ABC’s Nightline featured yet another Cynthia McFadden trip with Hillary Clinton on the campaign trail Thursday, but it wasn’t all sympathetic questions about how hard it is to be a feminist pioneer. (There was one about how all the criticism must be hard on her mother.) Instead, on the trail in Indiana, McFadden pushed hard from the left on how Barack Obama thought her gas-tax holiday proposal was "phony" and "pandering," and how columnist Thomas Friedman of the New York Times thought it was "ridiculous," and how Iran thought her remarks about them were irresponsible. She also wondered if the Reverend Wright issue was "guilt by association...Does it worry you a little bit about the taint of association? Because, you know, you’ve been tarred by the same brush over the years."
McFadden began somewhat sympathetically, although it wasn’t good news, about how Indiana superdelegate Joe Andrew switched sides to Obama, despite President Clinton making him DNC chairman in the late 1990s. Then she switched to arguing against any gas-tax relief:
"I wanted to ask you about the gas tax holiday. There’s been a lot of pushback. Barack Obama and others saying this is really a phony, a pandering plan that really would save most Americans only $28 in the course of the summer." Hillary replied it was "more of a $70 savings."
McFadden kept hammering. "Tom Friedman in the New York Times yesterday, perhaps you saw it, says that this is a ridiculous proposal, so unworthy of the people aspiring to lead our nation that it takes your breath away. He cites experts saying it will simply increase demand and take us exactly in the wrong direction by reducing the price somewhat over the summer." Hillary replied "Well, that’s a really elitist view, because a lot of people are trying to get from day to day, paycheck to paycheck."
ABC then moved on to Hillary’s provocative comments about Iran. McFadden asked, "Late last night, the Iranian government pushed back to a comment that you made a week ago when you said that should Iran use nuclear weapons that the U.S. would totally obliterate the country. They call your remarks provocative, unwarranted, and irresponsible."
Hillary pushed right back: "Well, that’s kind of strange coming from a provocative, irresponsible regime as we have currently in Iran." Then, she tried to tone it down: "And I would try to get to the negotiating table in as quick a manner as I could. But I also believe we have to do everything possible to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons."
McFadden asked where Bill Clinton’s office would be in the White House, which is an awkward question. Hillary strangely said "I don’t think he’s going to have an office," that he’ll be too busy with his foundation. McFadden thought that sounded unfair: "Well, you have had a West Wing office. You’re not going to give him one?" Hillary protested: "Well, I gave up everything when I went into the White House, you know, 15 years ago."
Then she mentioned Hillary was campaigning with her mother and daughter: "You have your posse with you today." She noted Hillary "admits" criticism is hard on her mother. "She must want to wring a few necks occassionally." Hillary replied that she says "When you were a little girl, I didn’t worry that much. But as you’ve gotten older I just worry all the time. So it kind of goes with the Mom territory. And I’m the designated worrier in my family, and I think most mothers are."
McFadden asked that since Obama gave a dramatic speech on race, whether Hillary would give a dramatic speech on gender, "which many consider as divisive, as important, as perplexing, troubling." Hillary demurred, saying she lives that every day, but "I think that most people are, you know, really coming to grasp what a significant, historical candidacy mine is."
From there, it turned to what McFadden called Obama’s "reluctant renunciation" of his Reverend Wright.
McFADDEN: Has Barack Obama at this point gone far enough to satisfy you that Reverend Wright does not represent his point of view?
CLINTON: Well, it’s not me. It’s up to voters to decide what to make of this.
McFADDEN: But what do you make of all of this?
CLINTON: Well, I thought that, you know, Reverend Wright’s comments were deeply objectionable. The idea that the United States government invented AIDS, I mean, that is so outlandish that you know, everyone should be offended.
McFADDEN: Is it guilt by association? I mean, at this point. Because he’s now said I disavow this. Does it worry you a little bit about the taint of association? Because, you know, you’ve been tarred with the same brush over the years.
CLINTON: Well, when you run for the presidency, everything in your life is an open book.
That’s a wild statement, ignoring that the Clintons are incredibly slow to let records leak out of the Clinton presidential library, and have yet to release a list of donors (especially big foreign donors) to the Clinton library and foundation.
McFadden concluded by giving Hillary a platform to sum up her candidacy with another stunning line: "I don’t try to be anything I’m not. I am, you know, I am what I am." Conservatives see her saying that in a drawling Southern accent with a Yankees hat on. McFadden called her "an unrepentant fighter who all these months later is still in it to win it."
—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center
















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
"a comment that you made a
May 3, 2008 - 09:01 ET by rimsky"a comment that you made a week ago when you said that should Iran use nuclear weapons that the U.S. would totally obliterate the country."
So, what exactly is she saying here? Does this mean that she'll hit back once a few hundred thousand, or more, Americans have been vaporized in a nuclear attack (..really big of her), or exactly what? I really have a hard time visualizing her striking back against anyone.
Instead, I guess she would "try to get to the negotiating table in as quick a manner as I could." As quick a manner..? After what? An attack? Or maybe she's meaning that she would "negotiate" with Iran after she's elected? Ok, but what's to negotiate? Our stance should be that Iran doesn't get to have nukes. Not negotiable. If we sit down at the table with that little freak, we've already lost.
Cynthia McFadden
May 3, 2008 - 10:01 ET by iveseenitallCynthia McFadden--- another intrepid "journalist" from the MSM. Outstanding credentials, found only among the best in the business: biased, ignorant, immature, poorly educated, hypocritical, dumb, over-paid, unpatriotic, illogical, thoughtless, shallow, vindictive, close-minded and quite "liberal"-- to name but a few.
NEVER, NEVER trust a "liberal"
i'veseenitall
May 3, 2008 - 10:04 ET by shawn228Do you actually have anything to comment about the article itself or does calling the reporter a bunch of mean names just make you feel better?
Did you ever?
May 3, 2008 - 10:07 ET by AgnosticDid you ever think you would live to see the day that self proclaimed conservative knee jerk reaction would be to defend a Clinton?
Blind
May 3, 2008 - 10:11 ET by iveseenitallNone so blind
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
iveseenitall,
May 4, 2008 - 06:56 ET by AgnosticNot blind but I do find it interesting in two ways. One, it seems that conservatives have chosen to have come around, as this site is a testament, to the idea that the media and not the Democrats are the problem except in the fact that they are led by the media and the left wing activist section of their constituency. Two, and I might be stretching here but it seems that people are starting to realize that without the proper media coverage to prop up people like the Clintons, the Kennedys and now Obama then Americans would have never been exposed to their corruption and condescension.
IMO, this is why the right can so easily defend Senator Clinton when she is attacked by the media because there is a common connection - a common enemy.
Shawn
May 3, 2008 - 10:08 ET by iveseenitallThe "mean" comment doesn't fly with me anymore--try another Shawn. Moreover, these are the characteristics of most "journalists" in our country today, like it or not.
NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal
iveseenitall
May 3, 2008 - 10:12 ET by shawn228I'm just saying, that instead of commenting on the article itself, your just calling the reporter a bunch of names. I was simply asking wondering if it makes you feel better insulting people
Insulting?
May 3, 2008 - 11:22 ET by iveseenitallInsulting? If the characteristics I mentioned were the reverse, and "journalist" met their responsibilities under the Constitution, this so-called "election" would be more than backyard gossip-mongering, filled with innuendos, lies, conjecturing, personal attacks, etc. The fact is there are very few decent "jounalists" today for many reasons. Things are serious, and our country is in grave danger. Instead of educating and informing our youth and the public in general, so-called "journalists" stoop to the kind of petty nonsense found in this "interview" and hundreds just like it. They fiddle while Rome burns. It's insulting to the thoughtful American people. Ignorance is costing us---big time.
NEVER,NEVER trust a"liberal"
George Bush is Cocaine snorting buffoon!!
May 3, 2008 - 12:18 ET by shawn228...but when MontanaLyons says Bush is a Cocaine snorting, baby killing, retarted warmonger, he is not expressing his opinion, he has a serious case of BDS right?
Ah.... Montana Lyons. Gone
May 3, 2008 - 12:23 ET by Jack BauerAh.... Montana Lyons. Gone to that eternal blog in the big sky. May he RIP.
Amen to
May 3, 2008 - 12:29 ET by bigtimerAmen to that Jack....Amen!
"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill
Enviros WANT $20 gal. gas
May 3, 2008 - 11:15 ET by Jack BauerOf course, Hillary should have fired back instantly ... well,
Is he suggesting that the right direction is to INCREASE PRICES over the summer?
But ... that would force her to face the reality of the grip that Enviro-nutjobs have on the Democrat party -- and lets face it, on vast swathes of the Yellow-Backed Republicans as well.
And that is this, privately crazed enviros... WANT TO INCREASE THE PRICE OF GAS. BY A LOT. A WHOLE HUGE LOT.
$12 a gallon. Peanuts. These guys want to see $20 a gallon.
They see it as their substitute-religious duty to reduce YOUR consumption of gas by hook or by crook.
For years libs have said we
May 3, 2008 - 12:21 ET by motherbeltFor years libs have said we don't pay enough for gas; we should pay $5 a gallon like they do in Europe; it would make us drive less and buy smaller cars. And of course, now all they can talk about is how this is outrageous! Bush should "do something" about it. Clinton and Obama promise to "do something" to "get the price down."
Get a gander at this from Time/CNN....some ideas they have to cut our usage. The first one is : (emphasis added)
HEATING. If users of fuel oil were allocated only enough to heat homes to 68°, and reductions of several degrees were made in plants and office buildings, the saving would be 250,000 to 300,000 bbl. a day. If users of natural gas and electricity were penalized with progressively stiffer rates for usage over 90% of their last winter's consumption, that would free more energy supplies, and another 200,000 to 400,000 bbl. of oil could be saved.
Of course, this wouldn't hurt Al Gore and his rich buddies, because they can afford the surtaxes. Which is why I've said all along that this is about the extremely wealthy using as much as they want (by buying carbon credits; this is just a different mechanism) and the hoi-polloi "making do" and "cutting back."
DRIVING. A 100 per gal. gasoline surtax could save as much as 450,000
bbl. of oil a day. A 300 charge could conserve 750,000 bbl. a day. [sic. I'm assuming they mean $1.00 and $3.00] The FEA
bases these estimates on recent experiences of how much gasoline demand
went down as prices went up.
Again, the very very wealthy will just pay up.
Don't get me wrong; I have no problem with people using as much gas or electricity as they are willing to pay for. I just wish they would stop preaching to the rest of us to "conserve" if they won't.
mb -- $5 a gallon. I WISH...
May 3, 2008 - 12:39 ET by Jack Bauermb -- $5 a gallon. I WISH...
It's about $12 a gal. for me at the moment.
Of course, in the UK the gas stations switched to LITERS about 15 years ago -- that enabled them to raise the liter price at the same amount as they used to raise the gallon price without much of a murmor from the swindled folks.
So if they used to put a penny on a gallon, they would then put a penny on a LITER. Same with the tax.
"Well, I gave up everything
May 3, 2008 - 13:55 ET by bigtimer"Well, I gave up everything when I went into the White House, you know, 15 years ago."
Oh my oh my...this woman cannot quit lying...it is an impossibility!
This line is the laugh of the week...she gave up nothing, she is a political whore, depending on her husbands tail-coats, as he always has, she has never done anything independently on her own as far as running for any office...the witch.
This has been well planned out for years with her...only problem is she thought she would be anointed by Feb 5th...
WRONG!
"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill
McFadden is
May 3, 2008 - 18:47 ET by docbtrying to put at least some talking points out there that none of the stoneless men have put to Hillary! The MSM is loath to take to hard of a punch in case she STEALS THE ELECTION..There is no one family more vengeful than the clintons.