The willing "mainstream" media promoters of NBC anchor Brian Williams have touted his credentials as a blogger. He’s so "with it." But NRO’s Greg Pollowitz points out that Brian talked to journalism students at New York University and exposed himself as yet another snob who wants people to know that bloggers are a nerdy stereotype named Vinny in a bathrobe "who hasn’t left the efficiency apartment in two years" and that people who depend on online media for news are "watching cats flushing toilets" – and missing the big stories from NBC’s "oasis" of reasoned, serious news people, no doubt.
So if we’re going to play stereotypes, let’s turn it around on Brian. "You’re going to get your news from people who get $400 haircuts and wear $3,000 suits and then cut their own wrists on the air lamenting poverty in New Orleans. They’re going to tell you that they’re the experts in international stories when they parachute into a war zone in designer khakis and spend more time with their hair dresser than with the generals."
Now would Brian Williams say that critique is fair? Or is it mean-spirited and highly made-up? And of all people, should news anchors striving for an objective, even-tempered image be going around making mockeries that sound mean-spirited and highly made-up? Take this opener:
"You’re going to be up against people who have an opinion, a modem, and a bathrobe," said Williams. "All of my life, developing credentials to cover my field of work, and now I’m up against a guy named Vinny in an efficiency apartment in the Bronx who hasn’t left the efficiency apartment in two years."
Pollowitz retorted: "A modem? Williams is worried about bloggers with dial up?" Williams prides himself on being wryly humorous – every intern who works for him is almost required to talk about how hilarious he is. I would add a pile of things. One, when Brian talks about developing his mad anchor skills "all his life," I remember the young Master Williams who wrote "young Democret" fan letters to Lyndon Johnson and interned in the Jimmy Carter White House. That would seem the "right" life experience for a network anchorman in today’s world. But it doesn’t impress me he’ll be worth anybody’s "fair and balanced" tag.
Two, Brian is claiming two very unfair and snobbish things about bloggers. That they are uneducated, and they are unsuccessful and impoverished. Neither charge makes Brian look very good. It’s the very definition of "looking down your nose" at people from your pricey Manhattan studios. If Brian knows more than diddly about blogging, he would know most bloggers have at least as much college education as he does, and many are lawyers and professors and wonks and highly credentialed.
And since when do liberal anchors show their compassion by mocking stereotypes of the poor and uneducated? This is what happens when MSM stars feel the heat of competition and criticism. You wouldn’t catch Brian Williams dead in New Orleans mocking a guy named Vinny who’s such an uncredentialed loser he hasn’t left his tiny FEMA trailer in two years.
Three, the final evaluation of the news ought to be its integrity. If Efficiency Vinny’s blog were the one to discover faked GM truck explosions at NBC today, which media outfit would be the journalistic voice of the people, and which would look like the deficient malcontent?
Four, doesn’t Brian know that this snobbery is precisely the way print people talk about television people? They can easily joke that when Brian goes "In Depth" on NBC, it can be finished in two minutes, or about one sheet of paper.
Finally, enough with the pajamas and bathrobe garbage! Brian, are you really claiming that your journalism is more authoritative because you’re wearing Hugo Boss? Or are you more credible because you're wearing sincere open-collared shirts in the Lower Ninth Ward? It’s probably not a good idea to mock other people’s wardrobe, as if it powdered poses really matter in evaluating the quality of the news product. Next:
He added that it’s often difficult to judge the credibility of a blogger. "On the Internet, no one knows if you’ve been to Ramadi or you’ve just been to Brooklyn and have an opinion about Ramadi," said Williams.
Pollowitz cracked: "Yes, almost as difficult as a major network figuring out that an anti-George Bush memo was written using Microsoft Word." This is why I made the parachuting-into-a-combat-zone joke. Going to foreign hot spots does give you first-hand visuals and bring you to on-site expertise, but it doesn’t make your stories accurate. Usually, the anchors seem fairest when they’re on the scene, and then go back to snide when they return to Manhattan – but they’ll tout the combat-zone visit to defend their Manhattan sneering at the commanders.
