When athletes trash-talk their opponents before a big game, their comments often go up in the opponents’ locker room for motivation. Something tells me Jonathan Alter’s trash-talking in Newsweek is in Sarah Barracuda’s locker. The piece was headlined "Why Sarah Palin is Likely to Belly-Flop." (It doesn’t have that title online, but that was the header yesterday on Newsweek's list of most-read stories.) Alter is looking forward to Palin being "grilled," as if she was going on with the mooseburgers:
The problem is that politics, like all professions, isn't as easy as it looks. Palin's odds of emerging unscathed are slim. In fact, she's been all but set up for failure, which is yet another reason McCain's choice may prove to be irresponsible.
The McCain camp will have to either let her wing it based on a few briefing memos (highly risky) or prevent her from taking questions from reporters (a confession that she's unprepared). Either way, she's likely to belly-flop at a time when McCain can least afford it.
I imagine Alter might be sweating as he rereads this after her crowd-thrilling Wednesday night speech. They gave her perfect tens for nailing the dive.
It’s also ridiculous that Alter, the champion of the "public character" of a certain sex-addicted, intern-canoodling president he called "our rogue prince of prosperity," would try to swoop on "what Alaskans call ‘Troopergate.’"
Palin's claim that she had "nothing to do" with the firing will hardly go unchallenged. Because the media loves scandal of any kind, especially one involving the potential use of public power to settle private family scores, this story could prove a distraction to the McCain campaign all fall.
That sounds like both a threat and a promise. But it's deeply, thoroughly hypocritical of every journalist who huffed at the original Arkansas Troopergate, and the abuse of White House travel office director Billy Dale, and the collection of Republican FBI files. And....
—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Newsweek is on it's last
September 4, 2008 - 07:07 ET by ConservativeRexNewsweek is on it's last legs. I don't think they'll be around for the next election. Maybe they'll take that sorry Peggy Noonan with them. I never did give a hoot for this weirdo anyway. And after what she has said about Mrs. Palin, well, Peggy Noonan can go pound salt for all I care. I hope she never has another audience to speak in front of.
We need a grassroots movement
September 4, 2008 - 07:08 ET by theduck6turn off your TVs, cancel your subscriptions and think for yourselves.
There isn't even a pretense at objectivity.
After last night's speech I
September 4, 2008 - 07:12 ET by AntiMediaAfter last night's speech I know why the liberals tried to destroy her. They are afraid.
Loaded poll questions
September 4, 2008 - 07:25 ET by FoolicanSometimes, the local rag, the Gainesville Sun, likes to have silly little polls that don't necessarily show their objectivity. Here's an example:
Would you vote for Sarah Palin if she ran for president?
1. Yes. Lack of experience is not an issue to me.
2. Maybe, although she does lack experience.
3. No. She lacks the experience to become commander-in-chief.
4. Not sure, but lack of experience may be a factor in my choice.
Gee, no bias there,
September 4, 2008 - 08:34 ET by MassConservGee, no bias there, Foolican.
That's just this side of,
Would you vote for Sarah Palin if she ran for president?
Bad News for Obama
September 4, 2008 - 08:45 ET by Hunter12Using lack of experience as the main directive in choosing a presidential candidate is very bad news for Obama. He has no executive experience. Let's rewrite that poll question to say what they really mean at the Gainesville Sun:
Would you vote for Sarah Palin if she ran for president?
1. Yes. The fact that she's not Barack Obama is not an issue to me.
2. Maybe, although she's not Barack Obama.
3. No. She's not Barack Obama.
4. Not sure, but the fact that she's not Barack Obama may be a factor in my choice.
"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last." - Sir Winston Churchill
"But lack of experience is
September 4, 2008 - 09:15 ET by Snappy"But lack of experience is not an issue for the Demecratic ticket." (repeat phrase again and attack Republican VP experience if questioned again)
This is a classic tactic of the left...the debate is over folks...
That's not fair
September 4, 2008 - 07:42 ET by mitchfloridaIt's not fair to revisit a pundit's prediction after 24 hours. Articles like Jonathon Alter's have a shelf life of 2 days.
His columns are never worth the time it takes to read them.
Meanwhile, here's what a Brit reporter has to say.
September 4, 2008 - 08:09 ET by Prester John"Today she is the most talked-about woman in the world. And with good reason.
Sarah Palin's sensational performance at the Republican Party Convention may turn out to be the tipping point of this rollercoaster American election.
Obama fans hoping she would fluff her big night were in for a nasty shock.
This speech has turned the election upside down. It was simply stunning. "
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/columnists/fergus_shanahan/article1647092.ece
Read it all, it's great.
Newsweek lavished praise on Palin in 2007
September 4, 2008 - 08:24 ET by Dee BunkDrudge had the article up yesterday but I had a hard time finding it today.
Read it here
Super find, Sue..
September 4, 2008 - 11:51 ET by Gary HallSuper find, Sue..
