Tuesday’s Metro section of The Washington Post covered a controversy at D.C.’s George Washington University, where fliers appeared on campus blaring "HATE MUSLIMS? SO DO WE!!" Post reporter Susan Kinzie mentioned that the GWU chapter of the conservative Young America’s Foundation denied the posters were theirs, and Kinzie noted that it was probably a prank, since the fine print at the bottom had the words "'Brought to you by Students for Conservativo-Fascism Awareness' -- and a postscript recommending a BBC video on the politics of fear." But while Wednesday’s article in Metro confirmed that it was a prank "produced by students who were attempting to mock those they thought were trying to stir fear of Muslims," YAF wasn’t named anywhere in the article as the vindicated victim.
Jason Mattera of YAF is rightfully upset: "The Post mentions Young America’s Foundation three times, even though the fliers were obvious hoaxes. Yet the paper’s article today explaining that the fliers were fabricated doesn’t mention Young America’s Foundation even once! The Post will report possible incidents of hate speech, but when those incidents turn out to be contrived, the paper doesn’t vindicate those who were targeted!!!"
The Wednesday article does quote Sergio Gor, the head of the local YAF chapter, but mysteriously only described him as "president of a group hosting the awareness week." (He was quoted and identified with YAF in the Tuesday article, which ended with several programs explaining what YAF was actually planning.)
Kinzie’s Tuesday article began:
Posters appeared all over the George Washington University campus yesterday morning blaring the message: "HATE MUSLIMS? SO DO WE!!!"
Campus police moved quickly to remove the fliers, university leaders began investigating how they got there and student groups met last night to deplore the posters, which had a photo of an Arab and description of "typical Muslim" features such as "suicide vest," "hidden AK-47" and "peg-leg for smuggling children and heroin."
Strangely, Wednesday’s article by Martin Weil and Elissa Silverman forwards the claim that the student pranksters said the flier was not an attack on Islam but an effort "at exposing Islamophobic racism." The headline on the Post story was "Poster Was Aimed At Racism, Authors Say." Racism? Don’t Muslims come in all colors? They couldn’t have put "racism" in quotes in the headline? This was the article’s lede:
Fliers that appeared on the George Washington University campus carrying an apparently anti-Islamic message were produced by students who were attempting to mock those they thought were trying to stir fear of Muslims, a campus newspaper was told.
The GW Hatchet, an independent campus paper, posted a story on its Web site late last night saying it had heard from those behind the fliers, who said they had been misunderstood. According to the Hatchet, an e-mail that it received from the students said the flier was not an attack on Islam but an effort "at exposing Islamophobic racism."
Words like "fake," "fabricated," or "phony" were not in the story, nor were words like "prank." Ideological labels were also missing for the pranksters, although the word "conservative" was employed by Post reporters three times on Tuesday and once on Wednesday.
The Post did not name the seven prankster students in their piece, either, even though one has been quoted in newspapers a few times: Adam Kokesh, a member of Iraq Veterans Against the War, recently active in International ANSWER’s latest protest. He’s conducted other guerilla-theater operations covered by the Post – and is not described as a leftist, despite his affiliations and his blog.
The letter sent to the Hatchet (and published there in PDF) completely pounds on the conservatives-are-racists angle. They described their prank this way: "This creative political action was part of a rich American tradition of raising awareness, in this case about Islamophobia. We exposed the upcoming Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week for the celebration of racism that it is."
The letter ends: "it is imperative that as a community that we unequivocally condemn racism (especially in its most egregious organized forms) on our campus. We hope that as a community we can come together to expose the true racist propaganda that we initially set out to expose: Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week."
The letter was also signed by Yong Kwon, Brian Tierney, Ned Goodwin, Maxine Nwigwe, Lara Masri, and Amal Rammah.
—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center.





















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
well i say we fake a
October 10, 2007 - 11:54 ET by TruthMongerwell i say we fake a mockery of these fakers who attempted to mock the conservatives who really are not islamofasciast racists but not really racists either because this is not about race actually
A service of the new NB respect police
So let me get this
October 10, 2007 - 12:07 ET by KC MulvilleSo let me get this straight.
So, the media helped denigrate conservatives twice. Instead of being condemned for this, the perpetrators are excused by calling this a 'prank.' They got to throw mud twice, at no cost. Journalism at its finest ...
SICK
October 10, 2007 - 12:11 ET by kdoliverI don't know why this story bothers me so much. For some reason I found myself getting angrier and angrier after I Googled and read up on that "former" Marine. However, I think I have come the reason for his "new views".
Having spent many years in the military I have seen soldiers get pissed after they get caught doing something wrong. He was demoted for illegally bringing a pistol back into the US. So he decided to make a stink and he has gotten attention for it. His actions have led him to do more and more things to get attention. He is an attention druggie.
The Washington ComPost is the big problem here. The latest article is just weak.
http://thelazytriathlete.blogspot.com/
If there's really
October 10, 2007 - 12:15 ET by HypocriteHaterIf there's really "Islamofascist Racism" being perpetrated by this conservative group, why doesn't this liberal group expose the actual examples of "racism" instead of making up fake "racism"?
The answer ladies and gentlemen, is because there is no "racism" there. But this liberal bunch of yahoos got their message out that conservatives are evil racists, so their mission is complete.
This is what's it's come down to, folks. The liberals are on a mission to smear every conservative Republican a racist just in time for the election year. They won't debate, they'll just agitate.
Post Reports ‘Hate Muslims’ Prank
October 10, 2007 - 12:47 ET by PShannon"Prank," my ass!
In the words of Rodney
October 10, 2007 - 16:29 ET by USA4freedomIn the words of Rodney Dangerfield in Caddyshack,You demand
satisfaction? Well I'll tell you what's satisfying: *cash*.
I bet if Young
America’s Foundation slapped a libel suit on them I bet things would be
different.. (and maybe profitable)
These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc.
Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day
Big Media: Small Brains
October 10, 2007 - 13:18 ET by deerjerkydaveThe pen is mightier than the sword. And Big Media are completely irresponsible and unethical in their handling of that power.
When Thompson was asked in yesterday's debate why many Americans believe the economy is doing poorly I immediately would have responded that big media has been falsely portraying the economy as being on the brink of recession because it makes Prez Bush and Republicans look bad.
Big Media is single handedly bringing our country to its socialist grave.
Well, now ...
October 10, 2007 - 13:43 ET by drillanwrThank you, stupid idiot liberals on a college campus ...
You JUST proved my strong theory about those election time fliers in poor neighborhoods giving the WRONG date(s) to go and vote ... I like to call them "election day land mines" ... While they seem to take out wouldbe voters (in primarily strong democrat areas), they also lay in wait as tools to dispute election results by claiming voter disenfranchisement, thereby throwing a wet, wool, dog blanket of doubts on election results nationwide ... A voter, more or less, in any one democrat district is of little tally consequence ... However, you notice this "wrong voting date fliers" controversy only seems to come up during presidential election years? And <gasp> it is usually suggested by the Jacksons/Sharptons/neoPRAVDA that since it was in democrat districts it had to be a republican dirty tactic!
"Election day land mines" ...
adam kokesh
October 10, 2007 - 13:52 ET by michael.098762001From Adam Kokesh blog @blogspot>....Why do people keep calling me a leftist?!? Well,
I'm as mad as hell! And I'm not going to take this anymore! Just to
make things perfectly clear, if I was not a board member of IVAW, I
would be doing everything in my power to ensure that Ron Paul is our
next President. I am a card-carrying lifetime member of the Libertarian
Party. That's right: with a big L.
Michael Pugliese
Oh, the horror...
October 10, 2007 - 13:55 ET by sarcasmoSupport for the ONE true fiscal conservative = "a leftist." Sigh...
JMR
Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul.