NBC Nightly News and ABC’s World News both brought out their Republicans-might-be-racists handbook and took advantage of PBS’s and Tavis Smiley’s decision to hold a Republican debate on black issues on the last week of the third-quarter fundraising crunch. Instead of trying to negotiate a better time, Smiley and PBS painted Republicans as making a huge and possibly racist mistake. Both networks loaded up on soundbites trashing the GOP frontunners for snubbing minorities and creating an "image problem" for themselves and their party.
On Thursday’s Nightly News, hours before the Smiley debate took place, NBC was already casting the debate’s losers as the no-shows. MRC’s Brad Wilmouth compiled the transcript:
BRIAN WILLIAMS: The Democrats debated on MSNBC last night. There's yet another presidential candidate forum going on tonight. The Republicans running for their party's nomination, they were all invited to talk about issues important to the black community in this country. But as NBC's Kevin Corke tells us, what's really notable about tonight's event is who didn't show up.
KEVIN CORKE: Rudy Giuliani and Mitt Romney are in California. John McCain is campaigning in New York. And Fred Thompson is in Tennessee. But none of the Republican front-runners will be in Baltimore for tonight's presidential forum at an historical black college -- Morgan State.
JOHN MCCAIN: We talked with them months ago that we had an event scheduled.
RUDOLPH GIULIANI: No matter how demanding somebody might be about their particular thing, you got to, you've just got to say, well, gee, you know, this next week is devoted to fund-raising because we've got to put a report in.
CORKE: But debate moderator Tavis Smiley argues their absences speak louder than their explanations.
TAVIS SMILEY, PBS: They've told every black request, essentially every brown request, there's a scheduling issue here. Is it really scheduling or is it a pattern?
CORKE: It's not the first time minority voters have felt snubbed by the GOP. Just last month, a debate sponsored by Univision, the Spanish language network, had to be postponed after only one candidate, Senator John McCain, agreed to appear. And in July, Colorado Congressman Tom Tancredo was the only Republican candidate to attend an NAACP forum in Detroit. Former GOP vice presidential candidate Jack Kemp chastised the candidates for missing tonight's forum.
JACK KEMP: I think we will be punished at the polls for turning, seemingly turning our back on such a large proportion of the American people.
CORKE: In a close election, the African-American vote can be pivotal. In 2004, Bush won 16 percent of the black vote in Ohio -- five points above the national average. Without Ohio, he would have lost the election. Some analysts say the no-show candidates are undermining the party.
MICHAEL FAUNTROY, Author of Republicans and the Black Vote: I think it's the sort of thing that they may be able to benefit from during the primaries, but when the general election rolls around, they're all going to pay a price for this.
CORKE: An image problem for a party coming off a decisive loss in 2006 and already on the defensive heading into 2008. Kevin Corke, NBC News, Washington.
The point of view that’s completely left out of these stories is that facing harsh questions from liberal black journalists on PBS or liberal Hispanic journalists on Univision might be a much greater risk than not showing up. When the national media could turn a nonsense word like "Macaca" into a national news story on Republican racism, the risk should be clear. Ultimately, in Sen. George Allen’s 2006 campaign, it didn’t matter that he had worked hard at minority outreach. The media not only declined to credit him for it, they created an entirely different image for him.
NBC’s Today ran with another version of Corke’s story on Friday morning, adding the harsh words of Mike Huckabee and Sam Brownback from the debate calling the no-shows a disgrace. On ABC’s World News with Charles Gibson on Friday night, Ron Claiborne’s report offered more of the same. Again, MRC’s Brad Wilmouth offered the transcript:
ELIZABETH VARGAS: To presidential politics next. The four leading Republican candidates find themselves on the defensive tonight. And some of the critics they're answering are within their own party. The four skipped a nationally televised debate on issues of special interest to minority voters. That opened the door to attacks from candidates who did take part. Here's ABC's Ron Claiborne.
RON CLAIBORNE: It began with a gentle jibe.
TOM JOYNER, Debate host: Let me take a moment right here and now to say hello to those of you viewing from home: Mayor Rudy Giuliani, Senator John McCain, Governor Mitt Romney, and Senator Fred Thompson.
CLAIBORNE: But when the candidates who were there were asked about their missing rivals, some of the comments were anything but gentle.
Former Governor MIKE HUCKABEE (R-AR): Frankly, I'm embarrassed. I'm embarrassed for our party. And I'm embarrassed for those who did not come.
Senator SAM BROWNBACK (R-KS): I think this is a disgrace that they're not here.
CLAIBORNE: To dramatize their absence, the debate sponsor PBS left four empty podiums on the stage. Giuliani, McCain and Romney had said they could not attend because of prior commitments. Fred Thompson accepted, then backed out when the other three declined.
TAVIS SMILEY, PBS: I mean, what are your priorities? Another fund-raiser with the same people? You can't make 90 minutes in the entire primary campaign to talk to voters of color? I mean, I don't think we're being unreasonable here.
CLAIBORNE: Earlier this year, the Spanish-language network, Univision tried to sponsor a Republican debate, but only John McCain agreed to show up. Univision cancelled the event. Even before last night's debate, the Republican contenders had come under extraordinary criticism from inside their own party.
SCOTT RITTER, Republican strategist: Let's face it. The politics of not attending on this is lousy for Republicans, and sends a very bad signal.
CLAIBORNE: On the stump today, the candidates defended their decision.
RUDOLPH GIULIANI: This last two weeks is devoted to raising money. That's just a simple reality.
CLAIBORNE: Another possible reality, if African-American and Latino voters perceive the
Republicans as snubbing them, it could undermine Karl Rove's goal of peeling away what has long been the Democrats' most loyal base. Ron Claiborne, ABC News, Baltimore.
Neither network noted that CNN rescheduled its YouTube debate after the front-runners said they could not attend on their September date, but PBS, it seems, would rather have "the issue" of a Republican minority snub than an actual debate with front-runners.
—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center.





CORKE: It's not the first time minority voters have felt snubbed by the GOP. Just last month, a debate sponsored by Univision, the Spanish language network, had to be postponed after only one candidate, Senator John McCain, agreed to appear. And in July, Colorado Congressman Tom Tancredo was the only Republican candidate to attend an NAACP forum in Detroit. Former GOP vice presidential candidate Jack Kemp chastised the candidates for missing tonight's forum.















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Didn't the Democrats negate this when they snubbed the Fox
Mon, 10/01/2007 - 08:07 ET by PamDidn't the Democrats negate this when they snubbed the Fox debate? IIRC, that debate was a joint venture between Fox and the CBC. http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110009921
Where was their outrage when the democrats snubbed minorities? IIRC on that issue, all was well because Obama said he wasn't going, therefore all the whites felt they had a free pass.
Not only that...
Mon, 10/01/2007 - 08:12 ET by sarcasmoKeyes, being a non-RINO, did show.
JMR
Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul.
I'm not that savvy on the
Mon, 10/01/2007 - 08:15 ET by drillanwrI'm not that savvy on the workings of political campaigns and fund raising regulations, but wasn't there just some fund raising deadline that had to be met for some reason last week? (possibly addressed in the above story but <woosh!> over my not-that-political-workings-head)
Taking THAT into consideration, ANY "group" can throw together one of these debates at next to the last minute, invite the candidates, and grumble because so-and-so didn't "bother" to attend. Hello, scheduling conflicts!!!! Of course, those who DO show up (are usually the ones not drawing in the campaign bucks and don't have such a heavy fund-raising schedule) tend to take big advantage to have a louder voice, and point out the "only a professional politician" jab at their party rivals.
Boy, talk about the pot calling the kettle black........
Mon, 10/01/2007 - 08:20 ET by BrillianceBoy, talk about the pot calling the kettle black........How many decades has a white male been sitting in the prime time anchor chair for NBC "news"?
Hey....NBC......How 'bout mixin it up a little....(heh heh heh).
Maybe Tavis Smiley and his band of unhappy negroes should sit down and have a heart to heart discussion with NBC reguarding their discriminatory hiring practices.
A Black debate?
Mon, 10/01/2007 - 08:39 ET by ThisnThatAnd why is there a debate devoted to black interests anyway? Isn't that, itself, more than a little bit racist? "Come talk to us -- we're black, and you have to give us exclusive attention here". I find the whole concept rediculous.
Besides, 90% of black people vote for democrats. And, the Congressional Black Congress is comprised only of black people. What's to be gained by Republicans debating black interests?
