For Rolling Stone’s 40th anniversary magazine, one of the celebrities interviewed was the atheist, leftist HBO comedian/pundit Bill Maher. Even as Maher has long professed his support for Bill Clinton's sexual freedom (remember this gig as Clinton's talking little Willy?), he still says of Hillary, "F— them and their Clinton baggage...when the Democrats want a sure winner, John Edwards looks like it." Whoever wins for the Democrats, Maher hopes they’re good at lying to the voters:
ROLLING STONE: What’s your best case scenario for the future?
MAHER: First of all, some Democrat better win it in 2008. Then that person should go for broke and say to the people, "Now I have to tell you the truth. I couldn’t do it when I was running, because you are a bunch of babies who can’t take the truth, and you know damn well you wouldn’t have voted for me if I said that. But we’re going to take these painful measures."
The sad part of it is, the money is there to do almost anything we want. It’s not as if you’d have to raise taxes so much. If you took the money being wasted on Iraq, corporate welfare and the drug war, you would have trillions of dollars to work with. That’s the core of it. Whoever is the next president has to get at this corporate state we’ve found ourselves living in.
Spoken like a true timecard-puncher for Time Warner/HBO. Then there was the hatred-of-religion section:
ROLLING STONE: Speaking of religion, do you see people getting more or less rational in the coming years?
MAHER: Both. People are finally catching on that religion is childish and dangerous....Europe is over religion. They’re religious in name only. So the older, wiser continent, they’ve moved beyond that. But of course, much of the world has not....
ROLLING STONE: What about religion in this country? Is it becoming less of a political force?
MAHER: I really feel like there’s a movement building. This is the issue of the day, and people are beginning to understand that religion is the problem. Now, when the president shows up at a disaster site and says he’s going to pray, it means nothing. He might as well show up and say, "I’m going to hope. I’m on it – I’m going to wish it were so." It’s meaningless at best. It’s difficult to steer the ship of state toward some sort of safe harbor when at least half the people in this country essentially think we should do that by splitting open a chicken and reading its entrails. I’m suggesting we use a compass.
That sounds fairly in sync with the Edwards campaign and its tendency to hire bloggers who rage against Bush's "wingnut Christofascist base."
Rolling Stone interviewer Mark Binelli also asked if Maher was optimistic or pessimistic about the future:
You know, one man’s pessimist is another man’s realist. People say to me, "Why are you so cynical?" And I say, "I wouldn’t be so cynical if you weren’t so f—ing stupid." I’m pessimistic because I see multiple looming icebergs that we’re sailing toward, and Captain George Bush is the guy in the crow’s nest of the Titanic. He doesn’t see the iceberg. Or he sees it and thinks it’s Jesus or some s–t. There are environmental, religious, and financial disasters looming. What if they all go down at the same time? It’s not like we’re getting our s–t together on any of this stuff.
What about global warming? Don’t get Maher started:
And don’t forget, most Republican congressmen are still global-warming deniers. I don’t understand what any person doesn’t get about "You’re going to die too!" I could understand that, because they’re selfish pricks by nature: "I’ve got my own air. Why do I give a s–t?" But there’s a cloud of coal slag over China that’s so large it affects the weather. How good can business be to justify that? [Italics in original.]
Maher’s ultimately not impressed with his own influence. He concluded that he’ll look back on his career of punditry and say "You’ve heard me. I’ve made my point. I’ve had my time on the soapbox. And nobody took my advice."
Update 13:50 | Matthew Sheffield. It's good to see Maher finally come out and admit he's pulling for Democrats. Maybe now he can finally drop the "I'm a libertarian charade."
—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center.
Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Well, I see this latest rant
November 10, 2007 - 11:51 ET by robert108Well, I see this latest rant from a prominent leftie as a good thing. They have always been liars who really want totalitarian powers to control us, and now one of them has told that truth on TV. This should be front page news, but it won't be, since they still have to lie to grab power from free Americans.
