Update (Ken Shepherd | May 9): Our good friend Mark Levin sent along an audio clip from his May 8 radio program wherein he addressed Jon Stewart's ludicrous comparison.You can access the audio here.
On Wednesday night’s edition of The Daily Show on Comedy Central, host Jon Stewart interviewed John McCain. As part of his ongoing outrage that the Reverend Wright issue would be raised against Barack Obama, Stewart sprung it on McCain that President Bush is his own Reverend Wright problem. He liked this “fascinating” analysis so much he repeated it, and suggested when it comes to Team Bush and al-Qaeda, “our policies are their Reverend Wright-- isn't he the guy they throw out there and inflame their base and get support? Don't you think he's actually been okay for al-Qaeda?” McCain answered by declaring the terrorists were a “transcendent evil” beyond one politician.
Stewart seemed to be citing an NBC poll (slightly wrongly) that found 32 percent of voters expressed concern about Obama’s relationship with Rev. Wright, but 43 percent were concerned by Sen. McCain’s relationship to President Bush. Stewart formulated his jokey question as if he were about to question McCain about being endorsed by harshly anti-Catholic minister John Hagee:
STEWART: You, sir, everybody knows Senator Barack Obama has a problem with the Reverend Wright issue.
McCAIN: Yes.
STEWART: Americans, I think 35 percent said they were concerned about his relationship. You, sir, have your own person, religious -- I don’t wanna say zealot, but a religious person endorse your candidate that americans have expressed greater concern, your relationship with him -- 43 percent. Will you take the opportunity right now to repudiate and denounce...President Bush?
McCain grinned, then stood up and pretended he was going to walk out. Stewart yelled in jest “Sit down! Sit down, sir!” McCain mugged and whispered “Technical difficulties!” And then Stewart repeated himself: What do you think of that, though? More Americans are concerned about your relationship with President Bush than with Obama and Reverend Wright. Don't you find that fascinating?”
McCain grew serious and starting talking about the economy: “I think that the president’s polling numbers are obvious. I have to run my campaign and present my vision and my plan of action to help America.”
Stewart later returned to his new intellectual plaything, comparing President Bush to Reverend Wright. It came in an exchange about whether McCain would apologize for publicizing the fact that a top Hamas adviser suggested a preference for Obama (see Power Line), and suggesting he’d be like John F. Kennedy.
STEWART: There was one comment-- and this could have been taken out of context as well-- you felt that Hamas endorsed Obama? Did they officially--
McCAIN: A spokesperson from Hamas said they wanted Senator Obama, but that's-- that's --
STEWART: Do you feel bad you said that? Because that is-- if you think about it--
McCAIN: A spokesperson said that, and I think --
STEWART: And you take Hamas at their word?
McCAIN: No, but it's indicative of how some of our enemies view America. I guarantee you, they're not going to endorse me.
STEWART: : I find that interesting because don't you think that these past few years, in terms of a recruiting tool for bin Laden and al Qaeda, I mean, isn't-- al Qaeda is trying to fire up their base. Isn't President Bush kind of... and our policies are their Reverend Wright-- isn't he the guy they throw out there and inflame their base and get support? Don't you think he's actually been okay for al-Qaeda?
So in this tortured analogy, Bush isn’t just like Reverend Wright, but conservatives are like al-Qaeda, easily agitated religious zealots inflamed by empty rhetoric. Stewart clearly thinks Bush is worse than Wright, and that Bush's idiocy and military recklessness should drag down McCain.
But what about the poll that inspired Stewart's analogies? A look at the actual poll questions shows that NBC's pollsters (a Democrat and a Republican) skewed the results with loaded and differing verbiage:
Now let me read you some critical things that have been said about the candidates. For each, tell me whether this issue gives you major concerns, moderate concerns, minor concerns, or no real concerns about that candidate.
– John McCain will be too closely aligned with the Bush agenda . He has voted eighty-nine percent of the time for the Bush administration’s programs.
– It is hard to know about Barack Obama’s values because he has friends like Reverend Jeremiah Wright and Willam Ayers.
The numbers Stewart used were the ones expressing "major concern." In the McCain/Bush question, the pollsters underline why the respondents should be concerned about the closeness, citing a number compiled by Congressional Quarterly, while the Obama question offers no specifics about Wright, and suggests that relationship is a nebulous mystery, not a two-decade relationship in which Obama has donated tens of thousands of dollars to Wright's ministry. Might the numbers have been different if it had been formulated more like the McCain question, such as:
-- Barack Obama is too closely aligned with his minister, Jeremiah Wright, who believes AIDS was invented by government to kill blacks and that September 11 was a natural reaction to America's own terrorism.
That's a little loaded, too, but shouldn't "objective" network polls offer more balance in their questions?
