NO one was talking to you LIAR. Airforce if you repeat this lie you're telling about me ONE more time I will have you banned.

  In one case. I worked on the pre-production version of a script that became known as Biker Boyz. The final version bears NO resemblance to anything I did though. Which in my vanity, I imagine is the reason for it's failure, LOL! 

 You'll hear it said in acting circles that the "moment" isn't about the words, it's about the underlying feelings and issues upon which the words rest. This is true. As it is true for acting, it's also true for writing. Back when I was on the Cosby Show the media made a big deal over the fact that Cosby had each script analyzed by noted psychologist Alvin Pouissant (sic?). Cos' explanation was that he didn't want America picking up the wrong things from the scripts, sub-consciously. What the media didn't tell you is that MOST scripts are "poured" over in that way. "Chuck and Larry" for instance was vetted by the Gay group G.L.A.D. before it would be approved for release. Now when you see the film there seems to be a healthy dose of "anti-homosexual" humor and attitudes represented and in this case, all who object to homosexuality are not necessarily portrayed as closet homosexuals themselves or hypocritical bible thumpers. Some are but some are not. There's a fair degree of balance there. This might even seem contrary to the idea of them proselytizing if they provide "balance". But the truth is that the Gays knew that the only thing that mattered is the "bottom line", no pun intended. Ultimately homosexuality is ACCEPTED by these "tough" N.Y. Firefighters and "bigots", meaning anyone opposed to homosexuality,  are rejected! 

Years ago major newspapers reported that Harvey Weinstein, then head of Miramax, vowed to GLAD that he would improve both the visibility and profile of homosexuals with his movies. Writers were then ordered to move the homosexual character into the "GUARDIAN" position within the script. What is the "guardian" you ask? lol. It's the KEEPER OF KNOWLEDGE. The character that has the Key to the main characters "dilemma". In Star Wars it would be "Obi-Wan" who trains the Luke in the ways of the force. The "guardian" character is above the judgement of the audience because it is their guidance that the main character seeks. What followed were My Best Friends Wedding and The Next Best Thing, both of which had homosexuals with wildly promiscuous lifestyles as the dispensers of heterosexual relationship "advice".

You might ask why does Hollywood spend MILLIONS on movies that they KNOW WILL FAIL? It's no secret that "anti-war" movies have NEVER done well at the box office with "anti-war" being the CENTRAL theme. Years ago leftists made "K-19 Widowmaker" starring Liam Neeson the movie tanked badly. It as all about these BRAVE submariners who buck authority and almost vanquish their enemies. Only problem was the stars of the movie were the RUSSIANS and the enemy was the UNITED STATES! The movie was rejected and only made 36 million. It cost a HUNDRED MILLION to produce. These people are trying to get out a "message" or series of "messages" and they are willing to throw gazillions down the hole to do it.  They know that every member of the NEXT generation they reach, is a victory. Our generation has largely let go of the traditions of the past but we still maintain to a degree, the taboos. They want to change that and their target is the youth.

I am actually boycotting white chocolate because it is a disgrace, an affront to the good name of real, true chocolate.

</s>

I'm saying that not reading or watching it because there is an atheist message is silly,

I'm a Catholic. So if I decline to read something because it's anti-Catholic I'm being silly? Do I not have the right to not read something that I believe is antithetical to my faith?

the only message I can imagine that you are trying to send is that you
think atheists shouldn't be allowed to have their fictional
masterpieces turned into movies.

No one is saying the book should not have been turned into a movie. No one is saying anti-religious books should not be written. What we are saying is that, having informed themselves of the content, people are certainly within their rights to not see the movie, and even to inform others and recommend that they skip it too. Movie critics do that all the time.

Speaking out against a movie is not censorship. Neither is a boycott. The message that a boycott sends is that people do not want to support or give their money to something they disagree with. It's as American as freedom of speech.

Actually no one has a problem with atheists making anything. We are free to either see it or not. What people of good conscience have a problem with, is a campaign of stealth indoctrination against Jesus. I actually had a modicum of respect for the authors honesty in admitting that his books are about "KILLING GOD". I think that people who have an interest in "killing God" now, have a book to read and a movie to see. However, for these liars to DENY the purpose of their works, is where the diabolical nature of their acts come in. Much like the liberals telling you that they wanted to teach sodomy in sex ed to "keep gays from being beaten up" but when you see hidden tapes of the sex ed classes, they're advocating orgies, golden showers and FISTING! There is the agenda they tell you about and then there is their real agenda! 

And they use people who have already "sold their souls" to do it. Nicold Kidman claims to be some kind of Catholic, right? Really? How is that,  since a real catholic, just like a "real" Jew,  can't marry a non-believer? So obviously any relationship she ever had with catholicism is tangential at best. Think about Brad Pitt and Angelina! Remember when Pitt was pimping for stem cell research on the campaign trail back in 04? Does Brad Pitt strike you as intelligent enough to even know where to FIND a book on stem cell research? I mean, here's a guy who's never even PLAYED an intelligent character much less been one himself, but he's out there for stem cells? 

They won't let you ascend to the heights of a Brad Pitt unless you swear fealty to their liberal filth. You get a proverbial "knock on the door" once you reach a certain level and if you sign on , you ascend, even in the face of FAILURE and box office DISASTERS! If you say "no" the stream of "offers" dries up and they forget about you and go on to the next chump they can use. Think not? Recently when asked why he and Angelina were adopting all these babies from other countries yet were NOT MARRIED, Brad Pitt said that he and Angelina will get married, WHEN HOMOSEXUALS CAN! Now, why would two of the biggest names in Hollywoood, tie their futures and the futures of their family, to the HOMOSEXUAL MOVEMENT when neither of them are gay? They made a deal that's why. And it explains why Pitt is still considered a movie star although he has NEVER been "bankable"! His ONLY hit movie, in which he was the number one on the callsheet was SEVEN. After that his only boxoffice success was in the ensemble Oceans Eleven franchise, where Clooney is clearly the star! But he still gets that 25 mil per pic, with no discernable financial explanations for it! He makes more than MATT DAMON and the BOURNE trilogy was a phenomenal success! 

And attacking Weitz is totally fair. No one made him try to make movies that end with "killing God", he decided that all by his lonesome. I was offered over 30,000 dollars per episode in a thirteen episode "arc", to co-star on "Will and Grace" as the inter-racial homosexual love interest to "Will". I declined. When I declined my management was VERY worried about the manner in which we said "no thanks". They ended up, without my permission btw, lying, and saying Keith has "other commitments". Well this is a small town and work of any consequence that would mandate turning down an offer of that magnitude would be known. It went around that I had a problem with playing a homosexual, which, while TRUE, was never stated by me or any representative and I was then "black listed". These people are serious my friend and they are light years ahead of your understanding in the field of cultural manipulation. Ask me some day why Rappers are in movies, allegedly because of their instant fan base, but yet white recording artists with FAR more record sales, are not, if you really want to learn about Hollyweird.

Bal, the arthor has said that he wrote the books as a "counter" to the "Chronicles of Narnia. The Lion the Witch and the Wardrobe." He specifically said his books were about "killing God". Now just how non-christian dose it have to be for you? I for one would never support anyone or anything, with my money, that promoted such an idea. 

Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!