On his Daily Nightly blog, NBC Nightly News anchor Brian Williams sent his happy-birthday wishes to liberal comedian Jon Stewart. In a Wednesday blog post playfully titled "Where Have You Gone, Jonathan Stuart Leibowitz?", Williams mourned how the writers' strike has taken Stewart away from his "vital comedic work" trashing Bush. Just like Tom Brokaw, Brian Williams thinks Stewart is an American treasure:
The serious fact is that Jon Stewart and his colleagues in comedy -- along with the writers who support them -- serve an invaluable purpose by skewering the pompous and deflating the egos of the high and mighty. They function almost as a separate branch of government. We need them, and we miss them.
If Stewart attacked Williams with as much aggression as he attacked Bush, Cheney, or Robert Novak the "vampire demon," perhaps Williams wouldn't be as quick to miss him. The Williams post also included a long list of Internet resources for people who missed Jon Stewart's conservative-bashing humor as much as he did. One missing-Stewart page even allowed you to wallow in a one-hour C-SPAN interview with Stewart. His infamous and pompous you're-hurting-America lecturing of Tucker Carlson on CNN's "Crossfire" is lauded as "possibly the greatest moment in television."
With his high and mighty look-Ma-I'm-funny ego, Williams has made a series of guest appearances on Stewart's show, and he seems to be angling to continue the string. Here's a larger snippet of the sappy Williams tribute:
But for the moment here at the Daily Nightly, we’d like to extend special birthday wishes to Jon Stewart. He’s 45 today, though you wouldn’t know it to look at him. You may recall that Jon once hosted a show on Comedy Central called The Daily Show. The sad truth is that we haven’t seen Jon -- or Jay, Dave, Conan, Stephen and the rest, including the gang at SNL -- since the writers’ strike knocked them all off the air 24 days ago.
Life has gone on without them, of course, but not for the better. Word is that talks have resumed, and we hope that means the strike will soon be over. But in the meantime -- for weeks now -- much vital comedic work has gone undone. There has been no one to skewer the pompous or ridicule the self-important; no one to blow the lid off the story, whether the story has a lid or not. No one, in short, to slip a banana peel under the body politic. There’s a presidential campaign going on, for goodness’ sake -- not to mention stories about OJ Simpson and Miss Puerto Rico. There is so much out there to poke fun at -- so much that demands to be poked fun at -- and it is simply going unpoked. This is no laughing matter.
The serious fact is that Jon Stewart and his colleagues in comedy -- along with the writers who support them -- serve an invaluable purpose by skewering the pompous and deflating the egos of the high and mighty. They function almost as a separate branch of government. We need them, and we miss them.
While they're away, here are a few web resources to tide us all over. In the meantime, happy birthday, Jon. And best wishes for a happy return.
—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
For some of us, it IS vital comedic work...
November 29, 2007 - 07:10 ET by sarcasmoFor example, they haven't followed-up on their hilarious first segment regarding the now-convicted BJ-Bob Allen, R. FL. The rash of restroom-sex can't be properly covered by CNN, Fox News, or the Big Three networks IMO. Only Comedy Central can properly do the job on a story this-full of inherently funny material.
JMR
Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul.
Rebut!
November 29, 2007 - 07:18 ET by Tim GrahamThe point here is precisely what kind of humor Williams is missing.
I miss it too.
November 29, 2007 - 07:36 ET by sarcasmoThe BJ-Bob story needs Comedy Central's touch, especially now that he's convicted, and by the time the writer's strike is over it will no longer be topical so they probably won't do it at all...
JMR
Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul.
What kind of humor? You
November 29, 2007 - 10:27 ET by balboaWhat kind of humor? You mean the funny kind?
Honestly, who is more
November 29, 2007 - 09:35 ET by Dave659Honestly, who is more pompous, Brian Williams or George W. Bush? Brian Williams or Dick Cheney? Reading the news, Williams seems to slow down and modulate his voice for the dimness he must perceive among his audience.
Separate branch of government
November 29, 2007 - 16:27 ET by iveseenitallThey serve as a branch of the Democratic party. They are immature jerks who play to the lowest common denominator. National treasures?? Jon Stewart, Letterman, et.al. make only themselves, not America, rich. Moreover, they are a major cause of the great divide in this nation.
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
Now that's some goooood
November 29, 2007 - 17:17 ET by balboaNow that's some goooood hyperbole. Come on. "Major cause of the great divide in this nation"? You're talking about a late night talk show and a cable comedy show.
Constant
November 29, 2007 - 18:16 ET by iveseenitallHyperbole??Constantly and overwhelmingly making one party the butt of jokes divides the nation. I thought you liberals were oh so sensitve to people's "feelings". You care so much about those poor people who are the butt of jokes, don't you? "You are full of it, you nasty, vindictive creep." That's what people "feel" inside when they hear the rantings of guys like Stewart. But what do you care, Bal, you're a "liberal" -- you understand "liberal", self-centered hypocrisy and ignorance, I don't.
BTW, when someone like Ann Coulter makes her remarks, you guys go nuts. The great divide.
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
Curious, did you feel this
November 29, 2007 - 18:16 ET by balboaCurious, did you feel this way when Clinton was in office and the target of constant, non-stop jokes? Probably not. And neither did I. Because I understood that they're just talk shows, shows trying to get laughs.
Plus (see above...)
November 29, 2007 - 18:22 ET by sarcasmoThe jokes are often quite FUNNY. And that also goes for when Stewart & Colbert rip on the Dems, too. Which, not-surprisingly, they've done a lot more -- now that the Democrat Party at least controls some of our obese government and is instinctively doing a crappy job of it.
I can't wait for the writer's strike to just END. We need a comedy "news" show like Stewart's to keep an eye on other news broadcasts, just like we need Colbert to constantly-mock that statist O'Reilly and other buffoons. IMO. :)
JMR
Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul.
boa.... The difference
November 29, 2007 - 18:24 ET by bigtimerboa....
The difference between the constant jokes about Clinton as you say was it was just that...jokes...the main stream media of all most all of the venues protected Clinton til the end, they still are trying to, plus rewrite history on top of that.
The way they have treated Bush has been with vitriolic disdain...they are not joking...including the most of the so-called comedy shows...including the guests.
How can you tell if a
November 29, 2007 - 18:29 ET by balboaHow can you tell if a Letterman monologue joke about Clinton sleeping around has more vitriol than one about Bush being dumb? I don't see how you can determine that Letterman and Stewart "are not joking" but with Clinton they were "just jokes."
bal
November 29, 2007 - 18:28 ET by MrShyClinton was the butt of non-stop jokes because he got a blowj*b (and job-s, I'm sure) under his desk... SERVES HIM RIGHT!
Bush is the target of non-stop jokes, because of his non-stop commitment to fighting a war the liberals don't believe in.
There's a BIG difference.
And Jon does more than just open with Bush/Chenney jokes. His interviews are totally left-leaning... with him kissing up to any Bush-hating liberal, or contantly interupting any Conservative (see: Lynne Chenney, Dennis Miller, William Kristol, et al..)
"MY end justifies THAT mean." - Shakespeare (not really)
Nonetheless, Stewart is
November 29, 2007 - 18:30 ET by JasonCNonetheless, Stewart is leaps and bounds more respectful of opposing viewpoint-oriented guests than any of the FoxNews pundits.
"He was, and is yet, most likely, the wearisomest, self-righteous
pharisee that ever ransacked a Bible to rake the promises to himself
and fling the curses on his neighbors." -Emily Bronte
JasonC
November 29, 2007 - 18:39 ET by MrShyJon Stewart is a late-night comedian and entertainment talk show host. Fox political pundits are just that, political pundits. What are you doing comparing the two??
Jon should TOTALLY bottle up his beliefs, and you and I know he doesn't. I think Jay Leno, a real pro in this regard, DOES.
But Jon can kind of get away with this, sheepishly saying "well, we ARE a fake news show, not a normal talk show like Jay or Letterman" so he can sort of interject his ideology... and he totally does. And YES, he is lunging forward while conservatives are trying to make their case on his show, waiting to follow up with his next talking point before they can finish a sentence. It's embarrassing.
All this being said, he IS still very funny, and I love watching him.
"MY end justifies THAT mean." - Shakespeare (not really)
I don't really get the
November 29, 2007 - 18:42 ET by JasonCI don't really get the distinction you're making. Stewart's show is adamantly about skewering the news and current events. His interviews are the one time when he's more or less serious. Anyway, I'm not talking about bias, I'm talking about the rudeness factor; O'Reilly, Hannity, and Colmes are all far more disruptive to their own guests.
