Monday’s Washington Post carried a long, splashy article on the divorce of Richard Mellon Scaife, major conservative philanthropist (and backer of the MRC, truth be told). The joy in Scaife’s misfortune was hardly hidden. The headline was “Low Road to Splitsville: Right-Wing Publisher's Breakup Is Super-Rich In Tawdry Details.” Reporter David Segal’s article began and ended with the gimmick that the divorce was so entertaining that you should literally pack a lunch and travel to Pittsburgh to watch it. Most of the details were personal, except for this bizarre paragraph about Scaife’s alleged philanthropic failures:
When he isn't tending to this modest publishing empire, he's underwriting what Hillary Clinton once called "a vast right-wing conspiracy." His highest-profile expenditure is the $2.3 million he gave the American Spectator magazine in the mid-'90s, to try to unearth prurient and embarrassing details about Bill Clinton's years as governor of Arkansas. (The magazine came up virtually empty-handed.)
Segal, who is one of a pack of liberal media elitists who began his career at the "neoliberal" magazine The Washington Monthly, cannot be serious. Anyone who goes back and looks into what caused the impeachment of President Clinton begins with the Spectator's 1993 expose on "Troopergate" -- how Clinton used state troopers to acquire sexual conquests -- for that story spurred the sexual harassment lawsuit of Paula Jones. (She was portrayed by the Spectator as a willing bimbo simply named "Paula.") The Jones lawyers found Monica Lewinsky, the President lied about a sexual relationship with her, and the rest is Clinton scandal history, including Clinton admitting his sexual harassment of Jones with a nearly million-dollar financial settlement. That's hardly coming up "empty-handed." It does, however, explain the Post's effervescent schadenfreude over the Scaife divorce.
Segal sounds like he was writing for the Travel section, as if he's going on a safari to watch crazy right-wingers in their natural habitat:
Looking for a perfect little weekend vacation this fall? Here's a travel tip you don't hear very often: Head to Pittsburgh. Right away.
Seriously, get in the car and read this story later, because when you're done reading, you'll wish you'd left 10 minutes ago. There are towns with better vistas, sure, and there are getaways with more sunshine. But only Pittsburgh is the scene of the fabulously tawdry and surpassingly vicious spectacle that is the divorce of Richard Mellon Scaife.
After milking all the gossip from motels and Scaife's deceased relatives, Segal concluded:
So, plenty to see, and truth be told, plenty of time to see it. A final settlement could easily be a year away, and the meanness, for all we know, has just begun. Which is why the Scaife Divorce Tour of Pittsburgh could be the ultimate family vacation. If it doesn't bring your family together -- in mutual horror, in a group hug that says "we don't have it that bad" -- nothing will.
Segal even tried so hard to be cheeky that he included a text box about visiting "the landmarks of the Scaife divorce," the retailers favored by the second Mrs. Scaife, including Saks Fifth Avenue, Tim Condron Designs, Salon DeStefino, and a high-end florist going by the name Toadflax.
The Washington Post, a liberal, Clinton-loving newspaper? It's as obvious as the smiles all over the Style section today.
—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Holy Cow! How long was that
October 22, 2007 - 06:51 ET by motherbeltHoly Cow! How long was that article in the print edition??? It took 6 pages on the internet. The WaPo doesn't have anything better to write about???????????
Amazing
October 22, 2007 - 07:01 ET by allanfYes its amazing how some of these guys can go on and on and say absolutely nothing.
the interesting media angle on this is
October 22, 2007 - 08:25 ET by sarcasmoThe wife's allegation in the divorce that one of his newspapers is "a hobby" rather than "a business," due to the fact that it consistently loses lots of money. The outcome of this issue would affect the size of the already-sizeable settlement greatly, as well as the reputation of his newspaper-or-hobby. Moral: Get a prenup, or stay-married.
JMR
Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul.
...they tried to
October 22, 2007 - 08:44 ET by TruthMonger...they tried to smear Scaife and came up empty:)
Meanwhile, George Soros - what a great guy he is...!
A service of the new NB respect police
Too bad
October 22, 2007 - 12:21 ET by ding7777Christopher Ruddy didn't investigate the "suicide" of Scaife's bother-in-law, Robert Duggan, huh?
So Scaife married a couple
October 22, 2007 - 07:30 ET by rimskySo Scaife married a couple gold diggers... so what? The details of the lives of the super rich would shock and surprise most of us, whether it be someone who is morally upright or someone who is.. not. The 'not' group is perhaps more entertaining to some people, like Segal.. what a sick puppy.. but it doesn't make their philanthropic efforts any less valuable.
}}---> A warmup?
October 22, 2007 - 07:34 ET by Cool ArrowTheir next target will probably be Betty Casey who won the bid on Harry Reid's condemnation of Limbaugh document.
"When you don't take your lips off the backside of George Soros long enough to speak out" M. Huckabee on Shrillary 10/21/07
Clinton did not admit any sexual harassment of Jones
October 22, 2007 - 07:51 ET by ding7777According to the ""stipulation of settlement and release"
Life in Ding-land
October 22, 2007 - 08:07 ET by Cool ArrowThanks for the caveat, ding.
So he paid the money for. . . WHAT in particular?
Arrow
October 22, 2007 - 11:46 ET by Airforce_5_OHush money for a honey.
The only thing you should feel when shooting insurgents is the rifle recoil.
Paula
October 22, 2007 - 12:18 ET by ding7777agreed to WHAT in particular?
Clearly, he's as "innocent"
October 22, 2007 - 08:26 ET by sarcasmoAs Larry Craig...The only thing different for me is the..uh..orientation of the politicians.
JMR
Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul.
}}---> Zackly sarc
October 22, 2007 - 08:37 ET by Cool ArrowConfessing and then retracting it isn't convincing and neither is paying out a chunk of change to stop Paula Jones from repeating her accusation.
Ruining Your Fun Here but...
October 22, 2007 - 08:55 ET by okiehawk44To refresh the Washington Post's memory it was their own Michael Isikoff who began the telling investigation into Bill's uncontrollable sexual behavior -- he even made overtures to the Style Section's editor to publish what the news side of the paper wanted to hide -- guess they still do huh? Can't wait till he's back in the WH with Hillary -- let the fireworks begin -- oh, by the way, he won't (WILL NOT) have any Constitutional protections as 1st spouse -- sleep well laddies.
Almost correct
October 22, 2007 - 12:15 ET by ding7777It was Lucianne Goldberg who contacted Jones' lawyers, Ken Starr's office, and also arranged for Michael Isikoff to listen to the Tripp tapes. Also listening to the tapes, was none other than Ann Coulter, who is a member of the Scaife funded WIF.
The interlocking Scaife funding memberships among Starr, Starr's office, the Jones' lawyers, and various Federal judges was indeed "a vast right wing conspiracy"
Using the expression "vast
October 22, 2007 - 12:56 ET by fitzfongUsing the expression "vast right-wing conspiracy", the Slickster's wife claimed that the allegations against the Slick One were false. Fact is, the allegations were absolutely true. No one attempted to stitch up an innocent man. They exposed a liar. That's not a conspiracy...to suggest otherwise is dishonest. A dishonest troll? Never!
So Ding-a-Ling...
October 22, 2007 - 15:57 ET by Del DolemonteHow many votes for Hillary are you going to cast in 2008?
Fraudulent land deals - for
October 22, 2007 - 09:50 ET by mattmFraudulent land deals - for which Clinton's lt. Gov, Jim Guy Tucker went to prison - insider trading, destroying legal records, tampering (at the very least) with potential witnesses, lying in court, failing to "re-call," suicides, witnesses dying in prison, charges of rape, charges of sexual assault, illegal campaign fund raising, selling military secrets to China, FBI files on "enemies," etc. etc. etc. all this, to the MSM is merely "embarassing"...
The Clinton administration was the single most corrupt administration in the history of this country, and the media's complicity with them is a disgrace.
I guess the VRWC made them do it...
-
October 23, 2007 - 06:07 ET by dahliatraversYes to all this. Concluded by the then President surrendering his law license and Bill and Hillary looting the White House and Air Force One. Count the silver if you have these two to dinner. (Or return them to the White House.)
Don't read the WaPo much,
October 22, 2007 - 09:56 ET by Chris NormanDon't read the WaPo much, but I'm getting the sense that they let the "hard news" division take the upper (not high) road, and use the softer news reporting and Style sections for a lot of their dirty work against Conservatives.
Is it any coincidence that
October 22, 2007 - 11:37 ET by fitzfongIs it any coincidence that they used that Sopranos scene to launch "Henry" Hill-ary's campaign? If ever there was an example of a campaign and a presidency being run like the mob, it's the Clinton Crime Family. In reality, the Clintons are a pair of petty thugs who ascended to power through intimidation, back-stabbing and ridiculously favorable media treatment. They have their hit men like Howard Wolfson, Mark Penn and David Brock to neutralize opposition by carrying out frightening character assassinations. They have their clean up crew, including Sandy Berger, to cover up their crimes. They have a team of dubious lawyers to spin their egregious crimes into "false charges" or "small misunderstandings". They have regulators like the IRS on their payroll to intimidate witnesses. And, mysteriously, they have a pile of dead bodies. At least John Gotti had the decency to have his main rival/boss whacked in public in front of a restaurant. He was a far more legitimate leader than the Clintons ever have been.
It's a given that ANY
October 22, 2007 - 12:47 ET by Right2thePointIt's a given that ANY divorce or for that matter any legal actions where Philadelphia lawyers is going to be messy. They have raised it to an artform.