NRO: Clinton Slams Vanity Fair, Proves His 'Cavernous Narcissism'

Photo of Tim Graham.

The line of the day comes from NRO’s Media Blog, where Greg Pollowitz passed along the Fox News report that Bill Clinton is livid at a new, negative, anonymous-quote-filled profile in the trendy liberal mag Vanity Fair, written by Todd Purdum, the husband of former Clinton press secretary Dee Dee Myers. The office of President Clinton responded fiercely: 

Most revealing is one simple fact: President Clinton has helped save the lives of 1,300,000 people in his post-presidency, and Vanity Fair couldn’t find time to talk to even one of them for comment," the statement continues, along with several pages of argument refuting the article’s main points.

Greg quipped: "The Vanity Fair piece accused Clinton of ‘cavernous narcissism,’ which his office confirms with the ridiculous claim that he saved more than one million people."

The Purdum piece is long, but the headline is "The Comeback Id," and the summary does sound like it's rough on Slick Willie:

Old friends and longtime aides are wringing their hands over Bill Clinton’s post–White House escapades, from the dubious (and secretive) business associations to the media blowups that have bruised his wife’s campaign, to the private-jetting around with a skirt-chasing, scandal-tinged posse. Some point to Clinton’s medical traumas; others blame sheer selfishness, and the absence of anyone who can say "no." Exploring Clintonworld, the author asks if the former president will be consumed by his own worst self.

But here's some tidbits from the Fox summary:

One source close to Clinton even suggested he has never been the same since quadruple bypass surgery in 2004.

“There’s an anger in him that I find surprising. There seems to be an abiding anger in him, and not just the summer thunderstorms of old.  He has been called into question repeatedly by top staff,” a former aide to both Bill and Hillary Clinton told Purdum.

More devastating is Purdum’s claim that about 18 months ago, a former Clinton aide tried an intervention with the former president because he was hearing so many complaints about inappropriate behavior.  According to the article, the aide believed “Clinton was apparently seeing a lot of women on the road.”

Purdum wrote that the aide was rebuffed by advisers close to Clinton, never got to speak directly with him, and the attempted intervention was not well received by either Clinton.

For a reminder on what kind of Messiah profile Slick Willie expects, let's recall GQ's George "I Love the Smell of Shoe Shine" Saunders, who heavily promoted the Clinton lifeguard line:

In this little Clinton-caused moment, something occurs to me: If not for the William J. Clinton Foundation, every one of these kids would be dead or dying soon, since every one of them is HIV-positive, and until the foundation intervened, almost no one in the Dominican Republc had access to life-prolonging antiretroviral drugs (ARVs). And for most kids this young, the life expectancy for something with HIV no on ARVs is five years.

"I see a vacant seat in the poor chimney corner, and a crutch without an owner, carefully preserved," the Ghost of Christmas Present says to Scrooge, re Tiny Tim. "If these shadows remain unaltered by the Future, the child will die."

The kids – these twenty altered shadows – present Clinton with a poster: CHILDREN LIVING WITH AIDS. A BIG CHALLENGE FOR THE DOMINICAN REPUBLIC.

The teachers count off: "Uno, dos, tres..."

"DENK YOU!" the kids shout.

Saunders projected that Clinton saved the lives of half a million people. Sounds like the Clinton people will be demanding an update.

—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Let's not get technical

By the way, I know Greg posted this late on Sunday, so technically, using Clinton lawyering, it could not be the "line of the day." Forgive me the poetic license.

We should never forget the

We should never forget the 800,000 Tutsis that died in 1994 in Rwanda because President Clinton did NOTHING to stop that genocide.  The rivers of Africa literally turned red and the bodies of countless individuals floated into neighboring countries. 

The United Nations called its troops from Rwanda, causing a Danish General to quit and Presiden Clinton did NOTHING to stop the massacre. 

The Hutus in Rwanda literally slaughtered countless of Tutsis with machetes....what did Clinton do? 

Oh wait, but we should not talk abou this since he apologized after 800,000 Tutsis died. 

My favorite Bill Clinton Quote

"No one is more humble than I am. No one."

I recall another Megalomaniacal moment

where in a town hall meeting some poor woman was gushingly thanking BJ for making the economy so great, so that she could be successful, feed the kids, happily pay her taxes, etc.

His response: "I did it for you."  Humble, indeed!

In his mind, Bill Clinton invented economic prosperity.

He is a genius.  He gets all the chicks.  He saves lives.  He is rich, but in a good way. . .

Saved 1.3m people?  For

Saved 1.3m people?  For what?  My husband watched "Black Hawk Down" again yesterday and despite my attempts not to watch, I was exposed enough to be left feeling livid at Clinton.  He is a disgrace and a walking evil.

