I'm sorry, but weren't we already treated to a discussion of Al Gore's "package" when a picture of him wearing a tight pair of jeans appeared on the cover of "Rolling Stone"? That picture was not candid; it was posed. Hillary's decolletage was also planned (one surmises she looked in a mirror at some point.) So why shouldn't people comment on whether it was appropriate, or speculate on their motivation?

PS: seeing a difference when they are watching her speak?

Not going there, not going there, nosiree, not going there....

The real outrage is Hillary showed her cleavage. Yeck!

 "You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious. "

                   - Ben Kenobi on  Liberals, and the MSM.

Seems there was just such a sporting event involving Al Gore's bulge in a Rolling Stone intervies.

Ms Howell doesn't know petty from morass.

If we start crotch-meters for men are we going to have to speculate on whether it is real or not? I remember the famous scene of the band going through airport security in Spinal Tap. The question will be "Is it real or is it a tubesock?"

Our real problem, then, is not our strength today; it is rather the vital necessity of action today to ensure our strength tomorrow. Dwight Eisenhower

The difference is that men don't generally flaunt their crotches, not even deliberately for political reasons. Could have been worse - she could have flaunted a thong, what with the proliferation of widescreen tv.

Good Lord, could we possibly sink any lower as a nation?

Help Fred defeat everybody.

This whole episode stinks of Clinton, Inc.  I'm convinced that Wolfson or one of those hacks planted the seed for this WaPo "fashion article" to stimulate the righteous indignation among Clinton supporters (no pun intended).  Hillary's mob is supposed to come out of this thing looking competent in putting out a fire.  Hillary is supposed to look like the victim of an unprovoked attack.  Net advantage: Clinton, Inc.  This story has gone well beyond its sell-by date.

Why does a woman expose her cleavage? Hmmm? I don't know of any male candidates exposing any parts of their bodies below the neckline.

Unless one of the male candidates has been displaying his "plumber's crack" on national television, these women should clam up.

"What you know you can't explain, but you feel it. You've felt it your entire life, that there's something wrong with the world. You don't know what it is, but it's there, like a splinter in your mind, driving you mad." - Morpheus

Okay, I looked at the pics in question and I don't see any cleavage.  At least not to my standards anyway.  Seriously now.  Hillary spooks me pretty bad, but what's her campaign manager going to do when they get bombarded with another crack about "pantsuits"?  What the hell do you expect them to do? 

Hillary Handlers:  "Okay, let's do something like I dunno. . .maybe a subtle V-neck thing"

 Blogs:  "ZOMG! Hillary's a Hooter's girl!!! Cleavagecleavagecleavage!!!"

This entire topic is completely beneath NB's dignity.  There's bigger fish to fry around here.  When she switches to jacket, tie, and skirt, they'll accuse her of wanting a sex-change.

The reaction to this non-issue is just too extreme.

Edit:  Yeah, what Bigtimer said!

-PJ   

"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07 

First off, who cares about Shrillary's "cleavage". Then the question is, "What cleavage?" Then, one has to seriously consider where to spew after even thinking about any of Shrillary's body parts. Kinda like gag + vomit = gavomit. Lastly, as to the calls concerning male crotches, they weren't exposing their crotches while Shrillary had whatever she has flapping in view (I have no details - at the first mention of a Shrillary body part being in view I dove under the bed).

If this is such a huge issue in our country's political future, we are indeed in deep doo-doo.  

The Closed Mind Erects Strong Barriers

It's obvious that Hillary was showing her cleavage to underscore the fact that she is a woman.  Some of us were taught to dress appropriately...some were not.  I imagine that the view had a deleterious effect on all but a few men.  Enough said.  

But "looking at [Presidential candidate's] crotches?"  Eeeewwww!