Let's see, he espouses
November 10, 2007 - 12:03 ET by KevroyLet's see, he espouses communist doctrine, slams Christians, urges the Dems to lie in order to achieve their goals (isn't that what they've been doing?), and trots out the tired mantra of the Left that Europeans are so much more enlightened than us cave dwelling Americans.
Talk about unwarranted self regard....
No fan of Bill Maher
November 11, 2007 - 07:26 ET by PShannonI'm no fan of Bill Maher, but you just gotta see this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5MetSquCtPU
I guarantee it's the funniest thing you've seen this week.
By of and for the American People?
November 10, 2007 - 12:01 ET by third eyeMAHER: First of all, some Democrat better win it in 2008. Then that
person should go for broke and say to the people, "Now I have to tell
you the truth. I couldn’t do it when I was running, because you are a
bunch of babies who can’t take the truth, and you know damn well you
wouldn’t have voted for me if I said that. But we’re going to take
these painful measures."
Translation
"First off, Im terrified that Hillary has no chance in hell in 08. Second, of course the democrat nominee should lie to the American people...how else could we possibly get elected? I think Americans are fools and the ends justify the means."
Although Maher describes
November 10, 2007 - 12:27 ET by SMGalbraithAlthough Maher describes himself (or did recently) as a "libertarian", when he's asked more in-depth questions about his political views, especially on domestic legislation, he reveals himself as sort of a "libertine socialist". On economic issues, he's clearly a statist. On foreign policy, he's got the view that there isn't a problem in the world that can't be solved by having the US not involved. On social issues, well, everyone knows where he stands on those policies.
A few weeks back, Tucker Carlson was on his show and listed the policy planks of Ron Paul, someone that Maher said he had favorable views on. Maher sat there shaking his head, apparently hearing these real libertarian views for the first time.
SMG
It's no surprise Maher
November 10, 2007 - 12:57 ET by Chris NormanIt's no surprise Maher can't keep an audience given his loudly proclaimed absolute contempt for the American people. His answers sound like the bileous ranting of a mental patient screeching from his padded cell...
Liberal Pain? Feel Conservative Pleasure
November 10, 2007 - 13:23 ET by Lame CherryI want to point out again just how tortured liberals all are as they always speak of "feeling your pain" or having to invoke "painful measures" and lie to people to get what they want.
I WANT FRED THOMPSON AND THE REPUBLICANS TO READ THIS: There is no reason ever for draconian or painful measures to ever fix things in the American ecomony. People like FDR start wars to stop depressions and President Bush with no economic plan had to open the printing presses which the Rockefeller Fed wanted to stop a depression which we are now all going to pay for in inflation, recession and a move by the Rockefellers for a North American Union.
THERE DOES NOT HAVE TO BE ANY OF THIS NONSENSE of pain or hardship for Americans as President Reagan and yes President Kennedy showed in basic Milton Friedman economics.
With 3 measures, I by God's Wisdom building upon Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson and Milton Friedman economics can fix all American financial problems without any pain, suffering, cut backs or a decline in a standard of living.
Measure 1: Congress takes all the billions being wasted on the global warming scam and the aids "research" scam (aids is a virus like a cold it does not need billions to study what is already studied) which are flowing into liberal coffers AND TAKE THAT MONEY AND GIVE AS GRANTS TO AMERICAN HOMEOWNERS FOR DISASTER SHELTERS AND STOCKING THEM.
America needs this for several food reserve, atomic warfare and terrorist warfare and storm shelter reasons. The construction boom and buying boom from these grants will stimulate the economy and actually INCREASE THE VALUE OF PROPERTY not by inflation but by making it worth more.
This net effect will raise the American standard of living and make a much better and safer America by boosting the economy and showing enemies it is useless to attack America as America will survive and come after them with nuclear bombs.
Measure 2: Tax relief must be expanded to American small business and international corporations who INVEST PROFITS BACK INTO AMERICA. This investment will purchase machinery which will employ high end American jobs and make for an expanding American economy with good jobs.
