about the personal attacks against John Kerry, because they're false. I know this guy and I know what he's made of inside and he's ready to lead this country.
GIBSON: John Edwards, good to talk to you. Thanks very much.
—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center.





















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Typical Media Bias
Fri, 09/12/2008 - 13:52 ET by flyingmonkeyI actually believe that the media's treatment of Republicans better prepares them for the debates. The best a Republican Candidate can do when being interviewed by the hostile MSM is a draw. It's a plus in the debates when the same question is asked of both sides.
Sarah Palin scored points yesterday by simply not giving the MSM an easy story. They're still going to spin it, but it will be seen for what it is.
"Gibson Didn’t Pound
Fri, 09/12/2008 - 14:09 ET by Blazer"Gibson Didn’t Pound Edwards in 2004"
However if Gibson was a chic, I'm sure Edwards would have been more than happy to pound him.
"You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious. "
- Ben Kenobi on Liberals, and the MSM.
" The Cake is a lie."
Dear John McCain, can we get over the "victimhood" ads already?
Fri, 09/12/2008 - 14:16 ET by smartestmaninamericaI support McCain/Palin, but frankly, I am getting sick of one after another playing the "Sarah Palin" is a victim card. I mean it is like McCain's entire ad team is stuck on stupid.
Meanwhile, Obama is putting out new ads (actually featuring him, how novel!) where his discussing issues (albeit quite generally).
So word to McCain. Enough of the victim ads, please! Geesh.
Obama On The High Road?
Fri, 09/12/2008 - 14:30 ET by Intellectual HonestyMeanwhile, Obama is putting out new ads (actually featuring him, how novel!) where his discussing issues (albeit quite generally).
I don't have the link but the latest ad out from Obama is to castigate McCain on his lack of computer savvy. Includes a shot of McCain in 1982. Is that discussing issues?
The McCain response to that one was "We're not hiring tech-support. We're hiring a Commander-In-Chief."
No, Obama has a newer one where Obama is speaking.
Fri, 09/12/2008 - 14:36 ET by smartestmaninamericaIt's a good ad in that it actually shows Obama. It sucks in that he is just dishing the same liberal "chicken in every pot" pablum we've heard from liberals for decades.
Still, our ads suck.
He has to stick to that
Fri, 09/12/2008 - 15:22 ET by Hunter12He has to stick to that "liberal pablum" with no specifics, because if he started telling the voters what he actually wants to do, about 2/3 of the country would be saying, "What the _ _ck?". Of course, the media would be there to interpret and correct things for him.
Obama: "... my Muslim faith..."
Snuffy: "You mean your Christian faith."
"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last." - Sir Winston Churchill
Are McCain's ads "dishonest"?
Fri, 09/12/2008 - 14:20 ET by smartestmaninamericaTechnically, no, but misleading, I have to be honest and say yes. The "lipstick on a pig" ad that featured Katie Couric. It appeared that she was castigating Obama for being sexist. Actually she wasn't talking about him at all, or the lipstick on a pig bit.
Now the new "disrespectful" ad takes some "liberties" with the context of some of the things they are claiming Obama said.
I mean, c'mon, we have a treasure trove of things we can be going after Obama on and we waste our time and dollars on this crap? Please. Can we get serious? i feel like I'm in a fight on a playground.
The comparisons have no end..
Fri, 09/12/2008 - 14:43 ET by Gary HallAmazing Tim, and all. NB and the MRC could turn this into a full time job; just comparing the past interviews, and current. Whether it with Palin, McCain, a previous Repubican candidate, a Rep. spokesperson, a McCain rep., Pres. Bush, VP Cheney, a former Rep. anything, regardless of who the interviewer is; Couric, Williams, the late Jennings or Russert, Brokaw, Larry King, Bill Moyers, John Roberts, the crew at The View, etc., it will almost always show the same darn thing -- they pound on the R's, attacking their background and stance on issues while defending the D's; and they throw softballs at the D's, and ask them about how tough it is having to deal with the attacks from the R's.
