History will note that the United States of America underwent a coup, brought about by the MSM, to drive their own leftist agenda to the mainstream of the American public. When you write the news, you can make it sound anyway you want to. You can make honest descent sound loony if you care to. This however, will not last. In the end, the ones who perpetrate this style of government lose, they always lose.  When it comes to it, Americans will not stand to have their freedoms taken away. Those little smirks you see on the Kos-kids will go away. They will forever regret tweaking the nose of real Americans.

You can't argue that Obama's performance during the trip makes it newsworthy, because the media were already there. The media had already decided that the trip was going to be news, long before Obama got on the plane. That's why they're there in the first place. By the same token, they didn't go with McCain on any of his trips, because they didn't think they were going to be newsworthy. (So how would they know, by the way, whether McCain looked presidential on those trips?) 

Like David Shuster, the NY Times decided that "America doesn't care" about McCain, and only cares about Obama.

The reason the media followed Obama and ignored McCain has nothing to do with the performance during the trip itself. It's very simple. The media like Obama, don't like McCain as much, so they're only going to cover the stories that fit their likes and dislikes. Of course, that's the definition of biased news reporting - you're only covering what advances your prejudices. That's like a judge not allowing the defense lawyer to present a case because the judge was wowed by the prosecutor. I mean, you just can't do that.

The real laugh came when she said: "When posing for an official photograph with a foreign leader, Mr. Obama often places his hand paternally on the other man’s arm, subliminally signaling that though a visitor, he is the real host of the meeting." When an American disregards the fact that he is in another country, and treats the locals as inferior ... that's the basis of the phrase "Ugly American." Since when did being an ugly American count as being presidential? And these people resented "cowboy" diplomacy?

The media is getting sillier with each passing story ...

This is 'Supremely" BIAS CRAP FROM NYTimes
The Republican Revolution will not be Televised

From Stanley's article:

"CNN even contrasted how the two candidates pronounce Pakistan. Mr. Obama favors the more international Pahk-ee-stahn; Mr. McCain keeps the a’s flat."

So I guess it's really Baad-drok O-bahm-MA, the way a Muslim would pronounce it, not the 'Americanized' plain old Barack Obama. We've all been mispronouncing his name.

Unlike the rest of us, The Messiah is 'international', even though the dope does not have even a rudimentary grasp on even one foreign language.

Hell, what am I saying, he even sucks at English. As we've seen in his freerolling speeches this week sans teleprompters, he can't string two sentences together without "uh, uh, uh..." He's even worse than Ed Koch, if that's even possible.

On an up note, this past week has been the first time he has dared venture out without all his usual propaganda signage and backdrops - very Presidential not to bring the sign crew along.

international Pahk-ee-stahn;

That's BALONEY!

Let me educate Ms Stanley from from neat position of actually knowing what I am talking about.

(And being a bit of a pronunciation buff regarding American English and British English, it's a hobby-horse of mine! Hot tip, our variations seem to be converging into a standard English on both sides of the pond.)

Parky-starn, That is how THE QUEEN OF ENGLAND, or stuck-up British elites, or the insufferable bores at the BBC may pronounce Paki-stan.

I can assure her that in England (home of English), as in the US, the vast majority of ordinary folks say PAKI...stan. FLAT.

Vote 4 change. Vote 4 anything. See Jack & Mr Shy's first campaign ad for the ONLY viable 3rd party candidate.