I advocate a deep sea mining cartel of American, British and Japanese industry as mining partners selling the ores and minerals to the 3 billion Asian market. This triad cartel will trade, manufacture and prosper among ourselves and milk the trillions of dollars in foreign hands back into America. This will create a lender nation in America and not a debtor nation as America was in 1950.
An America so furnishing raw resources will then be too valuable to attack by Russia, China or their Isamocommunist allies like Zawahiri and America will be so powerful in this economically that we can use financial leverage on rogue states instead of bombs to achieve our policy ends.
Measure 3: I have posted before in America must Americanize Mexico and Canada east. By this I mean American foundations which are liberal groups now must be mandated to invest in the northern Mexican states creating a Republic zone of teaching and industry for jobs for Mexicans there which America will profit by in industry and in Mexicans raised standard of living buying our technology.
Canada with it's resources and fine people need to reflect the praire provinces which are quite American in attitude and not the eastern liberals of their provinces ruining Canada. Canadians increasing their wealth will provide great trading partners on our hemisphere and security.
Into this, America should invest for the economy in a long term Eisenhower road system into speed rails or bullet trains. Boeing and Detroit could build the trains, Northwestern, American, Southwestern etc... could with their airlines run the train system and Fed Ex with UPS could be part of the trans shipping along with the railroads already in place. All would profit, all Americans would see better jobs being created and our commerce would shift from expensive trucking to truckers hired by rail companies to freight local jobs or work for this expanding national system of transportation.
None of this entails one bit of pain, misery or loss of jobs for any Americans. Homeowners instead would see their properties rise in literal value of $25,000 to offset the fake inflation which as now busted. American industry and hometown merchants would see a purchasing boom like after World War II with the grant money.
The investment of money back into America would upgrade the entire national infrastructure and by doing this America fixes itself.
The Americanization, selling of raw materials and security would mean America would not be drawn into wars and our allied ports of England and Japan would be our superpower partners shielding all of us from Eurasian wars.
In this real economic plan which is Conservative no one suffers and as America prospers so will the entire world follow our lead. It is horrid listening to incompetent liberals all telling people they need to be lied to and that draconian measures must be unleashed. Franklin built Pennsylvania without suffering those people. Jefferson expanded America without one recession and Reagan built a economic engine which is still generating even with all the inept taxes placed upon it.
In this end, if liberals would get out of the way, the increased production of America, increased wealth and increased wages would bring in 3 times the taxes now being raised if 1/2 the taxes were taken off as has been proven, by simply allowing Americans to prosper and giving investment programs which help stimulate the economy.
The GOP needs to get on this now and Fred Thompson must get off the doom message as this is the United States. Our God given right is propserity and only those who are not capable only see shortfalls. It is easy to point out what is wrong. History though has shown all of us how to accomplish things correctly.
The Baltic states have implemented Milton Friedman's economic plan and are prospering. It is time someone who understands economics and is working for America and mandating to the Rockefeller cartel that they can gain more power by this plan to bring this all to fruition.
It is simple. It is painless and in 3 years time Americans would be wondering why on earth they were ever worried about health costs, gas prices and the future as this economy will have empowered them to fix their own lives.
Granted a moral national outlook based upon Christian values of caring for others and respecting others must be in place to give our children the good disciplines to build fulfilling lives, but it is the economy now as that is what requires being fixed.
agtG
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
The simple solutions are
November 10, 2007 - 15:50 ET by mattmThe simple solutions are usually the best. Libs have to complicate things in order to confuse people, thus allowing them to implement error.
Somebody send Bill Maher Mark Steyn's book...
November 10, 2007 - 13:30 ET by desertdwellerSend Bill Maher "America Alone" and see how Bill rationalizes Europe's death spiral.
Whose audience has the
November 10, 2007 - 13:33 ET by TEWhose audience has the bigger collection of kooks, dupes, freaks, fools and idiots: Maher's, Jon Stewart's or Stephen Colbutt's?
looks like someone doesn't
November 12, 2007 - 09:24 ET by johnGlooks like someone doesn't find any of those shows funny...