Yikes. In fact, it's worthy of a book - just hundreds of pages of the questions put to both sides, from the same folks. (;~/ gary
Gibson: "Did you get mad?"
Fri, 09/12/2008 - 15:26 ET by deerjerkydaveHoly softballs Batman!
Gibson: "What are you going to do to respond to the false accusations by the Republicans?"
Gibson: "How does it feel when the Republicans are so negative about you and John Kerry?"
Gibson: "Did you get mad?"
Gibson: "But did you get mad like I did?"
Just watched Palin's Gibson
Fri, 09/12/2008 - 16:14 ET by JasonCJust watched Palin's Gibson appearance and Obama's most recent one back-to-back. Several things were noticeable.
1. Gibson deployed the same brass-balled, no-nonsense approach to his questions and responses with Obama as he did with Palin. Obama was not given preferable treatment. Gibson tore him new one, in fact, regarding his statement about Israel.
2. Palin's interview was, in my mind, atrocious. How on earth does this woman inspire confidence? Obama's interview at least seemed like a conversation, in that his answers had something to do with the questions he was asked. Palin on Iraq: Indecipherable. Palin on preemptive attacks: Tap-dance around the major issue with nonspecific platitudes about protecting the US. Palin on foreign policy: "You can see Russia from some places in Alaska." Who. The. F***. Cares. I guess being able to see it precludes the possibility ofever actually going there.
3. Palin should be given the sort of scrutiny that is being decried as unfair or harsh. She is a complete greenhorn on the national scene and she should be vetted accordingly with respect to her positions and philosophies. Gibson was not "being mean", he was doing his job. And if you look back to February 2008, you'll see Palin herself criticizing HRC for not "toughening up" in the face of criticism, for, so to speak "playing the gender card". Please cease categorizing any and all Palin criticism as sexist. It does not hold water.
"They seem to believe that high moral indignation offsets and indeed outweighs all deficiencies of punctuation, grammar, spelling, logic, and style. In support of this notion there's only the entire culture." -R.R.
Sorry JasonC.NB's itemized list ID's more than your genralizin
Fri, 09/12/2008 - 20:22 ET by JayTeeDetails Dude..... your undefined, unreferenced Generalizations above, as referenced below, need "particulars" .......
"positions and philosophies" reference...Well, If she had only one or two I'd know what your're talking about.
"interview was atrocious".....which part all of it, and WHY ?
"how on earth does this woman inspire confidence" If giving Birth to 5 kids and being a Govenor doesn't inspire you....You are an un inspirable Cynic, Republican hater, and woman hater....(having no Girlfriends will make you that way.)
"face of criticism" now Sarah's carrying a fairly large face full of Criicism the last few days....and it's a pretty large list. You home in on one critique...Playing the Gender card....well BHO doesn't like ANYONE playing ANY cards on him or he starts whining...BUT...BUT....Sarah was pretty tough on the long list of criticisms being thrown her way......and her KIDS have been talked about, Critiqued WAY MORE in the last two weeks. than obama's Kids have even been referenced in 12 months. She has permission and reason to Return Fire on Criticisms.
you see, the Liberal Media respects Obama's Kids, but not Sarah's
I've given you way more attention here than you deserve. But like ALL Conservatives, we are happily in love with our Messiah, Too.
The Republican Revolution will not be Televised
JT -- luckily for McCain,
Sat, 09/13/2008 - 03:55 ET by Jack BauerJT -- luckily for McCain, Democrats have gone even more bat shit crazy than usual. And truly, that is saying something, because these guys are one electro-shock treatment away from lockdown in the local loony bin.
McCain seems to have something you just can't buy -- LUCK.
He has to be one of the luckiest politicans ever.
Your observations are
Sat, 09/13/2008 - 03:52 ET by Jack BauerYour observations are pretty shallow, crass and bordering on the hysterical.
Silly you. In case you hadn't the noticed, the prime function of the VP pick is not to say or do anything to embarrass the PRESIDENTIAL pick. Ands that is precisely what Palin did to perfection.
But please... I'm begging Barack Obama and all Democrats to KEEP running their Presidential pick against the Republicans VP pick.
Possibly the DUMBEST political move since Al Gore listened to Naomi Wolffe. As you'll find out when the polls close Nov 4. Keep up the good work.
JasonC
Sat, 09/13/2008 - 15:22 ET by MrShySo you knew what the Bush Doctrine was before the Gibson interview?
No, you probably didn't, as 50% of those in Washington didn't, either.
NOW PLAYING:
Governor Palin Get Your Gun
OMG Jason... To use
Sat, 09/13/2008 - 15:32 ET by bigtimerOMG Jason...
To use Gibson and brass-balled in the same sentence is hilarious.
You have got to be kidding, surely you jest, and what world do you really live in.
Never mind...
At least you gave me the heartiest laugh I've had all afternoon.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
Palin did rather well
Sun, 09/14/2008 - 08:57 ET by Seabeach4348At very least Palin came off as genuine and able to give reasonably believeable answers while under pressure. This is a lot more than I can say for Odumma who uh, hum, uh, well, now, let me, uh hems and haws, spitters and sputters when being questioned "a cappella" so to speak.
While it is true that not too many people know what exactly is the "Bush Doctrine" (didn't Charles Krauthammer coin that term after 9/11??) Gibson certainly didn't know either......and Sarah Palin seized the moment to correct him!
And, excuse me, but if Sarah Palin were a liberal dem she would have been treated very differently by Gibson and the by the always-necessary lamestream news analysis afterward.
Gibson didn't pound Edwards
Sat, 09/13/2008 - 06:22 ET by Cool ArrowGibson Didn’t Pound Edwards in 2004.
How do you know. Does everything have to take place in public?
Sorry Charlie, PLAY THE WHOLE INTERVIEW NEXT TIME
Sat, 09/13/2008 - 11:59 ET by willc17If you go to
http://marklevinshow.com/gibson-interview/
You will see that the bold/underlined parts of the interview that ABC decided to cut from the interview. So the ABC standard is we cut what we don't like? Sorry Charlie, but bloggers will catch it everytime. That's the P.D.S. of ABC. They will say, well we had to cut some out to fit it into the timeline because of IKE. I bet Chris Mathews knows about it and won't report it. Keep it up MSM, you are going to make the left loose another one.
Edwards was not
Sat, 09/13/2008 - 14:43 ET by docba blank slate from the outer regions of nowhere...Being in the Senate and on the speaking circuit and a trail lawyer made him more a transparent quanity...
She , being mccains kneejerk, is a quanity of unknown that is without parallel...The attempts to obfuscate make her more a target..pun intended. her religiuos zealotry make her a fear monger, and her abuse of power and children, and office present the world with the whole package of what we have had for 8 years...
No way no how no mcC and running mate!
docb
Sat, 09/13/2008 - 14:48 ET by Cool ArrowNo way no how no mcC and running mate!
You're quoting Hillary? Isn't she fetching coffe for Joe Biden?
Stop making fun of her.
"Us white folk will take care of you" - Barbara Walters
Ct... Love your
Sat, 09/13/2008 - 15:03 ET by bigtimerCt...
Love your tag-line...
I was so angry with that coming from WaWa like I posted yesterday...
as to docb...phew...
By the way, I think it's Biden fetchin' coffee for Hillary in the upcoming future...
No matter what, this is getting to be so much fun...never thought this election would be bringing a big ol' smile to my face.
We've got the melt-down of The Chosen One, along with the msm...a twofer!
Nothing like watching you enemies self-destruct.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
Yay, docb!
Sat, 09/13/2008 - 15:10 ET by BlondeYou got some new DKos talking points!
Woo hoo.
I salute you for finally learning some manners, silly troll.
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
You know Blonde,
Sat, 09/13/2008 - 15:32 ET by HillbillyKingA part of Hell that Dante forgot to write about would be sumthin like this;
A rational, intelligent person with their OWN personality is inserted into docbs brain and is subjected to docb's thought process, in particular the intake of manufactured Ko's opinon and then the regurgitation of said opinion, in an endless loop for all eternity.
