The Washington Post Style section on Friday featured a front-page story on the gay-left group Soulforce and their so-called "Equality Ride" to conservative Christian colleges trying to stir up fights and publicity. Hanna Rosin's story was headlined "Young, Gay Christians On A Bumpy Bus Ride."
Soulforce is the organization of Mel White, a former speechwriter for Jerry Falwell before he came out of the closet and the author of the 2006 book "Religion Gone Bad: The Hidden Dangers of the Christian Right." White warned that religious-right leaders "are not just Neocons dressed in religious drag. These men see themselves as gurus called by God to rescue America from unrighteousness. They believe this is a Christian nation that must be returned forcibly to its Christian roots." He describes conservatives as the forces of "spiritual violence." But Hanna Rosin never used the word "liberal" once in the story to describe this bus crusade, even as she explained the gay leftists are traveling to "conservative" colleges.
Rosin's story drew heavily on the idea that the gay youths were oppressed, much like blacks in the Jim Crow South:
The [bus] driving down Route 7 in Virginia yesterday was purplish on one side and orange sunset on the other. In huge letters it said "Social Justice for Gay, Bisexual and Transgender People." On the highway, fellow drivers either honked and waved or threw Coke cans. In Sioux City, Iowa, someone spray-painted the bus with "Fag, God doesn't love you."
....The 25 "equality riders" from a group called Soulforce have roughly followed certain routes of the Freedom Riders who battled Southern segregation in the 1960s.
Instead of bus stations and restaurants, they stop at conservative evangelical colleges they say discriminate against homosexuals. Last week it was Bob Jones University in Greenville, S.C. Yesterday it was Patrick Henry College, a seven-year-old evangelical institution in Purcellville, Va., with grand political ambitions.
This is an odd sentence. Is Rosin trying to suggest that evangelicals have "grand political ambitions," but the Soulforce "equality riders" do not? Rosin then allowed Soulforce's Robin Padrika Reynolds to unspool her theory of theocracy marching from Patrick Henry right into the Bush White House:
"All Patrick Henry faculty and students must adhere to a worldview that says the Earth was created in six days," Reynolds began. "The Bush administration loves them so much. As a tiny school they've had as many White House interns as Georgetown. Janet Ashcroft [wife of former Attorney General John Ashcroft] is on the board. That tells you so much right there."
Next, the riders sat around and read Patrick Henry's student handbook: "The practice of homosexual conduct or other extramarital relations is inconsistent with our faith position," it says. It also condemns legal structures that condone "inappropriate sexual activity or lust, heterosexual or homosexual."
Some Christian colleges list homosexuality along with rape and harassment, so the riders see this handbook as an improvement, but it's not enough for Reynolds. "What's scary is that these people are going straight to Capitol Hill and the White House without ever talking to people of different views," she said.
Reynolds had the makings of a public relations problem for Patrick Henry. She is African American, and the school is highly self-conscious of its inability to recruit many African American students (this year it has one out of a student body of about 325). She is earnest and polite and always speaks earnest evangelese -- "goodness gracious" and "my word" and "have a blessed day." Before she eats or takes a trip or makes a phone call, she prays to Jesus.
The Post website has a video story by Akira Hakuta titled "'Equality Ride' Hits A Roadblock." It spotlighted the Soulforce organizers describing their publicity aims, but it eventually aired the views of Patrick Henry students and college founder Michael Farris. At the end, Soulforce's Robin Padrika Reynolds declared "God has not ordered us here in vain." Soulforce's Jarrett Lucas says conservatives are forces of "political and religious oppression" and came to discuss "a school that has oppressive doctrines."
Typically, Rosin did not acknowledge the views of Patrick Henry students and Farris until paragraph 16. She presented the student who spoke as not very well-spoken and embarrassed Farris by ending the story with this testimony:
David Hazard, a friend of college founder Farris who had edited one of his books, also told Reynolds he was gay. When Farris heard that during an interview in his office, his jaw fell open, and he stared for a long time. "Oh. I'm so sorry for David," he said. "I think he's deluded." The place for someone like that, he added, "is on their knees repenting of their sin.
"But here's a good reaction for you: I still like him."
Near the end, just before lowering the Hazard boom, Rosin also reported that "Soulforce visits often bring gay students and alumni out of hiding, and this was no exception. Three alumni contacted Reynolds during the visit; she said one told her he was gay and that his time at Patrick Henry had been the 'hardest four years of his life.'" Does Rosin know who these alleged gay students are, or is she merely accepting the activist's claim without checking on it?
If a group of Christian conservative college students decided to go on a bus tour and undertake an evangelization tour of gay nightclubs, would the Post cover it? If so, would it seek to embarrass the gay nightclub owners and suggest that the Christians were a "public relations problem" for them? Fat chance.
The Post also devoted a whole story to promoting the Soulforce tour last year, on March 11, 2006. Reporter Michelle Boorstein also failed to describe Soulforce with a liberal or anti-conserative label, but explained that some campuses were welcome Soulforce to discussions as "an opportunity to replace the stereotype of the intolerant conservative Christian with a more compassionate 'Christ-centered' response -- albeit a response that still views homosexuality as a sin."
The same labeling imbalance happened in tiny Post squibs on the tour last year. On March 11:
Liberty University police arrested more than 20 gay rights activists on trespassing charges as they tried to enter the Lynchburg campus yesterday. Many of the activists are members of Soulforce, a group on a nationwide bus tour to promote gay rights at conservative Christian universities and military academies. About 60 people gathered for the morning rally outside the main entrance.
On April 27:
WEST POINT, N.Y. -- Twenty-one gay rights activists from Soulforce Equality Riders were detained at the U.S. Military Academy and issued federal citations while protesting the Pentagon's "don't ask, don't tell" policy. The academy was their last stop on a cross-country tour of 20 conservative Christian and military colleges that protest organizers say discriminate against gay, bisexual and transgendered people.
—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
I'm guessing that the busses
April 13, 2007 - 17:10 ET by Clear thinkerI'm guessing that the busses bathroom gets a real workout. Especially since the riders go in two at a time.
The liberal MSM has become an enemy of the USA.
Soul Force?Fag Force!
April 13, 2007 - 17:15 ET by rbosqueSoul Force?
Fag Force!
Not just the big MSM
April 13, 2007 - 17:29 ET by nkviking75We've been getting a similar series in the Mason City (Iowa) Globe-Gazette, the latest installment of which is here. A Mason Citian is on the tour. The articles have been marked by a distinct lack of curiosity about what the affected institutions or their students think. That is, except when someone says or does something nice for Soulforce. Even then, we get that information as provided by the Soulforce member. One article quoted a statement from a college website. Otherwise, no indication is given that college spokesmen or students are even sought for comment.
This is obnoxious, in-your-face hate speech by intolerant gays who want to silence anyone who might disagree.
When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.
" purplish on one side a
April 13, 2007 - 17:59 ET by rwesley" purplish on one side and orange sunset on the other."
Oh dear me, those colors just clash. I wouldn't be caught dead wearing that.
The rules according to Liberals
April 13, 2007 - 18:10 ET by c5thenIf a liberal agrees with the censoring of a group or type of speach, it's a tollerance crusade or a civil rights issue. If a liberal disagrees, its oppression and hate speech.
Do these people in the msn me
April 13, 2007 - 18:40 ET by bigtimerDo these people in the msn media ever quit...ever?
I am sick and tired of the religious bashing.
Talk about double standards.
Yeah, those pesky "Chris
April 13, 2007 - 18:50 ET by drillanwrYeah, those pesky "Christians" hacking off the heads of those they don't agree with ... When will their insanity end?
Decapitation
April 13, 2007 - 19:00 ET by bigtimerSpeaking of hacking off heads, did anyone catch a segment yesterday or the day before on CNN, showing that is what the Mexican drug gangs are doing now to their rival drug gangs, putting it on video and then showing it on Youtube?
I would imagine elsewhere as in a warning to their rivals through different venues, You tube only had it on for a couple of hours before it was pulled, but CNN showed it all up until the guy was actually decapitated..
They have followed the terrorists...just think, whatever happened to good old water-boarding?
And we're the bad guys ... G-
April 13, 2007 - 19:10 ET by drillanwrAnd we're the bad guys ... G-d help us.
drill,My sentiments exactly!T
April 13, 2007 - 19:18 ET by bigtimerdrill,
My sentiments exactly!
This guy was tied up to a chair, blind-folded had tattoo's on his chest and stomach, the rival gang had a huge Z marked on his chest as a warning before the sword did the rest after he confessed to whatever it was...
This world is in a real mess...and it's all Pres. Bush's fault dontcha' know!
Yeah, the one person who is p
April 13, 2007 - 19:25 ET by drillanwrYeah, the one person who is probably praying the hardest in the world.
or putting panties on their h
April 13, 2007 - 19:56 ET by Conservative Voiceor putting panties on their heads
The line about the gay saying
April 13, 2007 - 18:52 ET by sunandsteelThe line about the gay saying his time at Patrick Henry was "the hardest four years of his life" got me thinking. Why didnt he ever LEAVE? Is this the ONLY college in America where he can get an education? Religious people, no I mean Christians, have to deal with harassment every day from somebody, and if they complain its "You deserve it." Let some homos bitch about a CHRISTIAN college and they are "fighting oppression" or some crap.
Texas has a population of nearly 21 million people, all of whom are ashamed to be from the same state as the Dixie Chicks. (IMAO.com)
999 to 1
April 13, 2007 - 19:08 ET by NortoBeliever
Is it not ironic that of 1000 colleges in the US, 1 of those might not share Soulforce's ideology. Like the msm, they attack any news source that has the audacity to be at odds with them, even if it only attracts 1/20 of the audience.
The socialist-progressives have been emboldened by this election cycle(Imus) and will stop at nothing. POV discrimination will be rampant. Note that Rosie and the like can say what they want as long as it bashes their favorite targets, never the reverse.
These homos are not the new F
April 13, 2007 - 20:12 ET by MidAmericaThese homos are not the new Freedom Riders. They are more like the old KKK. But instead of harassing blacks they are intimidating uppity Christians.
Homophobic and damn proud of
April 13, 2007 - 21:57 ET by Clear thinkerHomophobic and damn proud of it!
The liberal MSM has become an enemy of the USA.
Soulforce....
April 14, 2007 - 00:26 ET by boraxSoulforce made a visit to my campus too, Brigham Young University. They weren't permitted on campus this year because last year during their visit they broke their promise on how they were going to do their protesting. So this time they marched around the edge of campus seven times saying that just like the Israelites and Jericho, the "walls" of opression and bigotry that BYU has put up would fall down. (I found that quite sacreligious.)They claim that all they want to do is "establish a dialouge," among the students, but all they want to do get is media coverage with their staged publicity stunt. Several came on campus and laid down in the central square with lilies on their chests claiming to represent people who had committed suicide because they couldn't let out their true feelings. They were promptly escorted off campus and arrested. Students here sign a document when they are admitted saying that they agree to abide by certain rules, one of which is not having any extramarital sexual relations, including homosexual relations. These people know what they are getting into when they sign up; there is no secret. What's to protest?
I say you're all full of it.A
April 14, 2007 - 01:17 ET by tracheostomyI say you're all full of it.
As a straight Evangelical Christian who's spent a large amount of time with a gay family, has hung around the GLBT culture, and even attended their liberal churches, I find myself emotionally torn.
1. I know that from the POV of the gay community, the majority seems to think that all conservative Christians are obsessed with lynching them.
First of all, this is not only absurd, but incredibly self-centered.
Second, they seem to think that just because they came from a childhood background of Biblically misinformed New American Pharisees* who happened to turn legalism into pure idolatry, that they can go on the road and paint every fundie with the same broad brush.
2. And speaking as a comitted Bible fundie, I myself do not believe that America is made up of truly committed Christians.
Over 90% of the church services in my region alone have veered away from expository teaching of the whole Word of God; blindly following after the empty promises of the varied prosperity movements, Hybels' and Warren's growth movement, and the Emergent church. When the Evangelicals aren't busy paring down the icky; undesirable details of doctrine and the true gospel (you listening Debra?), they're too engrossed in political activism to even bother studying a Bible! If the preacher isn't engrossed with political activism, then he's preaching past a spiritually-starved congregation to deliver a dumbed-down gospel to a "seekers only" audience.
So to the GLBT community, I exhort you to repent of all your sin, just as all mankind is urged to do. . .and not just the sins you hold most dear. As a straight male who is without Christ, I would be under the same wrath as the homosexual as well as the petty thief, the liar, and the murderer alike.
To the evangelical community, I tell you that your moral merit is as worthless as the paper it's printed on. You're all nothing but empty clouds without water and fruitless fig trees. You all talk up a good fight of course, but in the end if you're not just another American Pharisee (you listening Debra?), then you're nothing but a health/wealth heretic--or God forbid, you're both.
Our lampstand is about to be collectively removed and the worst part is that no one is going to even notice.
Not a one.
-PJ
*The families who rejected them.
I am John Doe!
tracheostomy follow your own advice buddy
April 14, 2007 - 01:35 ET by Conservative VoiceI find it funny that you posted twice "(you listening Debra?)" that you don't realize you are on your own high horse. Give me a break...stick to the topic and stop trying to take the mote out of Debra's eye when there is a beam in yours. You know your religion isn't better if you somehow make someone else's religion seem less Christian.
CV, if anything else, your va
April 14, 2007 - 01:49 ET by tracheostomyCV, if anything else, your vague generalizations "high horse, mote, beam, religion, etc." are helping less than my post, that's for sure.
You wanna hit & run, then fine. But try to at least be specific.
-PJ
I am John Doe!
Just saying you kept attackin
April 14, 2007 - 02:02 ET by Conservative VoiceJust saying you kept attacking Debra's religion passive aggressively. If you have a problem with her posts than post to her instead of posting when she isn't even online laying claims about her religion; you can post to her directly when she does something you disagree with. You made very broad claims against her religion that were baseless. I am not of her religion, in fact many times she has attacked mine as you are attacking hers.
This isn't a religious forum to flex whose religion is more righteous. I think we need to unite, not divide.
You misunderstand me. My agen
April 14, 2007 - 02:32 ET by tracheostomyYou misunderstand me. My agenda is to unite also. The question is do we unite and ignore our differences, or is there something we have been ignoring this whole time that we still refuse to unite under?
Do you oppose homosexuality? Why? From what basis do you oppose it and to what ends? What is your solution to it?
It's not about whose is more righteous and you know it. We're flailing about with this issue; doing the moral equiv. of the "windmill attack" with our eyes closed. How do you think Ted Haggard went down? The track they've chosen to follow is neither of Christ, nor is it reliable.
-PJ
I am John Doe!
I am a strong believer of ove
April 14, 2007 - 06:44 ET by Conservative VoiceI am a strong believer of overlooking petty differences and uniting where we have things in common.
Personally I don't have a problem with churches becomming "political". Ted went down due to pride....something that is within us all. But you can't say everyone of that religion is not a follower of Christ just because a leader was a closet gay adulterer. That doesn't unite, that puts them on the defensive.
The following we can unite on, and should...
1. The ten commandments. Being moral, honest, and obey/worship God
2. the golden rule
3. freedom
4. Role of government and the role of the community and the role of the family and the role of the individual (ie don't be a slacker)
5. To fight against our common enemy: tyrants, terrorists, communism (which to me is the same as socialism, liberalism, facism )
Do I oppose homosexuality? This is something where Debra and I agree....I do oppose homosexuality and the teaching that its ok. It is not ok. I also disagree that its genetics, that they don't have the power to chose. Because I am a strong believer of free will and self determination...its funny eveny people who call themselves homosexuals call it a lifestyle. I oppose homosexuality being a protected class, I oppose anything that underminds the institution of marriage and family. Do I think we should harm homosexuals, no...hate the sin not the sinner. But I think we should stop teaching the propaganda in schools, for the sole purpose that if you can't teach morality in schools then you should not be able to teach immorality. I don't agree with homosexuals adopting kids, because I think a child should have a mother and a father. How do we fight it? Well we need to not be afraid of the pc. And we need to not come across as jerks. We should have the same emotion against homosexuality as we do with adultry, fornication, porn, etc. because all these things undermind the family and marriage.
You totally have it backwards
April 14, 2007 - 17:43 ET by tracheostomyYou totally have it backwards and here's why.
CV: I am a strong believer of overlooking petty differences and uniting where we have things in common.
We have alot less in common that you'd like to think, man.
CV: But you can't say everyone of that religion is not a follower of Christ just because a leader was a closet gay adulterer. That doesn't unite, that puts them on the defensive. The following we can unite on, and should... 1. The ten commandments. Being moral, honest, and obey/worship God 2. the golden rule 3. freedom 4. Role of government and the role of the community and the role of the family and the role of the individual (ie don't be a slacker) 5. To fight against our common enemy: tyrants, terrorists, communism (which to me is the same as socialism, liberalism, facism )
Ah, but you advocate doing that without an outside, unchanging, moral absolute, that is to say. . .a sovereign, immutable, and perfectly just God. You want to embrace these morals above as if they existed in a vacuum. What is it with you? If it's about traditionalism, then that is fallable and subject to change. If it's about self-preservation, then that's malleable according to your personal whim. People change and try to fake their moral code, or try to subvert it.
