Washington Post media writer Howard Kurtz reported on Monday’s front page that the on-screen feud between FNC’s Bill O’Reilly and MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann has spurred high-level calls between the top executives at Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation and NBC: "What began four years ago as a colorful feud between rival commentators, instigated by Olbermann as a way of drawing attention, has become a tale of bruised egos and secret maneuvering at the highest levels of two multinational giants."
Murdoch, FNC boss Roger Ailes, NBC boss Jeffrey Zucker, and General Electric CEO Jeffrey Immelt have all been involved:
Ailes called Zucker on his cellphone last summer, clearly agitated over a slam against him by MSNBC host Keith Olbermann. According to sources familiar with the conversation, Ailes warned that if Olbermann didn't stop such attacks against Fox, he would unleash O'Reilly against NBC and would use the New York Post as well.
Both Fox and the Post are owned by Murdoch, who complained about Olbermann's conduct in separate calls to Zucker and Immelt.
The high-level appeals failed, and O'Reilly has escalated his criticism of GE in recent weeks, declaring, "If my child were killed in Iraq, I would blame the likes of Jeffrey Immelt."
...Fox News spokesman Brian Lewis said Ailes never offered a "quid pro quo" involving a cease-fire by O'Reilly and Olbermann. "That's editorial control of Bill's show, and we don't do that," he said. "Bill doesn't run topics by Roger, or anyone else for that matter." Lewis dismissed the notion that Ailes has ever suggested using Murdoch's tabloid for revenge, saying: "Roger doesn't control the editorial policy of the New York Post."
O'Reilly's been pounding away on GE's dealings with Iran:
Days later, O'Reilly interviewed Tom Borelli, a portfolio manager and dissident GE shareholder. The program played a clip of Borelli, at GE's annual meeting, telling Immelt that the company's products are keeping Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad "comfy when he's plotting to kill U.S. troops and trying to annihilate Israel. It's just an outrage."
Last week, in an unrelated segment with CBS's Kimberly Dozier about being injured in Iraq, O'Reilly used a graphic that combined GE's logo with a photo of Ahmadinejad. The heading: "Business Partners."
GE spokesman Gary Sheffer called O'Reilly's remarks "offensive," saying: "He has a right to his opinion, and we equally have a right to be appalled by it. We felt he crossed the line. . . . Nothing we supply, or any goods and services we have supplied to Iran, is in any way endangering U.S. troops."
...Fox would not comment on the criticism of Immelt, and O'Reilly declined to be interviewed. Some Fox staffers say Olbermann was out of bounds last month when he imagined the fate of "a poor kid" born to a transgendered man who became pregnant, adding: "Kind of like life at home for Bill's kids."
NBC News President steve Capus called Ailes to complain about O'Reilly's criticism of pacifist war correspondent Richard Engel, but Ailes. Internal sources told Kurtz that Ailes said he agreed that "NBC was against the war and had aligned itself w ith Olbermann's mockery." They said Ailes told Capus he could shut down the situation by telling Olbermann to back off. Then there were calls between Ailes and Zucker:
In last summer's conversation between Ailes and Zucker -- the two men have known each other since Zucker tapped him as a commentator for the "Today" show in the early 1990s -- the onetime Republican consultant asked whether NBC still cared about the truth. Olbermann had inaccurately called Ailes "the lead political consultant for Rudy Giuliani's presidential campaign." Ailes worked for Giuliani's New York mayoral campaign in 1989, but no evidence has surfaced that he played a role in the presidential bid.
Zucker did nothing as a result of the call. "I have never asked Keith Olbermann to tone anything down," he said in a brief interview.
Olbermann said in an interview that his sources say Ailes was offering the campaign advice, which he did not explain or detail in his commentary. It would be a major breach of journalistic ethics for the head of a news channel to advise a politician, especially one his reporters are covering.
Fox's Lewis laughed off the charge, saying: "If he was offering Rudy advice, you think Rudy would have done as badly as he did? No way Roger was giving him advice."
Murdoch's call to Zucker, which was polite in tone, involved a request that Olbermann not air video from a Daily Kos blogger who had made a scene at O'Reilly's Long Island home. That, Murdoch said, should be off limits.
Activist Mike Stark had confronted O'Reilly when he was retrieving his newspaper, planted derogatory signs on his street and distributed derogatory material to neighbors. Olbermann says the only time he ever talked to Stark was to interview him about a stunt in which he called O'Reilly's radio show and mentioned Olbermann's name.
