In Brent Bozell’s culture column this week, Brent tackles the new Lifetime reality show oh-so-tastefully called "How to Look Good Naked." Brent reveals how the cable-TV elite has again displayed their knee-jerk tendency to tweak and tempt the public to watch by promising more skin and more emphasis on public discussion of skin-deep sexiness – even when it’s pitched as advice and cheerleading for confidence-impaired women are too heavy, too tall, too masculine, too outside the beauty cookie-cutter.
The naughty parts of the show are designed to distinguish it from the fully-clothed makeover shows it copied (think TLC’s "What Not to Wear"). The premise is inspirational – everyone’s supposed to root for the compassionate star/gay genie Carson Kressley and his magical mission to help women love themselves more in their own skin:
Fads and fashions are so fickle they ultimately undo the people who tried to be the tastemakers. The Bravo cable network reality show "Queer Eye for the Straight Guy" was all the rage for a season or two, but collapsed after five seasons when the insulting schtick of ultra-hip gay men improving the "style-deficient and culture-deprived straight man" annoyed its last viewer.
Which is not to say that the entertainment elite tired of the concept, of what one TV writer from the Boston Globe called the "national gay genie escorting all kinds of slovenly men and women to Fabulousville on his magic carpet." Now they’re turning the concept toward its more natural audience: women who hate themselves and love makeover shows.
Contrary to the implication in its title, "Queer Eye for the Straight Guy" was always a show for females, sponsored by the makers of leg razors and other feminine beauty products. Carson Kressley, the most flamboyant "Eye" alumnus, now has a new and similar show that just debuted on Lifetime, a cable channel co-owned by Hearst and Disney. It’s called "How to Look Good Naked."
Despite the provocative title, the show doesn’t display full-blown nudity, but its subjects have a lot of undergarment time – so much time that Kressley jokes "It’s fun running around all day in our underwear, isn’t it?" Yet stripping down is big on this show. The series debuted with Kressley declaring a "perception revolution" in feminist tones as a group of plus-size women walking down the street behind him stripped down to their bras and panties.
At the start of this half-hour show, they photograph the makeover subject in her undergarments (from the shoulders down) and flash it several stories high on a Los Angeles skyscraper, asking passers-by what they think. They only use the complimentary responses. Then they urge the woman to strip down and assess each of her body parts, one by one, and how much she hates it. They walk her into a room with six other women of varying body sizes in their underwear, and show the audience how women tend to see themselves as bigger than they really are.
Just as he played the quipster on "Queer Eye," Kressley moves the show along with naughty lines like the running-in-underwear line, and proclaiming "I’m your fairy god-stylist and you’re my Cinderella." At one point in the first episode, he walks his subject in undergarments out into the regular part of the store, then asks a woman and her boyfriend at the cash register for an opinion: "Do you like this bra and panty combo? How about your man?"
The whole "Naked" concept" is a flagrant marketing ploy, with no real nudity on screen. Each show concludes with a woman posing naked for photographs, which she then shows that "tasteful" nude photo to a crowd of strangers, again projected on several stories of that L.A. skyscraper. The subject is urged to ask strangers, "Do you think I look good naked?" After the first show’s ending photo shoot, Kressley lays down next to his nude subject and asks the woman "Was it as good for you as it was for me?"
Kressley declares in the show’s introduction, "My ultimate goal is to not only get her to not only love her body, but to flaunt it – naked." This ratings-squeezing spectacle should grate on the viewer. Newly won self-confidence is one thing. But this show isn’t about self-confidence. It is all about exhibitionism. At least it’s partially kept from the television audience.
The original "Naked" makeover show started on Britain's Channel 4 in July 2006, and has spread like wildfire to Australia, Canada, Denmark, Germany, Hungary, Israel, the Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Sweden, and South Africa.
Now it’s here, proving yet again that Hollywood’s creativity level is on Empty. Yet TV writers are intrigued. One called the show "madly cathartic, and although the whole idea of gaining self-esteem by being judged for sexiness by strangers on the street is horribly wrong, it is also affecting." Another proclaimed she admired the show, but found it tiresome. "One empowering episode is probably going to be enough. I tuned in. I teared up, and now I’m moving on."
Whether this show catches on or not depends on the degree to which there are enough self-loathing women willing to watch this foolishness week after week. But there is no "market demand" driving this show so long as the public continues to be forced to underwrite this program with its cable subscriptions. Give the consumer some "cable choice," and shows like "How to Look Good Naked" would not make it past the first episode.
—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
cooking naked?
January 12, 2008 - 21:40 ET by shawn228I totally read that wrong at the beginning. I thought it was how to cook good naked. I can lots accidents with knives and deep frying:-)
Romney time machine
RULE #1. Unless you are a
January 12, 2008 - 21:52 ET by Jack BauerRULE #1. Unless you are a professional model, under 25, or have way to much time on your hands, ONLY try this at home.
Wow
January 13, 2008 - 01:58 ET by ZapThey should just rename the show "There's no one we won't explot for ratings!"
Seriously, this is really sick. It's like a nonnude version of Girls Gone Wild, only instead of preying on drunk girls they prey on insecure ratings. Despicable.
Neckid
January 13, 2008 - 04:08 ET by Lame CherryWhile God made people naked, there is a reason people should be clothed and it simply is from centerfolds to Rosie O'Donnell, there is not such a thing as people looking good naked.
Of all people to quote in David Hasselhoff, "Women just look better clothed"........and they do and he probably has seen his share neckid.
I have known some centerfolds and the one thing they have in common is they do not think they are that hot and most of them are not. It really puts the old damper on fantasy when you see your favorite glamour people in real life without the million dollar makeup artists.........that they don't look any better than your husband or wife on a bad day.
But as though we in this world now have a full crop of shallow twits defining themselves by sodomite sex acts as a race to all those changling children online with tramp stamps looking to torture people, nudie shows will probably get great ratings.
Me, I will be tuning instead into shows showing naked walleyes, naked beef steak, naked cast iron pans, naked charcoal fires, naked blue potatoes and probably enjoying watching my unclothed Setter retrieving unclothed pheasants as that interests me a whole lot more.
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
Naked body makeup?
January 13, 2008 - 13:18 ET by shawn228"It really puts the old damper on fantasy when you see your favorite
glamour people in real life without the million dollar makeup artists."
I thought this thread was about looking great naked, I did not realize glamour people use makeup on bodies.
"Me, I will be tuning instead into shows showing naked walleyes, naked
beef steak, naked cast iron pans, naked charcoal fires, naked blue
potatoes and probably enjoying watching my unclothed Setter retrieving
unclothed pheasants as that interests me a whole lot more. "
If watching a piece of meat cook on a flame turns your crank more than naked or nearly naked models, to each their own
I can only imagine how you feel about watching the home and garden channel or maybe the food network.
Ladies and gentlemen, you
January 13, 2008 - 10:30 ET by BobAnthonyLadies and gentlemen, you are seeing another reason why queer nation must be stopped at all costs! And to think the stuff Laura Ingraham mentioned in Power to the People about Lifetime is bad! If this isn't a case for Cable A La Carte, I don't know what is!
There is a website promoting the idea of cable choice you should try:
http://www.howcables...