—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center



STEWART: Do you feel bad you said that? Because that is-- if you think about it-- 












Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Bush?
May 8, 2008 - 22:55 ET by candanceBeing linked to George Bush is the least of McCain's problems no matter which party you belong you.
Couldn't of said it better
May 8, 2008 - 23:03 ET by bigtimerCouldn't of said it better candance.
If nobody watched the interview with BOR and you are a conservative....do..plus listen to people like Bay Buchanan and Laura Ingraham afterwards.
I'm going to write in a candidate for sure....I am sick of getting stuck in the eye by him.
"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill
Democrats despise Bush, but
May 9, 2008 - 12:34 ET by TruthMongerDemocrats despise Bush, but have no problems with Rev Wright...
This does not surprise me...
...they don't complain much about OBL, Al-Queda, or Iran either - and seem to love Kim Dong Ill and tout Cuba as paradise...
It's a definite pattern all right...
By Democrats you
May 9, 2008 - 12:49 ET by balboaBy Democrats you mean...?
'Cause none of this applies to me.
Quit playing games
May 9, 2008 - 19:17 ET by reasonsjesterYou're not smarter by half than conservatives so quit jerking our - chains.
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. - Marcus Aurelius
I don't think Stewart really
May 8, 2008 - 23:13 ET by balboaI don't think Stewart really considers that a problem either. It was just an interesting poll number for discussion, and -- probably most importantly -- a fun way for Stewart to ask McCain to denounce Bush.
OK
May 9, 2008 - 00:06 ET by reasonsjesterMaybe this was my own perception. I really don't like Stewart because he's a mouthpiece for libs. The show is funny sometimes, but usually when they quit sucking the Democrats' - thumbs.
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. - Marcus Aurelius
It wasn't just that, though...
May 9, 2008 - 05:00 ET by sarcasmoI thought this was one of the only ways he could have told a funny Hagee joke. I didn't look at this as much of a Bush thing (though I'm sure some of the conservatives here did) but rather as a very clever way to discuss a bit of poll-weirdness with a Hagee/Wright quip. And let's face it, much like Rev. Wright, there's not that much funny material when it comes to Hagee.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
I agree. Wright is Obama's
May 9, 2008 - 07:07 ET by KillgraveI agree. Wright is Obama's albatross, and Bush is McCain's (this is true no matter what one personally feels for Bush). This is a perfectly feasible comparison.
I guarantee you, in the next several months we're going to see an increasing effort to make McCain and Bush one and the same. They're probably going to come up with one of those freakish photoshop pictures where they merge facial characteristics of both men (and this will be done by the so-called "objecive" media).
JON LEIBOWITZ...
May 9, 2008 - 17:18 ET by danybhoyI don't think that Jon Leibowitz had a problem with kissing the @$$ of Bolivia's marxist head of state, Evo Morales, when he had him as a guest on his comedy show. Morales answered most of Jon's question in a CLASSIC marxist manner, & the studio audience lapped it up. Whatta bunch of usefull idiots.
"Some of us are wise, some of us are otherwise" Mark Levin
Well . . . I do believe
May 9, 2008 - 00:03 ET by eaglescout1998Well . . . I do believe that George W. Bush can be a liability for John McCain. According to a Gallup poll, Bush is a bigger liability for McCain than Wright is for Obama (but only slightly).
It's the same with Bill Clinton and Al Gore (and maybe Hillary too). Gore lost an election that should have
been his in a walk. He was the first incumbent president or
vice president in 100 years to lose an election in peacetime with a
good economy.
Of course, this was before we even knew that Gore was a
deranged conspiracy theorist who believes the Earth is in serious peril
from cow farts.
nice eagle
May 9, 2008 - 10:27 ET by candanceNext you can give Ann Coulter credit for pasting a section of her article.
But we DO know!
May 8, 2008 - 23:00 ET by CobraMan"It is hard to know about Barack Obama’s values because he has friends like Reverend Jeremiah Wright and Willam Ayers."
But we DO know. With friends like these, who needs values? A class in urban combat will suffice.
Caught the show by accident
May 8, 2008 - 23:23 ET by reasonsjesterI told my wife not to run leftist agit-prop in the house, but being a Russian, she doesn't get politics very well. Anyway, Stewart was completely assinine in this "interview." It was really uncomfortable to listen to. He was putting McCain in a bad position question after question. At least the old geezer has enough cajones to go on the show. Wait, wouldn't he have more cajones if he went on Rush Limbaugh?
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. - Marcus Aurelius
And you think he was asinine
May 8, 2008 - 23:28 ET by balboaAnd you think he was asinine because...?
Obama would never get such treatment
May 9, 2008 - 00:02 ET by reasonsjesterStewart seemed really disrespectful to McCain. I hate McCain, but Stewart was really applying a double standard when he was putting him on the spot with "renounce Bush now" and badgering him for minutes about "who do you want to go up against?" I think if you watch the video you'll know what I'm talking about.
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. - Marcus Aurelius
The "renounce Bush now" bit
May 9, 2008 - 09:15 ET by balboaThe "renounce Bush now" bit was a goof. It wasn't serious. As for "badgering," that was fun, not antagonistic.
A goof?
May 9, 2008 - 19:15 ET by reasonsjesterNot purely. Behind every bit of humor on that show is a leftist agenda.
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. - Marcus Aurelius
Jon Stewart Little : World Class Idiot
May 9, 2008 - 05:46 ET by thoridflyBecause he's a psycho-liberal jackass idiot maybe?
Our canidate for president sucking up to the enemy Stewart
May 9, 2008 - 05:14 ET by Daniel BakerStewart is a profane propaganda spewer. We should of banned our canidates from going on his show. like that whole
Jon "Warthog" Stewart
May 9, 2008 - 05:55 ET by thoridflyJon Stewart is a wart on the pimple that is liberalism.
This is true
May 9, 2008 - 17:33 ET by JnobleThe guy is a former D list comedian who got famous reading snarky jokes off a teleprompter and mugging for the camera for a sheep-like audience.
Like most other lib comedians/actors who comment on politics, he's not nearly as smart as he thinks he is. Talk about buying into your own hype...
THE DAILY SCHMO...
May 9, 2008 - 06:08 ET by danybhoyFor a guy who comes from a very well educated Jewish family, & is well educated himself, Jon Leibowtiz should be smart enough to tell the truth about the conncetions of those who are running for office. As a comic, Leibowitz is in the smart @$$ buisiness, but too often he is just being an @$$. I get the impression that he is taking himself WAAAAAAAAAAY too seriously.
Being in the Telegraph's Top 10 for influencial political pundits won't help on this front. What is sad, is that people actually go to comedians for political information. Leno, Letterman, O'Brien, Colbert, & Leibowitz should not be where you get your news from, you go there to laugh at the news. I left out Dennis Miller from this list because conservatives don't rely on him for their news & political information like libs do with those I listed earlier. I love Miller's work, I like his books, & his stagework, I just wish his weekday radio show was on a station in town with a stronger single.
"Some of us are wise, some of us are otherwise" Mark Levin
Millertime anytime
May 9, 2008 - 06:29 ET by reasonsjesterMiller is broadcast free on his website from 10-1 Eastern time. For five bucks a month you can get all the podcasts and three months of archives. Its worth it.
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. - Marcus Aurelius
I don't want to say angry
May 9, 2008 - 08:20 ET by BacchusI don't want to say angry and monotonous... but will Stephen Colbert now repudiate and denounce his warm up act...Jon Stewert?
Stewart puts the anal in analogy.
May 9, 2008 - 09:34 ET by mattmVoting with the president (which tons of Democrats have done, too) is a tiny bit different than membership in the Church of Hating Whitey.
It's kinda strange that nobody mentioned
May 9, 2008 - 11:26 ET by sarcasmoStewart's (tongue in cheek???) idea of McCain picking Hillary as his VP. I thought it was hilarious, but McCain didn't seem all that amused.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
In the McCain/Bush
May 9, 2008 - 17:56 ET by cleverpigIn the McCain/Bush question, the pollsters underline why the
respondents should be concerned about the closeness, citing a number
compiled by Congressional Quarterly, while the Obama question offers no
specifics about Wright, and suggests that relationship is a nebulous
mystery, not a two-decade relationship in which Obama has donated tens
of thousands of dollars to Wright's ministry.
The thing is, there aren't any specifics about Obama's agreement with Wright on specific issues, other than his denouncement of some of them.
We know exactly which issues McCain and Bush agree on.
For Obama and Wright, you can instead tout the length and depth of the relationship, but you are just making assumptions about whether or not that means they agree on everything.
cp... Assumptions...maybe,
May 9, 2008 - 18:13 ET by bigtimercp...
Assumptions...maybe, but you don't stay at a hatepreach filled man's church for twenty years.. listening to his black nationalism, hate America first ravings if you don't agree with something, now do you?
Even Oprah left after two years.
Come on...nobody would stay that long unless they had an affinity for what that hate-filled man was saying.
Unless you are simply simple.
"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill
I would love to know how
May 10, 2008 - 02:32 ET by cleverpigI would love to know how many minutes of the undoubtedly thousands of hours of sermons the man has delivered you have actually listened to or heard quoted.
Every video and transcript available has now probably been gone over with a very fine toothed comb-- if there was more outrageous stuff to hear, we'd be hearing it right now.
So you know about the tone and content of... let's be conservative (ha!) and say 1% of Wright's total body of work. I'll bet it's not even that much.
I don't know... maybe Obama had some affinity for the other bits?