CBS foreign-affairs correspondent Lara Logan has granted an interview to Washington Post media reporter Howard Kurtz to acknowledge her messy personal life. Logan laments how she became "tabloid fodder," but she's telling Kurtz that the basic facts of the story are true:
[L]ast November, she broke off an intense relationship with another journalist in Baghdad. Soon afterward, Logan started dating Joseph Burkett, a federal contractor stationed in Iraq who was separated from his wife back in Texas.
Now, having just moved to Washington with an expanded portfolio for the network, Logan finds her romantic life reduced to tabloid fodder. And there is a new complication: She recently discovered that she is pregnant.
Logan, 37, says she and Burkett plan to get married eventually. Her divorce is slated to become final in two weeks, and Burkett's divorce trial is likely to end next month. But the case has turned decidedly messy, with Burkett's estranged wife Kimberly, the mother of their 3-year-old daughter, charging that Logan broke up her marriage.
A family friend told Kurtz that when Burkett came home to ask for a divorce and admit his affair with the CBS reporter, his wife was hospitalized after she overdosed on tranquilizers. Logan says the affair with Burkett came after her affair with CNN reporter Michael Ware:
Last year, about two years after Logan and her husband had separated, she began a relationship with Michael Ware, a CNN correspondent in Iraq. Shortly after that romance ended in November, she started dating Burkett, a friend she had met years earlier when both were working in Afghanistan.
Kurtz also quoted from the National Enquirer, proving the tabloid fodder is juicy enough to be reproduced in a prestigious daily:
Kimberly Burkett's lawyer, Susie Chmielowiec, told the supermarket tabloid that "Kimberly believes Lara stole her husband -- and now they're trying to steal her little girl." The divorce case includes a custody dispute between Burkett and his wife.
Chmielowiec and Burkett's lawyer, Jonathan Cluck, did not respond to requests for comment. The Enquirer quoted Kimberly Burkett last week as saying that "Lara Logan deserves to be canned" and that her CBS promotion is "a slap in the face to everyone who believes in marriage."
—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center
Comments Policy
HO-mewrecker
July 8, 2008 - 08:19 ET by SickofLibsHO-mewrecker
Your spot on Sick
July 8, 2008 - 10:55 ET by I.am.DILLIGAFThe word HO comes to mind. I wonder who else she was doing there.
Guns and Violence are not the answer but they are one solution to the problem== SARG
Same Burkett family?
July 8, 2008 - 08:23 ET by RightOfMostI guess I could look it up, but I wonder if this Mr. Burkett is the son of "Mr. Fake But Accurate" and if Dan Rather set up the (not-America) loving couple.
I missed
July 8, 2008 - 08:42 ET by Delsathe news value here?
What so I not know and why should I know it?
Good morning Delsa
July 8, 2008 - 09:23 ET by shawn228I totally agree. I guess the value here is to get a few shots in, to one of of CBS's chief foreign correspondents.
Some folks can dish it out but cannot take it
shawn... Except... except
July 8, 2008 - 09:53 ET by Jack Bauershawn... Except... except the MSM (and I don't just mean the National Enquirer these days) is always the first to print and broadcast "rumors" about the sex lives of others.
How about the New York Times a couple of months ago with a totally unsubstantiated rumor about McCain?
Yet for some odd reason, all the media chums are usually reluctant to the point of ..ahem... ignoring any indiscretions of their colleagues.
So much so, that when it happens openly (such as Olbermann's spats with O'Reilly), it is actually very unusual.
Those in the media can usually be relied upon NOT to apply the same standards to their ilk. In other words, they cover. and duck out.
Good point,
July 8, 2008 - 10:24 ET by NewsbusterbrownGood point, Jack.
“There are no easy answers' but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)
no, great point jack
July 8, 2008 - 11:53 ET by daberkmanThat's why newsbusters covers all scandals involving media figures. Like, when Bill O'Reilly got caught sexually harassing an employee while married newsbusters was all over it. Or when Rush Limbaugh went through each of his divorces or got caught with viagra coming back from the Dominican Republic or recently when a memoir came out discussing how Matt Drudge digs the gay bars, you can bet newsbusters was there. It's not about partisanship sir! It's about honor! Newsbuster honor!