He saved 1.3m people!?  For what?  For later!? For Hillary to finish what he ineptly started?

It is disgusting.  

"Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war"  - Shakespeare

Black Hawk Down...dont even

Black Hawk Down...dont even go there. That operation was a political operation, and only for Clintons glory. When it turned ugly, instead of turning lose the Rangers, he turned tail and ran. The same way he ran to Europe during Vietnam. Sniveling little coward.

Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!

bassndude, Hmmm...I am no

bassndude,

Hmmm...I am no Clinton fan, anyone on NB can attest to this, but was it not President George H. Bush that took us inside of Somolia?

What Clinton did is refuse armored vehicles and personnel to go into Somolia.  It was this lack of armored vehicle that caused the death of 19 Americans. 

futbolisgreat1 No, it was

futbolisgreat1 No, it was during the Clinton years. It was Clinton that sent in the Army. What Clinton did was order the fire support out. He left the Rangers exposed and unequipped to do the job he had assigned them to do. US soldiers are trained to use indirect fire support and air craft to accomplish their mission. He ordered the carriers to depart the AO, and left the men exposed. Then would not allow the men to exact any retribution. Sure fire way to demoralize the military. Only the UN peacekeepers were there before that.

Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!

Here's what really happened

Bush 41 sent US military forces to Somalia in late 1992 after the election to help with famine relief because Somalia did not have a functional government.  Clinton took it a step further after he became president and turned it into a nation building exercise.  The US was in the process of withdrawing its forces and turning things over to the UN when the warlords popped up and started causing problems.  Clinton then sent the Rangers in to try and capture Aideed, the main war loard--this move lead directly to the BHD fiasco.

It is interesting to note than less than a week after BHD Clinton ordered that no further action be taken against Aideed and that the reinforcements he did send to Somalia (to include the armored vehicles that had initially been denied) were to protect US/UN forces during their withdrawal from Somalia and not to go after the warlords. By March 1994, except for off shore Marines who were there to help in case of an emergency evacuation of US civilians and the few remaining US military adviors ashore, all US forces were out of Somalia.

And all this time Osama bin Ladin was watching.

 http://www.history.army.mil/brochures/Somalia/Somalia.htm

You got it!

I was on active duty then and an rabid Clinton watcher. He has never to my knowledge accepted any responsibility for anything that ever went South during his tenure as the POTUS. He always shifted total blame onto someone else; Janet Reno for Waco, Les Aspin for Somalia (he was partly to blame) and even blamed Lewinsky for tempting him just to name a few. Poor old Bill was no match for a young girl in thong skivvies. However, whenever something did go swimming well he would declare himself the Master planner and had the media there to support his claims from pillar to post, even if he had NOTHING to do with it. When Congress got us out of debt and created a surplus Bill and Gore claimed they did it! They had nothing to do with it, in fact they had to be dragged to the table and only after it proved to be right they suddenly started clucking as if it was their ideas that make it come to fruition. It made me sick to my stomach then and it still does today.

What do you expect?

Bill Clinton is just a man, and like any of us he reacted to this article in a negative manner. How many of you would simply sit idly by as people made all sorts of nasty statements about you, while not being man (or woman) enough to state it publicly?

Lord knows Bill Clinton has his flaws and his issues, but it is foolishness to expect him not to respond to this attack my numerous anonymous sources! Funny how we don't mind the anonymous source so long as they are targeting someone we dislike.

Americaneagle, I have to

Americaneagle,

I have to agree with on this one, but don't forget the temper tantrum that Clinton had on Foxnews when Chris Wallace cornered him with the truth.  The man is a lunatic. 

But I do agree with the whole anonymous sourcing crap.  This weekend I was writing a paper for my Master's program and as I was creating the footnotes, bibliography and all, I did think..."Wow, incredible that for my academic paper I have to cite everything, if not I fail, but a newspaper, magazine, etc story doesn't need to". 

The most incredible thing is that many of the professors in journalism and other professions that demand bibliographies and citing, don't have a problem writing a story using anonymous stories.

 

What do I expect?!

Americaneagle ,

"Bill Clinton is just a man, and like any of us he reacted to this article in a negative manner. How many of you would simply sit idly by as people made all sorts of nasty statements about you, while not being man (or woman) enough to state it publicly? "


Given that he didn't act like a man when he was in office, NOR does he act like a man NOW, I would expect him to at least be self-aware enough to slink back under the rock he came out of and just keep quiet.

But no, that's never been his style...deny and divert has always been more his style...PARTICULARLY when the TRUTH is being told about him.

chiefpayne

It's not about what you think of Bill Clinton, the point is that he reacted just like anyone else would react. Would you sit by while someone was saying you were cheating on your wife...without one shred of evidence to back up the claim? And if someone was making those allegations against you, wouldn't you want to know who was saying it so that their motives and veracity could be determined?

