Liberals Register Felons for Obama, WaPo Can't Locate Any Critics

Photo of Tim Graham.
  • Bookmark and Share

On the front page of Monday’s Washington Post, reporter Krissah Williams Thompson chronicled liberal efforts to register felons to vote for Barack Obama. The story was stuffed with liberal activists, but nowhere in Thompson’s story was a single source who was critical of restoring voting rights to felons.

Thompson made it clear that neither the McCain nor the Obama campaigns were actively registering felons, but the liberal groups clearly assume the felon vote is a Democrat vote. The hero at the story’s beginning is Obama-backing activist Reggie Mitchell, who hopes to overtake the Republicans in Florida:

Mitchell is a leader of a disparate group of grass-roots Democrats and civil rights activists who are trying to register tens of thousands of newly eligible felons. They have taken up the cause on their own, motivated by the belief that former offenders have been unfairly disenfranchised for decades....

In Alabama, Al Sharpton's younger brother, the Rev. Kenneth Glasgow, will take his "Prodigal Son" ministry into state prisons with voter-registration cards for the first time. The American Civil Liberties Union recently filed suit there and in Tennessee to make it possible for an even larger class of felons to register. In Ohio, the NAACP will hold a voter-registration day at the Justice Center in downtown Cleveland this month to register "people caught up in the criminal justice system," a local official said. In California, a team will stand in front of jails on Aug. 16 to register people visiting prisoners and encourage them to take registration cards to their incarcerated friends or family members, some of whom can legally vote....

Mitchell left a personal-injury practice in 2004 to become Florida legal director for the nonprofit People for the American Way Foundation. Leading the liberal advocacy group's state voting rights project, he sent out news releases, lobbied politicians and, in 2006, marched to the statehouse with the ACLU and others, demanding that ex-offenders be allowed to vote.

Since the law was changed, the ACLU and People for the American Way have been reaching out to ex-offenders through Web sites that help people figure out whether the state has acted on their cases. Mitchell oversaw the project that helped build the foundation's Restore My Vote site.

Thompson also participated in an online Q&A at washingtonpost.com, which featured the critical voices left out of the newspaper story. One worried about how it will be exploited by conservatives:

New York: This just seems like a horrifyingly bad idea from a political perspective. All the McCain campaign heeds to do is run a bunch of photos of black ex-felons with Obama stickers, and pow, Obama has lost a few swing states full of edgy white voters. Could these efforts in fact end up tilting votes away from the activists' favorite candidates?

Another offered the classic rebuttal that would have been easy for the Post to find:

mediaskeptic: It's interesting that activist Mitchell compares the disenfranchisement of felons (!) to the historic disenfranchisement of blacks. I guess can conclude that our educational system's pushing of postmodern attitudes has robbed much of the public of any ability to discern how felons, black or any other color, neither deserve to vote nor have any particularly valuable platforms to back politically. Are they in favor not only of Obama but also of leniency for all misdemeanors and felonies, so that they can continue to prey on people? This all comes at the expense of law-abiding members of society.

Some were sassy:

Dunn Loring, Va.: If they could, do you think Democrats would register prisoners at Guatanamo? [sic]

Thompson just posted critical comments, and made no attempt to engage them. Some inquiries were just odd, like the person suggesting drug addicts are no more to blame for their behavior than diabetes sufferers:

Kensington, Md.: Aren't most people who are in our prison industry's Gulag system drug "offenders"? Given that drug addiction is a brain disease and not a legitimate crime, and we don't lock up people with diabetes, I'm glad these unjustly imprisoned people are getting their rights back. Thank you for doing this article.

In this case, Thompson sweetly replied: "Thanks for reading."

—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Coming soon!!

Dead felons in Illinois will be able to vote twice!!  But only for a Democrat.  There have to be some limits, don't you know...

sounds familiar

This reminds me of a friend of mine who's cousin was saying how proud he was for being a Democrat and he kept ranting and raving about how the Republicans are all criminals and that they'll do anything to get elected, even if it's illegal.

My friend turned to him and said: "What the (blank) are you talking about! You're a registered Democrat who's also a convicted felon! You can't even legally vote!"

His cousin replied: "What? That isn't true! They wouldn't have registered me if I couldn't vote!"

We both told him how wrong he was and that he's been illegally voting since 1984, when he was released from prison. He still didn't believe us and we dared him to check it out., so he did.

Suffice it to say, he finally realized that he can't legally vote, and he's stopped, but he's yet to admit that he did the exact same thing he was accusing others of doing.

