Laura Ingraham's New Book Dishes on CBS News, MSNBC

Photo of Tim Graham.
  • Bookmark and Share

In the 1990s, Laura Ingraham was an exception to the rule, a conservative allowed into the rarefied air of network news. She was a Sunday night commentator on CBS Evening News -- matched on the left by Sen. Bill Bradley -- and then a host of a live morning show on MSNBC. In her brand spanking new book Power to the People, just out yesterday, Laura dishes on what it was like in the lion's den:

From Day One, I was a fish out of water in the television news business. I didn’t come from their world and I didn’t buy into their worldview. They knew it and I knew it. As a conservative lawyer who had worked for the Reagan administration and clerked on the Supreme Court for Clarence Thomas, I didn’t fit the CBS mold of the earnest, idealistic, liberal, "citizen-of-the-world" type attracted to the news business. I might as well have dropped in from a blinking spaceship from Saturn. One of the closet conservatives at the network told me that most of the producers and on-air talent thought the top brass’s decision to hire me was a "pathetic sell-out to the Right."

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

My mother used to tell me that she worried about me working at CBS. "Who will be your friend there? Who will look out for you?" she asked protectively. Her instincts were right as usual. But I was just a rookie and kept thinking ‘Any day now Paula Zahn is going to speak to me!" (In the New York bureau, I was told not to enter the make-up room until she was out of the chair.)

In 1997 I turned in a script I had written for a piece I filmed on abortion for the Sunday CBS News. "You can’t use the term pro-life," a producer said to me after reading my draft.

"Why?" I asked, incredulously.

"Because it’s CBS policy – ‘anti-abortion rights activists’ is what we use," she said flatly.

"Why?" I asked again.

Irritated that she had to provide an explanation, she snapped: "Because we do not want to appear like we’re taking sides. We don’t use ‘pro-choice’ either. For them we use ‘abortion rights activists.’"

This job was definitely not going to work out.

While I was still negotiating with CBS, a new cable network named MSNBC contacted me about becoming one of their on-air ‘friends.’ The deal was that I would appear on MSNBC three days per week and write columns for msnbc.com. It wasn’t much money, but I thought it sounded fun and different. So soon I found myself working for two different television networks simultaneously.

Compared to my CBS experience, my time as a political analyst and on-air host at MSNBC was idyllic, but still rocky. When we launched the cable network’s first live television show out of Washington in August 1998, MSNBC execs told us we wouldn’t have teleprompters for months. This was the new, cutting-edge high-tech news outlet and they couldn’t get their act together enough to get teleprompters? So my producer Lia Macko and I improvised with an easel and a big white pad of paper. Every day Lia would write the show topics on the pad with a big magic marker and flip the pages segment to segment. Guests thought it was a gag. A few months later we got prompters. I still have the pad.

The episode was a sign of things to come, a sign that the "new media" was maybe not so "new" after all....Sure enough, my producer and I ran into resistance from NBC executives on everything from whether we could book the cast of Gilligan’s Island to whether we could cover the Juanita Broaddrick rape allegations against Bill Clinton. (NBC’s own Lisa Myers did the story and we still had to fight tooth and nail to air the piece on the show.)....

I owe an eternal debt of gratitude to two news executives – Jon Klein of CBS News (now president of CNN) and Steve Capus of MSNBC (now president of NBC News). If both of them hadn’t fired me, I wouldn’t be hosting a radio show heard by millions today. I left television for a true ‘new media’ experience. And I love it.

PS: Looking back at Laura's career at CBS, I found this priceless tidbit in Brent Baker's Cyber Alert, outlining how angry the liberals were when CBS hired moderate GOPer Susan Molinari to co-anchor their new Saturday Early Show in 1997:

"The GOP News from CBS," read the headline over a May 29 New York Times editorial which argued: "With the hiring of Representative Susan Molinari to move directly from Congress to the anchor desk, CBS has reduced the wall [between news and politics] to dust. In fact, having already hired Laura Ingraham, CBS News now employs more famous Republican women than the Republican National Committee does."

—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Who is that ... person?

The idea of all those true-believer liberals staring at Ingraham, like she was from another planet, is simply too funny to resist. I can just see a bunch of headset-wearing, clipboard-carrying flunkies behind the camera, steaming at every word she says. Or squinting at the teleprompter, unable to grasp what she's saying -- where traditional values are like a foreign language. Priceless.

Don't you know that

Don't you know that everyone looked at Laura wondering how she could got past security without a foil hat?

Laura Ingraham is Incorrect

One does not thank liberal execs for their position in life, but like Joseph in prison in Egypt thanks God for making harmful situations into positive ones.

After reading the above with knowing this woman was dating Dinesh D'Souza (the person who blamed America for 9 11) to her idea of "I am going to work some place that is FUN" and the strange idea Ms. Ingraham is not God given Wise enough to figure out a way at CBS to get around the thought police, I have even less respect for this person.

Honestly, she is exactly what D'Souza is in right wing circles a product of affirmative action without any experience to have earned the position. To have one's mother worried that the bosses at CBS are not going to watch over you.........is about the worst kind of advice one can receive. God watches over His own and always makes the worst of it good.

With no intention of turning this into bashing "conservatives", it is little wonder Rush Limbaugh was proven right again in his complaint having to carry water for all of these political people (I will include pundits) who know nothing about God as a base and know nothing of what Conservative is driven by in economics to responsible liberties.

All of these "leaders" remind me of the British in World War I in being lousey generals and having a cast of soldiers too willing to charge and die. Bush got us John Roberts and the rest is what Conservatives accomplished.

That is not saying much for any of the dauphins on top with their Paris balls.

 

*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS

One does not thank liberal execs for their position in life,

One does not thank liberal execs for their position in life,

 

I though she was being sarcastic. She is quite funny

I agree.  No conservative,

I agree.  No conservative, regardless of career, could possibly hold a candle to any liberal.   They are just too darm smart.   In fact, compared to them, we're bland.  

Maybe I should become liberal again as I was in college in the early 60s. 

Nahhhhh.  I'm glad that I grew up.

Being a little hard on the woman, don't you think?

Affirmative action? Do you think that Ingraham was picked ahead of other "more qualified" applicants because she's a woman? You have to abandon the whole idea of 'more qualified' when it comes to broadcast media. Qualified = you got hired. Qualified = ratings; if you bring ratings, you're qualified. Where did you get the idea that the media is a meritocracy, and that advancement is purely a result of experience? When you call Ingraham a product of affirmative action, you suggest that she jumped over others with more 'merit?' Merit has little to do with broadcast journalism. Suppose it did, however -- how, then, would you explain Stephanopolous? How do you explain Olbermann? How do you explain that the media is 90% liberal? For that, you'd have to assume that liberals are more qualified journalists by a 9-to-1 ratio?

Nah. Merit has nothing to do with it.

Consider this. William F. Buckley, rightly considered the Zeus of all conservatives, achieved that position through a magazine ... National Review ... which he started without having any "media experience" of his own. He achieved the right to be a media superstar because (1) he had persuasive and intelligent arguments; and (2) he knew how to communicate those ideas persuasively. To be honest, what more do you need? A degree from Columbia? Twelve years on the city beat? The only people who demand those credentials are the poor suckers who pursued them themselves.

Ingraham deserves to be broadcast as much as anyone else in the media. She has a definite point of view, she can communicate it effectively, and entertain in the process (broadcast media is, after all, a profit-seeking enterprise). The idea that she needs any other 'qualification' is wrong-headed.

POWER TO THE PEOPLE...

I just picked up her new book at Border's in audiobook format & I'm looking forward to listening to it. 9 cds, that's a long one. Oh, if Ms.Ingraham reads this, your book was on the front table. Easy to find, unlike your attempt at the Border's next to MSG.

 

"Some of us are wise, some of us are otherwise"  Mark Levin