The conspiracy theory that Rupert Murdoch would ruin The Wall Street Journal with his tabloid conservatism is even struggling on the Journal's traditionally conservative editorial pages. The Journal's newly redesigned pages will now feature a weekly column from leftist cultural analyst Thomas Frank to underline "what's on the mind of the American left." Frank is by no means the first leftist on those pages, for anyone who can recall Michael Gartner (who also became president of NBC News), but it does frustrate the Rupert's Right-Wing Ruination spin.
Frank's inaugural column took some credit for Obama's San Francisco declaration that the voters have bitterness and cling to their guns and religion and xenophobia instead of noticing their class interests. Frank dutifully unloaded on conservatives:
Conservatism, on the other hand, has no problem with bitterness; as the champion strategist Howard Phillips said almost three decades ago, the movement's job is to "organize discontent." And organize they have. They have welcomed it, they have flattered it, they have invited it in with millions of treason-screaming direct-mail letters, they have given it a nice warm home on angry radio shows situated up and down the AM dial. There is not only bitterness out there; there is a bitterness industry.
After mocking Hillary Clinton's swigging of Crown Royal, he concluded with a swipe at our growing plutocracy (take that, Rupert):
If Barack Obama or anyone else really cares to know what I think, I will simplify it all down to this. The landmark political fact of our time is the replacement of our middle-class republic by a plutocracy. If some candidate has a scheme to reverse this trend, they've got my vote, whether they prefer Courvoisier or beer bongs spiked with cough syrup.
(Hat tip: Jack Coleman)
—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center
















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Al Hunt
April 22, 2008 - 09:22 ET by Matthew SheffieldI think he's supposed to replace Al Hunt who IIRC is no longer with the Journal.
WSJ - Conservatism Long Gone
April 22, 2008 - 12:29 ET by zeestephenI began reading the WSJ editorial page in the early 1970's.
Since the mid-1990's, it has drifted steadily to the Center.
David Brooks, now the "conservative" NYT columnist, and Paul Gigot, the "conservative" on Jim Leher's "News Hour," are chiefly responsible for the editorial change of tone and direction.
I stopped reading the editorial page during the 2005 Immigration Amnesty War, when the WSJ amped up its already strident attacks on Conservatives.
Also, the WSJ news pages, always center-left, have in recent years become consistently left of center.
NewsBusters, thank goodness, is often an excellent source of positive and insightful news on free enterprise capitalism.
i subscribe
April 22, 2008 - 10:41 ET by JWFRead it. Talk about bitter. This guy is bitter. Is he mad cuz his guy got his feathers ruffled? Does he hate Hillary? What is with the quote from 30 years ago? What plane?
Fox news has "fair and balanced"
I think the new Wall Street Journal may be "fair and unmedicated"
As Seargent Hulka from Stripes would say "Lighten up Francis"
Conservatives "organize discontent"?
April 22, 2008 - 10:52 ET by mikefiskKinda a strange statement coming from the party who cultivated the victim class.
Who needs another leftist commentator in the press?
April 22, 2008 - 11:51 ET by ballwana13The MSM is loaded with leftists, communists and Stalinists. Some of them are also running for President. The WSJ doesn't need vitriol from an angry leftist. I just hope that if the next generation of the Murdoch empire is as left leaning as has been reported, the transition to destroy all that the WSJ has stood for happens quickly and noticeably. I am praying that the News Corp. version isn't much different from the Dow Jones version of the WSJ.
Balanced
April 22, 2008 - 15:00 ET by KJZebraI'd say it's tit-for-tat:
Tony Snow goes to CNN and Thomas Frank hooks up with the WSJ...
Nice piece. I just blogged
April 22, 2008 - 20:29 ET by Matthew VadumNice piece. I just blogged about the same subject (and gave a hat tip). I see ConWebBlog has whipped itself up into a latte liberal lather over Tim's post.
—Matthew Vadum is Editor of Organization Trends and Foundation Watch, two monthly newsletters published by Capital Research Center