For the love of peter, paul and sister mary holy water.....

.....Wow......this is so screwed up, in so many ways, I don't know where to begin!...... and just what it exposes of the illogical, on so many levels......I'm just.......There has to be......Bah!...I'm losing IQ points just trying to sink to the level required to understand that thought process!..........

Let me go read some Stephen Ambrose, to clear this sludge from my brain.

White                  -  does not mean racist

Heterosexual     - does not mean homophobic 

Male                    - does not mean sexist 

thanks!

The liberal numbskulls blame someone just for being born white, heterosexual and male.

Perhaps the libs should

Perhaps the libs should change their stance on capital punishment? I mean, the dead vote overwhelmingly democratic.

"This
liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about
basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008

Stopping at nothing to win

It's just part of the Democrat plan.  A few years ago, then-Gov. Tom Vilsack of Iowa signed an executive order to restore voting rights en masse to felons in the state.  Vilsack was sucking up to be Hillary's VP before that campaign crashed and burned.

Let's also keep in mind that Obama has ties to Chicago, hardly an example of clean politics; and the activist group ACORN, which has run afoul of election laws time and time again.  He's also a Democrat.  In recent years, the Dems have tried anything they can get away with to win or steal elections.  So it would be reasonable to expect a lot of cheating by the donkey party.

When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.

Not a good argument

"Given that drug addiction is a brain disease and not a legitimate
crime, and we don't lock up people with diabetes, I'm glad these
unjustly imprisoned people are getting their rights back.
"

That is NOT a good argument. Drug addiction is not like diabetes, as diabetes doesn't affect someone's reasoning ability, unless, of course, they’re in a coma. I highly doubt that comatose diabetics will be allowed to cast the "unconscious vote" any time soon. Drug addiction DOES affect your reasoning ability and repeated use causes permanent brain damage. Do you REALLY want a bunch of brain-damaged drug addicts deciding the future of America? Not me!

thanks !

Good point! Obviously it takes a brain-damaged Democrat to think drug addicts with felony convictions should vote and will do so with any degree of thoughtfulness, but then of late the Democrat party is being to lack any thoughtfulness whatsover. Its seems to me that "crazy" makes sense to them an "making sense" is crazy to them.

Exactly!

"lack any thoughtfulness whatsover"

Exactly! They don’t seem to think things through completely, if at all. This “brain disease” argument is a perfect example. Everything is equal to liberals, so drug addiction is the same as diabetes, even thought drug addiction affects the brain and diabetes affects the pancreas. This idiots don’t even know the difference between their brains and their guts! That‘s what happens when you try to make everything equal. Eventually, everything DOES become equal, except for common sense which is completely lost.

"Given that drug addiction

"Given that drug addiction is a brain disease and not a legitimate crime, and we don't lock up people with diabetes, I'm glad these unjustly imprisoned people are getting their rights back."

Yes, and the local street corner pusher is just an unlicensed pharmcologist. 

drug addicts need either treatment or jail

And which one they get depends entirely on politics, and not anything like justice. Examples abound...
JMR

The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.

Sarc mostly it depends on

Sarc mostly it depends on the drug abusers willingness to accept and respond to any treatment programs.  I favor th one that goes ready...aim...fire.  I was in a drug program that worked for many years and AA also.  One theme in those programs is that you had to bottom out before you were ready ... willing to be willing.  Otherwise you usually failed. 

Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.

I think you missed my point entirely

If you're politically well connected, it's treatment. If you're not, it's a cage. That's my point. It has nothing to do with the drugs or the abuser, it's all about politics.
JMR

The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.

That's not true at all

That's not true at all. It's the repeat drug offenders who end up in prison. Most people never get incarcerated for their first drug offence. They’re usually given a suspended sentence unless violence was involved and someone got hurt or killed or they were DEALING the drugs themselves. They are also offered treatment. I know this because several friends of mine were arrested for drug offences over the years and they were ALL offered treatment, at little or no cost to themselves, even though most of them were never incarcerated. And no one EVER asked them about their political affiliations before or after they were offered treatment.

Let's look statistically

For SOME reason, the stats in my sigfile stand, and somehow addicts like Cindy McCain, Rush Limbaugh, Noelle Bush, and various Democrat addicts I could name which wouldn't infuriate you as much get treatment, but other addicts by some strange coincidence get locked in a cage. Just like I said. Go buy opiates from the maid and see if you don't get thrown in the slammer.
JMR

The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.

Oh please!