I thank you for your
July 8, 2008 - 12:10 ET by Jack BauerI thank you for your compliment.
Now... huh? Newsbusters comments on the Media covering the news.
Why do you think it's the job of a website whose masthead states its mission is to expose "liberal" bias to initiate coverage of alleged BIll O'Reilly scandals?
Thouggh I'm sure many of the NB contributors would cover Howard Kurtz in a thread if he interviwed O'Reilly on the subject you mention.
As for Rush Limbaugh I believe there were many threads based on the Media's handling of that issue.
If you want to find alleged dirtage on any of the people you mention I think there's no problem locating that on the new fangled webernet. Try the Daily Kos, for starters.
But again.. who claimed Newsbusters was anything but a conservative leaning website interested in liberal bias.
“But again.. who claimed
July 8, 2008 - 12:36 ET by Newsbusterbrown“But again.. who claimed Newsbusters was anything but a conservative leaning website interested in liberal bias.
Obviously, this is very difficult for some here to comprehend, Jack.
There are no easy answers' but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)
Do you applaud Kos and Media
July 8, 2008 - 12:39 ET by daberkmanDo you applaud Kos and Media Matters when you read those threads? Or is taking "a higher road" simply not something you are striving for?
daber, are you really that
July 8, 2008 - 12:47 ET by bassndudedaber, are you really that dense, that you cannot discern between the mission statements of these blogs? If you cannot, you have no business being out without your leash.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
Of course I understand the
July 8, 2008 - 12:50 ET by daberkmanOf course I understand the difference. You are right, they are left. I'm asking: Do you agree with their tactics? Do you think there's any difference between Newsbusters reporting on logan's personal life and Kos talking about Limbaugh's? How will you rationalize that this one is better?
It is not right or left on
July 8, 2008 - 12:58 ET by bassndudeIt is not right or left on newsbusters. It is omission and/or hypocrisy. You have not read the mission statements of any of the sites, have you? Newsbusters is a conservitive site concentrating on the bias of news stories. Kos, du, hp are all just left wing opinion sites. Read up, duf...dude...
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
Yes I have a noticed a big
July 8, 2008 - 13:11 ET by Jack BauerYes I have a noticed a big difference between Kos and NB, as you ask.
No one on NB uses f*** as every other word.
No one has posted that she's a f*****g b***h; wishing her dead; hoping she gets imprisoned and raped; wishes she burns in hell even though they despise Christianity anyway so don't believe in hell; wishing she gets cancer, things like that.
I'm surprised you haven't picked that up. That's one big difference between Newsbusters and hate filled lefty blogs.
Cool. So, I'm going to
July 8, 2008 - 13:39 ET by daberkmanCool. So, I'm going to talk about Rush Limbaugh and Cindy McCain getting hopped up on pills and Bill O'Reilly getting grabby and sexually harassing employees despite writing a book about traditional values and being married. But: I'm going to refrain from using profanity! phew! now the left is going to be upstanding as pillars of discussion, at least as much as newsbusters.
Nobody is stopping you from
July 8, 2008 - 13:55 ET by NewsbusterbrownNobody is stopping you from posting elsewhere about any of that, daberkman. Knock yourself out.
“There are no easy answers' but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)
Ur a lil' late daber, for
July 8, 2008 - 14:04 ET by bassndudeUr a lil' late daber, for those anyway...we have already discussed those things sometime back. But feel free to join in any of the other discussions we are having today.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
I don't know if you are
July 8, 2008 - 14:13 ET by fitzfongI don't know if you are intentionally missing the point or not, but here goes: NewsBusters didn't cover your favorite, cliched Limbaugh/O'Reilly/Cindy McCain DNC talking point "scandals" to the extent that NB is covering Ms. Logan's real scandal because those stories got saturation coverage in the mainstream media...not to mention the lib blogs. In other words, there was no need for NewsBusters to report on the "scandals" themselves, because you'd find ample coverage on AP/ABC/CNN/NBC/CBS/Reuters. If anything, NewsBusters' objective in covering any of those "scandals" would be in reporting on the media's biased coverage of said "scandals".
