Katie Couric Denounces Hillary-Cleavage News as 'Disgraceful', a 'New Low'

Photo of Tim Graham.
  • Bookmark and Share

In one of her one-minute "Katie Couric’s Notebook" speeches on her Katie & Co. blog, CBS anchor Katie Couric came lecturing to Hillary Clinton’s defense on August 1 over Robin Givhan’s Washington Post fashion review of her cleavage on C-SPAN2, but she never mentioned the Post, just how the story "dominated cable news for days, and it’s disgraceful." She sounded the feminist alarm: "By focusing on this display of decolletage, it seems we’ve plunged to a new low. What’s next? Studying a candidate’s too-tight jeans?" She said this election was too important for trivia: "If we focus on the issues, we could judge the candidates not on the color of their clothes, but on the content of their character." She acknowledged some fashion issues were "fair game," when the targets were men: the John Edwards $400 haircuts and how "Dick Cheney was slammed for wearing a parka when he visited a concentration camp."

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

This is the complete text of the commentary:

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

The cost of a college education has tripled in the last 20 years. That’s what Hillary Clinton was discussing last week on the Senate floor, but not what the media reported. You see, she wore a V-neck blouse revealing more skin than usual. This dominated cable news for days, and it’s disgraceful. Okay, some things are fair game: Dick Cheney was slammed for wearing a parka when he visited a concentration camp, and John Edwards was mocked for his $400 haircut. But body parts? By focusing on this display of decolletage, it seems we’ve plunged to a new low. What’s next? Studying a candidate’s too-tight jeans? This is a critically important time in our nation’s history, and Election Day’s 15 months away. As for the ensemble that launched a thousand quips, Andrea Mitchell said, ‘Sometimes a blouse is just a blouse.’ If we focus on the issues, we could judge the candidates not on the color of their clothes, but on the content of their character. That’s a page from my notebook. I’m Katie Couric, CBS News.

Maybe Couric didn’t mention Givhan because the CBS show Sunday Morning aired a puffy profile of her on May 14, 2006. But Couric probably shouldn’t play media critic without research. Is the attack on cable news accurate, that it "dominated" coverage for days? That it was a 24/7 topic, like Princess Diana’s car crash?

I tried a quick Nexis check of CNN, since Nexis only has parts of MSNBC and FNC coverage. I only found six mentions, all on July 29 and 30 – all after Hillary Clinton’s campaign made the cleavage story an issue and a fundraising ploy, something Couric leaves out of her Ann Lewis-echoing commentary. The first segment on the 29th came on Howard Kurtz’s journalism show Reliable Sources. Another of those mentions was a fleeting joke on the Glenn Beck show, which isn’t even on main CNN, but on Headline News. Then consider the tone of some of the actual CNN coverage on July 30:

– On The Situation Room, Wolf Blitzer held a discussion with two female pundits, Democrat Stephanie Cutter and Republican Leslie Sanchez. Cutter denounced the story, strangely insisting against all evidence that "the best way to stop a news story from being covered again is to use it as a fund-raising tool." Sanchez sharply insisted that the Clinton campaign wanted to use this fluff to divert people from her liberal record.

Later, Carol Costello did a light report (including a liberal blogger from Feministing.com), but said the story was either "incredibly demeaning or, as The Washington Post asserts, sassy." Blitzer led with the critics: "A lot of people though suggesting that this is different, that this is really sexist, the whole notion, the basis of the article." Costello replied: "You are right. A lot of people are saying that. But Givhan says Clinton's cleavage is news because it is out of the ordinary and says something about the way that people want to be perceived."

– On Lou Dobbs Tonight, it came up in passing when liberal talk show host Joe Madison carped "there's just so many non-issues. I mean Hillary Clinton's cleavage?" Dobbs agreed: "That is about as dumb as it gets."