God does not change.
CV: Do I oppose homosexuality? This is something where Debra and I agree....I do oppose homosexuality and the teaching that its ok. It is not ok.
Based on your say-so alone? Based on traditionalism? What is the immutable basis for that sentiment? I put my money down that apart from a pure and just God, there isn't any. Show your cards CV, I call.
CV: I also disagree that its genetics, that they don't have the power to chose. Because I am a strong believer of free will and self determination
Then you contradict yourself. Because if morality is determined through free will alone, then who's to say what is more right than another? What makes your moral merit any better than the gay bus activist?
CV: I oppose homosexuality being a protected class, I oppose anything that underminds the institution of marriage and family.
Why is marriage and family an institution? Who wrote that rule?
But seriously, that's a very nice little magic-trick you're doing there, with the levitation of the morals off the table and the passing the hoop around it. The problem is that's all it is--a cheap stage trick; an illusion.
-PJ
Based on the Bible, homosexua
April 15, 2007 - 03:19 ET by Dan The Man 2Based on the Bible, homosexuality is a sin against God. In the Bible it says That a man shall not lie with another man as with a woman. You lie when you say you know the Biblwe and God is the authority.
Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark. -- save my gun, shoot a liberal.
Tracheostormy, I never said t
April 15, 2007 - 03:46 ET by Conservative VoiceTracheostormy, I never said there isn't a moral absolute nor did I say that it is determined by free will, and have no idea how you came to that conclusion.
Let me be clear, God made the rules, but he also gave us free will, this is not a contradiction in terms.
As far as not finding anything in common in that list tells me you are a jerk, so please spare me your sermons because you have no credibility.
A free will to do what, CV? A
April 16, 2007 - 19:49 ET by tracheostomyA free will to do what, CV? Are you saying that man, by virtue of his own merit and/or choice, has the ability to please God?
As for my credibility, are you saying you'd listen if this kind of reasoning came from a "legit" minister or something? What, you look at the diploma before you check the facts? That's the habit of most leftists, I thought you were better than that.
Give me your standard for "credibility" and I'll meet it. C'mon, I double dog dare ya!
-PJ
Man are you thick. If you d
April 17, 2007 - 02:17 ET by Conservative VoiceMan are you thick. If you don't understand that we have free will, a gift from God, then I can't help you.
As far as your credibility is concerned, I don't care if you have a doctorate in religious studies, I can only go by what you post...and you are a jerk looking to pick a fight when there isn't one. That is why you have no credibility to teach anyone Christianity. Listen small fry, while you are stuck on stupid thinking your Church is the divine, and condemn everyone elses, there is a war going on. A war in Iraq, against terrorists. There is also a social war going on here. So go ahead and shake your judgemental finger at people, and ignore the four pointing right back at you. In the meantime I would like to unite under the banner of Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, for Justice and Honor, and the American way. Try and get some perspective!
Assuming...
April 16, 2007 - 19:57 ET by Mr. BishopI don't agree with Homosexuality is a choice, nor do I agree it is genetic. In the end, I just don't know... However -- assuming, for a moment, that homosexuality IS genetic. There is one explanation, and one explanation only: genetic mutation, thus birth defect. The survival of the human race depends, entirely, on the ability of a man and a woman to have sex, to reproduce. Anything else, is a personal CHOICE for an act that is genetically designed to reproduce.
"Stop global warming! Asphyxiate a liberal!" - Show us how far you're willing to go to stop "global warming"
homosexual behavior
April 14, 2007 - 08:23 ET by Parker1227This is about tolerance for people born gay, which I support, but it is also about whether society should sanction anything goes sex for all young men. Think ancient Greece and Rome, and bath houses and prisons.
If society actively approves all forms of sexual behavior then a lot more people than just those who are born gay could very well, over time, join in the fun. But doubling the number of HIV AIDS victims around the world doesn't sound very FUN to me.
Rosin's story drew heavily
April 14, 2007 - 08:35 ET by Jack BauerIn that case how come they aren't protesting outside Southern black churches?
Especially as it is an absolute FACT, that African-American Christians (and black folks in general) are amongst the most visibly anti-homosexual groups in the US?
From what I have read, it is also a fact, that African-Americans are very UNHAPPY at having their struggle to achieve civil rights equated with the homosexual agenda.