Olbermann says that NBC Senior Vice President Phil Griffin called to ask him to exercise restraint but that he had already decided to criticize Stark for going to O'Reilly's home. He told viewers, "with great regret," that Stark's behavior was "not acceptable."
He and NBC are fair game for O'Reilly, Olbermann says, but "when you start accusing a corporation of murdering Americans, with the thinnest and most ridiculous arguments behind it," it is unfair to GE employees.
This would probably make the GE the only American corporation with business in Middle Eastern hot spots that Olbermann wouldn't trash. It helps when they sign the paychecks.
—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Olberman
May 19, 2008 - 07:21 ET by opnpt0Wasn't Michael Savage dimissed for about the same level of behaviour as Olberman. Olberman is horrible but he needs to be on TV so people see the true face of liberalism.
»→ Let's keep Olbie
May 19, 2008 - 07:33 ET by Cool ArrowHe's as close to Gilda Radner (Roseanne Rosanna Danna) as we'll see in our lifetimes.
LYDSEXICS UNTIE!
Not on Olby Planet
May 19, 2008 - 07:41 ET by kg"Olbermann: "when you start accusing a corporation of murdering
Americans, with the thinnest and most ridiculous arguments behind it,"
it is unfair to GE employees."
Hmmmm, I wonder if that is like Olbermann accusing the Administration and the Military of murdering
Americans and others with the thinnest and most ridiculous arguments behind it? Not on Olby Planet.
"Forget change, I want improvement!"
»→ kg
May 19, 2008 - 07:48 ET by Cool ArrowSounds simple enough to me too.
MSNBC's parent company is either doing business with Iran or it's not.
GE got caught helping our enemy.
LYDSEXICS UNTIE!
GE's ImmeltDown
May 19, 2008 - 07:26 ET by allanfJeff Immelt is has rapidly managed to undo Jack Welch's accomplishments.
Immelt has taken NBC to the far left and that's not an accident. GE is agenda driven, and uses "Green is Universal" to indirectly push a set of high priced GE products.
A relationship with Iran, is not a good idea for the corporation. Given last quarter's dismal financial performance, the pending sale of the fabled appliance division and the little war with News Corp., Immelt will soon be gone.
Immelt
May 19, 2008 - 07:30 ET by BobAnthonyThis guy is a PRIME example of the corporate fascist media. He works for a company worth billions of dollars and yet works with one of the biggest sponsors of Islamofascism out there in Iran. And when he is called on it, he cries and looks the other way.
I am calling on GE stockholders--SELL, SELL, SELL! And I am calling for a boycott of any and all GE products and subsidiaries--namely RCA and of course NBC Universal.
And Fox News couldn't POSSIBLY
May 19, 2008 - 07:42 ET by sarcasmoHave similarly nefarious foreign ownership influences for Olberloon to throw back at the blowhard...
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
Can't Connect
May 19, 2008 - 08:51 ET by JoelCTAre you trying to say that Fox News toning down a story about Muslim riots is the same, morally, as GE selling products to Iran that are resulting in the deaths of American soldiers? I pray that you don't actually have that twisted view. If Fox News actually did what that Saudi prince said they did, then I find it socially unacceptable. But if GE did what Fox says they did, then I find that to be criminal and traitorous.
No, I'm saying what I said.
May 19, 2008 - 08:52 ET by sarcasmoNot what you said. 1 standard, even if it annoys those who don't want to find any fault with the supposedly "fair and balanced" network.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
What exactly...
May 19, 2008 - 09:22 ET by ontheright...did you say, Sarc?
It is very difficult to disect and understand your "counter-points" most of the time. Mostly your responses include nameless, faceless, factless rebuttals that don't usually bear any resemblence to the truth and/or actual events.
Read above.
May 19, 2008 - 09:31 ET by sarcasmoIt's quite clear IMO. Give a specific question, not a hallucination like you did above, and you might get a more-respectful answer. As others have found just like you did, hallucinating does not do much good in discussions with me.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
"Hallucinations"...
May 19, 2008 - 09:43 ET by ontheright...is a perfect description of most of your witty, however less than informed retorts...thank you for the insite to your world.
Nope, it describes your failed attempt
May 19, 2008 - 09:45 ET by sarcasmoTo put words in my mouth. You lose, but thanks for playing!
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
Hmmm...
May 19, 2008 - 09:51 ET by ontheright...can you tell/show me exactly how I tried to "put words in your mouth".
I asked you what exactly it was you were saying..." not implying you were saying something you weren't; typical, nonsensical reply....excellent answer. You prove exactly, my point.
See above.
May 19, 2008 - 10:13 ET by sarcasmoYou tried. You failed. I gave you the "respect" you deserved.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
I never asked...
May 19, 2008 - 10:24 ET by ontheright...nor would I ever expect any "respect" from you. True respect is beyond your realm of understanding. I only wanted to see if you truly had an intelligent and somewhat coherent thought process. Neither has surfaced (during any of our exchanges, as far as I can remember...).
So it seems, my "unhinged" friend, you own defeat, as do your ilk.
Spin, spin, spin; works well with the mind-numbed liberal sheepocrat massess...not here, not with me.
Your posts do not rise to the level of intelligent debate and are no longer deserving of my responses.
Have a good life - in your biased, socialist cocoon.
Hilarious...
May 19, 2008 - 10:25 ET by sarcasmoA big government fan calling ME a socialist. Dimwitted, but hilarious. Someone school this one for me, please....
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
Last response...
May 19, 2008 - 10:33 ET by ontheright...you have no clue as to my political leanings and/or affiliations.
Nor do you have any clue who you might be chatting with.
Calling me "a big govt. fan..." would be the equivilent of me calling you the son of a black share cropper...no way to know and who cares, name calling is, based on what I've seen you post in the past, your M.O.
Kinda like you with calling me a socialist??
May 19, 2008 - 10:36 ET by sarcasmoDimwit. Calling me a socialist is the height of stupidity.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
If Fox News actually did
May 19, 2008 - 10:11 ET by NewsbusterbrownIf Fox News actually did what that Saudi prince said they did, then I find it socially unacceptable. But if GE did what Fox says they did, then I find that to be criminal and traitorous.
Agreed. The two scenarios are not equal in malfeasance. Not even close. I think it's one of those numerous Sarc posts where both sides have to get equal blame, even if the scales don't register that way.
Sometimes he's right on the money, but not in this case.
“There are no easy answers' but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)
More hallucination
May 19, 2008 - 10:12 ET by sarcasmoWhere did I say THAT?? Both sides getting blame != both getting equal blame, if the only place the word "equal" appears is the hallucinations...You're all just getting unhinged over a legitimate critique of Fox that shows a bit of a double-standard around these parts, because it's never mentioned except by me.
JMR
PS It's not in any way a matter of "if" in the case of the Saudi owner's influence. It happened. Period.
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
Where did I say THAT?? Both
May 19, 2008 - 10:20 ET by NewsbusterbrownWhere did I say THAT?? Both sides getting blame != both getting equal blame, if the only place the word "equal" appears is the hallucinations...
Then why bring it up, Sarc, if they're not remotely equal?
“There are no easy answers' but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)
Because nobody else does.
May 19, 2008 - 10:20 ET by sarcasmoAnd, in hindsight, because it's obviously likely to cause some of the unhinged around here to hallucinate in an amusing way. And I repeat, there's no "if" in the reality of the Fox situation. It happened, period.
Disrespect tends to generate disrespectful replies from me. It's not gonna change, so get used to it.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
And I repeat, there's no
May 19, 2008 - 10:25 ET by NewsbusterbrownAnd I repeat, there's no "if" in the reality of the Fox situation. It happened, period.
That might be the case, but is there actually any proof other than "he said-he said?"
“There are no easy answers' but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)
The Saudi called
May 19, 2008 - 10:28 ET by sarcasmoAnd the Fox News coverage suddenly changed. Did Fox actually admit what happened as honestly as the Saudi did? No, not that I've seen. But as I said, there's no "if" here in my book: "It happened, period." I don't need to have Fox admit the obvious.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
And the Fox News coverage
May 19, 2008 - 10:39 ET by NewsbusterbrownAnd the Fox News coverage suddenly changed.
Has that actually been documented?
“There are no easy answers' but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)
The Saudi *himself* documented it
May 19, 2008 - 10:44 ET by sarcasmoWhat more documentation would you want?? Fox ain't gonna admit to their bias any more than MSNBC will, that's why we're here to admit it for 'em.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
The Saudi can't be
May 19, 2008 - 11:39 ET by NewsbusterbrownThe Saudi can't be lying?
“There are no easy answers' but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)
In this case, I'll believe the Saudi ANY day
May 19, 2008 - 11:46 ET by sarcasmoOver any denial (and I don't even know one exists, so AFAIK it would be a hypothetical denial) from Fox News. Why would he brag about what he did when it worked?? I just don't get the reflexive defenses of Fox around here when facts get inconvenient. People tend to try to attack the messenger instead of looking at the situation, as we've seen today.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
Why would he brag about
May 19, 2008 - 11:52 ET by NewsbusterbrownWhy would he brag about what he did when it worked??
Maybe because it gives the impression that he has more power than he has?
I just don't get the reflexive defenses of Fox around here when facts get inconvenient.
...or even the reflexive attacking of Fox around here by some even when the "facts" are a little murky here. ;-)
BTW, I rarely watch Fox.
“There are no easy answers' but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)
Hey, I just believe the guy who seems to be telling the truth.
May 19, 2008 - 12:02 ET by sarcasmoI've seen Fox try to manipulate things (and I've seen NB deliberately not-notice when Fox tried to do it, and I pointed it out, as when Jay freakin' Leno had to literally do NB's bias-bustin' job!). If you think this guy's allegations are dubious for some reason, you're free to believe Fox News instead. I think what the Saudi says happened happened, because I wouldn't put changing the coverage past Fox News.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
If you think this guy's
May 19, 2008 - 12:09 ET by NewsbusterbrownIf you think this guy's allegations are dubious for some reason, you're free to believe Fox News instead.
I haven't said he is lying. All I'm asking for is facts. "He said-he said" just doesn't cut it for me.
“There are no easy answers' but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)
Getting tapes of the before/after Saudi-call coverage
May 19, 2008 - 12:13 ET by sarcasmoIsn't possible for me. I just believe the Saudi and doubt Fox News in this case. My personal experience with Fox News isn't one of great jouralistic integrity, so that might color my views, too. I have no doubt where I'd put my money if this were a bet, and I suspect most people would bet the same, even if not all here would admit it.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
I have no problem with what
May 19, 2008 - 12:44 ET by NewsbusterbrownI have no problem with what you believe, only with your stating that something is a certified fact when you can't (as I can't, either).
“There are no easy answers' but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)
Ok, let's say it's a bet not a fact.
May 19, 2008 - 14:16 ET by sarcasmoMy money's on the Saudi owner's word. Bigtime. And please note: Fox News -- despite the fact that his allegation's been out-there for quite a while and they-not-me would have easy access to all relevant Fox News videotape from that era -- AFAIK has NOT issued the denial you're straining to believe for some reason...
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
Disrespect tends to
May 19, 2008 - 10:36 ET by NewsbusterbrownDisrespect tends to generate disrespectful replies from me. It's not gonna change, so get used to it.
I have not been disrespectful toward you (though you may have toward me if you have me lumped with the "unhinged.") I just have noticed a knee-jerk response from you to beat up on conservatives regarding any story or post attacking liberals. Which is fine if they deserve it and if it is accurate, but some times it seems to me just a way to annoy posters here for the hell of it (especially when your charge against conservatives in rebuttal is not equally as bad as the original charge against liberals).
I consider myself a conservative that leans toward libertarianism. IMO, Ron Paul makes a lot of sense on many issues (though I have grave problems with his foreign policy). If you looked at some of us as, if not exactly on the same side, having some equal goals, you might find it easier to swim around here.
“There are no easy answers' but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)
Ok, then.
May 19, 2008 - 10:43 ET by sarcasmoThe unhinged one did. And I don't want it to be "easy to swim" around here. I consider most around here want vastly-more government than I want, even though they're quite reluctant to admit it (to the point of calling me "socialist"!). When some dummy tries to put words in my mouth around here, it has NEVER gone well for 'em. This is just another example of another one trying it & failing.
Also, I think NB's masthead did a TERRIBLE job on the vast antilibertarian media bias against Ron Paul, to the silence of many here who claim to have libertarian views. When Jay flappin' Leno has to bust obvious bias (and come to think of it, this was obvious Fox News bias) for us, we're not doin' too well. We sucked. I said so. It wasn't popular, but I was right.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
I consider most around here
May 19, 2008 - 11:48 ET by NewsbusterbrownI consider most around here want vastly-more government than I want, even though they're quite reluctant to admit it (to the point of calling me "socialist"!).
I honestly don't understand that charge against you, Sarc. You might be a lot of things, bur "socialist" doesn't come to mind. :-)
Also, I think NB's masthead did a TERRIBLE job on the vast antilibertarian media bias against Ron Paul,
They're unabashed, uncloseted conservatives. They don't pretend to be anything but. What did you really expect there? Ron Paul is not a conservative, however conservative he is on some issues.
Now, if NB was pretending to be unpartisan like the MSM does, then you would certainly have a valid point about bias.
“There are no easy answers' but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)
No, they're Neocons
May 19, 2008 - 12:11 ET by sarcasmoThey don't like to admit it, so I tend to admit it for 'em. They want that word to be "antisemitism," but it's really just an honest description they happen to dislike these days, and the honest ones all know I truly don't care what religion they choose. "Conservative" -- like "liberal" -- is slowly becoming NewSpeak, especially in the fiscal dept., and our conversation here is proof.
And on the subject of NB's crappy job Jay Leno had to do right for us, Matthew Sheffield himself has explicitly denied my charge of antilibertarian bias here at NB regarding the Ron Paul campaign. You seem to see the exact same antilibertarian bias that I see, which is the very bias that Mr. Sheffield denied, and I find it very amusing. :)
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
They don't like to admit
May 19, 2008 - 12:41 ET by NewsbusterbrownThey don't like to admit it, so I tend to admit it for 'em.
Whatever you want to label them, you know where they stand. They're not hiding their views.
Matthew Sheffield himself has explicitly denied my charge of antilibertarian bias here at NB regarding the Ron Paul campaign.
Well, it has been pretty self-evident that NB wasn't too crazy about his candidacy. Again, they have every right to be biased agianst libertarians, as they do against liberals. I don't know what you expect from them here. I wouldn't expect a libertarian website to worry about conservatives or liberals, either.
“There are no easy answers' but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)
I'd expect a libertarian mediabias site
May 19, 2008 - 14:20 ET by sarcasmoTo be fairer to them than they were to us, and I think my label fits a hell of a lot better than "conservative." Media outlets & media critic sites alike DO have a right to be biased, as you say, but they DON'T have any right to deny said obvious bias & then get away with it. I'm living proof of that! :)
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
You're all just getting
May 19, 2008 - 10:19 ET by NewsbusterbrownYou're all just getting unhinged over a legitimate critique of Fox that shows a bit of a double-standard around these parts, because it's never mentioned except by me.
Fox has its biases, just like liberal outlets and..gasp!...even libertarian sources. ;-) I do feel they're better at staying closer to the "fair and balanced" mantra than the others, but they're not perfect.
“There are no easy answers' but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)
Nobody has denied that
May 19, 2008 - 10:23 ET by sarcasmoFor Libertarian sources. Indeed, http://www.isil.org/fnd/ gives a daily tour de force of biased libertarian headlines on MSM stories, which is often quite amusing. I call 'em as I see 'em, and that time I called Fox-bias as I see it. I, as usual, stand by my call. Fox ain't so great, even when compared to the others.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
MSNBC and Fox
May 19, 2008 - 07:49 ET by NKurucThis network and the "schills" it uses as spokesmen or spokespersons (Matthews, Olberman, Schmoe, Mika, etc.) is truly deplorable. I watched to receive the opposite point of view, but now it's become totally ridiculous. They have no logical point of view, and spend the majority of air time bashing the administration, anything Republican, and of course Fox News. Just look at the guests on each show....there is no opposite point of view. And please, Pat Buchanon is not an opposite point of view. Just to watch these people do their inside jokes, and complement the uncomplementable is sickening.
It's GE stupid
May 19, 2008 - 07:52 ET by robertjacobGE Stinks - the great American company has gone to dogs.
NBC is loving this
May 19, 2008 - 07:58 ET by MystapittAll this attention is the exact reason they began this assault. The more Fox squeals, the more attention people pay which sadly turns into PR and ratings.
BOYCOTT GE, NBC, AND PMS-NBC
May 19, 2008 - 08:05 ET by charlietexasBOYCOTT GE, NBC, AND PMS-NBC AND THEIR SPONSORS!!!
I have boycotted anything to
May 19, 2008 - 10:12 ET by mjgI have boycotted anything to do withthat stupid network, I used to watch the Today show but I haven't watched in a while, not when they start the day praising their god Obama. Obama can't do anything wrong as far as they are concerned.
It's not O'Reilly
May 19, 2008 - 08:05 ET by ArcherBI don't think it's O'Reilly that is the problem, but GE itself. If you don't want GE employees to be harmed by something stupid, don't do stupid things! Does Ubermann think that it's fair to American soldiers or their families? Does he really think that this shouldn't even be looked at?
"To send men to the firing squad, judicial proof is unnecessary." Ernesto "Che" Guevara
re: It's not OReilly
May 19, 2008 - 08:16 ET by MrltavernI agree. "when you start accusing a corporation of murdering Americans, with the thinnest and most ridiculous arguments behind it,"
I'm sorry Mr. Olbermental but don't you accuse Halliburtion and the VP of murder on a nightly basis?
Mr.L
Sad
May 19, 2008 - 08:42 ET by iveseenitallAmerica is in deep soup and the media are all laughing their way to the bank. Look what "freedom of the press", sans responsibility, has wrought--- petty fights among the rich. A soap opera, and Americans have fallen for it. Sad.
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
There is no
May 19, 2008 - 09:13 ET by TEThere is no "Olbermann-O'Reilly Feud". There is only a homosexual obsession that Olbermann has for O'Reilly. I don't watch either show, but according to Olbermannwatch.com, Olbermoronn has mentioned O'Reilly hundreds and hundreds (thousands and thousands?) of times on Olbermoronn's unwatched leftist freakshow, but O'Reilly has only mentioned Olbermoronn once or twice in the many years that he has been on television. That ain't an "Olbermann-O'Reilly Feud".
One can only hope that
May 19, 2008 - 09:28 ET by marpelOne can only hope that Olbermann gets fired, but the way things usually go, he'll get promoted. He is disgusting; like a bitter old woman.
Plus, he really needs to be arrested for treason.
Pot meet Kettle?
May 19, 2008 - 09:33 ET by connorin"He and NBC are fair game for O'Reilly, Olbermann says, but "when you start accusing a corporation of murdering Americans, with the thinnest and most ridiculous arguments behind it," it is unfair to GE employees"
And how many times has KO blamed "FoxNoise/FauxNews" for cheerleading the US public into this war and thus left-handedly blaming them for ALL of the deaths over there??????
Aren't we all missing the
May 19, 2008 - 10:53 ET by amberAren't we all missing the real story behind this? If a network is nice to another network, then no one is going to report the truth about that network, the truth that the public should hear. They should be reporting the connections with GE and terrorism. That is a huge story pertinet to all Americans, but the only way they decide to even cover it is if someone says some mean things about Bill O. That is appauling and it just reinforces my view that there is no real journalism anymore except the rare cases of hard working bloggers.
The right can dish it out,
May 19, 2008 - 11:39 ET by goldbarThe right can dish it out, but they sure can't take it!
It took O'Reilly A Long Time...
May 19, 2008 - 11:51 ET by deedledeeto respond to Olbermann. I watched him for a long time while he tried to ignore it then he began to comment obliquely a couple of times. He finally is responding...good for him.
That has been my point of view for years!
May 19, 2008 - 12:31 ET by SanityClauseSeveral years ago, O'Reilly noted how Olbermann's ratings were lower than Donahue's had been when he was axed. and Bill humorously started a petition to have Donahue reinstated. This backfired on O'Reilly, and he has not mentioned Bathtub Boy since.
Oh, he does not want Olbermann's name mentioned, but this has been standard policy of most competitors for years, the memorable "Brand X".
Leaving sexuality out of the equation, KO does have a fixation on O'Reilly that is simply weird. Adding a possible sexual angle makes the situation freaky.
Olbermann Watch maintains a count of Bathtub Boy attacks on O'Reilly: It passed the 400 mark earlier this year.
Wow...this is rich with
May 19, 2008 - 15:09 ET by bigtimerWow...this is rich with back scene information...wonder who will last the longest....Olbie or BOR...hmmmm?
All in all...too funny...I have to have a sense of humor after years of this and the insanity of the filthy enemy within Olbermann.
"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill
I've been watching The OReilly Factor for years now
May 19, 2008 - 17:20 ET by JnobleI don't agree with him on everything, but all in all, he does a good show, has a sense of humor about himself and always has guests on to support the opposing argument. I think he goes out of his way to be fair to most people and topics. He gives Al Sharpton way too much leeway and airtime.
His show is head and shoulders above Countdown To No Ratings With Keith Overbite (credit the Great One Mark Levin for that better more apt title)
Basically, I think it's only a matter of when not if KO's show gets cancelled or they just replace him. The man is pathetic attention whore and a desperate loser.