"He was, and is yet, most likely, the wearisomest, self-righteous
pharisee that ever ransacked a Bible to rake the promises to himself
and fling the curses on his neighbors." -Emily Bronte
Oh, if you're talking
November 29, 2007 - 18:51 ET by MrShyOh, if you're talking rudeness vs. politeness, okay, fine. They're passionate political pundits, like so many, and not just on Fox. And if Fox is more animated, I say, good for them. When you're the black sheep/minority in the MSM, you're prone to yell a bit more.
You libs are hilarious. It's all one outlet with you... Fox Fox Fox. With us, it's CNN, MSNBC, ABC, and other alphebet nightly news, NYTimes, Wash Post, MOST print newspapers, and the list goes on and onnnn.......... Quite a disparity there, wouldn't you admit?
"MY end justifies THAT mean." - Shakespeare (not really)
Oh, if you're talking
November 29, 2007 - 18:52 ET by MrShyOh, if you're talking rudeness vs. politeness, okay, fine. They're passionate political pundits, like so many, and not just on Fox. And if Fox is more animated, I say, good for them. When you're the black sheep/minority in the MSM, you're prone to yell a bit more.
You libs are hilarious. It's all one outlet with you... Fox Fox Fox. With us, it's CNN, MSNBC, ABC, and other alphebet nightly news, NYTimes, Wash Post, MOST print newspapers, and the list goes on and onnnn.......... Quite a disparity there, wouldn't you admit?
"MY end justifies THAT mean." - Shakespeare (not really)
Oh, if you're talking
November 29, 2007 - 18:52 ET by MrShyOh, if you're talking rudeness vs. politeness, okay, fine. They're passionate political pundits, like so many, and not just on Fox. And if Fox is more animated, I say, good for them. When you're the black sheep/minority in the MSM, you're prone to yell a bit more.
You libs are hilarious. It's all one outlet with you... Fox Fox Fox. With us, it's CNN, MSNBC, ABC, and other alphebet nightly news, NYTimes, Wash Post, MOST print newspapers, and the list goes on and onnnn.......... Quite a disparity there, wouldn't you admit?
"MY end justifies THAT mean." - Shakespeare (not really)
dooble post
November 29, 2007 - 18:54 ET by MrShysorry
Fox is the only one I watch
November 29, 2007 - 18:55 ET by JasonCFox is the only one I watch (x3).
"He was, and is yet, most likely, the wearisomest, self-righteous
pharisee that ever ransacked a Bible to rake the promises to himself
and fling the curses on his neighbors." -Emily Bronte
I think Stewart is more than
November 29, 2007 - 18:31 ET by balboaI think Stewart is more than fair with all his conservative guests. He doesn't agree with them, but he's fair. If there was ever an interview where he wasn't fair, it was the one with Chris Matthews.
And please, Bush is not the target of jokes strictly because of the war. There's waaaay more material than just that. Many of these jokes would still exist if we had never gone to war.
Yep.
November 29, 2007 - 18:35 ET by sarcasmoComics, as I said above, have a target-rich environment with obese government politicians...
JMR
Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul.
Hey Bal
November 29, 2007 - 18:42 ET by fosstenHey Bal
Deflecting as usual.
Forget 911, I dial 10MM.
Deflecting from what? No one
November 29, 2007 - 18:49 ET by balboaDeflecting from what? No one was bitching about all the jokes during the Clinton administration, but now that it's a Republican one, it's "This is just vitriol!!!" These are JOKES on entertainment shows.
And when Ann spends most of her life as a stand-up comic and then has a talk show on a comedy channel, I'll have a totally different reaction to everything she does. Until then, she's a very smart person who says things in an outrageous fashion in order to attract attention to herself.
For your information, Bal
November 29, 2007 - 18:47 ET by iveseenitallFor your information, Bal, I have felt this way since the inception of Saterday Night Live. I knew then what this would come to. Hurt brings hurt, just as violence brings violence. It's not a one way street. I admit that some of my words come from anger. My anger has come from hearing left-wing lies and hypocrisy go unchalllenged for thirty years or more. I and millions of others in America have had it with the snarky hypocrites who hurt people sans conscience, many of whom are on t.v.
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
But you seem to only be
November 29, 2007 - 18:51 ET by balboaBut you seem to only be angry at liberals who "hurt people sans conscience," right?
Not just liberals
November 29, 2007 - 19:16 ET by iveseenitallI don't enjoy this kind of thing from anyone. As I said, it hurts and I believe it serves no purpose but to hurt. However, I also believe that it has been overwhelmingly one-sided.
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"