I spent a small smidgen of time on Monday at Fox News discussing the Oprah Winfrey struggle with sex abuse allegations at her South African school for girls. Why is this story so big? In part, it's because Oprah made it so big, inviting massive coverage of her philanthropy, as I said to Martha McCallum on her show Live Desk:
Part of the problem is the way she built it up in the first place. As you have just described, she put an enormous amount of money in here, built this thing, hand-picked the students, and when you have that much involvement in it, when something goes wrong, people are going to look right at you. They're not going to look at, "well, she was just the billionaire philanthropist who paid money and did not have anything to do with it." Now the media can turn around and say everything that goes wrong to these -- with the students that she selected becomes her problem, and she is obviously getting very aggressive in trying to meet it head on.
So what can she do to remedy the abuse allegations? She's obviously aggressive in her PR, but I suggested she was overpromising:
It is hard to expect the level of intimacy that she is sort of promising here where she says, "these are my babies, they are not a part-time project." How can they not be a part-time project? She has a lot of irons in the fire. She is not on the ground in South Africa. There is going to be a little skepticism here about how much she can do to oversee this school. Obviously if she had overseen it carefully, this might not have happened in the first place.
The female guests who came after me were much more supportive on the talk show megastar. "Pop culture commentator" Jehmu Greene said she knew Winfrey could fix things, and she needs to make sure they "do not take out all of the culture" from the South African girls. Legal analyst and author Wendy Murphy was much more positive:
She is so generous, and I do not think anything she is doing is depriving these young women of their culture. We know about the sexual abuse stuff, and one thing and I am expecting from oprah is to say, look, anyone who is running a school, including anyone in the united states, is expected to do a super good job, psychological screening in particular before you put in adults in a position of caretaking over super vulnerable kids away from their families. We do not do a good job in this country, so let's not be too hard on Oprah.
I wouldn't suggest it's "too hard on Oprah" to note that every public-relations gain she banked in publicizing her school project to the hilt is now going to reflect back on her. No one's saying she should have never been generous or tried to help educate poor African girls. But building up a big philanthropy story for good publicity can backfire when the news goes bad.
—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
Comparison
November 7, 2007 - 00:43 ET by KC MulvilleI will say this - unlike the story of the Catholic bishops, when Oprah heard of it, she reacted aggressively. Good for her. Maybe that whole disaster taught some important lessons. I just hope that people know that the bishops (in general) have indeed learned the lesson also. They also react aggressively these days, even if the PR damage is long past salvaging.
On the other hand, I think it also shows something else. Teacher abuse happens. It's difficult to catch. I doubt that even the most brilliant administrators can catch everything. You can only do the best you can, but you have to be vigilant.
I also think we need to teach kids less about how to have sex, and start teaching them that you're allowed to say no. Whether you have to say no to your teacher, or your friends, or to the MTV culture ... you can say no to all of them.
}}---> Oprah
November 7, 2007 - 02:02 ET by Cool ArrowIMHO she started this experiment with the noblest of intentions. I've no reason to believe she flung money and walked away. She makes her money here.
Her experiment has been contaminated and she's handling it with dignity.
I wish her and her school success.
I agree, Cool. I don't
November 7, 2007 - 07:00 ET by motherbeltI agree, Cool. I don't really like Oprah or the huge influence she seems to have over so many women in this country. But she seemed truly contrite for this failure. She even said to the parents (paraphrasing): You trusted me with your girls and I let you down. She didn't pawn the blame off on someone else.
That's something a lot of politicians could learn from.
Oprah's policies remind me of big government.
November 7, 2007 - 08:24 ET by sarcasmoWhy? The pattern of control-freakery followed by subsidy!
Consider: rule #1 for students is "we're taking away all your cellphones." Post-scandal, rule #2 is "we're buying cellphones for all of you." Besides the blatant inconsistency, what's wrong with this picture is that nobody else is noticing it but me. At least in this case it's Oprah's billion$ instead of my taxe$ for once, so I can just be amused instead of my normal "outraged."
JMR
Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul.
Big Government
November 7, 2007 - 10:24 ET by DunqueActually, the part that reminds me of big government - and the cautionary tale that this sad outcome tells - is that the thought that "Let's throw a lot of money at this problem" is not the solution to all problems. More than anything, it's an argument for involvement, personal not monetary, local not far-removed.
What societal problems have been improved by the presence of lots of government money and abdication of personal responsibility? Teenage pregnancy? Poverty? Don't think so. The list goes on and on.
However, I will add my name to those acknowledging that, unlike so many others, Oprah is at least trying to address the problem head on. The problem is that she is addressing the wrong problem.