I won't engage in fantasy to the point of actually imaging that the MSM would publish and write about Obama's uber-liberal voting record in any sort of objective manner.
Heck, I would just settle for the MSM being factually honest with the public, and pointing out that the shootings of innocent people that have recently occurred, occurred in so-called "gun free zones" (aka "defenseless victim zones").
The MSM conveniently refuses to do this because this one simple fact invalidates all the hysterical cries from the gun-grabbers and panty-wetters for more so called "gun control" laws.
Why does it invalidate?
Because it has been amply demonstrated in the 45 mass shootings since 1996 that occurred in "gun free zones" that approximately 20,000 US guns laws coupled with a total ban on guns in a specific location will NOT prevent criminals and wackos from obtaining, bringing, and using guns to execute, for pleasure and fame, innocent and defenseless people.
Also, amply demonstrated is that police CANNOT arrive in time to prevent such carnage. Also, amply demonstrated is the fact that a single law-abiding citizen, ARMED, can and has stopped such attacks by shooting the pervert, dead. Conservatives call this "negotiating" with a terrorist.
In other words, "defenseless victim zones" (aka "gun free zones") are another mindless governmental, and often university, intrusion into freedom and safety, by liberals, and the only thing these zones accomplish is getting innocent people killed.
If you want America to follow the downward spiral of the UK into defenseless-victimhood, where self-defense is virtually illegal, just vote for Obama, or Hillary, or practically any Democrat.

No and they wont ever.They lack common sense.

Many of these anti-gun proposals are quite popular in gun-control circles.Several are routinely floated by Democrat mayors, governors and legislatures.President Obama will get much suppport from his party on these proposals.The Democrat governor of my state can't wait to turn gun owners into felons with the swipe of his pen. 

It's the Leftie insistence on "self esteem" and making sure nobody ever feels "left out" that lowers frustration tolerance. This makes kids a lot more likely to go ballistic in the face of frustration.

Roy F. Baumeister, in "Evil: Inside Human Violence and Cruelty", noted that it's not "low self esteem" that contributes to violent outbursts. It's irrationally high self esteem. The person is so dependent on other people propping up his sense of self that as soon as somebody says or does something that bursts his bubble, he snaps.

 Yeah, we're all ultimately responsible for our behavior, but from a sociological standpoint the "self esteem" movement is responsible for a lot of damage. 

One point on the parallel: The NRA is actually proCHOICE on gun ownership.

 They don't want to force you to buy somebody else's gun with tax money if you're opposed to the ownership of firearms.

The NRA isn't trying to force all retailers to sell guns and ammo, the way the abortion lobby is trying to force all medical practitioners to participate in abortion.

And the Constitution actually spells out that owning a gun is a right -- unlike the bogus "right" of abortion that supposedly is so fundamental that you're not just entitled to do it, you're entitled to have somebody else perform it and pay for it against their will and against their conscience!

Once they're elected Leftie politicians might not do much about gay marriage or gun ownership but they go about promoting abortion with a religious fervor.

Look at what the governor of Kansas is doing for George Tiller -- he's clearly and openly performing illegal third trimester abortions, but  since all the people he supported politically are in the position to enforce the law, he gets away with it. He let one of his quacks, Leroy Carhart, do a botch job and kill a 19-year-old mentally retarded rape victim who was well into the third trimester, and the medical board (appointed by the governor) found no fault with him.

Electing a "prochoice" politician is like putting a fox in charge of the henhouse when it comes to abortion. The abortionists will be protected, not only at the cost of unborn lives but at the cost of the well-being of the very women that supposedly the "prochoice" are so concerned about. Where were they when Christin Gilbert had a choice made for her to -- for supposed "health" reasons -- spend three days in a motel room going unconscious from sepsis while Tiller's staff killed her baby at somebody else's request?

http://justiceforchr...