Neither does Nancy Pelosi's promise to bring down gas prices.

I posted about this also this morning and I am eagerly waiting for the moonbat fallout.

Bush lied, people died. That's their story and they're stickin' to it!!

what the report said. Unfortunately most of the media spin it like this AP article which starts out

"WASHINGTON - A new Senate report gives a fresh shot of adrenaline to the election-year debate over the Iraq war. President Bush and his top officials deliberately misrepresented secret intelligence to make the case to invade Iraq, according to the Senate Intelligence Committee."

Then continues to slam Bush by false implications and inuendo. It's not until about the 6th paragraph that you get this statement

"The Senate report, however, found that intelligence supported most of
the administration's statements about Iraq before the war. But
officials often did not mention the level of dissension or uncertainty
in the intelligence agencies about the information they were presenting."

Even that statement makes it seem as if mentioning the "level of dissension or uncertainty" Was something the Bush administration was obligated to do but didn't but excused all the Democrats who voted for the war for doing the same thing and all of the other Countries at the U.N. who's intelligence bore out the same thing. No one credible at the U.N. questioned or was concerned about "dissenters" to their intelligence either. It wasn't just the U.S. who didn't mention dissenting opinions it was France, GB, Germany and tons of other allies not to mention non allied countries like China and Russia.

I doubt there is any intelligence that's ever been without dissenting opinions. But this sure is the kind of spin that the Media and the sheepish public eat up without critical examination.

The moment I encounter anyone who says that Bush lied, it immediately marks them as unserious people. You have every right to complain that Bush is president, and like the captain of the ship, he has to bear the responsibility for any mistake. You can argue that being the executive means that sometimes you have to take a guess, and unfair as it is, you have to take the fall if the guess is wrong. I can respect those arguments. But the moment you argue that Bush concocted the threat from Saddam, that’s the moment you prove yourself to be a waste of time.

Rockefeller is a powerful senator, and because of his position, he has to be taken seriously. But he’s shown himself to be a loose cannon. He tried to demean McCain’s military service by accusing McCain of being a fighter pilot! What an immoral job that is (to Rockefeller)! Now he’s waving a report in front of the camera, McCarthy-like, claiming to have proof … even though the paper he’s waving is empty.

Eight years of this?

I work with a woman who thinks that Pres. Bush should be tried for war crimes, she says he murdered all the soliders who have died in Iraq. It should be mentioned that she thinks Obama is the only one who can save America. I try to talk to her rationally, but she just walks away in a huff. This is the kind of thinking that we are up against...it is just crazy.

Ok, he might as well admit it! The war was all about oil. It's now time to call in his markers; He should tell the new government of IRAQ, that the USA wants ALL of their oil. And by the way the price will be dictated by the USA. At last the MSM will be able to say "I told you so." It sure would make a great picture with W, Cheney and Mccain making this a joint announcement on CNN!

Here's an article about an FBI investigation of some Air Force contracts to a small company in Johnstown, PA.  While the article didn't specify who represents Johnstown in Congress, does anyone want to take a guess?  And I wonder how much this company owner's have contributed to that certain Congressman's campaigns?

Government Probes at Least 7 Defense Contracts for Charities

The federal investigation of contracting arrangements between the Pentagon and tax-exempt defense firms in Pennsylvania includes multiple deals that go as far back as 2002 and involve more money than was previously known, according to documents obtained by The Washington Post.

The FBI and the Pentagon's Defense Criminal Investigative Service issued subpoenas two months ago seeking information about a small intelligence firm called Commonwealth Research Institute, or CRI, and its parent company, Concurrent Technologies. Both firms are registered nonprofit charities based in Johnstown, Pa.

Concurrent was established two decades ago and has almost $250 million a year in revenue. Most of its research, program management and other work is for the Pentagon. It also has received more than $226 million in congressionally directed funding known as earmarks in recent years.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/06/AR2008060603810.html

Of course this whole "Bush lied, people died" argument is itself, ironically, a lie. That it has gone unchallenged should tell you all you need to know about how corrupt and biased the media is in this country. Not only do they not challenge it for the most part, they enable it. Just look at how they covered this "report" by Rockefeller. In the coverage I've seen, they deliberately give people the impression that this report is proof of Bush wrongdoing rather than telling them the truth about it being just another partisan hit piece by Democrats who, again ironically, are likely lying themselves.

Doesn't matter, Mr. Graham, at least not to those who feel their way to their truth. They hate Bush and nothing else matters.

Hypocracy doesn't matter to them, either, for the ones with whom I am familiar are the same ones with the "Hate is not a family value" on their bumper sticker.

At one time I tried to reason with them and discover their meanings. I gave up the idea as the only possible outcome of the effort was my own insanity. 

Novice