If NewsBusters and/or other conservative-leaning sources did not shed light on Lara Logan's actions, the media would have simply buried it. This story speaks directly to Lara Logan's credibility as a journalist, and, as such, is highly relevant. Oh, and by the way, Rush Limbaugh and Bill O'Reilly are commentators, Cindy McCain is a candidate's wife, Lara Logan is presented as an objective journalist (a distinction she compromised through her "extra-curricular activities" with another network's journalist in the field...ever heard of conflict of interest?). Try understanding the distinctions before retreating to the well to produce the same, tired, phony moral comparisons.
"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan
fitzfong.blogspot.com
Try understanding the
July 8, 2008 - 14:18 ET by NewsbusterbrownTry understanding the distinctions before retreating to the well to produce the same, tired, phony moral comparisons.
I'm pretty sure he knows the distinctions, fitzfong, as most liberals do (whether or not they admit it).
“There are no easy answers' but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)
The self rightous liberals who frequent Newsbusters
July 8, 2008 - 14:45 ET by Dee Bunklove to miss the point and lecture on decorum and standards, despite the fact that they don't have a single site that can compare to Newsbusters.
They intentionally miss the points and slap our hands with rulers for minor infractions while ignoring the complete vitriol of their own.
There isn't even an infraction in this story. It's a story where the accused is giving her side. It's not just gossip and slander like so many their stories against Republicans.
"Constantly attacking (peaceful) religions rather than politely sharing your own shows lack of faith " DB
I don't know if you are
July 8, 2008 - 14:53 ET by Jack BauerI have no idea what his point is. Except that unless Newsbusters covers "everything" it should cover nothing. Sure, that makes sense.
(Must write of Daily Kos and complain that don't cover stories from the conservative viewpoint.)
Knock yourself out. I
July 8, 2008 - 14:55 ET by Jack BauerKnock yourself out. I honestly don't care how or what you write about any subject.
daberkman, if you had the brains to use a search engine...
July 8, 2008 - 20:47 ET by L.N. Smitheedaberkman, if you had the brains to use a search engine, you would have scrolled to the top of the page and found NewsBusters threads galore about the coverage of O'Reilly (whose out of court settlement admits no guilt) and the suit filed by Amanda Mackris.
IMHO, Mackris' entire story must be taken with a grain of salt considering that:
Remember also that while Mackris sued O'Reilly, O'Reilly countersued Mackris and her lawyers for extortion. THEN came the settlement, which neither party can legally discuss.
Is O'Reilly innocent of the charges? I have no idea. Does Mackris have credibility problems? Heck yeah, demanding $60,000,000 for the supposed indignity of volunteering herself to get paid $90,000 a year while listening to nasty talk from her boss.
"Well, I've got nothing against the press...they wouldn't print it if it wasn't true..." -- Joe Jackson, "Sunday Papers"
except the MSM (and I don't
July 8, 2008 - 10:36 ET by balboaexcept the MSM (and I don't just mean the National Enquirer these days)
is always the first to print and broadcast "rumors" about the sex lives
of others
So that means Newsbusters should, too?
Don't follow bal? I
July 8, 2008 - 10:49 ET by Jack BauerDon't follow bal?
I thought we were commenting on Howard Kurtz commenting with Lara Logan on media coverage of Lara Logan and her tawdry dalliances?
I thought I was saying "Who
July 8, 2008 - 11:09 ET by balboaI thought I was saying "Who cares?" :-)
So what?
If she'd been
July 8, 2008 - 11:16 ET by sarcasmoDoing single guys (not exactly a rare commodity in war-zones, right?) it would indeed fall in the category of "who cares?" The fact that Lara's so consistently into married guys -- if not marriage -- makes it tabloid & joke fodder. And to head off any accusations; no, IMO I don't think it's "sexist." A good looking, married-but-separated, guy doing the same thing with multiple married females & knocking one of 'em up would be fodder for almost exactly the same jokes.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
Absolutely it's tabloid and
July 8, 2008 - 11:25 ET by balboaAbsolutely it's tabloid and joke fodder. I just don't know how it fits in...here.
I'm commenting on #1. Kurtz
July 8, 2008 - 11:32 ET by Jack BauerI'm commenting on #1. Kurtz commenting with Logan; #2. The fact that the media reserves the right to trample through everyone elses privacy (which I have no problem with) but seldom its own denizens.
Sorry you don't find thast interesting. But do me a favor, don't waste your time responding with another post about how you don't care. That way we both win.