Williams is again mocking people without his resources: "I can hop a plane to Ramadi, Vinny, unlike you, you loser! I've jetted to 23 countries. What can you do, take the Greyhound bus to Mobile?" Brian shouldn’t dare to ask the soldier in Ramadi who he trusts to tell his story, Brian Williams or the blogger in a "bathrobe." Next:
Williams is certainly not anti-blog — in fact, he has his own blog, The Daily Nightly, which he updates every day. But he does worry that the explosion of opinion-driven amateur media might distract the public from big stories or important writers’ work.
"If we’re all watching cats flushing toilets, what aren’t we reading? What great writer are we missing? What great story are we ignoring? This is societal, it’s cultural, I can’t change it. … Like everybody else, I can burn an hour on YouTube or Perez Hilton without breaking a sweat. And what have I just not paid attention to that 10 years ago I would’ve just consumed?"
Pollowitz has the perfect retort to this bilge: "Big stories, like this NBC News video of Posh Spice coming to America." It's a pretty low blow to compare InstaPundit or Michelle Malkin to Perez Hilton, not to mention cats flushing toilets -- which is probably more likely to wrap up NBC Nightly News on a cuddly note than show up on a political or media blog. Oh, but he's "not anti-blog." I just love the "opinion-driven amateur media" line. As if Brian's "opinion-driven professional media" has an opinion that's much more worth absorbing, endorsing, repeating line by line.
Once again, Brian lamenting the "great writer" we're missing can easily be used against him. "I could be reading something substantive, but I'm watching Brian Williams reporting on Posh Spice. What a waste of my brain's time!" When Brian goes looking for the "great writer" we're missing, he goes and finds a thug-rap-endorsing, Bill Cosby-bashing, hard-left hack professor like Michael Eric Dyson to ridicule President Bush for being clueless about black people. So he can put that lecture away.
Is Brian really looking to underline the impression that he's this generation's Peter Jennings, the snobbish, pompous jerk who thinks he's bringing the gift of his enlightenment to all the rubes in their efficiency apartments? If so, it's working.
—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
Rising to the Top
July 21, 2007 - 07:58 ET by allanfThe "Men in Bathrobes" have found power only be revealing truth. Dan Rather lost his job because "Men in Bathrobes" exposed his story on President Bush for what it was, a lie. "Men in Bathrobes" exposed Reuter's publication of doctored photo's during last years Lebanon conflict. One can go on and on.
I rest easier knowing that there are "Men in Bathrobes" out there. There combined strength will eventuall dwarf purveyors of artifiicially sweetened news such as Williams.
The Internet is the most important invention for news since the printing press. Do a better job Williams
"You’re going to be up
July 21, 2007 - 08:01 ET by richflanj"You’re going to be up against people who have an opinion, a modem, and a bathrobe"
Thank God they're wearing bathrobes!!!
The Tan Man
July 21, 2007 - 08:30 ET by capavcapav
Don't forget to add the "natural" tan Williams always has. I remember him reporting from New Orleans and talking about the sun and his tan. Why is it there in February? Ever notice when he blinks that his eyelids are pure white? He obviously wears those eye shields without a nose piece or elastic bands.
OH Brian
July 21, 2007 - 14:23 ET by PAPA LDon't look NOW!! BUTTT yours are the ratings that are falling faster then an old man with out a jock strap
Vinnie Should Have His Job
July 21, 2007 - 08:35 ET by gideonmjamesThat's Williams' best shot at trying to silence the blogosphere ... paint all [conservative] bloggers with a Sopranoesque image of some New Yorker named Vinnie in his skivvies. That's sad.
If Vinnie's kickin' his butt with just truth and a keyboard, maybe he shouldn't be making $5 million a year ... maybe a guy like Vinnie should be sittin' in his seat - making $2 million a year (think about the savings, NBC).