Here's the link you were looking for. Looks like Newsweek added 4 new paragraphs to the beginning of the old story (which you linked) - which, I suspect is OK to do, but the reprinted version here, doesn't make that clear. (;~> gary
Now This Is Woman’s Work
Right back at you Gary - good find
September 4, 2008 - 12:19 ET by Dee BunkIt's so funny how the liberal media love Republicans when they are taking on Republicans but no Democrat or Republican is allowed to expose corruption of the Democrats.
The only reason they had praise for her is because they never anticipated her being on the National stage.
Gary and Dee... thank you
September 4, 2008 - 12:27 ET by bigtimerGary and Dee...
thank you for the link...this is delicious hypocrisy isn't it...heheee
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
Typical MSM wishful
September 4, 2008 - 08:43 ET by mattmTypical MSM wishful thinking: report what you want reality to be, not what it actually is. Newsweek is merely more obvious about it, but it's all over the MSM.
Not to be the wet blanket,
September 4, 2008 - 09:03 ET by BruzillaNot to be the wet blanket, but the reaction to Palin's speech was the same as we saw from the speeches the Dems made. One side raves about how fantastic and effective the speech was, and the other side rants about how lackluster or outright bad it was. Being as I'm not supporting either side this year, I have found that neither side has much to crow about so far. IRT Palin, I thought she said all the right words, but her delivery didn't impress me at all. She might as well had been addressing a PTA meeting. I loathe Hillary Clinton and disagree with everything she says, but when she takes the floor she takes the floor. She displays strength and emotion, and I didn't think Palin showed much of either.
I think the odds are good that Palin will flop as she is definately not prepared for playing at this level. She has the ambition and drive to be there, but I think it remains in question if that'll be enough to get her through. What is also interesting is how the McCain campaign is pushing her harder than they are McCain. They know that Palin is much more popular than McCain, and they are trying to make her the face of the campaign, which will put even more of a burden on her.
You don't fool anyone Bruzilla
September 4, 2008 - 09:08 ET by Dee BunkYou've been in the tank for Obama.
You are right that Obamabots wouldn't be impressed by her speech - that's why you are not. No one is surprised. I could have told you how you'd react before she gave the speech.
No one is surprised. I
September 4, 2008 - 09:34 ET by NewsbusterbrownNo one is surprised. I could have told you how you'd react before she gave the speech.
The same goes for his tag-team partner PopularTech.
“There are no easy answers' but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)
Right NBB - but poptech is a woman hater - Bruzilla is a
September 4, 2008 - 09:36 ET by Dee BunkRepublican hater.
And Ginger is just a hater.
September 4, 2008 - 09:38 ET by Free StinkerAnd Ginger is just a hater.
right free
September 4, 2008 - 10:31 ET by Dee BunkI have to add that Bruzilla is much more mature than Ginger or PT.
I have to add that Bruzilla
September 4, 2008 - 11:03 ET by NewsbusterbrownI have to add that Bruzilla is much more mature than Ginger or PT.
Agreed. He might be wrong, but he's not immature.
“There are no easy answers' but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)
Newsweak
September 4, 2008 - 09:23 ET by sawing battaNewsweak: a once great brand....diluting itself beyond recognition.
Groundhog Day
September 4, 2008 - 09:31 ET by billbLet's have a groundhog day for Wednesday's day long attack on Palin BEFORE her speech! Programming from the MSM could prove quite entertaining.
One interesting thing I
September 4, 2008 - 09:52 ET by SnappyOne interesting thing I noticed, was that every commentator started off by saying "the speech was brilliantly written, she didnt write it, obviously........" and this happened across the networks, the only person to commnt on that was Brit Hume on FOX who stopped the show for a sec and asked why he kept hearing this as no politician ever writes their own speeches, they are all written for them.
Wussie lib men
September 4, 2008 - 10:28 ET by SpikerI'm sure Jonathan Alter is quite intimidated by women like Sarah Palin. We all know why.
Yeah, Spiker
September 4, 2008 - 11:13 ET by Mica the MagnificentNot that there's anything wrong with that.
The supposed purpose of a magazine like Time,
September 4, 2008 - 11:39 ET by IamTinmanOr Newsweek is to investigate and analyze newsworthy stories, not spread rumors, lies and innuendo. Those that aren't legitimate stories but just demeaning gossip say a lot more about the lack of objectivity of the magazines and their staffs than the subject of their smears.
Klein and Alter have been exposed to the public as liberal puppets who will stoop to amazingly low levels to get their candidate elected.
MSM missing the boat, as usual
September 4, 2008 - 12:03 ET by BaxterJWonder how NewsWeek will cover her speech.
I just misread the
September 4, 2008 - 21:53 ET by JasonCI just reread the editorial in question, and I think you're misreading Alter. His article is, for the most part, making predictions and offering analysis concerning Palin's capabilities in the long-term. That her acceptance speech was riveting and energizing to a roomful of really enthusiastic Republican delegates is hardly indicative of anything concerning Alter's critique. I believe you've jumped the gun on this one.
"They seem to believe that high moral indignation offsets and indeed outweighs all deficiencies of punctuation, grammar, spelling, logic, and style. In support of this notion there's only the entire culture." -R.R.