National Public Radio’s "Car Talk" program is a popular weekend show, as Tom and Ray Magliozzi (or "Click and Clack") trade light banter over what can go wrong with your Chevy. But even the "Car Talk" guys are acting out as liberal activists. In a letter to the House Select Committee on Global Warming, the NPR hosts gleefully sign up as part of the "barrage of lobbying" around higher fuel-economy standards, and knock the automobile industry:
The onslaught of "we can’t…it’ll ruin us… you’re denying Americans a choice of vehicles" begins every time we the people—through our elected representatives—try to bring the auto industry, kicking and screaming into the modern era. And every time, their predictions of motorized-skateboard futures have failed to materialize. Let us repeat that, because the historical record bears it out to a tee. Every single time they’ve resisted safety, environmental, or fuel economy regulations, auto industry predictions have turned out, in retrospect, to be fear-mongering bull-feathers. Isn't it time we (you) stop falling for this 50 year-long line of baloney? [Emphasis theirs.]
They also have a no-blood-for-oil paragraph asking for Congress to mandate "more appropriately powered" cars:
In 1964, the most powerful, over-the-top Mustang muscle car you could buy came with an optional, four-barrel, 271 horsepower engine. Today, that’s what comes standard on the highest rated minivans. 275 horsepower. To take your kid to nursery school? What does this say about our national priorities? Do we really want to send our kids to fight and die in the desert so that can go 0-60 in eight seconds instead of ten seconds?
The NPR hosts conclude by insisting the federal regulators impose a high bar for "American ingenuity," since aggressive regulation will make the industry more globally competitive:
Not only can it be done, but by increasing CAFÉ standards dramatically, you’ll be helping the American automotive industry compete—by forcing them to synchronize their priorities with those of the American people, and the populations of other countries where they will be increasingly marketing their cars.
It’s the job of private enterprise to design and sell products. But it’s the job of Congress to set our national priorities. Trust us, the car companies won’t go out of business because America insists that they build the world’s best, most efficient cars. We urge you to set the bar high for American ingenuity. We have no doubt out car industry will make the grade—to the benefit of all Americans.
The House global warming committee is chaired by liberal Democrat Ed Markey, who happily publicized the letter and endorsed its contents: “As any listener knows, Tom and Ray are where common sense begins when it comes to cars, and when they say reaching 35 miles per gallon is feasible and the smart play for the American auto industry, people should listen.”
Should our taxpayer-funded radio hosts be lobbying side by side with Ed Markey? It sounds like a question for the new NPR Ombudsman, Alicia Shepard.
PS: Thomas Magliozzi of Boston is also a Democratic donor.
—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
CAFE standards are a joke
November 2, 2007 - 07:43 ET by BruzillaCAFE standards are a joke and always have been. Check out the CAFE sign on a new car, note that it always reads "Average MPG. Actual MPG may vary" or words to that extent. Most CAFE ratings are based on a car being driven on a level surface under optimal conditions. So a car can be rated at 32 MPG on the sheet, yet you never seem to be able to get better than 25 as you drive in less-than-optimal conditions.
Also, there's no prohibition against making cars that don't meet CAFE standards, which most SUVs and trucks don't. As long as you sell a bunch of econoboxes that exceed CAFE standards, you get the equivalent of Gore's carbon credits that can be used to offset the penalties of making cars that don't meet standards. So where's the real benefit to the environment?
Meanwhile.......
November 2, 2007 - 08:39 ET by Prester John.........Chrysler lays off 12,000 workers.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/01/AR2007110100693.html
Dumb and Dumber
November 2, 2007 - 11:32 ET by JEB StewartIt seems our "Car Guys" don't know much about late model Minivans or vintage cars.
First, there was no such thing as a four-barrel, 271 horsepower engine in a Mustang in ’64 (early 65 model). This engine was not available until after Apr ’65 as a “Hi-Po 289”
Second, there is not a Minivan on the market for ’07 or ’08 with a horsepower rating of 275. Toyota is the highest I know of at 266. Gee, if they don’t even know there own business, what other crap are they “misinforming” the public on?
The real horsepower was in
November 2, 2007 - 11:53 ET by bassndudeThe real horsepower was in the '63 vette. But it was a fuel injected 327 pushing 365 HP. Now that was a fast car. But traded for a 68 RS camaro then up to a 69 chevele SS 396. I sure did like the cars back then. But a Mustang with 275 HP in '64? Never ran across one, not stock anyway.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
dead bodies everywhere...
November 2, 2007 - 11:44 ET by wizardjrEvery single time they’ve resisted safety, environmental, or fuel economy regulations, auto industry predictions have turned out, in retrospect, to be fear-mongering bull-feathers
Can these people actually be that ignorant if they are 'car guys'? Current estimates are that around 2,000 people die unnecessarily each and every year due to the flimsy construction of high mileage vehicles - lighter equals deadlier.
My wife was hit near-head-on by an idiot in a truck. She got away with a nasty strap bruise and a busted kneecap (hit the dash as she slid forward a bit from the extreme g-forces). The crash totalled our F150. If she had been in anything smaller I would be a widower.
As an old hand...
November 2, 2007 - 13:37 ET by okiehawk44I for one don't want to drive a tiny little car that gets higher gas mileage so more illegal aliens can come here and put a burden on available resources.
"Do we really want to send
November 2, 2007 - 17:20 ET by ckc1227"Do we really want to send our kids to fight and die in the desert so that can go 0-60 in eight seconds instead of ten seconds?"
Wow, after all this time, I thought it was a war for oil. Turns out it's actually a war for horsepower.