– On Paula Zahn Now, it also came up in passing, in an anguished discussion about why America is still so backward it hasn’t had a black or female President yet. One guest was Kenneth Arroyo Roldan, author of Minority Rules: Turn Your Ethnicity into a Competitive Edge. He suggested it was a metaphor for sexism: "Look at Hillary's neckline, for God's sake, as it relates to issues that still are quite pervasive in the marketplace." Zahn replied: "We had not planned on talking about her cleavage tonight, but you took us right there. Judith, let's not sugarcoat this, though, because we have seen electorates overwhelmingly put women in office. We have seen it in Chile. We have seen it the U.K. We have seen it India. We have seen it Germany. Why hasn't it happened here? There certainly are a lot of qualified females out there."

So how does this display make Katie Couric look for denouncing it all as "disgraceful"? None of these CNN snippets sound critical of Hillary (except for GOP pundit Sanchez). As for Cheney being "fair game," it should be noted that while CNN took nine or ten days to notice Givhan’s Hillary critique, Brent Baker reported back in January of 2005 that CNN arrived on the story (again, with a dismissive tone) on the same day -- no ten-day wait on that one.

PS: It might help to remember that Holocaust historian Deborah Lipstadt was appalled by the Givhan-inspired parka fuss at the time. From her blog:

Having been asked by a number of people about Dick Cheney's choice of a parka and a navy wool cap for the Auschwitz commemoration, I must say that I find the whole discussion ridiculous. Having been with him the evening before and discussed his previous visit to Auschwitz [with Germad (sic, Gerald) Ford] and walked with him through Auschwitz I the next morning, I have no doubt that he was deeply moved and touched by his visits.

I have two thoughts: the man has a history of heart trouble. My mother's cardiologist would probably have told her, also a heart patient, "are you nuts to even think about sitting outside for 3.5 hours in a driving snow storm? If you must then wear the warmest clothing you have." [And I remind those who compared this to the inaguration that that ceremony was about 40 minutes, this one was far longer.]

—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

couric-ageous

Come on and show some solidarity

I'm glad katy is there to

I'm glad katy is there to let us know what is and what is not fair game when it comes to fashion.  Frankly, I don't remember a dustup over the VP's jacket, he didn't pull a Diaz and have a picture of Hitler on it did he?

Hillary Cleavage

For once I agree with Katie.  This heavy coverage of IT's cleavage is rediculous.  I focus on more important things like what they belive, and what are their goals.  Not the fact that they showed some VERY LITTLE cleavage.  Big woop... 

As for YOU, Katie.  I think you should set the example of what decent cleavage looks like :-) 

 

 

What the MSSM doesn't report can kill you.

I don't think the outfit

I don't think the outfit itself was all that important. But I do think that, for a woman whose every syllable and motion is scripted, it is worth speculating on what her motive was. Nothing, absolutely NOTHING she does isn't planned and poll-driven.

For example,her first outfits were always black or dark pantsuits. Then she started adding color, first a scarf, then a little sweater, etc. Then she started wearing womanish suits of lighter colors instead of the dark pantsuits....she poll-tests everything and then lives by the results. So who's to say she didn't have a poll that said women wanted to see her dress in a more feminine fashion, rather than as an executive?

PS I'm not sure using the term "a new low" was wise on Katie's par. LOL

}}}----> Perky strikes again

So she can say "decolletage". but she'll beat the hell out of a producer who throws "sputum" into the script?

You know, I just can't get worked up with what this Roseann Rosanna Danna loonie says.

Sorry Katie, you're too late....

Sorry Katie, you're too late.   Nancy Pelosi has picked up on the new Congressional fashion trend, and it's sure to be commented on..... 

Right. Now we'll be

Right. Now we'll be hearing about Nancy and Hill crashing the glass ceiling of the "unspoken" old-fashioned Congressional dress code.

What heroines! What courage! What trailblazers!!

Sheesh.

Fashion Don'ts

What's next?  Ted Kennedy in a Speedo? 

My eyes!, My eyes!

TK...Oh

Try this

[***Warning *** The image could cause mental scarring for an indeterminate amount of time. Only known treatment is this.]

}}}----> Disgusting Lion

Why would you be surfing snuff sites?  I thought they were illegal.

please

Please no  Camel Toes

 

}}}----> Camels

I'm watching it right now on split screen.

Drill... Laughing my a$$

Drill...

Laughing my a$$ off!

Now there is some cleavage Hillary could only wished she had...!

