Newsweek has posted a Hillary Clinton question-and-answer session on their website, selecting eight questions out of "more than 1,000 queries from readers," but the "best questions" Newsweek plucked out of the pile often suggested a hostility to America’s current state under Team Bush, with "huge deficits," a "collapsing" middle class, and a teacher "appalled" at the underfunded No Child Left Behind education plan. One asked how she could convince the "Clinton haters" to leave divisiveness behind. Another wondered whether she would plow on with investigations of the actions of "Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Gonzales, etc.?" But there were no questions about her Iraq vote, Clinton scandals, or Democrat corruption of any kind.
Newsweek began its Q&A with the explanation: "Last month NEWSWEEK invited readers to submit questions to Democratic front runner Hillary Clinton. We received more than 1,000 queries from readers—the bulk of them about Iraq, the economy, health care and education. We forwarded a selection of the best questions to Sen. Clinton. Here are her answers." Left unsaid: Was Hillary handed just these eight inquiries? Or was she allowed to narrow it down further?
Here’s how the questions appeared in order, with snippets of Hillary’s answers. First, the "huge deficits" question, which could come across as centrist, sort of a Ross Perot/Concord Coalition query:
How are you going to deal with the huge deficit? Where will you find the money to pay for health-care reform? – Sarah, Miami
Hillary said "We have a lot of work to do to reverse President Bush’s fiscal recklessness," and claimed she would put the country on the path to balanced budgets.
Then came the "haters" question:
Whether it’s fair or not, you and your husband are polarizing figures to many Americans. America needs some healing after all of the divisiveness of the last eight years. During the campaign and after, how will you convince the Clinton-haters that you can be a good president for all the people? – Cynthia, Denver
Hillary insisted naysayers about her Senate career hardly stopped her from winning 67 percent of the vote in 2006 (against the almost unknown and unreported Mayor of Yonkers), and concluded: "Anyone who gets the Democratic nomination is going to be subjected to the withering attacks that come from the other side. I think I have proven that I can not only survive them but also surpass them." Translation: She’s proven that the media will ignore the scandals, and then lightly gloss over them when forced to acknowledge them, with words like "Clinton haters" employed to describe those annoying people who actually want to see tax returns or other facts.
Then, the obligatory army-to-Darfur question:
For four years now, American citizens have been witness to the genocide and mass atrocities in Darfur. What specifically will you do as president to help bring this to an end? Will you authorize the use of U.S. military assets to help protect the lives of innocent Darfurian civilians? – Kristen, Des Moines, Iowa
Hillary wants UN peacekeepers on the ground, and maybe a NATO no-fly zone: "It is long past time that we bring the international community together through American leadership to end the genocide in Darfur. We must quit giving lip service and start acting." Then:
If elected, how will you handle any investigations that may pop up into the actions of Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Gonzales, etc.? Should the investigations continue or should the country move on? -- Steven, Raleigh, N.C.
Hillary made no promises to impeach or imprison Team Bush players, but tried to throw some partisan red meat: "For the last six and a half years we have seen a dangerous experiment in extremism in the White House. The Bush-Cheney administration has elevated partisan politics and cronyism over competence and professionalism."
Cronyism over competence? This, from the woman who threw career employees out of the White House Travel Office and replaced them with buddies and relatives? Then:
As the first woman president, what would you do differently from the men that have preceded you? – Dan, Ladera Ranch, Calif.
What a toughie. Blah blah blah, she’s not running because she’s a woman, but, by the way, she’s a wildly inspirational figure: "Fathers are driving long distances to bring their daughters to my events. Women in their 90s are telling me that they were born before women had the right to vote and that they want to live long enough to see a woman in the White House. When I am elected, we will have made history by working together." Then, more sinking America:
The middle class seems to be collapsing. A few Americans are becoming well off, but many more are finding it harder and harder to live an acceptable life. What will you do to keep me, my family and my friends from sinking to low-income or poverty levels, as the jobs we did go away? – Tim, Sandusky, Ohio
Hillary agreed: "Americans are facing increasing costs of living, from housing to energy to health care to college; health-care premiums have nearly doubled in the last six years, while wages have been stagnant." In this answer, Hillary sounds the most like Bill scribbled in the margins: "I believe it’s time to reject President Bush’s philosophy of a ‘you’re on your own’ society and to replace it with shared responsibility for shared prosperity." Then:
As a 58-year-old self-employed female Realtor, I can no longer afford health insurance. If I become ill or partially disabled I will have to surrender my home, my car and any other assets in order to receive medical care. This is a constant worry. What is your health-insurance plan? -- Carol, Greenwood, Ind.
Don’t say candidates never get open-ended sales questions any more. Hillary says her "American Choices Health Plan" will "put the consumer in the driver’s seat by offering more choices and lowering costs." As if her last health plan did any of that. The last question, on ruthless education cuts:
As a teacher I am appalled at No Child Left Behind. The emphasis is on testing for both children and teachers, yet no money is given to support this or anything else. Our classes are getting larger; help is being cut. What would you do to set education right again? --Jeanne, Rockingham, Vt.
Hillary felt her pain: "It is an unfunded mandate that encourages teachers to teach to the test, and the curriculum is being narrowed. I hear story after story about music and art or physical education or field trips being cut out of the school day to make more time for drilling and routine work that prepare students for standardized tests."
It's too bad Newsweek just published first names for these Hillary-pleasing questioners, which makes it little harder to wonder whether Cynthia in Denver runs the local Democratic Party, or Tim in Sandusky is an organizer for Kucinich for President.
—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
}}---> Oh, Tim, Tim, Tim
October 4, 2007 - 08:03 ET by Cool ArrowOf course these are the questions Americans crave the answers to. You just don't get more hardhitting than Newsweek.
When is their Bill Clinton cover edition due out?
It's the same old "Let me pick the questions and I'll let you sleep with my husband" routine.
~LYDSEXICS UNTIE!~
Of course these are the
October 4, 2007 - 10:59 ET by motherbeltOf course these are the questions Americans crave the answers to
I know that was sarcasm, but I'll have to take your word for it. I couldn't even read the entire post without getting nauseous.
God help this country.
I wonder why we continue
October 4, 2007 - 08:15 ET by sndrmrvto be shocked at the BLATANT liberal bias and POLITICAL agenda of rags like Newsweek, Time etc.
I would have asked a
October 4, 2007 - 08:29 ET by JimboI would have asked a question or two about her new socialist health care scheme. Perhaps something like:
“Since you will be intimately involved with the development of this plan and will no doubt draw on personal experience to help guide you,
“Will your new program cover the removal of ice water from one’s veins?”
“Will it cover the removal of large sticks, perhaps as large as 2 X 4’s from one’s ass?”
“Will it cover mental health benefits, for example, assistance with pathological lying and megalomaniac tendencies?”
“Will it cover soul transplants for those who have sold theirs?”
Jimbo says - "There is a fine line between freedom of speech and treason"
"We have a lot of work to
October 4, 2007 - 10:02 ET by misterbee241"We have a lot of work to do to reverse President Bush’s fiscal recklessness."
I remember fiscal recklessness was never a problem when democrats controlled Congress and the White House. Why is it such a concern now? Besides, what do we call Hillary's 20 billion dollar baby bonus?
"I believe it’s time to
October 4, 2007 - 10:12 ET by misterbee241"I believe it’s time to reject President Bush’s philosophy of a ‘you’re
on your own’ society and to replace it with shared responsibility for
shared prosperity."
Ok, so some people get to work harder to support the people that dont. That's a good old American value.
Are there really people in this country that are stupid enough to give up their freedom by electing this socialist hag?
Unfortunately, the answer to
October 4, 2007 - 10:51 ET by JimboUnfortunately, the answer to your question is YES.
Not surprisingly, those who will vote for her are the ones on the receiving end of the equation.
Jimbo says - "There is a fine line between freedom of speech and treason"
And people wonder why
October 4, 2007 - 11:15 ET by motherbeltAnd people wonder why Republicans are as bad as Democrats when
it comes to programs and spending. They have seen the writing on the
wall. Unfortunately, it more and more seems like what the people in this country want is to be given more free stuff. And the Republicans, if they want to compete, have to get in that game too.
Sir Keith Joseph, an adviser to Margaret Thatcher (he's sometimes called the "Father of Thatcherism"), commented some time ago that Britain was becoming a "pocket money society", meaning If the state provided all of the basic human needs—housing, health care, education, care for the elderly—it left nothing for people to provide for themselves, other than the more trivial recreational things. Their own earnings became like children’s pocket money, to be spent on toys or self-indulgence. Janet Daley, City Journal
This, apparently, is what more and more of US citizens are looking for: a "pocket money society." Although we don't have "council housing" like they do in Britain, so we can't say the government provides housing, but the rest is pretty close.
Check out the link; it's a good read.
No Surprise
October 4, 2007 - 11:03 ET by Del DolemonteThis is not shocking news-after all, Newsweak employs Hillary's twin sister, Eleanor Rodham Clift.
The funny thing is..
October 4, 2007 - 11:09 ET by Sergeant ROCK.. you have all of these people involved in democRAT politics assuming the position of 'journalist' and STILL there are people out there that can't, or refuse to, connect the dots as to why there is a liberal bias in the MSM. Geez!
Indoctrinate-U
Our Education. Their Politics.
Clinton and genocide?
October 4, 2007 - 12:35 ET by Gary HallThe question just drives me nuts:
The question should be:
Senator? Senator? ...did she faint? Darn, I wanted to ask her why her husband didn't protect New Orleans when they had a silly surplus?