Let's give Katie Couric (and her producer Rick Kaplan) some credit for doing a better job interviewing Syrian dictator Bashar Assad then Diane Sawyer's flippant what's-on-your-iPod interview back in February. On Friday's edition of The Early Show, Couric appeared live to introduce the taped piece. She pressed the Syrian leader on his support for insurgents going across his border into Iraq, and even aggressively pushed him with a quote from Sen. Joseph Lieberman arguing that "The notion that Al Qaeda recruits are slipping into and through the Damascus airport unbeknownst to you and others is totally unbelievable. It is therefore time to demand that the Syrian regime stop playing travel agent for Al Qaeda in Iraq."
Couric explained "during that interview, he denied that Syria was as big a feeding point for terrorists going into Iraq as the United States contends." MRC's Kyle Drennen captured the transcript:
Bashar Al Assad: "What do they do, those terrorists in Iraq? They kill civilians. They create chaos. What interests have Syria in having chaos in Iraq? Chaos is contagious."
Couric: "Does that mean you support a stable, democratic Iraq?"
Assad: "Definitely, for our interests first of all, and for Iraq's interests second. Otherwise, the whole region, and maybe later, indirectly, the rest of the world will be suffering."
Couric: "U.S. Officials have said 80% of Al Qaeda in Iraq suicide bombers have entered through Syria at a rate of 60 to 80 every month. What have you done to crack down on this problem?"
Assad: "These are false allegations. Who are they? What their names? Actually, all these allegations just to divert attention, for the people, that the problem is political. It's not related to Al Qaeda. It's political problem in Iraq."
Couric: "So you're denying that any suicide bombers or terrorists in Iraq are coming from your country?"
Assad: "No, that's not the issue. Because any country in the world cannot seal its border. And the example is your border with Mexico. Nobody can seal its border."
Couric: "Let me read an op-ed by Senator Joe Lieberman that was recently published. "Syrian President Bashar Al Assad cannot seriously claim that he is incapable of exercising effective control over the main airport in his capital city. The notion that Al Qaeda recruits are slipping into and through the Damascus airport unbeknownst to you and others is totally unbelievable. It is therefore time to demand that the Syrian regime stop playing travel agent for Al Qaeda in Iraq."
Assad: "Well, that is nonsense. If we have any information about any terrorists coming through the borders, the legal border, the airport, or the other borders, we will capture him right away."
Couric: "You say that chaos does not work to Syria's advantage."
Assad: "Exactly."
Couric: "So you support the U.S. efforts to help establish a democracy in Iraq?"
Assad: "There's no -- if they only talk about military, numbers of soldier, raising of the number, or making draw-down. That's only what they talk about. There's no serious political process supported by the Americans so far."
Couric: "But I was in Iraq, in Anbar Province. President Bush and his other top officials were meeting with Prime Minister Maliki and his top leaders, trying to move democracy forward. Why do you say there's no political process going on?"
Assad: "We're talking about the results. It's getting worse every day. Nothing is better. Sometimes it gets better, but it's like flash in the pan---"
Couric: "Do you not support Prime Minister Maliki?"
Assad: "We support any prime minister who work for his country. I have good relation with him. He came to Syria a few weeks ago and we had very good meeting."
Couric: "Do you think his government has the potential to be is successful."
Assad: "We have to ask the question first, does, do they have authority to be successful? Do the Americans allow them to do what they have to do? From our knowledge, according to many Iraqi officials, they don't have the authority. The American leads everything in Iraq."
Couric: "Let's look forward. Do you believe that U.S. troops should withdraw from Iraq?"
Assad: "Definitely yes, as a principle. How and when, this is the Iraqi issue. We cannot decide it as Syria."
Couric: "Are you concerned, though, Mr. President, that if U.S. troops do withdraw, and do it too precipitously, the country will break out in an all-out civil war?"
Assad: "Some say, if they leave, it will get worse, maybe. So this is not the debate. As principle, they have to leave. In parallel, you have to have political process going with the withdrawal, in order not to have this chaos getting worse and Iraq get unstable again."
Couric: "Do you want to see America succeed in Iraq?"
Assad: "If the successful means political stability, we don't have any problem because we support any country in the world, including the United States, in succeeding in Iraq in that regard."
American TV viewers would have a lot more respect for tough questions to President Bush if the networks preformed like Couric did here, and pressed foreign leaders and international bureaucrats with the same kind of hard-driving inquiry as Bush receives in the East Room or the Rose Garden.
—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center.





















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
I did think praise of Katie would be at NewsBusters
September 8, 2007 - 16:05 ET by PamBut she deserves it! Great interview.
Well, she had to do
September 8, 2007 - 16:10 ET by fitzfongWell, she had to do something to jump-start her flagging ratings.
Based upon what I've read
September 8, 2007 - 17:21 ET by stratmanBased upon what I've read on NB, not being a Katie or CBS News watcher, her trip to Iraq, her commentary while in Iraq, and this recent interview with Syria's Assad has earned some respect from me. I hope she continues in this vein upon returning to the US.
Unfortunately, and all too often, when people cozy up into their customary habits back home, they fall lockstep back into their old habits and ways of thinking.
We shall see.
Killing them with kindness isn't working. Time to get scrappy with the Donkeys.
yes stratman
September 8, 2007 - 17:25 ET bywe shall see, if she continues this trend for say one tenth the time of her biased reporting i may watch her.
a good name is rather to be had than silver or gold Proverbs
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.
Still can't bring
September 8, 2007 - 21:21 ET by Conservative_in_mass.Proceed with caution here folks, I still say she's setting up the straw man for a bash fest when she returns. True, her questions were much stiffer than Sawyer's, but then again, a third grader is more probing than powder puff Diane.
I still can't bring myself to trust her one bit. This junket she's on may have knocked some sense in her head, but there is too much history with this standard bearer of the Lib media to look past. Once she returns to her upper East Side element, I'm sure the "old Katie" will be back.
Cobras always look their best just before they strike.
"Good News is not News" MSM mantra.
Congrats to the Perky One
September 9, 2007 - 00:00 ET by americaneagleI don't care why she did it, I'm just glad that she did it. I respect her a bit more after reading the transcript of her interview because she did not allow Assad to dodge questions, and she asked him the exact types of questions that should have been asked. That was real journalism, and for tha Katie deserves a hand.
Whoopdedoo.... I will
September 9, 2007 - 00:11 ET by bigtimerWhoopdedoo....
I will withhold my judgement one way or the other with this leftist so-called journalist...who has always had an agenda.
What are we suppose to do...clap because she did a journalist's job for once in her leftist agenda driven life?
You don't change your spots/stripes that fast for me.
exactly bigtimer
September 9, 2007 - 09:52 ET by lunaticcringeradiokatie is far too little and far too late, she must have thought she was doing a parody bit and the tapes got switched.
a one time act does not entitle full redemtion, how many new stories will it be before the next cut is slipped in. i don't care if it's a bubblegum piece of reporting i'll bet her next broadcasts first story will have a few drops of poison in it. that's only basing this theory on the fact that this was the last story she did over the weekend, if it wasn't then i'm sure this was a fluke accident, and the very next story had a knife in it's back.
lunaticcringeradio
Stipes haven't changed
September 9, 2007 - 09:57 ET by ThisnThatYou're right, BT. This is a wolf in sheep's clothing. The only reason she would have asked difficult questions is because she has developed a personal distaste for this individual, not because she's turned over a new leaf.
___________________________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber
i'm really tired of this word insurgent, it's a lil to ambiguous
September 9, 2007 - 09:45 ET by lunaticcringeradioshouldn't mercenary be a better word used or just hired thugs or my choice term alien combatants. these alien combatants aren't native to iraq, they have no vested interest in iraq as part of their heritage, they are merely imported into the area mainly from all over the african and asian continent to cause disruption. they are creating the problems that the iraqis have to deal with and the us military has to stand up to. of course the ambiguous term insurgent gives them a litl bit more authenticity and ligitimacy to the leftists who could never give any ligitimacy to the current administration.
lunaticcringeradio
Edward R. Murrow.
September 9, 2007 - 10:35 ET by Shooter1002This interview simply demonstrates that the media is fully aware of how they make anti-Americans look good. Ahh, but when ratings ($$$) and the need to render gravitas to a cutesy teleprompter reader are required, suddenly we have Edward R. Murrow!?!