She only dreams of looking

She only dreams of looking so hot in a bathing suit! Bill would be all over her for sure.

My rods!!! My

My rods!!! My cones!!!!

Thanks Tom,  now I'll spend the rest of the day trying to keep that image out of my head!! 

but on the content of their character

I don't think Queen Hillary would want us to judge her on the content of her character.

The media can't define her character for us, although they have tried. We can do that ourselves from years of observation.

If we judge her by her character, she's in big trouble.

lowlife

Does nobody remember the airbrushing of the Al Gore "package"?

Curt

}}}----> Yes, curt

This was disgussed last week in rebuttal to the "double standard" post that women demand crotches to watch.

This is all a set up

This entire controversy was fabricated by Hillary’s campaign staff.  Among her many problems, the perception of Hillary is that she is a ball busting shrew.  The Cleavage gate story gives her a two-fer; the attempt to create the impression that she is more feminine as well as the opportunity to complain about it as a fundraising ploy.  I mean, really, who has had any interest in Hillary Clinton’s cleavage since 1989.  Ever since leaving the White House all she has been wearing are pantsuits.  Now all of a sudden she wears something more revealing while addressing the Senate?  Give me a break.  By attempting to play the victim once again she is able to divert attention from any difficult questions about her positions.  Not that the MSM would ask her any hard questions anyway.  Katie and all the other liberal talking heads can now tisk tisk about how women aren’t taken seriously in politics… blah, blah, blah and continue the drum beat daring us to vote for her because it is “her turn”.

So, Comrade Katie, are you

So, Comrade Katie, are you willing to lead the 21st Century's new feminist movement in honor of future Czar HRC and STOP flashing those scrawny chicken legs of yours every chance you get while the camera is on ... on NBC and now CBS?

Hill's Cleavage

There is no doubt in my mind that Hillary’s cleavage ‘thing’ was a staged event and nothing more than a stunt to garner free publicity.  

There is an old adage in Hollywood that says: ‘Whether my publicity is good or bad, just make sure they spell my name correctly’. And thus far, the MSM have dutifully done their job in making her cleavage an issue – pro and con.  

It would seem that the Clinton machine hasn’t, pardon the expression, lost its touch.

Would someone enlighten

Would someone enlighten me?

Why was Cheney slammed for wearing a parka to a concentration camp? Was it not cold that day?

I'm not being sarcastic, I'd really like to know why that is wrong.

Katie is only upset because

Katie is only upset because the powers to be at CBS told her she was not allowed to show any cleavage to help her ratings...(not that it would)

No RINOs in '08 - Thompson/Hunter would be a good ticket; Thompson/Steele would be a great ticket

Man Up

I think Katie should let her beard grow out.

Courage.

 

Smut talk

Believer

Jeri Thompson's Hollywood dressage comes to mind. 

Katie needs to just thank

Katie needs to just thank the good Lord that she has the job she has. She is unattractive, unintelligent, annoyingly condescending, and frankly, looks like she has gained some lbs. and age spots. Screw the feminists too; the 1960's have been over for more than 40 years now. Hairy armpits and legs, nasty hairstyles and the need to look like a man is "out". Show me some cleavage!!!

Nancy's are WAY Bigger

Pelosi has some huge boobs. I think that's what made Hillary think she needed to drop the neckline, but what a disaster. Major bony chest there, Hill. You'll need to get some double-E implants to compete with Mama Pelosi. And it would help balance out that humongous rear end.

 

Bee Blogger
Ten Reforms That Will Save America

doc... LMAO! Great

doc...

LMAO!

Great post...true too!

I think the portrayal of

I think the portrayal of Hillary on the degenerate SouthPark cartoon (which I adore) is most accurate. Her massive booty overwhelms her entire body (and I don't mean in a GOOD way).

The only reason Katie

The only reason Katie Couric has a job is that she "tarted it up".  Her only asset is her sexuality...which she flaunts as pathetically as Kelly Ripa.  She has zero credibility and has traded on her appearance (such as it is, eye of the beholder and all) from day one.  In light of all this, it's simply laughable for "Her Perkiness" to wag her finger over this non-story.