Brian's schmundo
July 21, 2007 - 19:40 ET by Tim GrahamActually, press accounts have reported Brian makes $4 million per year.
Image of the Liberal Blogger
July 21, 2007 - 08:52 ET by gideonmjamesGod forbid what the liberal bloggers look like ... naked, frothing at the mouth, with a bunch of empty Red Bull cans all over the floor ... and CNN running in the background ... and Gore-Lieberman posters all over the wall ... and Newsweek magazines scattered across the bed (probably mixed in with several Playboys, some form letters from Hillary Clinton, a stack of credit card bills, and a week's worth of unwashed underwear).
Red Bull? That stuff's
July 21, 2007 - 08:56 ET by sarcasmoRed Bull? That stuff's expensive! I'd imagine maybe PBR...
JMR
Williams
July 21, 2007 - 11:13 ET by pocomocoWilliams, and other newsreaders, are seeing the handwriting on their teleprompters, and it is telling them they are becoming irrelevant - and they don’t like it.
As they sit in their multimillion dollar news sets telling us how important they are, the bloggers, sitting in their PJs, are doing what the MSM should be doing – reporting the news.
Apparently, he and his fellow newsreaders believe that by ridiculing and demeaning them, the bloggers will fold up their PJs, put them back in the dresser, and go away. Talk about the height of pomposity and how delusional they are.
A few rears ago Matt Drudge, speaking before the Washington Press Club, predicted the emergence of what he called “internet citizen journalists”, and they laughed at him. Well, they ain’t laughing now.
Power to the blogosphere!
blogging is here to stay
July 21, 2007 - 15:58 ET by DontFeedTheTrollsPoor Brian is kinda like a horse and buggy salesman around the turn of the last century, hoping those 'horseless carriages' won't catch on.
Sorry Brian, but the internet isn't a passing fad.
D
I don't support our liberals or their mission.
Pocomoco
July 22, 2007 - 10:09 ET by Cape ConservativeIndeed, power to the blogosphere! In 5 years - or less - I predict msm evening news will be just a memory, along with many of the major newspapers and news magazines!
I would much rather peruse the web for my news than listen to what these pompous a$$es decide is important and which they will interpret for us - you know, we, the unwashed masses, who cannot think for ourselves.
Anti Italian-American?
July 21, 2007 - 09:05 ET by Mica the MagnificentIt appears to me Brian has a problem with Italian-Americans.
Why choose Vinnie from the Bronx? Are Italian-Americians too stupid to blog? Why not Jose or Jamal from the Bronx? Is it because you're afraid of being called racist?How about Alice from the Bronx? Can't appear to have that anti-women issue, can you?
What a jerk!
What's your issue, 'ol superior white one?
Knowing all I know about
July 21, 2007 - 09:15 ET by sarcasmoKnowing all I know about Brian, and all I can possibly "know" about Brian's "Vinnie" stereotype, I'm leaning toward trusting Vinnie more to tell the truth on any political story...
JMR
Is it possible he made these
July 21, 2007 - 09:50 ET by Gat New YorkIs it possible he made these comments right after reading Daily Kos?
Williams: "All of my
July 21, 2007 - 09:59 ET by MidAmericaWilliams: "All of my life, developing credentials to cover my field of work.......
So sad for Mr. Williams. He's a generation too late. Gone are the days when the wise men descended from their lofty perches each day to tell us what was important and how we should think about it.
He added that it’s often difficult to judge the credibility of a blogger. "On the Internet, no one knows if you’ve been to Ramadi or you’ve just been to Brooklyn and have an opinion about Ramadi," said Williams.
uuuhhhh..... is he saying he's been to every place that he's ever mentioned on his newscast?
Brian's Song
July 21, 2007 - 13:35 ET by GalvanicMidAmerica: " So sad for Mr. Williams. He's a generation too late. Gone are the days when the wise men descended from their lofty perches each day to tell us what was important and how we should think about it. "
I think you've hit upon THE major reason for Williams' rant, MidAmerica. For about five decades, network news anchors were regarded as the Grand Ol' Men of News. Consider the names like Cronkite, and Huntley & Brinkley --- these anchors were respected and trusted -- even honored -- by the public which had few other outlets for news information. They were American icons.
When Williams and his peers got into the business, their dream was to become the saints of news. They believed that climbing to the top of the heap and attaining anchor's chair, they would be immortalized and celebrated as Murrow, and Cronkite, and Brinkley before them.
But the blogosphere has irreversibly burst their bubble. They are no longer the trusted sources of news, because their biases, their omissions, and their outright fabriactions of news have been exposed and undermine any semblance of credibility. In other words, Williams' timing is off by perhaps a decade or so.
So, naturally, he strikes out at the alternative sources of news --- in other words, his competition --- for having denied him the glory that was Cronkite's. He will never understand that had the blogosphere existed in the era of his anchor heroes, they would never have been canonized either. He shouldn't blame the bloggers; he should blame Rather and NBC Dateline and the others who've been caught.
BTW, aren't William's ratings still sinking faster than Couric's? Ironically, not only is he a weak anchor, he'd probably be a weak blogger.
And that's the way it is, Brian.
"You’re going to be up
July 21, 2007 - 10:41 ET by MidAmerica"You’re going to be up against people who have an opinion, a modem, and a bathrobe," said Williams.
I can't speak for Mr. Williams, but so there's no misunderstanding, as I sit here and type I have never tried to visualize what you other guys are wearing right now. Just wanted to make that clear.
MiB
July 22, 2007 - 10:15 ET by Cape ConservativeMen (and Women) in Bathrobes rule!!!!
PS Like most bloggers, I have actually gotten out of bed, showered, dressed and enjoyed a healthy breakfast before sitting down at the pc...don't put me in the same carriage as all those "unwashed illiterate masses" he is talking down to. Can you believe the arrogance of the guy!
Brian Williams
July 21, 2007 - 11:09 ET by PShannonWell, dear Brian has every right to comment on the education of bloggers. After all he has a first-class education:
After high school, he attended Brookdale Community College, before transferring to George Washington University, and then to the Catholic University of America. To pay his tuition, he worked at a pancake restaurant and at a local Sears department store. He never graduated, instead taking an internship with the administration of President Jimmy Carter.
Got that -- HE NEVER GRADUATED!
Maybe he was too smart for
July 21, 2007 - 12:01 ET by stratmanMaybe he was too smart for college.
What an patronizing ass.
Only a foolish man would
July 21, 2007 - 11:26 ET by maggieqpublicOnly a foolish man would choose such words to lash out against his critics. Anybody remember how the MSM ridiculed George H.W. Bush for being out of touch with the ordinary American…. all because of a grocery scanner? But William’s lack of the “common touch” will only be noted on the blogs.
Brian Williams
July 21, 2007 - 11:35 ET by pbthinkerMr. Williams seems to believe there's a difference between the Beltway crowd and the NY News Crowd. The difference between many bloggers and Mr. Williams is the bloggers actually do their own research and come up with informed opinions. Mr. Williams has his opinions before he even reads the copy.
IT would be fun to see a debate between Mr. Williams and any number of Conservative Bloggers (and no I don't believe I'm one of them). Many would hand Mr. Williams his lunch, on any subject he chose to debate, with the exception of how a news anchor can slant the news every night and still claim to be unbiased.
Never argue with an idiot. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
Brian Williams isn't as clever as he thinks.
July 21, 2007 - 11:40 ET by ThisnThatWilliams should note two things. First, he said "On the Internet, no one knows if you’ve been to Ramadi or you’ve just been to Brooklyn and have an opinion about Ramadi," in trying to make a point that it’s often difficult to judge the credibility of a blogger. Well, Willams, did you know that our unmanned vehicles these days are flown by soldiers sitting in a ground station in the United States? Does that make these soldiers "not credible"? Or does it really mean that modern technology allows us to take advantage of world-wide information sources, giving bloggers a lot more credibility than you now have?