Being burnt alive at the stake for eternity would be a vacation compared to that. :-}
If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you.
Don Marquis 1878-1937
Huh?
Sun, 09/14/2008 - 09:11 ET by Seabeach4348<<Being in the Senate and on the speaking circuit and a trail lawyer made him more a transparent quanity...>>
Since when are "trial lawyers" transparent? And Edwards certainly wasn't "transparent" about his little honey on the side (and kid?) now was he.
<<her religiuos zealotry make her a fear monger...>>
What in the world are you talking about? And just because she's a Christian doesn't make her a zealot!
<<...and her abuse of power and children,...>>
When? Where? Sarah Palin abuses children? That's a rather heavy allegation, boy!
Just keep drinking that liberal Kool-Aid! They may have changed the flavor, but apparently it's the same old crap
". . . a blank slate from
Sun, 09/14/2008 - 10:01 ET by Galvanic". . . a blank slate from the outer regions of nowhere...Being in the Senate and on the speaking circuit and a trail lawyer made him more a transparent quanity..."
Edwards a little known junior one-term junior Senator from North Carolina who declared he was running for the Presidency when polls in NC indicated that his constituents weren't going to re-elect him. He was hoping to get by on his Breck girl image, but not even Democratic voters were fooled, and he flopped in the primaries.
". . . She , being mccains kneejerk, . . . "
Another pejorative term thrown at Palin. Actually, as the polls have proven, Palin is anything but a kneejerk. She's rejuevenated the Republican Party like no one else.
". . . is a quanity of unknown that is without parallel...The attempts to obfuscate make her more a target..pun intended. . . "
She has a public record as as a small town mayor and Governor of Alaska. The fact that you didn't know what it was is indicative of your disinterest in Alaska, and the media's dismissal of her a inconsequential.
Again, the polls say otherwise.
". . . her religiuos zealotry make her a fear monger, . . ."
Apparently not for 80%-plus of Alaskans, who think she's doing a good job.
". . . and her abuse of power and children, . . ."
Whether she abused pwoer or not is still under investigation.
But unless you have any evidence that she has abused children, drop it.
". . . and office present the world with the whole package of what we have had for 8 years... No way no how no mcC and running mate!"
You can vote for whomever you want. But accusing the opposition of being a child abuser is the kind of over the top horsesh** that poisons any real political dialogue in this country.
Remember Your Children Need Food In Their Lunchbox!
Sun, 09/14/2008 - 04:37 ET by RedphillyI don't believe Gibson pounded her. She is going for the second most important job in the country. I don't think he pounded her nearly enough. Obama was pounded more by the entire media just for listening to his preacher preach. Not preaching himself; just for sitting and listening. She is trying to slip and slide into the White House with so much personal baggage and lies up the wazoo that it is just unbelievable. I just hope and pray that the American Caucasian people, because they are the ones that like her, wake up before November 4th and realize that unless you are rich the McCain/Palin ticket won't help you!
»→ Good point Redphilly
Sun, 09/14/2008 - 04:56 ET by Cool ArrowAnd since Obama takes a hands-off attitude about the hate speech his daughters are subjected to at Sunday services, it's no wonder he's already anticipating them being "punished with a baby" as he put it.
Sorry Philly, but we've already witnessed enough of your candidate's misogynistic, white-hating, America-bashing, Infanticide-defending perspective to give us enough fair warning.
Know what? For the first time in my adult life I'm completely ashamed of a Democrat candidate for the Presidency.
"Us white folk will take care of you" - Barbara Walters
Yes, my children may need
Sun, 09/14/2008 - 09:23 ET by Seabeach4348Yes, my children may need food in their lunchbox, and I certainly will not look to the government to put it there.
Sorry, but it appears as if every time someone "pounds" Odumma it's labeled as "unfair" or "racist" or "off limits". Of course, Sarah Palin is a conservative so anything is fair, even if it's fabricated or an outright lie.
More and more people everyday become aware of what a phony BHO is, and it will take us at least 30 years to recover and revcrse the damage that this Marxist will do to this country in just one term!