"other addicts by some strange coincidence get locked in a cage"

Oh, please! Explain to me why SO MANY first time offenders, (you know, the ones that "buy opiates from the maid“) never get incarcerated? You may believe that only the politically connected is offered a lenient sentence and/or treatment, but I know that's not true. Of all the people I know who were arrested for a drug offence (none of who were was politically connected, BTW), only ONE was incarcerated, a six month sentence after his THIRD offence, and this occurred after he received TWO cost-free treatment programs. He even received a THIRD treatment program DURING his incarceration which shorted his sentence by two months. Not that it help much as he’s still abusing drugs, but I don’t blame that on some falsely perceived inequity of sentencing and treatment program availability between the politically connected and everyone else.

Face it, your cherry picking your vaunted "stats” in order to justify your biased view of the drug offence system in America. You don't want to accept the fact that people who can't afford to pay for their addiction treatments are offered FREE treatment programs for their addiction and that a LOT of addicts ether refuse that treatment or do not allow that program to be successful.

I'll "face" nothing of the sort.

You can't counter the facts I presented except by your own anecdotes, which do not work on me. And I've said nothing about "FREE" (meaning, "taxpayer funded," in honest-speak) treatment, I've just talked about treatment vs jail, and you don't like what I've said so you don't want to focus on it. Tough.
JMR

The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.

Here's your facts

You don’t seem to like my “anecdotal” evidence. I can understand this as I'm am offering DIRECT OBSERVATIONS of particular situations that occurred and those observations are counter to the “stats“ as summarized in the study you cite.

You want facts? Well, here’s the facts:

Only ONE of the people I know who were arrested for a drug offence was ever incarcerated, and I know 9 people who were charged with a drug offence. That’s an incarceration ratio of 1 in 9, 1 in 11 if you count the fact that the one who was incarcerated already had TWO prior offences. This is a direct observation, an eyewitness account. So, where's the sentencing inequity in those cases?

NONE of the people I know who were arrested for a drug offence were politically connected, yet ALL of them received a suspended sentence for their first offence, and one even received TWO! That’s a political connection ratio of 0 in 9. This is another direct observation, another eyewitness account. So, where's the political bias in those cases?

Both of these observations directly counter your claim of political bias in drug offence sentencing. But you don’t accept them because they are counter to you claims of bias and that challenges your faith in your vaunted “stats.”

By your own admission, eyewitness accounts won’t “work” on you. Well, guess which one is going to "work" on me? I'll give you a hint; it's not some generic "stats" that were derived by a study, especially if the results of that "study" is counter to my direct observations of how people are being treated for drug offences. If you can’t accept that, well, that’s just tough.

Game. Set.

Game. Set. Match. 

 

"I don't have time for this. You all can continue your co-dependency posts and make yourselves feel all chummy... Frankly, you all don't represent where America is going and you might as well get used to it."

--The Dooper

Nope, nope, and nope.

The idea that being poor and black and politically un-connected is no disadvantage is belied by ONE look at the people locked up in your local jail, or one look at MSNBC's "Lockup, Extended Stay" series. There's a reason anecdotes, like it or not, don't trump the national stats listed below, even if they make you uncomfortable because of the drugwar's racist history and racist current effects. Deal with it.
JMR

The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.

"deal with it." Umm...

"deal with it."

Umm... Ok. It's been dealt with. Just curious, how do you deal with it?

"The incarceration rate in state or federal prison or jail for men was 1,384 per 100,000 residents, for women 134 per 100,000 residents." 

Obviously, the drug war is sexist as well.

Is this the part where it makes me uncomfortable?

 

"I don't have time for this. You all can continue your co-dependency posts and make yourselves feel all chummy... Frankly, you all don't represent where America is going and you might as well get used to it."

--The Dooper

No Sarc you miss it.  The

No Sarc you miss it.  The peopel I knew in these progams were not politically connected and yet they were getting treatment.  Waht you dont understand is you have to want the treatment for it to take.  I knew many friends in the progams that died or got thrown into teh slammer or came back and actually worked the program and were successful.

Go to the local AA or drug rehab programs and get to know some of the people in them.  Stay in for like 10 years or more and then you might understand the mindset of the addicted and what it takes to bring about change.

Put simply is you need to walk in the shoes of those addicts actually trying to change their lives.  I will tell you that the other addicts are quick to spot those who are not serious and still using and they will call you on your BS, but quick.  They have been there and done that.

Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.

WaPo advocates for child rapists?

Just great, WaPo!!! You numbskulls!!! Next felons will be voting in politicians favorable to liberal sentences for child rapist/murderers, adult rape/murder, and every other crime under the sun.

Don't you jerks at the WaPo get it? Felons, in general, lack good judgement or they would not have committed the crime in the first place. Thus they will vote for politicians lacking good judgement too, or haven't you put 2 and 2 together yet? Are you at the WaPo trying destroy all of the USA with your crap?

You have s..t for brains!

Also, what does that say about Obama, that he is the "favorite" of child rapists and child murderers because he wants them to vote for him? I think some of the staff at the WaPo has left the planet!!!!

Here Democrats, more ways to steal an election

Besides registering felons as Democrats you should try registering:

  • children under 18
  • foreign tourists
  • dead people
  • people not yet born
  • felons from other countries
  • dogs, cats and pet birds
  • fictional characters
  • street names
  • cloud formations

New Flash! It is reported that all of the above has been tried with a great deal of success by Democrats.

Well, I am sorry I could not give you any new ideas then.

How about abortion by-products?

"people not yet born"

How about abortion byproducts? When you look at it this way, a fetus may appear almost human after all.

Impunitas semper ad deteriora invitat.

As the Democrats are Bound and Determined...

to give the vote to felons, the least we can do is set aside a special voting day, just for these new Democrat voters - Wednesday, November 5.

As they have already been inconvenienced by being in prison, that special voting day - just for them - means they don't have stand in long lines.

Details

The Obama effectively won the nomination by stuffing the caucuses with college kids. He does know how to organize. His opposition will need to work just as hard as he will. This is only one more example of what they will do.

What's next, voting rights

What's next, voting rights for the terrorist in Gitmo?  I mean, they have almost every other right an American citizen is afforded . . .

I bet some of you think that is far fetched, don't you?

CHEAT TO WIN...

I don't, after all, foreigners want to vote too. They feel they should be able to because America has too much influence around the world, & since we effect their lives, they should be allowed to vote in American elections. I flipped that on it's head this way, since America is responsible for defending most of the free world, it is us who should be able to vote in their elections, many in Europe don't like hearing that.

As for Dem's voting fraud, Cheat to win, anything & everything they need to do, they will, if they can get away with it.

 

"...it's still We The People, Right?"  Megadeth 

→ Equal protection

States have differing opinions as to who are eligible voters.

At the national level, the rights of felons who have paid their debt to society should be uniform.  IMHO they should be revested with their right to vote.

I ♣ my seal

Felons voting for Felons?

Since 50%+ of the democrat politicians are convicted or soon to be convicted felons it should be no surprise that felons will vote for democrats. The democrat party voters are made up of  Felons, Druggies, Drunks and welfare riders and now we find that over 90% of the racist blacks will vote on race only, with no qualifications required. 

The democrat party talking heads know that to implement socialism they have to cater to the lowest mental capacity crowd in the country. They're support for the enemy paid dividends this week when the communist invaded a free country and there will only be 50% support (as usual no democrat support) for the U.S. to get involved in helping a free country stay free. Democrats are free until they fall on they're own sword of socialism, so they say screw you and the rest of the world. Not since Hitler have the citizens been ordered to report to 'party' headquarters, for not toeing the party line (free speach not allowed), but it is happening in Denver. Co (Democrat convention) today.

 

Old, Retired and glad of it.

Get ready for the 'Obama Or Die' prison tats

Is there ANYTHING the ACLU doesn't stick it's dirty little snout into?

I can't wait to see the signs at the convention...

MURDERERS FOR OBAMA!

RAPISTS FOR HILLARY

FORGERS FOR OBAMA (the biggest contributors)

Makes one wonder whether the Democrat's tent is 'big enough' to hold all these people far enough appart so they don't have to interact with the 'leaders'.

 

The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back! Alan Keyes '08.

Wouldn't it be a hoot if many of those felons voted for McCain?

I just don't buy the argument that a felon is automatically going to vote for a dem if given the opportunity.

-Dave.

We are not going to save this country by being polite to those who are working tirelessly (and succeeding right handily) at destroying it.

especially politically-aware felons in FL

Who might feel justifiably grateful to a certain RINO governor, to the chagrin of Democrats...
JMR

The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.

Doubtful

It's doubtful that many will vote republican as we're talking about felons who are registered democrats here.

CM, many states do not require registration by party.

My home state of Georgia is one of them.

In a general election here, you can walk into a voting booth and vote for dems, repubs, libertarians, and whatever other party may be represented on the ballot, in any combination you choose.

-Dave.