Second, Pollowitz had a good retort to the William's "We concentrate on the important stories at NBC". Yeah, like Harry Potter? Now that's important. I'm looking at the top stories on MSNBC right now. The top story is "Harry packs a punch". Then, below that, are "Other top Stories" which includes "Iraqi Army: Dozens seized near border". Hey Brian, which do you think should be the top story, and if you choose the Iraqi story, how come you don't have enough influence to make it happen?
Williams is just another whinney, liberal know-it-all whose head is too big for his hat, trying to bring normal people down to his level.
DETAILS: these high
July 21, 2007 - 11:46 ET by PKDETAILS:
these high flyers seem to forget that its the dumb little details that mess you up.
like when they are over flyover country did the mechanic (named Vinnie) replace the fuel filters on the bird. (modern birds fly like bricks without good fuel.)
like when a certain fellow is trying to destroy a presidents future but looses a career of many years worth millions of dollars because the documents were written on a word processer that was not made until 20 years after the document was supposedly written.
the big worldy reporters are talking to the generals in the hotels that are fortified and get the "big picture".
but its the gunneys, chiefs, top kicks that make the thing work.
on second thought maybe its a good idea that they keep them away from those guys. they're doing the business of winning the war and much to important to bother.
there's lots of generals that can babble on without effecting things that much.
C
Jesus the Right Wing Conservative Blogger
July 21, 2007 - 12:22 ET by Lame CherryIn reading Brian Williams silliness, I was reminded of a Person Who never had a pillow of his own to rest his head on in poverty, never went to a university and never travelled more than 200 miles from His earthly home in His Life.
Jesus was His Name and He received all of His Wisdom from the Father.
Now perhaps Mr. Williams is referring to the malevolent ranters like Bill Maher on Huffington Post who seem to link everything to the F word in life and those who hide behind their computers following Ariana and comradery and never see the light of day or understanding.
BUT, most bloggers here have a definite insight which can only come from God. That kind of discernment is not travel, money nor university created. What is travel, money and university created is being a pompous ass like Brian Williams.
In closing, Williams "thought" when he took over he could run one week of pro American and Conservative stories and fake all of those "stupid" people into forever ratings. They left him though and NBC has tanked.
I though would rather be in the company of thee Jesus who never travelled, was God inspired and was poor, because His Work for the Father changed the world and is the Power which Brian Williams is still fighting against.
God bless you Brian Williams as it is a long hard lesson learned and haning around with bigot and racist Jimmy Carter is not improving your chances at Life where Life matters.
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
I think you're taking
July 21, 2007 - 13:35 ET by balboaI think you're taking Williams' comments way too seriously and purposely looking for the negative. I don't think he means what you think he means. But by all means, carry on.
Once more, Balboa directs
July 21, 2007 - 14:44 ET by JoeBobOnce more, Balboa directs traffic... "Move along, nothing to see here..."
Come on, b. Deriding his competition as a unkempt, introverted, slob don't mean nothin', right?
Without recognizing the ordinances of Heaven, it is impossible to be a superior man. - Confucious
He's merely describing how
July 22, 2007 - 12:31 ET by balboaHe's merely describing how wide and varied the crowd is that is now debating him online.
Brian Williams... You are
July 21, 2007 - 16:29 ET by bigtimerBrian Williams...
You are NOT important.
Never have been...never will be.
You are a pompous arse...a legend in your own mind.
Click the channel.
Brian's just mad because
July 21, 2007 - 19:09 ET by GothampcBrian's just mad because it's the 21st Century and he hasn't figuerd out a way to work from home yet.
So you worked on your
July 21, 2007 - 19:13 ET by Andrew H.So you worked on your credentials--heh. I still don't bother watching you, Brian. There is absolutely no reason for me to do that. My credentials have been established too and I submit, beat yours.
Liberalism is a convenient lie.