Well, it fits in
July 8, 2008 - 11:38 ET by sarcasmoOn the Daily Show, but Stewart was too-nice and/or the story hadn't broken yet. If it's the latter, I'm hoping he or his writers find a way to remedy that humor oversight.
For the argument that it fits in here, I guess conservatives would say her values on marriage are reflected in the rest of her reporting, and even if people like me might disagree, everyone has to admit Lara put Lara's credibility into the tabloid & joke category, not us.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
From Another Forum
July 8, 2008 - 11:48 ET by Del Dolemonte"So we have at least four named men, two husbands, at least one broken family, and this woman who CBS says is qualified to tell us about what is right, just and moral in the world.
Makes one yearn for the clean, clear, moral days of Dan Rather (who only did one Hertz Girl at a time back in the Civil Rights days.)"
That depends...
July 8, 2008 - 10:55 ET by sarcasmoThis is "news." Helen Thomas doesn't have quite the same hottie-value. It's also a bit amusing that a girl blessed with Lara's looks apparently can't, or doesn't want to, find single men in a war-zone. At this point, she shouldn't be surprised it's tabloid-fare, though.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
we're just "targeting the
July 8, 2008 - 11:34 ET by TruthMongerwe're just "targeting the hypocracy" bal
ask larry craig about it
Shawn
July 8, 2008 - 14:27 ET by DelsaTo tell you the truth, I did not and do not know who the bimbo is?
I am just out of the loop!
If only it were that simple
July 8, 2008 - 16:31 ET by UnsaneActually, no.
How come in my four months in Iraq, I saw ONE reporter the ENTIRE time? Well, I guess we know now at least in one case.
Also, I guess Baghdad is relatively safe. Definitely safe enough for Miss Logan to engage in...extracurricular activities. Well, I guess it beat hitting the road in Iraq, getting out amongst the troops and Airmen, and finding out what the rest of the country is like. You know, what she is PAID to do as a reporter???
Res tantum valet quantum vendi potest.
And you base this on the
July 8, 2008 - 16:33 ET by balboaAnd you base this on the fact that you never saw her?
Sure hope the adultery was
July 8, 2008 - 09:01 ET by taterSure hope the adultery was worth it.
www.theholyrosary.org
"There is no problem, I tell you, no matter how difficult it is, that we can not resolve by the prayer of the Holy Rosary." -Sister Lucia
Just a Guess
July 8, 2008 - 11:51 ET by Del DolemonteI would think that any former British swimsuit model (which Logan was) who is now a "reporter" in a war zone would have the good sense to use birth control. My guess is that she heard her biological clock ticking?
If I were Joe Burkett . . .
July 8, 2008 - 09:20 ET by CaringwhiteguyI'd make sure Lara submits to a DNA test for the newborn before any wedding bells ring.
And I can hardly wait for CBS's coverage of darling Lara's pregnancy. Maybe Katie will get access to the delivery room.
The Baghdad Herd
July 8, 2008 - 09:23 ET by KC MulvilleLogan's personal life is none of my business. I hope she works things out, especially if she's pregnant.
What strikes me, though, is the suggestion that the America "journalistic community" in Baghdad is really a closed circle. When people are thrown together in a place far from home, they quickly develop a herd mentality. It's simply a survival mechanism. And if the circumstances are tough, the ties are all the stronger. Romances are often just predictable symptoms of that herd mentality.
But if we're getting our news about the war from that enclosed group, then it isn't surprising that all the news comes from that herd perspective. It's no longer an open perspective on what's really happening; instead, the news becomes a herd exercise. And as we all know, the perspective of the herd is dictated by the leaders or leaders, who are usually just the most exotic, or the biggest bullies available. Quite likely, the newcomers would adopt the perspective of the veteran reporters who were there before the war, who were most likely to take the point of view of the native Iraqis -- who, in turn, would have been against the war from the start.
It would explain a lot, actually.
Exactly Jack...
July 8, 2008 - 10:07 ET by jpatch"All the news thats fit to print" seems to be a phrase that encompasses anything that will do potential damage to a Republican, even if it's just unsubstantiated rumors or completely fabricated lies.