As for this being the "truth", we don't know that. Generally for us to accept something as true we demand some objective evidence, not just the opinion of unnamed sources. Just because the story and the views of the writer comport with your OPINION of Bill Clinton does NOT make them true.

Let me see...

I seem to remember something about it being not about the facts of a given matter, but about "the seriousness of the charge."  Ring any bells?

Nevertheless, there has been more than enough evidence in Bill's post-presidential escapades to nudge folks to at least the "appearance of impropriety."  Should a man traveling without his wife take other women out on dinner dates?  Chat up women he meets when he's at scheduled functions, or when he's out on the town?  Should he do things that give observers' tongues a reason to wag?

You'd think Bill would've learned a lesson, but he wasn't paying attention.  It's all about him, unfortunately--even his wife's Presidential bid wasn't about her, but about him.  People cluelessly say that a McCain presidency would be George W. Bush's third term, yet ignore the fact that Bill Clinton lusts for a return to the Oval Office by proxy.  Why, if Hillary can't get it done, he's even suggested that Chelsea could give it a go.

Bill Clinton is, politically speaking, Vlad Putin with more hair.

--Mike

www.thebrattonreport.com

Thrown under the Obama Bus

Vanity Fair, the fave glossy of the latte left, has found itself a new hero in Obama, so it starts treating the Clintons the way it has treated Bush over the past 6 years or so.  It couldn't have happened to a nicer guy.

It's been amusing watching

It's been amusing watching the msm turn on the Clintons...we have had to put up with unending defense of this man for years, and they are just now writing down some of the truth about the guy that everyone has known for years....and by the way it has nothing to do with his surgery, before or after.

He has had a sky high temper forever, let alone nothing but a narcissistic woman chasing rapist liar .

"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill

....Live by the MSM, die by

....Live by the MSM, die by the MSM.

There he goes again,

There he goes again, pointing his finger....

Finger-pointing

As my father always used to say, "You point your finger at me, and you'll draw back a nub."

Oh, to be sitting across from Bill Clinton when he starts the barking and the finger-pointing...

--Mike

www.thebrattonreport.com

 

You're a poor second, Humble Bill

This morning, I felt a belch coming on, yet I stifled it; as soon as I could, I instead released it directly onto a plant.  Since carbon dioxide has a diabolical plan to kill us all, refusing to expel all that eeeevil carbon dioxide freely into the air contributed to the rescue of all six billion people on planet Earth.

Please, thank me.  I just saved your life through my selflessness.  And remember, there's no one more selfless and humble than I am.

Ka-chow, Willie!

--Mike

www.thebrattonreport.com

Clinton? more lives lost, than saved!

Wow, imagine the MSM being so quick to offer something like this for President Bush:

President Clinton has helped save the lives of 1,300,000 people in his post-presidency..

Matt Lauer of NBC's Today, once, while interviewing Clinton, fawned with the same sort of fantasy line in asking Clinton, suggestively, if he thought that his post-presidency legacy would be as wonderful as his presidential legacy. I'm starting to gag here.

President Bush is being credited with saving over a million lives in Africa, Indonesia, and other 3rd world areas; notably via his twin historic malaria and HIV/Aids program (PEPFAR), and because of the massive influx of prevention and treatment, millions more lives will be saved.

While it is truly commendable that Clinton decided to do something in his after-life of human value, one should consider that Bill Clinton's effort, while worthwhile, is a penny in the bucket compared to the massive effort of the Bush administration. Over $20 billion has been spent to date, in target programs - which included the distribution of over 1.9 billion condoms (in Africa - since 2004, alone).

And what was it that Clinton did during his presidency for global aids? Too little, too late - How many times is Bill Clinton going to apologize to Africa?

And how many millions died in Africa (D.R. Congo, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Ivory Coast, Darfur) from genocide, civil war and conflict, and from HIV/Aids and Malaria during his 1st legacy? 3, 4 5, 6 ..perhaps even 8-10 million.

Elsewhere. Did Clinton save any lives in Afghanistan? In Chechnya? In N. Korea? In Iraq? In the Middle East?

Has any other news outlet alleged Bill's cheating on Hillary?

If not, then all that's here is an anonymous allegation. Admittedly, considering Bill's history, it's tempting to believe he'd try something as dumb as this, but so far it seems like pretty flimsy evidence he's actually cheating on her again.
JMR

The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.

If ever a magazine title

If ever a magazine title could accurately describe a former President, it's this magazine and this former President.

"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan

"Saunders projected that

"Saunders projected that Clinton saved the lives of half a million people. Sounds like the Clinton people will be demanding an update."

Not an "update"... a recount!

Le mot juste.

;^)

IJ... Recount

IJ...

Recount indeed...ROFL!

"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill