Catholic Bashing Day on ABC's 'View'

Photo of Tim Graham.

Catholic-bashing was in vogue on ABC’s The View on Thursday. St. Louis Archbishop Raymond Burke’s announcement that he would not offer communion to GOP presidential contender Rudy Giuliani – an ardent supporter of abortion embarking on his third marriage – upset Joy Behar and Whoopi Goldberg."It seems that the Catholic God always says judge,lest ye be judged," complained Goldberg, who also complained the church should punish proponents of the death penalty and the Iraq war. Even Elisabeth Hasselbeck denounced Archbishop Burke as a publicity hound.

The View crew doesn’t seem to think anyone should be refused communion – even if by rejecting Catholic teachings, politicians like Giuliani and John Kerry are clearly not communing with the faith of their youth. MRC's Justin McCarthy provided the transcript.

WHOOPI GOLDBERG: Welcome back, welcome back, welcome back. I don't know if you guys are aware of this, but, you know, often times when our politicians are running, you know, the Church gets a little aggravated with that because there’s quite a few of them have different pasts and sometimes the Church wants them to be more perfect.

JOY BEHAR: When you say "the Church" which church are you talking about?

GOLDBERG: Well, it’s, it’s all churches seem to have all kinds of problems with all kinds of candidates. But this particular problem comes when Archbishop Raymond Burke says no communication --

BEHAR: No communion, communion.

GOLDBERG: No communion for Giuliani.

BEHAR: Holy communion on Sunday.

GOLDBERG: Yes, holy communion, you know what holy communion is. For the Catholic Church, you go in on Sunday, you've confessed everything on Friday or Saturday, you're clear, they give you the host, they say you're cool.

BEHAR: Then you get drunk and go out and have fun.

That may have been the Catholic tradition in Behar’s neighborhood, but not in most. Traditional churches teach that any serious sins should be confessed before coming forward to receive communion, but that certainly does not mean that Catholics in general attend weekly confession, as Goldberg implies.

GOLDBERG: Yeah, you’re done. But because of Rudy's stance on abortion, he says he can not give him communion and he is persisting in a very serious sin. When asked if the Archbishop would deny those pro-death penalty, pre-emptive war, he says it's a little more complicated in that case.

BEHAR: Because they're adults and they've committed some crimes, they feel that, that's a legitimate reason to kill someone.

While Pope John Paul II was a prominent public opponent in many death penalty cases, the church does not define opposition to death penalty as a requirement for all Catholics, unlike opposition to abortion.

ELISABETH HASSELBECK: I always had an issue with priests denying communion. I remember someone in my family went through a divorce. Unless she got her marriage annulled, she wasn't allowed to receive communion. Her ex-husband wouldn't give her an annulment. He wouldn’t show up for the annulment. So, then she was shamed, in other words, for not being --

BEHAR: Excommunicated, yeah.

HASSELBECK: -pretty much not able to walk down and receive what is to be the most intimate, you know, part of the week with God and taking Jesus into your body.

BEHAR: What about Giuliani? He's been divorced three times at least.

SHERRI SHEPHERD: Has he had communion prior to this? Have they been giving him– is this an everyday thing?

GOLDBERG: I assume in other churches he wasn't having an issue or we would have heard about it.

BEHAR: Well, they don't exactly interview you when you’re at the rail. The priest doesn't say how many times have you been divorced? They don’t do that.

GOLDBERG: But if the archbishop is making that much noise, I assume that this is not the kind of story that would disappear. We would have heard something because it happened with John Kerry, didn't it?

BEHAR: Well, you know, just, just speak to the annulment problem. I remember when the Beatles were around, that you could, that you could buy an annulment. People used to buy annulments.

GOLDBERG: Yes

BEHAR: You know, the Kennedys and people like that could buy annulments, so it meant really nothing.

HASSELBECK: Our family didn't come from a lot of cash, so they weren’t buying an annulment.

BEHAR: Well, that's my point. So, I mean, it's not exactly the most moral position.

I can believe that some people face ex-spouses who refuse to follow the annulment procedures to deny the sacraments to their bitter marital enemy, and that can be a very frustrating predicament. But even the Kennedys have had problems with annulments: when Rep. Joseph Kennedy Jr was granted an annulment from his wife Sheila Rauch Kennedy, she made a major stink, writing a book called Shattered Faith that denounced the Church for granting the annulment. The Vatican reversed that decision this summer, so even though Kennedy re-married, he is now once again seen as married to Rauch within the church. Back to the lip-flapping:

GOLDBERG: It's very strange that when, when the Catholic God, you know, because there are so many different gods. I'll refer to the Catholic God at the moment. It seems that the Catholic God always says judge lest ye be judged. And always says if I-

BEHAR: They always say that.

GOLDBERG: If you come to me, I'm the only one who can forgive you. It doesn’t matter what everyone else says. And yet a priest, the mouthpiece to God, would say you can't --

BEHAR: There are amendments. Unless you do this. Unless you do that. (hand gesturing)

SHEPHERD: The priest has absolute say, because I don't know about Catholicism –

BEHAR: No the Pope does.

SHEPHERD: The Pope, okay.

HASSELBECK: No, the Pope does. The bishops are an extension of his, his abilities to say yeah or nay to certain things. There are a lot of rules in the Catholic, you know, Church.

SHEPHERD: So if he says I don't believe in abortion anymore, then he can take communion?

BEHAR: Well, the thing about is that Rudy Giuliani hasn't necessarily had an abortion himself. His wi- you know what I mean? His wife hasn't had one. I don't know if she has or not. He's not saying I'm going to get it or you should get it or you shouldn't get it. He's saying people should have the right to choose whether they want this or not. And that's his position is. The Church doesn't have that position. [Applause]

SHEPHERD: But did they deny him for leaving his wife or cheating on his wife and marrying another woman?

BEHAR: No, no, no.

SHEPHERD: Why don't they deny him for that? Is that not a sin any more to leave your wife? Excuse my anger, but is that not a, not a --

BEHAR: It is a sin. But he wasn't running for president at the time, so there wasn't an issue.

Adultery is certainly a serious sin that could cause the refusal of communion, but most adultery practitioners aren't revealed in the newspapers, unlike the public positions of presidential contenders.

HASSELBECK: I seems this archbishop needs a little pub. You know what I mean? He wanted a little publicity. He thought slamming Giuliani would get him into the limelight.

BEHAR: You think that’s it?

HASSELBECK: Yeah, they’re all about it.

BEHAR: What about the vows of modesty? Don't they take that also?

HASSELBECK: Some don’t. You should see the jewelry they wear. They’re, you know.

SHEPHERD: Blinging! Bling, bling!

GOLDBERG: I just find it very interesting that, that, you know, it's like closing churches. I don't understand people who close churches because there’s so many, you know, folks that go to church. You know, it’s really a big deal for a lot of people. How can you live at the Vatican and say we have to close these churches because there's not enough money when we could, like, sell some stuff?

BEHAR: Well, the Catholic Church is, is in debt now for paying off a lot of the pedophile cases and they have to close all these churches.

GOLDBERG: There's a lot of stuff they could be selling.

HASSELBECK: And they were handing out communion to all those men who were molesting all the boys out there and they didn’t have a problem giving them communion.

BEHAR: We were all raised Catholic here, so this is not some anti-Catholic rant that we're on. This is just factual information.

GOLDBERG: No, I’m a little bit on a rant. No you’re right.

BEHAR: You can rant. But I was raised -- I had communion every Sunday. I received my communion, my confirmation, all nine yards. My daughter’s been baptized, just in case, you know?

GOLDBERG: You are so funny.

BEHAR: And so this is just- these are facts about the Church right now that people have to either live with or reject.

HASSELBECK: That's one area. That's the Catholic Church. There are many other divisions of Christianity.

SHEPHERD: If you’re a Christian, you can do communion if you sin.

GOLDBERG: Not in the Catholic Church.

Again, Goldberg is completely misconstruing Catholic teaching. You can certainly come to communion with your minor everyday sins, and receiving the Eucharist helps clear away those sins. But you should not come forward with serious sins like enabling abortions, especially if you have no intention of repenting and changing your position.

—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Let us change the "View"

Let us change the "View" here for a minute.  What if the topic were Islamofacists...

Behar: "But thats their belief, submit to Allah or die"!

Hasselbech: "But that's, that's "

Goldberg:  "Elizabeth shut up you're make no sense here"

Hasselbech: "But it's murder isn't...."

Behar: "You're the token stooge here, remember?"

Hasselbech: "Oh yeah...right I...I only meant that..."

Goldberg: "Meant what? that followers of the religion of peace should not be able to practice their religion?  That's mean spirited Liz!" You conservatives...I just don't understand your hatred"

Behar: "If they wish to stone women to death, so be it.  Hanging  homosexual males is their business. Who are we to judge Liz?"

Hasselbech:  "All I was trying to say was..."

Behar & Goldberg: "You've said enough!" Want to attack something, Lets attack a wicked institution, the Roman Catholic Church!"

Pukes...all of them.

 

 

 

The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.  ~ Unknown

ok,  let's get

ok,  let's get this straight..this is the same Goldberg who told Pelosi that she would "do" her and her husband in a three way?  Why hell, she's just a font of credibility.

It's beyond me why anyone would question Goldberg on anything.  I do not know the Roman Catholic Church,  but I'll bet they can whether anything these two lightweights can dish up.

I wouldn't be a bit concerned if Goldberg misconstrued your religion.  Look to the source.  Honestly,  I would think that she may be  high functioning idiot.  She did not graduate from any school.  These people are not very intelligent. 

So point out that they are idiots and leave it at that.  We have bigger fish to fry, as it were.

We will survive Whoopi

The Catholic Church has survived for two thousand years. We survived the Caesars and the Huns and the Vandals and worst of all, ourselves. We’ll survive Whoopi Goldberg. 

  • To be clear on Catholic teaching: each bishop succeeds the apostles, and is technically equal to the pope. The Pope is also the successor to the apostles, but we treat the Pope as first among equals, since he succeeds Peter specifically as bishop of Rome. The universal Catholic Church is really a communion among local churches, each headed by a bishop. That was the model of the apostles, and we continue that tradition -- we call ourselves an “apostolic” church. Because of that, each bishop has (pretty much complete) authority within his own diocese, but is limited elsewhere. Raymond Burke gets to say what happens in St. Louis, but Burke has no official authority over New York. 

  • Burke represents one view, namely that the sacraments should be denied to someone if they are publicly opposing church teaching. Other bishops argue that the sacraments are sacred, by definition, and we shouldn’t be using them as a publicity weapons.

  • Burke’s side holds that it’s important to follow church teaching, and he’s certainly got a point. Another side is that once you’re baptized, you become part of the church family, and the church is reluctant to throw children out of the house as long as the children (in some way) wish to be there. The question of who to give communion to is a judgment call, made by each bishop and binding within their own diocese.

Rudy has often said that he believes that abortion is a sin, so he can rightfully claim that he does support the teaching of the church. But Archbishop Burke argues that as a Catholic politician, you are duty-bound to lead the effort to get the current law changed, and Rudy refuses to do that.

  • Rudy argues that as a matter of law, he can’t impose his beliefs on others. Now to be clear, I disagree with Rudy’s position here. I deny that abortion is a Catholic teaching that we’re trying to foist on other religions … instead, it’s an offense against humanity in general, and that Catholics are proud to take the lead in defeating it.

  • I think Rudy’s wrong there, but it’s unfair to portray Rudy as flagrantly disobeying the Catholic Church. He agrees with the teaching itself, and for that, he should be given some credit.  

As for the rest of his private life and the divorces, that’s another story. But I’ll say the same thing I said about John Kerry: it’s not for me to judge. If his pastor wants to give him communion, that’s between him and his pastor.

KC, the last sentence is incorrect

According to Christ, a Catholic (or non-Catholic for that matter) who divorces and remarries is committing adultry.  One is in a state of mortal sin when committing adultry.  One isn't supposed to recieve Holy Communion when in a state of mortal sin.  To do so is to commit sacrilege.  A priest is obligated by his priestly vows to withold Holy Communion from a Catholic he knows is in a state of mortal sin. 

Well, exactly

But my point is that I'm not a priest. That's not my call to make.

I know someone who has been married three times, and I once saw her go to communion. I took it upon myself to give her the rules, in which case she abruptly advised me that her first two marriages were annulled. Ain't gonna make that mistake again.

}}---> Technical equality difficulty

Maybe they were equal for the first 1700 or so years, but that little proclamation in 1877 went a long way in ensconcing the pope as more equal than the rest of the bishops.

I'm still wondering how they could have missed so important a truth as that one. 

But I wonder about a lot of little unimportant things like:  How is it the Native Americans forgot completely they once had the horse, the wheel, and concrete before the coming of the White Man.  Luckily Joseph Smith came along to set that record straight.

Can you imagine a collection of cultures forgetting that engineering marvel, the wheel, en masse?

~LYDSEXICS UNTIE!~

Yes and no

I was reacting to the wrong idea that bishops are just assistants to the pope. That's not true. Bishops are still extremely important, even if their power is restricted to their diocese. If the bishop of New York decides to give Rudy a dispensation to receive communion, the bishop of St. Louis (Burke) really can't stop it. But I like the way you phrased it ... the pope was always the first among equals, but especialy since Vatican I and the infallibility doctrine was promulgated, the pope's 'firstness' is a lot bigger.

Thanks, KC. I actually

Thanks, KC.

I actually started to do a "fisking" of those idiotic comments, but to tell the truth, it was exhausting!


GOLDBERG: Yes, holy communion, you know what holy communion is. For the Catholic Church, you go in on Sunday, you've confessed everything on Friday or Saturday, you're clear, they give you the host, they say you're cool.

BEHAR: Then you get drunk and go out and have fun.

Once again, Joy Behar shows her...uh......"class."

The Catholic Church has

The Catholic Church has survived for two thousand years. We survived the Caesars and the Huns and the Vandals and worst of all, ourselves. We’ll survive Whoopi Goldberg.

Exactly.  The fact of the matter is I don't think it's too far out of the thought box to believe we may see another split in the Church within this century.  You'll have the strict "constitutionalists ... so to speak" who will remain with the Pope/Vatican.  The break off will be much like a "Martin Luther" secession on secular doctrine ... You know, birth control, abortion, gay marriage, divorce, euthanasia ...

I just think it might just be inevitable.

 

As for the rest of his private life and the divorces, that’s another story. But I’ll say the same thing I said about John Kerry: it’s not for me to judge. If his pastor wants to give him communion, that’s between him and his pastor.

This is the point I was trying to make in my sarcastic post late last night in here .  While a Priest is ordained to follow the Catholic dogma on ALL things, he still has free will.  Is he himself sinning himself if he goes ahead and serves Rudy Communion because of Rudy's abortion views?  I'm not sure.   I sort of equate it to "not following military code" ... But then I push aside the whole man-made restrictions within the Catholic Church and remind myself Jesus pretty much fed everybody with the "loaves and fishes" and didn't take any faith polls.  He turned no one away at anytime. 

I'm not up on the processes of Rudy's divorces, but I would think those might be more in question when refusing him Communion (which in the last 30+ years many Priests have overlooked and granted Communion to the divorced) ... than his conflicted views on abortion.

I believe the Priest made his comments for purely political reasons, however.  And I'm NOT so certain they are conservative motivated.  I think they were made to soil Rudy in the eyes of conservatives.  Just my thought.  Anyhow, there are many clergy within the Catholic Church today who are extremely liberal in their views and feel the Church needs to change.  I equate it to those politicians in this country that seem to think our country needs to change to accommodate those not covered under our Constitution.

You can feel the angst in Whoopi

I'm not exactly sure why this dialogue is Newsbusters-worthy, but as I read through the transcript, it became painfully obvious that Whoopi is very anti-Catholic/anti-Christian/Pro-Abortion.  Her reactions seem like someone reacting to nails on a chalkboard.

She probably feel like a very "spiritual" person

Her movie roll in ghost made her an expert.

_______________________________

Learn about "the best choice for people of faith" http://www.evangelic...

"the best choice for people of faith"...

is not someone with a different Jesus.  Sorry, this evangelical doesn't buy it.

This is all I am going to say about this here.  We have had this discussion before at NB.

v

18But Jesus, knowing their evil intent, said, "You hypocrites, why are you trying to trap me? 19Show me the coin used for paying the tax." They brought him a denarius, 20and he asked them, "Whose portrait is this? And whose inscription?"

 21"Caesar's," they replied.
      Then he said to them, "Give to Caesar what is Caesar's, and to God what is God's."

 22When they heard this, they were amazed. So they left him and went away. Matthew 22

NB-worthy?

We had a discussion yesterday about whether this was NB-worthy, and I was on the fence. But last night, I thought it might at least be an interesting post for people who wonder how religion is discussed on the "lighter" forms of television. You might argue that since they were coming to Rudy's defense, the View crew sounds pro-Republican. But then, Rudy's social positions are almost identical to Hillary's.

It's a little odd to me that people like Whoopi can't stand "judgmental" people. But how quick they can be to get "judgmental" about the "judgmental"....without having a lot of knowledge of the subject they're discussing.

NB worthy

For me, the religion-bashing on the entertainment side matches the bashing on the news side. They go hand in hand, especially these days. The sharp divide between "hard" news and "light" entertainment breaks down every day. What was the statistic that showed how many people get their news from Leno, Letterman, and Jon Stewart? It's absurdly high for a civilized country.

The last two presidential elections were decided by a relative handful of votes, and although the Dems swept most of the midterm races, many of those races were ridiculously close. Maryland was a narrow Dem victory in a brutally Democrat state. George Allen fell in Virginia by just a few votes, despite a relentless campaign against him by the media. A few liberals can present a respectable argument, but the vast majority seem to prefer persuading voters subconsciously. They throw mud and make accusations, and they leave the impression that with all this smoke there must be fire. It isn't honest. It's an attempt to persuade with emotions rather than with ideas.

Put it all together and you realize that every vote counts, but that we don't have the luxury of working strictly through conventional politics. We need to address the liberal bias through every genre, not just the evening news commentary.

just playing devils advocate on this

yeah bad punn i know, but lets just consider the example of who out the does follow what their religious leaders are teaching to the letter. need i say more? all i'm trying to say is the jedau/christian based theocracy is hinged on faith in god, freedom of choice, and forgiveness of ones sins because nobody can live up to god requirements. now compare that to the taliban theocracy, we are all sinners big time in their eyes, so much that they believe they should martyr themselves while killing us. they do a wonderful job walking the walk and talking the talk of that religion, so would you say they are better because they are more religious??? i sarcastically invite and dare to end up in a muslim hell out of spite to all their bullying crap their dishing here on earth since their earthly goals and values are so ridiculous. and also they used up all their ammo up here. i ignore muslim edicts and eternal threats like ignoring a voodoo curse. so my point is that christians should learn to relax and remember it's faith, free will, free choice, and forgiveness, not beating someone over the head with religion to prove a point.

no i'm not religious before anyone who wants to condemn my soul to hell for my blasphemy or pray for me. but i will defend your right to worship whatever you want, just sure as hell don't bang on my door early saturday morning cause i'll answer the door nude.

lunaticcringeradio

whoopies still an ass though

"I don't know if you guys are aware of this" no i don't know whoopie, why don't you tell me, i'm too stooopid and i need you to tell me how things are you ass. thank you whoopie for knowing everything i need to think.

i could only wish for a disfiguring accident that would leave her...........ah never mind, you can't wreck that train twice.

lunaticcringeradio

Is Whoopi Catholic?She

Is Whoopi Catholic?

She needs to just back off ... She doesn't know what a hard choice it is for a Priest to follow the Church doctrines and laws.  Has she ever had to make that hard choice?  How can she comment on it if she hasn't ever been a Catholic Priest? She should have more reverence for these poor Priests who have to make such hard choices ...

Wait ... So, Communion now means something to these hens because a Priest says he has to use his ordained judgement whether or not to feel a person is worthy of a sacred sacrament ...

Must have been one of those days when it wasn't just a stale waffer and a cup of cheap wine to these dingbats ...

}}---> Whoopi's Sacrament

Most enraging is Whoopi used the same words each time she, or a doctor performed her sacrament:  "This is my body"

There, you see? I can be profound once in a while.

~LYDSEXICS UNTIE!~

technically i think whoopie is

her genetic heritage has some jewish mix but i think her religion is the church of worship my liberal big fat ass.

lunaticcringeradio

Blood Covenant

I will not get into what Whoopie thinks or what Catholic doctrine teaches, but for the sake of those who may read this and have no idea what "Communion" is, why it is and it's purposes.........the following explanation should suffice.

You have to know what Covenant is first, because that is what the Bible is divided into: The Old Testament and New Testatment. Testament means Covenant or unbreakable marriage vows. The term Communion defines "communion or coming together of the saints at the Lord's Supper".

The greatest Covenants in the Old Testament were Abraham's with God and the Covenant between Jonathan, son of king Saul and David, God's anointed King.

Abraham was the spiritual bond of marriage to the God Spirit family and David was the earthly royal bond which the Word would be born into as Jesus the Christ as King of kings.

All of these Covenants involved a bull split down the back and a lamb split down the back laid out in line. Blood was shed and pooled.

Covenants lasted for generations. Some Covenants could be between farmers who could not protect themselves and warriors who could not grow food........the joining of groups like these caused peoples to prosper into nations.

In the ceremony, the 2 heads of households would walk a figure 8 through the animals and meet. They would then recite unbreakable vows, take their girding off leaving them helpless, exchange weapons, clothes and then walk through the bull and lamb again.
The bull was the symbol of strength that each brought and the lamb was the symbol of weakness that each brought and the joining made both strong.

It was at the last figure 8 that the real vows took place of depth. Knealing, they would take wine and give it to the other and say, "This is my blood in symbol poured out like these animals in Covenant that I will die for you that you may live. My life is forfeit for yours".

They would then take bread and break it and feed it to the other and say, "This bread is broken like these animals are broken and with it I feed you and to give you life if necessary I will feed you my own flesh that you will live".

Hopefull the readers will about this time perk up and say, "That is sort of what Jesus was saying at the Last Supper". You bet it was and the disciples KNEW THIS and immediately understood a Covenant was taking place........they might not have understood that Jesus was about to die as payment for all sin in His Body being broken on a cross and His Blood shed, but they understood this Covenant was immense as this was God Himself in the royal blood of David adopting just like David was people back into the Spiritual Family of God after the divorce of the Israelite and Judean peoples.

Jesus upon giving thanks and blessing, MANDATED that His children were to now repeat this Covenant ceremony with wine representing His Blood and bread representing His Body just as the 13 tribes were instructed in the Old Covenant to eat the Passover of the lamb in being delivered out of sinful bondage in Egypt.

Communion therefore is not a light thing to be doing. The Apostles warned against the early Church taking it lightly like it was a meal, because of all that it represented.........the literal adoption of an individual from being a human to a child of God.
Jesus paid with His Life to give all who believe on this Covenant Life. The "Communion" does not forgive sins as Jesus does that, but it's symbol is sacred and no deliberate sinner should be partaking of it........as doing so would mock God and all this stands for as some of the most wretched of sins.
A person like that would have a conscience so seared that normal Spiritual revulsion of their sin should keep them away........but it is not and therefore such activity would be counted as sin by God in the gravest terms.........as in the Old Testament when people were worshipping other gods of pleasure etc... and then coming to God to offer and giving him crippled sacrifices.

It is my hope that people understand this more now. The Catholic religion has a great many problems, but in this they are correct in denying people so overtly defiling a most sacred Gift from God.

If I may, King David when he committed adultery and then sent the pregnant woman's husband out to battle so he would die to cover it all up, was confronted by God. God was angry though not of the sin as much as David had God's Name on him and God knew that His reputation would have people thinking, "Gee David is God's and he gets away with murder and adultery". God will have none of that associated with His Name as He is perfect.
God punished David for his using His Name in vain. God allowed the child to die (For the purpose that the throne would never have a question of the child was the former husbands which would have clouded salvation's birthright in Christ's Kingdom). God wrenched David's kingdom from him....his own son took his wives and took the kingdom before a civil war had slain David's rebellious son and it never ended until Solomon the chosen heir by God cleaned house in judgment.

God takes His Name serious and it should be understood by all people that whether it is Rudy or John Kerry, these people in their very flawed lives and in many cases making a mockery of God's Laws which are still in effect from not allowing sodomy, fornication to the butchery of children who are God's are in great need of a reality check.

God is not mocked and in time everyone answers in this life for the idiocy they sow in rebellion and if they disregard the exact solution Jesus laid down in being saved only comes from Him.......these people will face Him.
No human has the right to condemn for that is what the literal meaning is Judge not and you will not be judged.......it is Condemn as in damn not and you will not be damned as that Office is only God's. People though are mandated to judge situations, people and natures to stay away from those things which will bring us to rebellion.

We are to discern these things as Jesus is our Guide, the Holy Spirit our Comfort and we are often to remember this Covenant God has given to us. It is our life and our Life depends upon it.

God bless.
agtG 223

 

*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS

C. I.M. Thanks you said

C. I.M.

Thanks you said it for me.

Husband taking my blood pressure now.

Caryn is IMHO  a confused

Caryn is IMHO  a confused good girl living out the life of a 40's Hollywood slut.

This I can live with, but the fact that the now W. G.has a platform in the media with which to influence the next generation is intolerable and unacceptable to this old granny.

"and the gates of hell

"and the gates of hell shall not...(who can fill in the blanks)

}}---> prevail against it

And the Christian Church is still with us today despite many attempts kill it and hijack it.

~LYDSEXICS UNTIE!~

and the gates of hell.....

shall not prevail against it.

That's the thing people don't understand.....Jesus never promised that His church would be perfect; how could He when it would be run by humans? He promised that it would prevail.

Heck, the Catholic Church has all kinds of Popes, good and bad, but 2000 years later it's still here.

Hmm

I think what the Archbishop did was political.I am tired of Church leaders being politicians whether it is giving illegals help or pushing there politcal agenda.I dont blame religion I blame those people who use it as a tool.Only one I know that walked on water isnt on earth.Maybe in spirit.He is probably wondering what in God's name these supposed leaders are doing.With the exception of Billy Graham who I have tremedous respect for most of the church leaders need to take refresher course in Bible Study and learn what Jesus was truly about.I should probably join them.

Except for Baba Wawa &

Except for Baba Wawa & Shepherd, the View crew has Catholic backgrounds, as do most of the zaniest Scientology nutjobs [Tom Cruise was actually a Catholic seminarian, Travolta & Holmes & Preston are supposedly from RC backgrounds.

I find as a former Jesuit seminarian myself that those leaving the seminary often leave the Church and then are violently opposed to the RC Church and teachings---even Hasselbeck with her Boston College background is fuzzy on some doctrinal points, although I heartily agree with her that rich influential Catholics get annulments rapidly while less well off RCs have to wait forever.  Simony or something like it.  

And some diocesan priests do come from money and have a lot of money---others like some priests in DelRay Beach here in S. FL have absconded to Ireland & Australia after rifling the collection plate proceeds for millions over decades---I kid you not.

The worst are despicable pedophiles, but RC priests get immense publicity while a rabbi here in Boca was almost treated with thundering silence by the local and national MSM.

There's a huge anti-Catholic bias in the national MSM for sure, some of it a bit deserved [as with annulments], but in a large part caused by the RC conservative take on traditional values.

well99I agree

well99

I agree

Seems to me humility is lost on these men.

Yup

Even a illerate yutt like me can see it.It is a shame because Jesus was a example that they and we should follow.I know I am far off the mark but I not the shepherd of the flock.Thank God for that.

The worst are despicable


The worst are despicable pedophiles, but RC priests get immense publicity

I'm going to say this again (and yes, I agree, the way the Church handled it was horrible!)

The problem in the Catholic Church was not one of pedophilia (none of the victims were pre-pubescent); the ignored elephant in the room was that virtually all the molestations were male-on-male. Exactly how many girls were molested?

But it's not PC to condemn homosexuals, so the problem had to be described as something that is universally abhorred.

motherbelt, Excellent

motherbelt,

Excellent point.

}}---> Prepubescent?

So, 13 yrs old doesn't qualify as pedophilia?  Sounds too much like:  "Hey, if you can just hold out until the kid grows his first hairs, he's fair game.

I don't see the semantics justifying the rationalization.  I won't accept it.

~LYDSEXICS UNTIE!~

I'm a Southern Baptist and

I'm a Southern Baptist and I know more about Catholicism than these airheads. I'm a little surprised at Hasselbeck. I thought she had a little more on the ball. They dont even have a clue about basic doctrine.

I'm astounded at these people and how little they know - some of them are Catholic - and they dont know the basics of their Church? They should stick to things they know like abortion and Bush-bashing.

And did you ever notice the only verse from scripture liberals know is the one about "judge not"? They have no idea where it's from (FYI - it's from Matthew 7:1 and Luke 6:37) they have no idea of the context or even who Jesus was speaking to. And Goldberg has it wrong anyway - it's "judge NOT". And they are ignorant of the ending - go and sin nor more.

They really should stay away from Church doctrine - it just makes them look ignorant and stupid. It is better to be silent and be thought a fool...

I guess ignorance is bliss

I guess ignorance is bliss eh Whoopi? We can tell by the mindless crap that comes out of your empty head.

Must be nice being that stupid and then getting paid a pretty penny for it.