The sad part of it is, the
November 10, 2007 - 13:56 ET by motherbeltThe sad part of it is, the money is there to do almost anything we
want. It’s not as if you’d have to raise taxes so much. If you took the
money being wasted on Iraq, corporate welfare and the drug war, you
would have trillions of dollars to work with. That’s the core of it.
Whoever is the next president has to get at this corporate state we’ve
found ourselves living in. Bill Maher
Does Maher think this is original? Where has he been? Even OBL in his cave in Afghanistan is more up to date. You can't listen to a Liberal for five minutes without getting a lecture on what we could do with the money being spent in Iraq and if we raised taxes on rich corporations. OK, I'll admit, they don't get into the drug war thing much, but Maher has to be in a coma if he's missing the other two.
Alice's Law
November 10, 2007 - 16:07 ET by scamoramaThe sad part of it is, the money is there to do almost anything we
want.
This is Alice's Law of Compensatory Finance: the money you "save" by not buying one thing can be spent on another.
But, what if the money is borrowed? Or comes from increasing taxes? Is it really "there" to begin with? In Liberal La-La Land, the answer is always "yes".
Whiny Boy
November 10, 2007 - 14:37 ET by KC MulvilleMaher entertains his audience by telling them how stupid everyone else is. They revel in it like adolescents, whooping and hollering at every insult thrown at others. Now they see that Maher thinks that everyone who disagrees with him must be an idiot. That includes his audience, and they'll see how little respect he really has for them. Let's see them whoop and holler then.
In fact, now Maher is whining about having to defend his prejudices. He wishes he could get elected, by lying if need be, and just impose his beliefs on everyone. And yet this guy has the nerve to insult others as childish.
If his isn’t the ultimate childishness, I don’t know what is.
And let’s be honest about Europe shedding its religion and moving 'ahead.' For the last century and a half, the intellectual elites of Europe have advocated atheism and various forms of managed economies and managed politics. The landscape of eastern Europe is littered with the debris of failed communist regimes, and west-European socialism left behind huge, dependent welfare states. How’s that European Union going? The only successes have been states that dropped the elitist hubris and moved back to rewarding hard work and individual initiative, like Britain since Thatcher. And as for the shedding of religion? Right now, Europe is being flooded by Islam. The Bureaucrats are defeating Europe more than Saladin ever could.
Maher is a religious bigot. He has no reason or explanation. He’s just the teenager sitting in the back of class who wants so desperately to get laid, but can’t, so he whines about the ‘uptight’ rules of the church. As if the nuns were his problem …
"And let’s be honest
November 11, 2007 - 00:14 ET by Carl Kolchak"And let’s be honest about Europe shedding its religion and moving 'ahead.' For the last century and a half, the intellectual elites of Europe have advocated atheism and various forms of managed economies and managed politics. The landscape of eastern Europe is littered with the debris of failed communist regimes, and west-European socialism left behind huge, dependent welfare states."
Now KC, don't you know Maher has his own show with people who email him and tell him how great and smart he thinks he is. You should worship Maher and trust him. If he says we need a new Enver Hoxha to start the second Atheist state, then you believe him. Who cares if nothing productive came out of Hoxha's Albania, or that he banned and attacked religion. We need more Walter Ulbrichts and Erich Honeckers to attack religion and then build walls, because people are leaving. And then they can have people like Egon Krenz shoot and kill people as they try to escape. We need more Mao's to ban religion and wait for the Great Leap Forward to be successful, while watching Taiwan become an economic super power. We need more Pol Pot's to ban religion and kill anyone that can think for themselves. We need for Ceausescu's to attack religion, and who cares if he had the Securitate which is similar to the Stasi. Those people in Romania who decided to execute him and his wife couldn't appreciate all the freedoms he was giving them.
KC you just don't understand how smart and brilliant Maher thinks he is. You had better learn, or Maher and Company will label you obsolete.
"Well I got nothing against the press. They wouldn't print it if it wasn't true" 'Sunday Papers'
If it wasn't so true
November 11, 2007 - 01:44 ET by KC MulvilleCarl, if it wasn't so true, I'd think you were just piling on. Scary to think about, isn't it?
"I Hope the Next Dem
November 10, 2007 - 14:47 ET by Chris Norman"I Hope the Next Dem President Lies..."
Don't most liberal Democrats running for office already lie about and obscure who they are and what they'll do? We always hear, before the elections, liberal pundits advising the Democrats that they have to "look" strong on national defense, "look" tough on terrorism, "look" more conservative on spending, etc. The operative word being "look" and not - "be"...
Maher wants the next dem to
November 10, 2007 - 15:44 ET by bigtimerMaher wants the next dem to lie....
What does he mean want...
Where has he been ...that is all they do everytime they open their mouths...the Clintoon team are perfect to a tee examples of that.
His wish is full-filled with the exception of seeing a dem for Prez in '08....
LOL!
Wait a second. Let me get
November 10, 2007 - 16:11 ET by fitzfongWait a second. Let me get this straight. First, Maher claims that Bush is leading us into an iceberg. Then he essentially claims "the debate is over" regarding global warming. If that's the case, global warming should take care of the first problem, by melting this iceberg that Bush is supposedly leading us into. Just a thought.
This is actually instructive...
November 10, 2007 - 16:29 ET by c5thenMaher is a typical liberal nut. Listen to what he says and what he wants the President to do and you will see an almost complete lack of understanding of how the government really works. The way he talks, it's as if he thinks we are electing the next dictator. he also apparently doesn't understand, or has never read, the Constitution. He seems to be particularly ignorant of the entire wording of the First Amendment.
The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back! Fred08.com
Maher: Agnostic!?
November 10, 2007 - 17:34 ET by Doraemon_OReillyHey there again, all my fellow NBers. I know that Bill Maher's as much of a libertarian as I am much of an atheist. Speaking of atheism, on Bill Maher's Wikipedia article (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Maher), the article stupidly claims he is an "agnostic" and says he believes in God. "Agnostic" my petunia!! Just the anti-religious hate he spews from his piehole makes me wanna be baptized into the Catholic church even more! (no kidding)
"Kame-Hame-HAAAA!!!!!" - Son Goku, destroying Usama Bin Laden.
It's especially rich when a
November 10, 2007 - 18:04 ET by KevroyIt's especially rich when a millionaire who gets a huge paycheck each week from a giant media conglomerate bemoans the evil corporations.
Exactly. Bill
November 10, 2007 - 18:43 ET by kathleenirishExactly.
Bill Maher: the smug elitist. Obnoxious, ugly misogynist. I hope some girl kicks him in the bollox.
Anyone who says they support the troops but not the mission is a liar.
Sacrifice
November 10, 2007 - 22:01 ET by nkviking75Lib dictionary Sacrifice: We're going to jack taxes way up by claiming to be going after the rich. In reality, the definition of "rich" will encompass a major portion of the middle class. We're going to use that tax revenue to bribe a lot of "Americans" (not necessarily limited to citizens or legal aliens) to vote for us, and to keep them dependent so they'll keep voting for us.
When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.
Unfortunately, NK.
November 10, 2007 - 22:22 ET by BlondeYours was the spot-on post of the day. Maybe the year.
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
Instead of a Liberal lying
November 11, 2007 - 07:47 ET by sublight68Instead of a Liberal lying to the stupid, uneducated masses to get elected, wouldn't it be great if a Conservative respected the intelligence of the country at large and told the truth?
Tell us how government is too big and wasteful and which programs, agencies and departments you would cut. Tell us government is not the answer to our problems and that we should be more self-reliant -- and give us back our money to be so. Tell us true freedom comes with less government intervention and how you're going to reduce its presence in our lives.
That's the remedy the country needs, not dumping more money into even more ineffective social programs.