Moreover, M(r)s. Logan was supposed to be in Iraq on a serious and important mission of covering the war; she wasn't supposed to be there for a sex-romp with married men who are/were working for the U.S. government. That is totally unprofessional - but I guess when you come from the party that defends Bill Clinton getting b.j.'s in the oval office, you wouldn't see the problem here.
I'm sure that sleeping with multiple married men while embedded as a reporter in Iraq didn't distract Lara or detract from her work whatsoever (or the work of the men that she was banging), much in the same way that I'm certain that bubba wasn't distracted or detracted from his responsibilities as President while he was busy getting fellatio from an intern...NOT.
I'm not sure her time in
July 8, 2008 - 10:23 ET by balboaI'm not sure her time in Iraq could be characterized as a sex romp.
Another non-statement from the blind balboa
July 8, 2008 - 12:33 ET by jpatchWe know you're not sure. Just like we know that you "don't see" 99% of the bias and hypocrisy that we document and converse about here.
It's so crystal clear that you find yourself to be witty and insightful, and yet in reality, you never add anything of the sort to our discussions. You hang in the background, avoiding any issues with serious meat to them, and then you chime in with inane one-liners on stories like this, that are more about exposing hypocritical and amoral behavior amongst journalists than they are about exposing a liberal media bias. Moreover, as I said above, this is pertinent because of the documented affect that extra-marital affairs can have on one's ability to do their job...although I'm sure that fact has remained unnoticed by your omniscient eye of judgement and reason.
As a reporter embedded in a war zone, I would certainly classify Lara's behavior in Iraq as a sex romp, considering she had affairs with at least two married men that were working for the U.S. government (as well as several servicemen, no?). That behavior is an insult to our service men and women, an insult and an embarrassment to her employer, and it is extremely insulting to the institution of marriage...which is probably why you (and shawn), yet again, fail to see why this is an issue at all. The men involved in these episodes must also share the blame...but perhaps we should think twice when sending young, attractive women to war zones to do "reporting".
Considering the incredibly weak and nearly non-existent "journalism" that has come out of Iraq since March 2003, I would say that there was more sexual intercourse going on with M(r)s. Logan then there was serious reporting...but I'm sure that you see things differently. What a shocker.
Nice soapbox ya got there.
July 8, 2008 - 13:24 ET by balboaNice soapbox ya got there. I notice you use it selectively.
I didn't say Logan was a paragon of virtue. I objected to the term "sex romp." Not much witty about that, is there? I wasn't sitting in the background for hours thinking up that post.
bal goes amish
July 8, 2008 - 13:47 ET by TruthMongersounds like it was a sex romp to me:)
you're not against sex romps are you bal?
what next - opposing gay marriage?!?!? evolution?!?!? electricity? running water?
Getting involved with two
July 8, 2008 - 13:51 ET by balboaGetting involved with two men over several years is hardly a sex romp, IMO. I just don't know what this has to do with her reporting in Iraq. Does infidelity immediately preclude you from being able to do your job?
Of course it does you Schmuck
July 8, 2008 - 17:37 ET by Mr. KafirIt indicates a certain lack of ethics. In the worst case it indicates a lack of morals. Now with that fact firmly established, how can I expect anyone like that to tell the truth??? And here's the punchline: she's a "journalist". Critical thinking isn't your forte. Stick to one-liners.
"Israel and Palestine should have their countries taken away from them, put in timeout, until they can prove they can get along." - balboa, ignorant bastard, 3/17/08
Mr. Kafir, you're adorable
July 8, 2008 - 18:52 ET by balboaMr. Kafir, you're adorable when you whip the Yiddish insults at me. Just adorable. It's so...honest.
Sorry, but having affairs does not in any way mean someone can't do well at their job, Pookie.
Trust
July 9, 2008 - 04:16 ET by UnsaneSorry, but having affairs does not in any way mean someone can't do well at their job, Pookie. Having an affair reveals the ability and absolute willingness to lie. If employees lie about this, well, they can lie about just about anything. Trust breaks down. Thus I wouldn't be able to trust whether or not someone did their job or could.
Maybe lying isn't that big a deal to you, but to me and countless others, it means quite a lot.
"Trust. What a quaint idea." - from Goldeneye
Res tantum valet quantum vendi potest.
You're right, Unsane. Lying
July 9, 2008 - 10:24 ET by balboaYou're right, Unsane. Lying isn't a big deal to me. In fact, I love liars. They're my favorites. That's why I enjoy politics so much. Yea, liars!
Well, allow me to retort!!!
July 9, 2008 - 15:57 ET by UnsaneNow allow me to address another smartass comment of yours:
And you base this on the fact that you never saw her?
One, as a logistician, where I was positioned, I knew who entered and left my base on a daily basis. This included civilians. Two, the ONLY reporter I saw on my base was Martha Raddatz, and rather than cover the stories of the troops getting Bronze Stars directly from the VP, she decided to do a story on how the troops cannot wait to vote for Obama.
And this is a shame. Just the hospital alone on our base was a gold mine for journalists. But, since the professionals who work there do so much good for Iraqis as well as the military, the Logans of the world avoid the place like the plague. (Did Miss Raddatz hit that place on her sojourn? No, but there were plenty of people from the VPs office who were running around there, and they were asking more questions and were more innately curious than the so-called "journalists"!!!)
Res tantum valet quantum vendi potest.
TEA & STRUMPETS...
July 8, 2008 - 10:47 ET by danybhoyThe story about Ms.Logan is on the prowel while on the job in a warzone really is not much of a story. But since she is a VERY active part of the MSM that is openly criticle of American foreign policy in the War on Terror, the judgemental Lara has opened herself to judgement. She has comprimised her reputation, & the last thing CBSnews needs is more trouble.
"...it's still We The People, Right?" Megadeth
The big thing is in many
July 8, 2008 - 10:52 ET by taterThe big thing is in many television contracts there is a certain "moral clause" in them so that if you do something stupid or against the law, a tv station can fire you (as it is seen as a black eye to the reputation). I've seen many examples with DUIs, inappopraite pictures on the web, and other law breaking infractions causing journalists to lose their jobs. I would think sleeping with married men and having a child with one of them while working as a journalist in a war zone would be a big breach of the "moral clause".
www.theholyrosary.org
"There is no problem, I tell you, no matter how difficult it is, that we can not resolve by the prayer of the Holy Rosary." -Sister Lucia
Lara Logan is a hottie.
July 8, 2008 - 11:00 ET by R D HelmLOL-Yeah, I know. Men are pigs.
Oink. :-)
The truth is insensitive. - Neal Boortz
YES WE ARE...
July 8, 2008 - 11:07 ET by danybhoyMen are pigs, & putting her politics aside, I would not be the one to say no if she was interested. She is a hot womenz, & I'm a bit of a sucker for a foreign accent. So I guess I am a pig.
"...it's still We The People, Right?" Megadeth
I hear you. She's just too
July 8, 2008 - 11:59 ET by NewsbusterbrownI hear you. She's just too ridiculously good looking for her politics to be a distraction. :-)
“There are no easy answers' but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)
WARES FUNNY WAY OF TALKING
July 8, 2008 - 11:06 ET by jaywlMaybe it is Logan's, ah, influence that causes Ware to talk rather strangely in addition to his Aussie accent. At times he appears to be having difficulty and has to just force the words out of his mouth with contortions of the mouth and almost expelling the words. Who knows what might be going on under camera range?
how to make it big
July 8, 2008 - 12:58 ET by Old EuropeIt's no surprise to me that she made it to the top. She's a maneater. Sometimes, clichés are right on the money.
The moral of the story
July 8, 2008 - 13:43 ET by greenfairieThe next time See-B.S. wants to send a female journo to issue biased reports of a war, pick Helen Thomas.
This was too funny,but
July 8, 2008 - 14:22 ET by kdizzydazeI just had to google Lara Logan to see what she looked like (yup, she is a hotty)
Anyways, the page I pull up is a June 24th, 2007 video of her taking jabs at Bill O'Reilly over some ridiculous kerfuffle. While that was of no consequence, the comments section was. I found this little nugget from some libdouche that goes by the handle "BoilTheminTheirOil":
This lady has far more balls and true moral compass than almost any other member of the US media. The US mainstream media should all look to this “pretty blonde” for how the job should be done! Are you listening Timmey? Tweety? BillO?
The two points that actually fit the current situation, I have placed in bold. While the second point (and remainder of the comment) plainly shows the ignorance, anger, hatred, and blinding rage that fills the left, the First point is simply appropo of what this little hoochie mama truly was up to in Iraq.
First point is simply
July 8, 2008 - 14:32 ET by general companyFirst point is simply appropo of what this little hoochie mama truly was up to in Iraq.
As long as you dont call it a "sex romp"
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
I still don't
July 8, 2008 - 14:39 ET by Delsaknow who this bimbo is!
Maybe I don't watch her channel?
Hot or Not I still don't get it and although men can be pigs, women can be, and in some caes are, a lot worse!
Sorry girls.
Like Grandma said " a
July 8, 2008 - 14:54 ET by general companyLike Grandma said " a woman can run a lot faster with her dress up, then a man with his pants down"
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
Delsa... Bingo! You are
July 8, 2008 - 15:45 ET by bigtimerDelsa...
Bingo!
You are dead on.
By the way... messing with Ware....
OMG!
She was a busy little leftist grass-hopper...must of been desperate to-boot.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
Liberals should love this
July 8, 2008 - 15:06 ET by DelsaLaura person. She has lived up to all their moral standards.
You know like "if it feels good do it"?
The Howards of the world are angry because she has not killed the baby yet.
They are not angry because she was having sex in Iraq while others are dying.
I don't care about her at all. Can we call for her resignation?
Never mind she will take her paid maternity leave.
Maybe she will name her baby Hussein
Hysterical Delsa
July 8, 2008 - 16:03 ET by Dee Bunkand right on.
"Constantly attacking (peaceful) religions rather than politely sharing your own shows lack of faith " DB
Lara Logan........
July 8, 2008 - 16:20 ET by connmanCold Blonde Skank!
This town needs an enema! - The Joker
Lara...
July 8, 2008 - 16:23 ET by Clear thinkerCBS....
Crotch Being Sold!
45 Communist Goals for America http://www.nationmakers.com/com_goals.htm
Yeah! Cool Blonde
July 8, 2008 - 16:36 ET by balboaYeah!
Cool Blonde Sluts!
Cagey Bedroom Sweet-thangs!
Crotch-focused Bad Sistahs!
boa... ...bet ya love
July 8, 2008 - 16:45 ET by bigtimerboa...
...bet ya love WaWa too...
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
You mean the Crotchety Bag
July 8, 2008 - 16:53 ET by balboaYou mean the Crotchety Bag of Sin? She's a regular Caretaker of Backseat Sex!
Lara Logan is a whore.
July 8, 2008 - 16:32 ET by thebronzeA hot whore, but a whore none the less.
She absolutley no morals, whatsoever.
She's also a...
July 8, 2008 - 16:35 ET by Clear thinkerJournalist.
Ooops, my bad, they are the same thing.
45 Communist Goals for America http://www.nationmakers.com/com_goals.htm
CT
July 8, 2008 - 16:41 ET by SemperrightBut not all journalists are hot*
*see Helen Thomas
I could be wrong she may have been the same Helen that launched all those ships in Troy, I hear she was a hottie.
"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference.
The MARINES don't have that problem."
President Ronald Reagan - 1985
Really?
July 8, 2008 - 17:16 ET by Del DolemonteAccording to her See-BS bio, she never received any formal "journalism" training-at least she never majored in it:
"Logan was born in Durban. She was graduated from the University of Natal in Durban in 1992 with a degree in commerce. She also earned a diploma in French language, culture and history from the Universite de L'Alliance Francaise in Paris"
http://www.cbsnews.c...
Bal
July 8, 2008 - 20:08 ET by DelsaIn this gals case, she had a great time sleeping her way into her job and beyond.
The book title?
My Days and Nights in Iraq...How I grew
Love in the Time of
July 8, 2008 - 20:21 ET by balboaLove in the Time of Chlamydia
The Legend of Logan's Pants
Your title is
July 8, 2008 - 20:44 ET by Delsamuch better than mine
All Quiet on Lara's
July 8, 2008 - 20:58 ET by balboaAll Quiet on Lara's Front
Her Thighs Were Watching the Bod
To Thrill a Talking Bird
...and of course...
Of Human Bondage
Lara's Front? Her Thighs? Human Bondage?
July 8, 2008 - 21:04 ET by R D HelmOh, nevermind!
:-^)
The truth is insensitive. - Neal Boortz