If black people want to get the attention of Republicans, they should become more mainstream and get off the fringes. And they should start adopting more conservative principles, IMO. The very idea that conservative principles are going to change to accomodate the very liberal outlook of any group of people is a non-starter.
___________________________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber
couldnt agree more.
Mon, 10/01/2007 - 09:34 ET by jondelwicheExactly, to quote the Sopranos, "don't 'crap' on my head, and then expect me to thank you for giving me such a nice hat."
The news angle again is the 90%+ voting allegiance to the Democrats at a time our urban centers have become so ungodly awful it seems the fantasy world of Snake Plissken may be coming to reality (see murder stories Philly, Mpls this past week). I can't figure out why Black America doesn't seek out new ideas or leadership. Honestly, I just dont get it.
It's one thing for a high-performing constituency to fell miffed if snubbed, but Tavis my friend, you and your ilk bring nothing to the table for either votes or donations. And the community rebuke of Mr Cosby again bodes badly for any of us seeking to recapture our once vibrant city centers. Unless you are a Plissken....
The media, as usual, mostly feigns surprise at our current dilemma (i.e. America's civilian murders likely tops Iraq's civilian death toll).
Good luck to us all.
Image only means something to a 'progressive'
Mon, 10/01/2007 - 08:53 ET by Six String SpiffImage is NOTHING. Substance is everything. Earth to MSM. We voters don't pay attention to things like hair styles, and fashion trends. These debates are nothing but dishonest lip service. Don't you DARE forget to mention Hillary and crew skipping debates. I'm sure you will though.
The American Revolution Continued
True statements Six. But
Mon, 10/01/2007 - 09:15 ET by MightyMouthTrue statements Six.
But there are large blocks of voters that rely almost exclusively on image. Example: My wife who had been a life long Democrat (before becoming "entangled" with me) would always use Image as the prime factor in her voting. Bill Clinton (who she voted for twice) is the prime example. And now she likes Rudy, who still elicits the "great leader" (and I'm not saying he wouldn't be) Image because of 9/11. In fact she is still a registered dem and received a "who would you vote for" poll in the mail from the DNC. She wrote in Giuliani simply because of Image. When I asked did she know his positions, she said no but he did a great job during 9/11. That was enough for her!
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Neither network noted that
Mon, 10/01/2007 - 09:16 ET by HypocriteHaterNeither network noted that CNN rescheduled its YouTube debate after the front-runners said they could not attend on their September date, but PBS, it seems, would rather have "the issue" of a Republican minority snub than an actual debate with front-runners.
In the words of Johnny Carson, I did not know that.
Well that changes my opinion of this situation. I had previously thought that the GOP candidates were making a mistake in not bringing their message to this group, regardless of their left leaning politics. Now that I'm finding out that the PBS debate was scheduled during an important fundraising timeframe, AND the democrats got one of THEIR debates rescheduled for this exact same reason, I'm definately seeing the double standard here.
Shame on Tavis Smiley and all his fellow MSM for turning this into yet another "GOP Racist" smear. This unfortunately is just the beginning.
Did Williams say about the
Mon, 10/01/2007 - 09:44 ET by buddycDid Williams say about the liberals refusing to debate on Fox. If he said nothing then he has no credibility commenting on Republicans.
I don't watch ANYTHING on NBC or MSNBC since they hired that brain dead Olberman, so someone will have to tell what Williams said.
I am the rainbow coalition!
Mon, 10/01/2007 - 09:50 ET by CrashMy family is comprised of every major ethincity.
Next, if the so called 'image building minorities' want to represent one side and call it an open debate, I wonder if the Dem's would attend a real debate with substantive issues? They haven't yet.
Here's the challenge - Invite the Democrat candidates to attend a "debate" with the following attendee's - Michael Steele, Shelby Steele, Juan Williams, Bill Cosby, Walter E. Williams, Herman Cain, and Dr. Allen Keyes.
Would they decline the invitation?
That would be a great
Mon, 10/01/2007 - 09:53 ET by drillanwrThat would be a great debate!
Democrats are all about
Mon, 10/01/2007 - 11:28 ET by kgDemocrats are all about race. To them, there is no color blind agenda. As a matter fact Democrats have been all about race for the last 140 years. African American Democrats should take a good look at the history of their Democratic counterparts.