Los Angeles Times reporter and blogger Andrew Malcolm drew an interview on MSNBC Tuesday for his report at Top of the Ticket that Oprah Winfrey is suffering in popularity due to her endorsement and campaigning for Barack Obama. (MSNBC also blamed a popular YouTube video called The Church of Oprah Exposed). Malcolm and Don Frederick reported that while Oprah certainly boosted Obama’s star power, it came with a price:
But little attention has been paid to the effect of Obama on Oprah. Now along comes Costas Panagopoulos, an assistant professor of political science at New York's Fordham University, to ask and answer just that question.
Writing at Politico.com, he suggested Winfrey has paid a price for getting into the dirty business of politics. By August 2007, a CBS poll found her favorable rating had dropped, from 74% to 61%. Recently, her rating dipped a bit more, to 55%.
Story Continues Below Ad ↓And Panagopoulos pointed to an AOL survey of 1.35 million Americans that found 46% said the daytime TV host who "made their day" was Ellen DeGeneres, while only 19% chose Winfrey. Panagopoulos drew the conclusion that celebrity endorsers run the risk of costing themselves more than they benefit the endorsee.
Actually, the lower 55 percent rating came from a Fox News survey, wrote the Fordham professor (who, ahem, also worked in the office of Hillary Clinton):
But by the time Fox News/Opinion Dynamics asked Americans about their attitudes toward Oprah in a survey conducted about 10 days later, Dec. 18-19, Oprah’s favorability ratings had dropped even further — to 55 percent — the lowest level of favorability ever registered for Oprah in opinion surveys. Oprah’s negatives also spiked, with one in three respondents (33 percent) reporting unfavorable impressions of her.
MSNBC not only interviewed Malcolm during the 11 am hour Tuesday, but in the next hour interviewed Nancy Giles, best known as a liberal commentator for the CBS News show Sunday Morning (but not identified as such on MSNBC). Giles seemed frustrated that Oprah would suffer for boosting Obama, but Ellen DeGeneres has not seemed to suffer for boosting Hillary Clinton on her program.
Anchor Tamron Hall tried to suggest that Ellen can show Oprah how to recover after coming out as a lesbian led to her ABC sitcom being canceled, but she came back with her talk show. That led to this exchange:
NANCY GILES: We want Oprah to know, ‘We want it to come back!’ Right?
TAMRON HALL: Only if she pays me. I don’t have an opinion on this. I don’t care.
Giles laughed, suggesting that maybe the two African-American women are friends, or that she was simply shocked by the Oprah-indifferent answer. Hall seemed to be suggesting that she needs to shelve her opinions if she's going to host a news show -- which no doubt will lead to leftists decrying her as a corporate sellout.
—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
Well, if Oprah supported
April 16, 2008 - 15:34 ET by ConservativeRexWell, if Oprah supported the most conservative candidate out there I still wouldn't view her favorably. I think she is full of herself, and other substances. And is there one person in America surprised that she has endorsed Uh-bama?
You mean there is actually
April 16, 2008 - 15:49 ET by motherbeltYou mean there is actually one area in which Americans don't want Oprah to stick her nose?
Wow.
"Endorsing Obama is costing
April 16, 2008 - 16:01 ET by Chris Norman"Endorsing Obama is costing Oprah in the favorable ratings"
That's not fair! That's, that's...censorship.
That Oprah vid is
April 16, 2008 - 16:03 ET by tracheostomyThat Oprah vid is great.
I was Oprah 15 years ago.
I can count at least half a dozen "just-so" fallacies about her take on Christianity, and that's at 4:58.
Then Eckhart turns it all on its head and uses a quote from Jesus to authorize his own religion. And no one among them seems to notice Eckhart's little shell game, they simply pay him out to take this streetcorner bet one more time.
I particularly loved 5:30-35. If God is a "feeling experience," how do you know for sure what it is you're experiencing is truly "God"?
That's usually my main question when I talk to followers of Neopaganism, "How do you know this spirit you encountered was a spirit you could trust?"
It is as if Oprah's trolling around her local singles' bar and going home with the first guy that walks up and gives her a special feeling.
We're moving into an era now where there are no more "safe" secular celebrities. Our refrigerator is so chock full of entertainment goodies, that the stuff we've kept the longest is starting to spoil.
And when I say "we" I mean to throw myself in also.
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
Oprah's a Christian?
April 16, 2008 - 22:27 ET by BodiniI find any inference that Oprah is a Christian to be laughable since hearing Reverend Al (Sharpton), state on Fox news a few weeks ago, that the Obama family's Reverend Wright's hate-sermons about America and white folks are standard fare in black churches across the USA. And besides, "Oprah Winfrey attended that church."
Thanks Rev. Al, that makes me feel a lot better about Obama and Wright since Oprah, another left-wing media darling, has blessed the entire group of "Chistian" hate-mongers!
loony Oprah
April 17, 2008 - 01:53 ET by m1xramThe comment above yours implies she's a loon not a Christian. Oprah is really into New Age religion, which roughly translates into false teachings. So I have to agree with both of you, she's not a Christian but she is a loon.