With all the mainstream media emphasis on poll numbers that supposedly show strong leads for Barack Obama I was wondering if there should be any analysis of an AOL straw poll that shows John McCain solidly beating Barack Obama in a random sample of hundreds of thousands of readers. A major difference between the AOL straw poll and that of other polls is that the AOL poll does not consist of people that are chosen by the pollsters.The poll runs over a number of days and is repeated on a weekly basis.
I wrote about this poll on September 14th. It asks one question, vote for your candidate of choice. Two weeks ago the three day poll had amassed 321,168 samples, with 60% of the votes going to John McCain. The poll continues this week. As of September 25th the poll had counted 154,732 votes and McCain picked up 3 percentage points from the week before, leading Barack Obama by a 27 point margin, 63% to 37%.
In June it appears that John McCain's lead was only 8 points after some 200,000 responses according to a Hillary blogger. This is the type of swing that would be relevant to me as it represents a change in AOL readers that bothered to participate. Unfortunately I can't find history on the AOL page.
I am not an expert on polls but it seems to me that the AOL poll is without the kind of bias that can be injected by pollster samples and then touted by the media as an advantage for Obama. The AOL straw poll has been relatively low profile and you must use a captcha to vote. It has been running for a while now and the results have been fairly consistent. The bias it does have would likely come from the demographics of AOL readers. The poll appears to be an outlier and I have no clue how closely a poll of this type tracks real votes. AOL states that it is not a scientific poll. In other words it just captures the votes that readers put in. Simple.
I wouldn't have McCain supporters getting overly excited about this poll just as I wouldn't have them overly worried about polls that oversample democrats or African Americans to artificially hype Barack Obama.
Criticism of online straw polls actually runs counter to the narrative about democrats and the internet. It is often explained as socioeconomic bias, whereas the rich and wealthy have more access to computers. Of course we are told that Democrats are more likely to use the internet so take it with a grain of salt. In the case of this poll perhaps there is some bias of that nature as I can't believe all states are going to go for McCain. Real Clear Politics tells a much different picture.
Nonetheless we are supposed to suspend reality and believe all the polls the media touts without reservation. Me, I am a little more skeptical. If the AOL poll is of any value it would be in substantiating my skepticism about polls in general. Still, the consistency of this recurring poll is something to ponder.
Terry Trippany is the publisher of Webloggin and holds the post as The Watcher at Watcher of Weasels.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Both CNN and Fox had "punch
September 27, 2008 - 14:56 ET by wdhorningBoth CNN and Fox had "punch in" polling. Here were the numbers about midnight:
: CNN FoxNews TOTALS
McCain 30317 73800 104117
Obama 73250 15300 88550
These results show a few things:
1) for the total of all Democrats and Republicans and Independents, more voted for McCain where the vote ratio was 44% for Obama, but 56% percent for McCain.
2) CNN has a viewership that is mostly Democrats, that is a ratio of 3:1 over Republicans, yet Obama only got 7:3 ratio which, when a common denominator is used, yields 7:3 ratio out of 9:3 proving that many Democrats switched sides, at least when looking at debate performance. (A tie ratio would have been 9:3, but Obama only got 7:3).
3) FoxNews viewship is mostly Republicans, and that ratio is about 7:5 over Democrats according to recent viewer's survey. In this case McCain got a ratio of 3:1 and when the common denominator is changed for comparison we see that with a viewership of 7:5 McCain got a vote of confidence of 15:5 which exceeds a tie of 7:5 by 2 to 1
4) There was of course some independent voters in the mix, so the ratios are not perfect, but still close
Breaking news!
September 27, 2008 - 16:56 ET by wdhorningHenry Kissinger was just interviewed live on Fox News minutes ago and he said "no president should sit down with the Iranian president without preconditions, preset by working level diplomats." (paraphrase)
However, Obama lied and said Kissinger told McCain he should just sit down with the president of Iran without preconditions.
Obama, the liar, had a fire, now its been quenched.
He sucks at prose, see his big nose, now he's been benched.
MSM is wrong then
September 27, 2008 - 14:59 ET by wdhorningMSM is wrong again, but then what's new? The MSM is seldom right any longer.
In fact, I wonder if the MSM is really a communist conspiracy, where ever since the 50's the commies have tried to sway the American public towards socialism, soon to be followed by communism, and they did this with planting journalism majors in American colleges over the years.
Terry T. I am so glad you
September 27, 2008 - 15:00 ET by bigtimerTerry T. I am so glad you put this here...for me it is what I really believe the real numbers are out here in the real world...
I also think for the most part the msm knows this...
Matters not, I do not care for McCain, but I have said for quite awhile now, I think it is going to be a land-slide...plus the genius of picking Gov. Palin.
It has nothing to do with race for the majority of all the voters, it has to do with being a far leftist the Chosen one is...and then the pick of Biden really couldn't help us on the good side of life any better...hehehee...
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
MSM slants polls?
September 27, 2008 - 15:04 ET by wdhorningYou are probably right in that the MSM knows what the real numbers are. Since they slant all the news most all the time, it would not be beyond them to slant the polls too, just to hide the real numbers.
Note that most of the non-MSM sources are often more favorable to McCain, but also even some of those are like Gallop are in the lefty came, as Gallop is run by a liberal college, correct me if I am wrong.
Democrats support this poll?
September 27, 2008 - 15:00 ET by wdhorningIronically, correct me if I am wrong, but is not AOL run by Democrats or Democrat leaning leadership?
Well, AOL is (or was) owned
September 27, 2008 - 23:52 ET by Indiana JoeWell, AOL is (or was) owned by Time/Warner. Or vice-versa. But anyone can vote on this poll.
"... smells like... victory." - Robert Duvall
yes,... and at present, the
September 27, 2008 - 15:02 ET by BuxomAnnieMcGreggoryes,... and at present, the straw poll over at Drudge stands at;
MCCAIN
68%
250,116
OBAMA
30%
110,302
NEITHER
2%
9,201
Total Votes: 369,619
"We retort..... you decide."
Drudge is very right-wing
September 27, 2008 - 15:08 ET by wdhorningWhile those number are obviously right-wing numbers, I tried to get a more balanced percentage. Here is what I did. It shows what people think of the debates, and may more accurately reflect the mood of the country, but never fear, McCain is ahead by a lot.
Both CNN and Fox had "punch in" polling. Here were the numbers about midnight:
: CNN FoxNews TOTALS
McCain 30317 73800 104117
Obama 73250 15300 88550
These results show a few things:
1) for the total of all Democrats and Republicans and Independents, more voted for McCain where the vote ratio was 44% for Obama, but 56% percent for McCain.
2) CNN has a viewership that is mostly Democrats, that is a ratio of 3:1 over Republicans, yet Obama only got 7:3 ratio which, when a common denominator is used, yields 7:3 ratio out of 9:3 proving that many Democrats switched sides, at least when looking at debate performance. (A tie ratio would have been 9:3, but Obama only got 7:3).
3) FoxNews viewship is mostly Republicans, and that ratio is about 7:5 over Democrats according to recent viewer's survey. In this case McCain got a ratio of 3:1 and when the common denominator is changed for comparison we see that with a viewership of 7:5 McCain got a vote of confidence of 15:5 which exceeds a tie of 7:5 by 2 to 1
4) There was of course some independent voters in the mix, so the ratios are not perfect, but still close
We beg to differ!
September 28, 2008 - 11:09 ET by JWFDrudge leans left, slightly left of center.
Sincerely,
a Veteran of a 1000 psychic wars.
That is because this poll
September 27, 2008 - 15:10 ET by Conservative VoiceThat is because this poll is a live poll, the other polls are more real, because they count the dead...since the dead tend to vote Democrat.
Seriously though, the best thing McCain could do is allow Sarah Palin solve the credit crisis...let her live up to her cuda name!
Man, ever since I saw a
September 27, 2008 - 15:47 ET by SRPwrdMan, ever since I saw a "When Women vote, Democrats win!" bumper sticker, I have always wanted a "When the Dead vote, Democrats win!" one for my car.... but, I have to go to the coast often to see my family, and I like the windows, paint, and shape of my car... and the fact that it hasn't been firebombed by "peaceful" Dems, so I have given up hope...I might be able to stick a small M/P sticker on there though.
SRP,
September 27, 2008 - 23:45 ET by Indiana JoePut in on the inside of the gas-cover door. ;^)
"... smells like... victory." - Robert Duvall
Straw Poll...
September 27, 2008 - 15:11 ET by Jarhead68I've been watching this poll for at least 2 months now and the worst McCain has done is 60% and that was just BEFORE the current manufactured economic crisis.
The naysayers will say, "But it's not a "scientific" poll." Hell, it's probably MORE scientific because this actually represents "Mainstream America". You know, people like us who go to work every day, have access to the internet and cable TV and support families without government assistance.
I have been predicting a landslide for McCain to anyone who will listen. Obama is what I'd call "Hollow Man". He's empty inside and the media knows it but they hate conservatives so much that they will support any democRAT who runs. If the media ever did a credible job of being unbiased, no democRAT could win an elected office with the ideological insanity that they espouse today.
caution
September 27, 2008 - 15:44 ET by wdhorningCaution: A lot of poorer people do not have AOL access so there is some risk in inflated numbers for McCain, since poorer people tend to vote Democrat.
My real caution though is that those who are for McCain should not let down their guard and feel their is such a cushion they need not vote.
There is no such thing as
September 27, 2008 - 16:40 ET by Conservative VoiceThere is no such thing as poor in America the way you defined it. And the real poor don't tend to vote anyway.
I agree somewhat, people
September 27, 2008 - 17:52 ET by Terry TrippanyI agree somewhat, people should not read too much into the poll as I said in my article. However anyone that has acess to the Internet has access to AOL news. This is no different than Yahoo or any other web site as it is not a members only site.
For me the real take should be the consistency of the numbers and the change in the poll that had McCain moving from an 8 to a 27 point lead over the months. I would imagine that whatever would move the internet users that read AOL in this direction might also have an analogous affect on the broader population as a whole.
It would be interestering to know the demographic make up of the AOL readers as that could provide an interesting way to measure a cross correlation with the same demographic in say a Zogby, Gallup or Rasmussen poll.
wdh,
September 27, 2008 - 23:50 ET by Indiana Joe"A lot of poorer people do not have AOL access..."
Anyone can go to www.aol.com and vote. I just did. Log on at a library if you have to.
And any worries about the "demographic" of AOL users is addressed by the same point.
Anyone.
"... smells like... victory." - Robert Duvall
Socialist Defeat in America
September 27, 2008 - 15:34 ET by liberal_bug_zapperI am hoping for a presidential election much like this;
Final Vote Tally:
McCain: 62%
Obama: 38%
And then, have Democrats try and sue to get more electoral college votes for Obama... that's what I want to see... oh yeah, and mass suicides of the Obamites.
____________________________________________________
"A society that puts equality...ahead of freedom will end up with neither equality nor freedom." ~ Milton Friedman
mass suicides of the Obamites
September 27, 2008 - 15:48 ET by BlondeLike little lemmings hurling themselves over the cliff.
That's quite an image.
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
"Democrats try and sue to
September 27, 2008 - 23:55 ET by Indiana Joe"Democrats try and sue to get more electoral college votes..."
Yeah, the irony of Dems fighting for those Electoral votes that were so "out-dated" in 2000 would be sweet indeed.
"... smells like... victory." - Robert Duvall
I would love for this poll to be true but...
September 27, 2008 - 15:43 ET by MexNobama...it seems like a bit of wishful thinking.
There is an intimidation factor in the polling.
Now especially with the MSM calling any democrat who doesn't vote for Obama a racist people are not willing to say that they are voting for McCain, but they are willing to vote on an internet poll.
I can't see California New York or Illinois going to McCain, but it seems to me that the south is his, and Obama is underperforming in battle ground states.
Remember the New Hampshire primaries? Obama a was up by 10 points according to the polls but Hillary won.
Perhaps stuff like that is going on in Pennsylvania, Michigan etc where polls have Obama up by 3 to 5 points.
MexNobama,
September 28, 2008 - 00:00 ET by Indiana JoeFirst, welcome, I haven't had opportunity to reply to you before this. Pleased ta meetcha.
I would take this poll as fairly accurate. Anyone can vote, just go to www.aol.com. So I would think it's pretty representative. And the New Hampshire thing? The MSM often gets these wrong. They were pushing Obama, but it didn't work then. Maybe it's not working now.
Just remember, Reagan took every state but Minnesota in 1984, and no one predicted anything like that. It may not be a blow-out, but I'm thinking more and more that an Obama win would be a real long-shot.
"... smells like... victory." - Robert Duvall
ron paul spammers
September 27, 2008 - 16:57 ET by JWFMaybe Obama needs to hire those ron paul spammers.
Sincerely,
a Veteran of a 1000 psychic wars.
How do the AOL straw poll
September 27, 2008 - 16:58 ET by GregEHow do the AOL straw poll voters usually get to the site?
Here's why I ask. I'd never gone there until now. But if it's on the main AOL login page, then we'd need to understand what the AOL user base is these days. If it's on the AOL homepage, then it's the particular AOL demographic that is doing the voting. My guess is that this demographic is not the younger voter. It's likely people who signed up for AOL long ago when it was top dog, and have never changed internet service providers.
Any ideas on that demographic these days?
AOL demographics
September 27, 2008 - 20:54 ET by dmillsIf memory serves me correctly AOL is still the most widely used ISP in the world right now. DSL and Cable modems are kind of like having a flat screen TV. Lot's of people have them but most don't.
Surprisingly most people in America still don't have cable or dish, just regular old analog TV. Believe it or not the AOL poll may be more reflective of AVERAGE Americans then we all think.
Modems,
September 28, 2008 - 00:07 ET by Indiana JoeI used to subscribe to AOL, and when I switched to DSL I could still connect to AOL via broadband. So it doesn't really matter. Just type the address (I think I've linked it about 3-4 times here, lol) and you can vote.
I would consider it very representative.
"... smells like... victory." - Robert Duvall
AOL is wide-open
September 28, 2008 - 00:05 ET by Indiana JoeJust go to www.aol.com. It's like Yahoo or MSN or Google. They don't even charge for an email account anymore, and that would be the only thing you'd have to "log-in" for. I just went there and voted, no problem.
So the demo is, anyone who wants to vote. Kind of like... an election. Without the legal restrictions, of course. So, even with legally ineligible voters, McCain still gets the numbers.
Unless you think teens and illegals are going for McCain in droves. ;^)
"... smells like... victory." - Robert Duvall
"Adios,, have a nice day"
September 27, 2008 - 17:23 ET by needleIt looks as if the media is faltering in their efforts to deliver for the big O.
In what may very well be related news there is a head line in the Drudge Report that links to article about how the ratings of all the major season premieres of all the networks have dropped mostly by double digit percentages.
http://www.thrfeed.c...
Following the short article there are HUNDREDS of comment, almost all of them barfing on the networks for their bias and the odious opinions and themes of the Hollywood types behind the shows. The strong consensus is: “Adios, you jerks, have a nice day.”
Impunitas semper ad deteriora invitat.
Obama did not win
September 27, 2008 - 17:55 ET by johnbarryObama did not win on the issue of the economy. Obama spoke about tax cuts for the middle classs. There will be no tax cuts for the middle classes under a president Obama. Obama has already made promises to the tune of 1 billion dollars. Now add 700-1000 billion dollars for the bail out. How would he finance the tax cuts? When McCain suggested that a freeze on public expenditure (excluding military) would be a good starting point Obama begged to disagree. He funked the issue of spending cuts.
If he is elected president where will Obama find 2000 billion dollars? He also got caught out on earmarks. McCain destroyed Obama on foreign policy. Of course Obama empathized with the middle class and with almost all sections of the community. This was a cunning strategy which may work unless Obama's bluff is called. On the night McCain was a clear cut winner.
Interesting results for AOL
September 27, 2008 - 17:58 ET by Secret ConservativeSince most of the polls I see on AOL tend to skew heavily liberal, I am very surprised to see McCain have such a lead on an AOL poll.
Now I shall go cast MY vote...
Polls, shmolls
September 27, 2008 - 19:45 ET by FastEdWe're all being set up - once the election is over we're all going to be called racists, dummies, cowards, etc.
The agenda being pushed by the (L)sm, is one of division, but to what means? There is an underlying motiviation for the drooling over Barry, but what it is escapes me.
We need to remember, (maybe this is it), back when Andrew Young spoke at the democrat convention, he was thought to be the new, young black leader - seems he went the way of socialism that Barry is heading for (should say wants us to head to). The boneheads that control what is seen on tv seem to think that Barry would be what Young wasn't, 'cept for the fact that Young actually did things before he was put on the big stage.
Wouldn't it be nice if the media actually knew some history? (he asked knowing that is the dream of ours - and might as well throw in some honesty - dream big).
There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V
We're all being set up -
September 27, 2008 - 19:54 ET by bigtimerWe're all being set up - once the election is over we're all going to be called racists, dummies, cowards, etc.
Why Fast...whatever do you mean once the election is over...they are already doing that now!
Btw...I agree with your post, just had to throw that in there...
Plus I wanted to say, we all aren't being had, some of us all know and agree with exactly what you are saying....me being one.
The msm will attempt to incite riots to-boot, with Geraldo, Shep, Olbie, Maddow, Matthews, Wolfie, Couric ect ect leading the way...
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
A clue?
September 27, 2008 - 22:45 ET by RHRobinsonMDThe striking thing about this poll is the other polls at the site concerning Sarah Palin show her way down. That suggests to me that is a more accurate reflection of the US electorate than any of the CNN/ABC/NBC/CBS/Zog/Ras "scientific" polls. Clearly this is not just spamming by McC/Pal zealots.
First, what is it you want us to pay taxes for? Tell me what I get and perhaps I'll buy it. - Robert Heinlein
No Trust in Polls
September 27, 2008 - 23:32 ET by BigSpoon65BigSpoon65
Remember that democrats were up big in the polls in the last two presidential elections on the eve of the election. Following the 04 election there was dismay in the media at how the exit polls had failed. But they stopped short of questioning the pre-election media polls. Rasmussen got it wrong, Gallup got it wrong, Zogby got it wrong. I don't trust any of them. I also do not believe that conservatives are now a minority in this country. I believe that is a fallacy being sold by the left-wing media. Just like most Americans see themselves doing okay financially but believe their neighbors might be struggling. This is because of the incessant MSM drone about how bad the economy is. From my perspective the only thing wrong with this economy is the wall street meltdown which was caused almost entirely by democrats control of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and all of the sub-prime loans given to people who couldn't afford them. Free markets didn't fail, socialism failed once again! The current financial crisis is exactly what happens when democrats are left in charge of anything. The poll that counts is on November 4th.
Conservative.....Because we can't all be on welfare!
>>>Conservative.....Because
September 27, 2008 - 23:52 ET by seanrobins>>>Conservative.....Because we can't all be on welfare!
Too freakin' true!
sean robins
blog.seanrobins.com
Drudge reflected reality in his poll too matching AOL
September 27, 2008 - 23:35 ET by Lame CherryDrudge's poll numbers matched the exact split of AOL, and that is honestly how the real electorate is breaking.
Want to know the reality?
My Aunt was thrilled with Obama. Came up with racist angles why people weren't voting for him.
After Sarah Palin went on stage. Aunt went silent.
More silence from McCain.
Absolute silence after John McCain trounced Obama in the debate.
The Obama people know they are loosing big and their campaign knows the reality of this too. Unless they commit massive voter fraud which they are attempting now and the Rense voters join the political rape of Gov. Palin as they are now being manipulated to do, that is the only chance in Obama hell for this snowball to even get close enough to get elected.
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
MSM Shut Out
September 28, 2008 - 00:07 ET by BigSpoon65BigSpoon65
What I would love to see the McCain White House do is shut out the MSM and treat them as they have treated conservatives for many years, as second class citizens. I would love to see the network anchors lining up like young hatchling birds waiting for Fox News to regurgitate some political news for them to fight over. IMO this wouldn't be an administration harming the credibility of these networks. They have already done that to themselves. When they openly become cheerleaders in the camp of one of the candidates it shreds all credibilty of every report. After these network news stations all fail perhaps it will serve to encourage network CEO's to bring their news networks back to center. Fair and balanced is what most people want.
Conservative.....Because we can't all be on welfare!
Seniors also left out
September 28, 2008 - 01:47 ET by Alpedhuez55I think the Seniors would be left out of this survey as well.
But the numbers are encouraging.
"I drink a great deal. I sleep a little, and I smoke cigar after cigar. That is why I am in two-hundred-percent form."
-- Winston Churchill
Maybe, but I don't think
September 28, 2008 - 02:20 ET by Indiana JoeMaybe, but I don't think the senior demo is heavily Obama. Might be neutral, due to "white guilt" or something, but not favoring Obama.
"... smells like... victory." - Robert Duvall
I am one senior with no
September 28, 2008 - 03:03 ET by cocodrieI am one senior with no guilt and no love of liberals.
For all you demograhic inquirers
September 28, 2008 - 09:42 ET by Snocrash35 million members worldwide
2.7 million peak simultaneous users
400 million e-mails sent and received daily
13.4 billion Web URLs served daily
70 minutes online per member daily
More than 2.1 billion instant messages sent daily across the AOL network
Gender
Male: 43%
Female: 57%
Marital Status
Single: 38%
Married: 62%
Education
College Grad: + 51%
Age Composition
18-24: 15%
25-34: 18%
35-44: 25%
45-54: 24%
55-64: 12%
65+: 7%
Household Income
$50k+: 63%
$75k+: 40%
$100k+: 23%
Occupation
Professional/Managerial: 30%
Self-employed: 11%
Source:
http://www.aolyellowpages.com/advertisers/1/H_why_demog_aol.htm
From a 10,000 ft view, it doesn't look too promising for Barry does it?
My Analysis
September 29, 2008 - 12:08 ET by AdelynHi everyone, here is my take on all these polls. I truly think
all the national polls i.e. gallup, rasmussen, cnn, fox, etc...are not
reporting the truth. Why not you ask?
NY Time's, LA Time's were both going down hill on the fast track.
MSNBC has/had very weak viewership, all the numbers across the board were
low. The closer this poll is, the more people tune in. The more papers
are sold, the more people tune into to news channels, etc...
How did I determine this? Well, 3 reasons really.
1.) I do a lot of blogging. I've had no life this past month.
;-) I have been on nearly every blog space I can find. Here is what
I have noticed. Several negative commenters against McCain on YouTube are
actually from other countries. I spent one night counting and found for
every 5 negative - 3 were from foreign countries. The other thing I
noticed is the majority are young. Mostly between 15 and 24. I have
also notice a lot have since changed their profile from showing the country to
not showing their country.
2 .) The Bradley affect does not apply to the aol staw poll. When
someone is called by a national pollster, the person on the phone may worry the
caller can identify them via their phone number. They may not be forthcoming
to whom they will actually vote for in the booth. Aol poll is more apt to
have people voting their conscience without fear or being exploited.
3.) I've always been political. I have volunteered to work on
campaigns for over 16 years. My friends all know it and I have lots and lots
of democrat friends that love to argue with me. This year, I can't get a
discussion going. All of my democrat friends have been telling me that
they are voting for McCain. They are even going to so far as to say that
even their parents (I'm in my mid 30's) will be voting democrat for the first
time in their lives! Their reason - Obama scares them! Sure - there are 1
or 2 associates I know that are die hard Obama fans and they have become so
ignorant and nasty to me that I will never speak to them again.
Just to add, I think considering the debate had a low turnout means many
people have already made up their minds and I think most are in favor of
McCain. I think the only people who are in favor of Obama are your far
left, your youth, foreigners who can't vote, and the African Americans.
Just my humble opinion and I hope I am right.
;-)
Nice post! Great explanations!
September 29, 2008 - 12:23 ET by MaximusBraveheartLove your post!
You meant voting REP vs. DEM on the snip below obviously:
"They are even going to so far as to say that
even their parents (I'm in my mid 30's) will be voting democrat for the first
time in their lives! Their reason - Obama scares them! "
I stand corrected
September 29, 2008 - 12:53 ET by AdelynYes, I meant to say they would be voting republican for the first time.
Hey Adelyn... In my
September 29, 2008 - 12:34 ET by bigtimerHey Adelyn...
In my humble opinion, I think you are EXACTLY right!
I have said before, I think this is going to be a blow-out myself, I also think the leftist msm knows what is coming too...
Hence the obvious hate-filled desperation with their daily propaganda.
I cannot wait to see the majority of the msm on the evening of Nov. 4th and morning of the 5th with men with little white coats coming to take them away...I am so looking forward to this.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh